Yes!

02.19.132:15 PM ET

Here's One Version of a Pro-Family Tax Policy

Tim Carney (Washington Examiner) ()

Tim Carney's got an idea:

[H]ere’s my proposal: All brackets, not just the 0% bracket, should get wider as household size grows. If a single gets $9,000 at the 10% rate, and a couple gets $18,000 at the 10% rate, a couple with a kid should get an additional $4,500 at that 10% rate (I’m counting kids as half an adult) for a total of $22,500 at the 10% rate.

Here’s why. I see the rates in a progressive tax code this way: When you’re dirt poor, we don’t tax you at all. When you actually have a bit of money, but are still in poverty, we tax you at 10%. When you are out of poverty, but still not really enjoying luxuries, we take 15% of your money. Once you have a bit of a cushion, we take 25% of your money. As you get wealthy, we take a higher portion.

Well, the distance in income between those categories — poverty, basic needs met, a bit of a cushion — grows as you have more dependents. So the distance between the income-tax-rate thresholds should grow, too. 

how do i comment?
Get The Daily Beast In Your Inbox
By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to have read the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to the Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason
You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason
You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason
Follow The Daily Beast