Blogs and Stories
Nobel writer puzzles American authors
E.L. Doctorow, the American author of the The Book of Daniel and Ragtime, agreed with Mr. Engdahl's contention that American publishers do not translate enough foreign material. But insularity or provincialism in the literary community, he said, is nothing to sneer at.
"Many countries have their provincial writers: England has Jane Austen, Ireland has James Joyce, Russia has Anton Chekhov," Mr. Doctorow wrote to The Daily Beast in an e-mail. "When a great writer is resolutely local and specific in his or her attentions—whatever the narrative strategy—the work has universal relevance."
But he conded the Nobel committee may have a point. “The judge spoke of American insularity. That is certainly true of our publishers these days as compared to Alfred Knopf, e.g., who made his name in the twenties and thirties publishing foeign authors. Absoluely true and regettable at the present time when so few foreign works.”
One of the few authors interviewed who recognized Mr. Le Clezio's work was Adam Gopnik, an American author and staff writer for the New Yorker—and even he said he didn't feel qualified to offer an opinion.
"I can tell you that he's a highly charismatic, even a glamorous, figure in France, and a very ‘French’ literary figure at that, very much in the tradition of André Malraux: a world traveler and essayist, the writer as global voyager and man of the world, not as novelist alone," Mr. Gopnik said in an e-mail.
Francine Prose, president of the PEN American Center, a writers’ association, suggested the selection of an author she didn't recognize was surprising—particularly against the backdrop of the heated debate surrounding Mr. Engdahl's comments. Contrary to his accusation of insularity, she said, Americans are a major part of the world conversation.
"It seems like a peculiar choice," she said. "It's not as if none us here have heard of a French writer. There are many Europeans who are widely read here."









As a twice published American novelist, I just can't seem to find it in myself to CARE who wins PRIZES for their art. To me, showing such a scorned woman attitude about whether some committee decides you get their approval is far more insular and self obsessed than any art you create could be. This isn't a beauty pageant. It's literature. No matter what country we come from or language we write in, we deserve, as artists, to concern ourselves with far more important things than trophies and ego stroking pats on the back.
Sarahbeth Purcell
I've won a literary award (a Whiting.) I give a literary award (The RRofihe Trophy / Open City Short Story Contest.) I administer a literary award (The Anderbo.com Poetry Prize.) I've had nine stories in The New Yorker, and a book, FATHER MUST, published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (to all-positve reviews.) but I deliberately keep a low profile so I can... win a Nobel.
Rick Rofihe
What does this mean? "As for the insularity argument, the Nobel committee has no farther [sic] to look than Denis Johnson. (Tree of Smoke, Already Dead.) Or Cormac McCarthy."
Neither has won the Nobel. And while you could pedantically accuse McCarthy of being insular, there's no way in hell you could say the same of Denis Johnson. I don't get it.
I believe Adam Gopnik is still a Canadian ( as is Malcolm Gladwell for that matter )JaneBe
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.