Blogs and Stories
Big Woman on Campus
Debora Spar, the new president of Barnard, has been hired to bring a new dynamism to New York's premier women's university.
Few people use the term “bluestocking” anymore—a rather pejorative word for an intellectual woman (perhaps the concept became unavoidable)—but until recently, many used it to refer to Barnard. It’s not that the girls of Columbia’s sister school are smarter than they are elsewhere, but rather that the college has a stuffy reputation (as antiquated as the word bluestocking itself). The school seems like part of another era; it didn’t merge with Columbia in 1983 when it had the chance—Radcliffe melded with Harvard and Pembroke nuzzled next to Brown—and Barnard stayed a pillar of all-female, second-wave feminist education. Unfortunately, it started to seem then like Columbia’s shrewish sister—a second choice for those who couldn’t get into the grander school.
At 45, she is the first Barnard president to have come of age after the feminist revolution, so she has the easy confidence —not stridency—of someone who grew up feeling that all doors were open to her, even if she later realized that some were only open a crack.
Since the 80s, Barnard has had a hard time shaking off its image as a relic; a bra-burning enclave that has yet to modernize for today’s woman. The campus itself can seem dauntingly serious-minded with its wrought iron Victorian gates, perched on Broadway and 116th street like a private entrance to the past, and its inner quadrangle, sprinkled with gas lamps and Ionic columns.
Enter through those gates: Debora Spar.
The new president, Spar is young (45), headstrong, and prepared to turn Barnard’s reputation from that of a schlumpy all-girls academy into one of excellence and forward thinking. As cliché as it sounds to say she is shaking things up, there is no better way to describe what she intends to do on campus.
Previous presidents have not been so successful: 1983 was a crisis moment for Barnard, and the board made a bold decision. It chose a young lawyer and alumna, Ellen Futter, to be president—she was barely 30 and didn’t have a Ph.D. In a decade at the helm, Futter (who later became president of the American Museum of Natural History, despite no science background) steadied the ship...somewhat. She launched a huge fundraising campaign and built a new dorm to make the campus fully residential. She made it clear that, concerns or not, Barnard was not going away.
Still, the school did not attract the world’s attention despite the efforts of Futter’s successor, anthropologist Judith Shapiro, who was supposedly well-liked by the faculty, but who made few waves beyond Barnard’s walls.
Spar comes from the co-ed world, a seemingly plain credential but one that will give her an enormous advantage at Barnard. She was a professor and associate dean at Harvard Business School, and knows how to compete in one of the toughest academic environments around. Writer Anna Quindlen and the Barnard board were smart to reach beyond the universe of single-sex schools and into a heavily male institution for their next pick. Spar thrived at Harvard, and knows how to place Barnard not alongside its women-only counterparts, but also up against the co-ed giants that now dwarf it.
Speaking with the Daily Beast, Spar acknowledge that brightening up Barnard’s image is her first task, a problem right out of Marketing 101.









Really? Iambic Columns? Could you possibly mean Ionic? Not being snarky...but as a poet I'd like to know if there's more to iambic than I had thought.
ic9
This is so interesting to me. As a black stocking graduate of Barnard in 1955, I was impressed/inflienced by the views of Dean McIntosh who urged us -- at every opportunity --to be both wives and mothers as well as business women. She urged us forward into the world of men. And so I went. Unaware that I had not been educated in a properly male dominated institution.
What is so interesting is that today -- 2008 -- after so many years of feminism -- we are still being told that fully merging with a male university would have somehow made us more relevant.
Having achieved all of my credits by the middle of my senior year, I was free to study in Columbia's graduate school. I still remember Meyer Shapiros course on modern art and most of all Walter Stace's course on Epistomology. So I didn't feel deprived.
I have always been grateful for my Barnard education which has enabled me to reason and survive in male dominated fields. Would it have been different if it had merged with Columbia? I think so. Probably more distracting. Would it have been better? I don't think so. Because what I believed than and still do is that what my education gave me was a background of knowledge and the curiosity to continue to explore and it still does. All the rest is just architecture if it doesn't do that.
Hopefully the "bluehairs" will stand aside and let this remarkable woman move forward.
Thanks--good catch. Fixed columns--ed.
While you're right about Spar, the article betrays a clueless ignorant contempt toward Barnard and its' students.
Ms. Spar is a terrific woman. My path first crossed with her at Harvard, when I studied her writing and research. Our paths then continued to cross, lately in South Africa. She had intellectual depth, an incisive mind, a beautiful writing style, and genuine interest in other people. Barnard is lucky.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.