Blogs and Stories
The Man Who Helped Drive Powell Away From His Party
Inside the longstanding feud between Colin Powell and Christian right leader James Dobson.
After Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama on Meet the Press, Sarah Palin was interviewed by Christian right leader James Dobson on his Focus on the Family radio show. Though Palin did not mention Powell, she attacked Obama as a socialist by referencing his now famous encounter with Joe “the Plumber” Wurzelbacher.
“Joe the Plumber, you gotta hand it to him,” Palin told Dobson. “He's the one who got finally Barack Obama to say what he’d do with redistributing wealth and raising taxes. And Joe the Plumber said that certainly sounds like socialism to him, and I appreciate Joe having the boldness to get out there and ask the question.”
Powell’s endorsement and Palin’s appearance on Dobson’s show are not entirely unconnected. Dobson has long been one of the banes of Powell’s political life―and the right’s warm embrace of Palin is part of what drove Powell away from McCain.
When Powell endorsed Obama, he offered a litany of factors, from Obama’s “transformational” potential to “steadiness.” But Powell, a military man and self-described “Rockefeller Republican,” also declared his disappointment with the “rightward shift” in the Republican Party.
There is a little understood, rancorous subplot behind this vague remark: Powell’s war with the religious right. That conflict began years before the current presidential campaign and, if Powell plays a role in an Obama administration, will almost certainly extend beyond it.
Over a decade ago, when General Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, emerged as the Republican Party’s most popular figure, James Dobson targeted him, fearing his political ascendancy might spell doom for the party’s anti-abortion wing. Dobson’s tactics ranged from threatening conservative movement leaders who dared to praise Powell’s political potential, to devoting an entire broadcast of his top-rated radio show to attacking Powell’s advocacy of condom use. Dobson and his minions laid the groundwork for Powell’s castigation from the Republican Party. Yet by helping to force Powell into the wilderness, Dobson may have also provoked his momentous act of political vengeance.
While Dobson has not yet commented on Powell’s endorsement, his former Washington lobbyist and ally, Gary Bauer, dismissed it as an irrational act of racial solidarity. “Powell’s endorsement is nonsensical, and it leaves open the question of just how big a factor race was in his decision,” Bauer wrote in his daily email blast to supporters. Bauer, who now leads his own outfit, American Values, spent much of the 1990s building Dobson’s Family Research Council into one of the most formidable Christian right groups inside the Beltway.
Back during the run-up to the 1996 presidential primaries, when some movement conservatives advanced the notion of Powell as the GOP’s most viable presidential nominee, Dobson moved to intimidate and silence the general’s boosters. Among Powell’s fans was the ardently anti-abortion Jack Kemp, who called him “Republican on almost every issue.” Neoconservative former Education Secretary William Bennett repeatedly praised Powell on the pages of the National Review, while Weekly Standard editor William Kristol argued in an editorial for his magazine that Powell was the only figure who could defeat the increasingly popular Bill Clinton. Already annoyed by the swell of movement support for the pro-choice Powell, Dobson was furious when Christian Coalition President Ralph Reed refused to condemn Powell’s possible candidacy during his appearance on This Week with David Brinkley.
Immediately, Dobson faxed a five-page letter to Reed accusing him of unholy motives. “Is power the motivator of the great crusade?” Dobson asked the fresh-faced operator. “If so, it will sour and turn to bile in your mouth…This posture may elevate your influence in Washington, but it is unfaithful to the principles we are duty-bound as Christians to defend.” Bauer copied the letter and blasted it out to other Powell-friendly conservatives, including Bennett, whom Dobson baselessly accused of being “pro-abortion.” Shaken by Dobson’s jeremiad, Reed hastily composed a letter suggesting that attacks from the Christian right would only provoke Powell into running. The situation “required a delicate balancing act,” Reed insisted, according to Dobson’s official biography.
Bringing Down Bachmann
Benjamin Sarlin is a reporter for The Daily Beast. He previously covered New York City politics for The New York Sun and has worked for talkingpointsmemo.com.
America's Hot Jobs (and Not Jobs)
The Daily Beast is dedicated to news and commentary, culture, and entertainment. We carefully curate the web’s most essential stories and bring you original must-reads from our talented contributors.
Nicolas Cage, Compulsive Spender
Jacob Bernstein is a senior reporter at The Daily Beast. Previously, he was a features writer at WWD and W Magazine. He has also written for New York magazine, Paper, and The Huffington Post.
Did Women Beat the Right's Point Man?
Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast, writing fellow at The Nation Institute and author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books). Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.
Pat Robertson's Manchurian Candidate
Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast, writing fellow at The Nation Institute and author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books). Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.
Joe Wilson's Strange Friends
Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast, writing fellow at The Nation Institute and author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books). Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.
There was a time--about 25/30 years ago--when Dobson offered opinions on child rearing/development which provided a more conservative alternative to Dr. Spock. It would appear many of his observations in that arena had merit and helped spearhead the "tough love" movement.
Over time, however, he has become a power hungry merchant of his view of "rightous living" to the exclusion of all other viewpoints. That single minded viewpoint may be fine when you are inside a group of likeminded Americans, but when you attempt to impose that singlemindedness upon the diverse populus you become akin to the Inquisitors.
Dr. D, when you lash out at your "allies" for failure to toe your line you miss the point completely. You would have done better to try to influence those allies with reason rather than intimidation. You get what you deserve--hopefully a minor footnote as the unwitting saboteur of the party you wanted to own. Go back to your own writings and learn your own lesson--Love Must Be Tough!
your pal, RR
A single minded viewpoint is exactly what Jesus instructed Christians to have. To think that Dr. Dobson's actions are off base is to fail to understand Christians. We are to hold steadfast to the truth as well as hold fellow Christians accountable. That is all Dobson has done. Could he have done it better? Sure. But he did do what is expected of him. Christians must hold others accountable to God. Tough love at times and soft love at others. It is no longer republican against democrat. It is Christians against the Godless. Dobson knows this which is why you all are complaining.
Colin Powell has twisted himself into knots explaining why he chose to endorse Barack Obama. If he were honest, he would admit that his reasons for endorsing are racial. He was advanced to four star general under Republicans, was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Republicans, was Secretary of State under Republicans, was a 25-year friend (supposedly) of John McCain - and suddenly he realizes how wrong Republicans are? An honorable man would have quietly voted for whomever he chose instead of publically sticking a knife in John McCain's back and giving it a twist.
Dobson's views aren't off-base; they are ugly, dangerous, destructive, unpatriotic, dishonorable, and unChristian. We have a word for people who imagine that they alone know the Truth or have a connection to God: insane, which as a devoted Levitican Jeremie will recognize as derived from the word "unclean." The right word.
The greatest threat facing this nation now is not al Qaeda, but our own inner fundamentalists, and Dobson's the star now that Robertson's senility is obvious and Falwell is rotting in his gold casket. While offering mealy-mouthed qualified praise for the Founders, Dobson and his idiotic left-behind ilk hope to reverse the most essential tenet of American culture and society, and that is freedom from oppressive state religion. Dobson would happily institute christianist Sharia tomorrow if he could get away with it, (and if it didn't apply to him, of course). If that's the truth or the Way, I'll pass--and I think we'll see a significant majority of Americans passing on November 4, too. I know the folks like Jeremie above will have a new way to explain that, but the truth is out, and getting outer all the time: Not only do Dobson and Baeur and others not have a lock on morality, they are immoral men and hypocrites of the worst order, and their poison is no longer effective. May it stay that way; may they slink off to the nutty margins of the nation where they belong; may they take their place with the celebrated hypocrites and crackpots of their genus and become one more embarrassing chapter in a civilized and moral new America. Amen.
ice9
Mike,
Jesus also told us not to throw our pearls before swine. I'm afraid Dr.D did exactly that when he decided to be a power broker instead of voice of righteousness. Sometimes the expedient course isn't the best course.
Yes, we will always have the poor, and blessed are the peacemakers, but Dr.D's singlemindedness to indict all who do not march in lockstep with him isn't the Christian's charge. The Christian's charge is to be salt and light. Dr.D would salt the earth like the Romans did to Carthage. When Dr.D decided to be a powerbroker he sold his birthright for a pot of stew--a very salty stew.
Many Christians, certainly not all or even a majority, lost a lot of respect for Dr.D when he made the turn down the expedient road of political kingmaker.
RR
James Dobson and Focus on the Family have long been one of the great cancers preventing the spread of Christianity and evangelicalism to non-believers. Few people and organizations are so hazardously close-minded and intolerant. I am a devout Christian, and a Republican who plans to vote McCain, but I respect Powell greatly, and am happy that McCain is basically pro-choice. Dobson seems to not understand that as Christians, we are told to spread God's word AND love to others. We are not instructed to oppress others with our belief system. And while my beliefs are anti-abortion, I steadfastly believe that the government should never be able to dictate what choice a woman makes in that regard. And Jeremie, Christians have to be careful about holding non-Christians accountable to God, because when it is done with ignorance and hostility, that alienates non-believers and pushes them away from God further. Also, take care how you imply that Democrats and Colin Powell are God-less because that is how your post reads, and that just go back to my comments on ignorance and hostility.
I find this whole article and comment section very scary. It seems to me there is not too much difference between the mentality of Dodson and that of Hitler. Both are/were so sure of their own brand of superiority that they will go to any lengths to enforce it. You may say otherwise but I wonder if Dodson had complete power over this country as Hitler did over his nation, what would this control lead him to do? If God wanted to control the outcome of people's lives by removing freedom of choice then he would do it, plain and simple. I imagine there is reason behind the ability for each of us to have the choice of right and wrong and the consequences it brings us. Having someone dictate faith is rather a hollow feeling.
Good observation Catch22.
elvin1- so the 6 min or so worth of solid, rational reasons Gen Powell gave can simply be dismissed because he's black and so it Obama...
You mention that Powell served under a variety of republican admins ... Doesn't that lend MORE credence to his reasoning... not less?
Let me see if I can state this properly. The Godless are those that have nor chosen to follow Jesus. The result of their choice is hell. That is a pretty hostile end to such a poor choice. I am a Christian. That means I strive to follow Jesus and ALL of his teaching. Dobson as a power broker? A political Kingpin? What like Obama? It sounds more like he is a leader and as such uses his authority for God instead of sitting on his hands just wishing our Great country would turn back to God. I have no respect for Powell. I did not have much before. Godless is a good description for those that kill babies and promote perversion. I do agree that reaching the Godless requires many different methods. Not all work for everyone. And I did not say that Dobson had the best method. But at least he is doing something and but from the sound of things here doing something was the problem. I vote for people that are Christians because they are the only ones I know will be listing to Gods directions. McCain only gets my vote because Obama should never become president. But I am afraid he will be. Mainly because McCain was not good enough to run against him. That is why Dobson would not vote for him before Palin.
James Dobson's mentor was Charles Keating--yes, the S&L Charles Keating, and a staunch crusader against what he deemed obscenity. I'd love to see an article detailing that relationship.
There has been so much killing in the world in the name of religion. Government should be run separate from religion with basic laws governing its citizens. Didn't Jesus say "render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's and unto God what is God. People should look to their church for moral fortitude and leave religion out of government as our forefathers sought to do when writing the constitution. They understood because they came from societies that did not have religious freedom of choice. They suffered through the persecutions, it is why so many escaped to America. We are only as good as history and the memory it serves otherwise we are doomed to repeat past mistakes. The knowledge that you know what is right compared to the next person living down the block who may have a different interpretation. Superiority is a heavy mantle to wear in life and it can lead you down some evil paths all in then name of God. Poor God, it must make him sad...
All the christians who clamor for more religion in government are trying to destroy American values, the vision of the founding fathers, and the principles that distinguish this country from all that came before. Secondly, you are giving your vote to wolves in religious raiment. George Bush may have thrown tax dollars at your thinly-veiled political groups and he may have appointed conservative judges to the Supreme Court, but he has also brought a once proud nation to its knees and has us all teetering on the precipice of a financial tsunami that will make the great depression look like the roaring twenties. But given the christian willingness to blame everything from Katrina to 9/11 on liberals, he will not suffer for it, and neither will the Republican party.
As I say, that is a very strange flavor of "values" and one to which you are welcome, but you shall NOT steal this country without a fight.
My sister votes exactly as she is directed by Dobson. She has no idea of the issues or the relative merits of opposing candidates. This seems like brain-washing to me...or some sort of coersion not matter how soft. So I suppose that Dobson's vote is multiplied by thousands - make that MILLIONS - thanks to these trusting Christian robots. I can't believe that noone has learned a lesson after the "W" debacle. Surely this is not what Jesus had in mind. What is the most frustrating is that it seems that Dobson followers believe that there are no REAL Christians among the Democratic or Independant ranks.Trust me...THERE ARE! Some of us even remember that God has told us "thou shall not kill"! God must be really scratching His head! It's all so sad.
Dobson is simply a marketing hack who has keyed in on "c"hristian values(small c intentional). I find it quite interesting that when people talk about christian values it is ALWAYS in reference to what SOMEBODY ELSE should be doing. Dobson tends to pray on half wits who only have a "vacation bible school" understanding of the Bible. For that reason alone he is a danger to any democracy!
Our founding fathers to great pains to create a separation between church and state, not to protect the churches, but rather to protect the state from clowns like Dobson!
So what is the difference in Dobson's mind between the US and Iran? Seems like none.
Dobson emerges here as a SCARY behind-the-scenes influencer of Bush and other Neocons, worse than I imagined and an enemy of any Republican centrist. It's interesting that he who is running a religious organization has the right to comment on any arena of public life, but Powell -- a national role model, not just Secty of State, is not allowed an opinion on condoms because he's not Secty of Health! Wow! So much for freedom of speech, let alone of ideas. Dobson is one scary dude with WAY too much influence in the RNC.
I'm not sure Dobson is even a competent child psychologist. A neighbor of mine followed his advice to beat her 3-year-old son with a wooden spoon, based on the whole "spare the rod and spoil the child" thing. Far from improving his behavior, he just acted up more.
"Tough love" is a euphemism for child abuse, just as "pro-life movement" is a euphemism for fertility cult.
Let's calm down. Dobson and his cronies are only powerful because they have exploited the vacuum created by Moderate Republicans, Independents and Democrats who made the elementary mistake of underestimating how focussed fundamentalists are.
They never stop. They don't take a break. They just keep coming, like the Borg in Star Trek.
The penny has finally dropped. These people are nuts. Just like Muslim fundamentalists are nuts. Just like Jewish fundamentalists are nuts.
What put that on the table so clearly it could no longer be ignored? Palin. She believes the planet is 6,000 years old. She has been blessed by a priest to protect her from witchcraft. The Republicans have stopped attacking Jeremiah Wright because the Democrats will retaliate with Palin having attended a church where the congregants speak in tongues.
Now it's one thing to know that the crazy right-wing fundamentalist Christian base is a force to be reckoned with in Republican politics, but it is another thing entirely to have their Poster Girl one heartbeat away from the United States Presidency.
I have a dear Republican friend who is convinced that if McCain is elected that he will be assassinated by a fundamentalist Christian in order to put Palin on the throne.
If it's possible, he is even more terrified by that prospect than I am.
At the end of the day though, there simply aren't enough people in the crazy base to out-vote Democrats, Independants and Moderate Republicans.
The irony here, is that Obama has run the best Democratic campaign in living history, but the Republicans are going to beat themselves out of the White House.
God does indeed work in mysterious ways.
Ever the alarmist, Blumenthal again finds great import where there isn't any. Does anyone really believe that it was Dobson who undercut Powell's influence? I can only imagine the reaction of Cheney and Rumsfield had Dobson's name come up during a policy discussion. Republicans have never had any use for Dobson's beliefs; their tolerance has always been proportional to the number of votes he could deliver. As the Evangelicals ranks continue to splinter, Dobson and his cronies will be reduced to sending telegrams to the White House.
Boy, Powell's endorsing Barama has inspired a lot of religious responses here.
Yes, the article was about Dobson getting his knickers in a twist over Powell's endorsement but reality is that I don't see Powell "bugging out" over who Dobson's endorsing.
Who cares?
Point made,case closed.
None of this has to do with "Christianity" at all anyway .
What we have here is someone who is a prominent official, (Powell) someone who has been proven a dedicated Patriot holding an actual position serving his government as gracefully, admirably and honorably in our day and age who has held true to his own honor, ethics and still is not waivering under non-sensical ,yet sadly prominent, outraged, demanding, demeaning pressure from outside, high power "lobbyists" claiming to be morally relevant over all "others' " beliefs and who have NO place in politics.
Thank God for separation of Church and State.
Our founding fathers had seen the horrors of that mix and were brave enough to set forth into unknown lands to be as far away from the foaming at the mouth, damning religuous extremists that had made toxic their very home of orgin and to create an everlasting document upon which to found a new land, government, America, so that it would be free and it's people be free of the religious tyranny that risked lives and died to escape.
Let's not let Mr Dobson undo that just yet, okay?
I don't think even Jesus would vote for Dobson if he were to run for any office to be honest.
Back to the facts; Powell has every right to not like what he sees happening to his party, the extremeists have taken over the party to a significant degree and certainly the more rational moderates are going to take into account what the party currently represents and the direction the party vows to lead.
Smart people often reassess the situation periodically and will respond to the actual state of matters when deciding whether to go forward or needing to move at a different angle.
This form of continued analysis is the definition of intelligence.
"Intelligence" is the ability to adapt to one's environment" per the dictionary.
An interpretation can easily be made to say, "Hey, I don't like the outrageous crap I'm seeing within my own party and the other guy is looking and sounding much more promising, more like what I can honestly get behind on than with whom I've based and built my career upon"
Or you could just say, " He's voting for Obama because he's Black". (this of course is a popular, demeaning, "not so intelligent" attempt by those who must feel "hurt" to dismiss that Gen Powell's re-evaluation has merit.
I'm "white" and every Presidential candidate I've ever voted for in the past has been also "white"and so has every one that I "didn't" vote for.
What does that make me?
Not that it was necessary but Gen Powell did at least offer some of his main reasonings and concerns as to what he had based his own decisions upon ( imagine if you and I had to do the same each time we voted for a new President?!).
He likes Obama, his diplomatic demeanor, coolness, level-headedness (kinda good qualities in a "leader" especially during crisis, don't you think?).
He is for uniting a "partisan" America and he feels Obama is the most likely candidate to truly attempt/achieve that
(still doesn't sound like a "black" thing to me.
He is more optimistic about Obama's approach to engaging our "turned-off" foreign allies than the Republican's (if they have one?).
He's known/been work friends with John McCain for 25 years, long enough to know what concerns he would have with McCain as Commander in Chief.
He REALLY doesn't like McCains choice of Palin as his "Trophy" running mate for countless, valid reasons.
On so on.
Powell is under no obligation to share these personal/professional concerns with the public if he did not think it relevent to America and important to share what he considered in making his choice.
Personally I've liked McCain for a number of years and both he and Powell were two of the very few Republican party members that I respected and admired enough to consider voting for them if they were to run for office.
I can't say what happened to McCain, it's just bizarre and reeks of "desperation".
McCain seems to have just abandoned a vast majority of what he stood for, what set him apart from the other politicians when he started bear-hugging/placating to the far right religious extremists (Falwell, Dobson, Bush, etc).
It was so shocking and I was literally squeemish when I saw the news clips for him that he had to pander so far out of his character to gain support of his "base" just so he could run for a 3rd time before winding up in a nursing home, I literally felt embarrassment for him, sad, McCain was better than that but it is the world of "politics" however no one put a gun to his head to drop his pants so suddenly in a 180 degree turn like that.
My stomach got worse whe McCain "left off" his calling for an issue-based, non-negative campaign when Sen Obama became the Dem Nominee and the total collapse /demise of McCain's intergrity, all that I had admired him for before, was thrown out the window like a live hand grenade from the moment the polls weren't a "landslide" for McCain.
During the past months of the campaigning all I see is a "desparate old man" who sees this as his "last chance" to achieve what he must think is "rightfully his" (the Presidency finally) after 2 successive runs and 8 yrs on the campaign trail, his 70 yrs in senate and we will never be allowed to forget he was one of the hundreds of POW's 35 years ago that survived Vietnam, one of many war "heros" (don't you have to save others' lives or divert an attack or something other than being wounded and "electing to stay an extra five years to be named an actual "hero"? Okay, that may be too much nit picking).
I can see how Powell would look "outside" especially given the drastic, desperate campaigning, Robo-calls, slander, cheapshots, lies, neurotic twitching, smirking, grimacing, spastic blinking and "gotchya!" personal victories McCain has so frequently displayed during these past weeks post RNC.
But a wise leader must make wise decisions, stand up to their "base" to do the right thing.
McCain surrendered his best, most desired, most credible, knowledgable VP "pick" (Leiberman) in order to put up a "celebrity" to "energize" his base ( and please Dobson at the same time with Palin's down-home, pro-life, coyote shooter background.
McCain lost a tremendous amount of respect by giving in and making such a poor pick for the actual White House (scary) especially at his advanced age and with his health considerations by selecting Palin soley on her ability to draw attention and do most of his dirty work campaign mud-slinging for him in lieu of someone who was suitable to take over as President and run this country during a time of unprecidented, concurrent, multiple crisis if McCain became yet another "crisis" if President and became incapacitated or died in office.
This Palin pick is NOT funny, it's totally irresponsible on McCain's part.
If I hear him say, "I'm So proud of her", "Isn't she great??!
"I could't be anymore proud of her" etc, I think I might throw up a little in my mouth again.
She's not his "daughter" for crying out loud
For all practical purposes she might as well be, it makes as much sense for a VP pick and he is old enough to be her father with 10 years to spare.
Colin, we truly respect you/your "sticking to your guns" and making the, albeit, hard choice that made the most sense.to you for America.
I pledge to do the same.
Why don't the Republican's make it clear that the tax raises apply to those individuals making $250,000 or more a year? I'm not sure I know anyone that makes that amount of money, and I certainly don't. I believe the advertising negativity and the neglect of addressing issues including actual detailed solutions, by the Republicans is the biggest boost for the Democrats. We don't need a "good fairy" , we need specifics.
As far as the pro-life issue. No one has asked Gov. Palin or Senator McCain if they are going to change the laws for this country concerning this stance? I can feel however I want and even express it openly but, would I fight to change it with new Government laws? Sounds like Palin wants everything left up to the states. We are electing someone to make changes in the American government, not state changes. Also, why isn't more conversation made about how Sarah Palin's husband has (had) been a member of the AIP (Alaskan Independence Party) for years to get Alaska separated from the USA?
In reference to Colin Powell's interview with Tom Brokaw, I believe he made a clear explanation of his choice for Obama.
There are many 4-Star and other Generals and upper level military supporters for Obama who are white. Maybe they are supporting the 1/2 white side of Obama?
If Powell endorsed Obama for racial reasons... would he have endorsed Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton were they the nominee? Doubt it.
So it must not just be race.
While Dobson, as Uriah Heep of the Cross, still continues with his power-mongering machinations, the net results of his work does indeed bear fruit. Palin is a case-in-point, and as clear an example as we're ever going to get of the goals Mr. Heep of the Cross has for this country: the apotheosis of Machiavellian mediocrity, which will lead us into another Dark Ages and herald the rise and rule of the American theocracy.
Hmmmm... come to think of it, that reminds me, for some reason, of certain Islamic fundamentalists and their desire for a return of the Caliphate.
Thank God that Dobson et al and bin Laden et al are enemies. I tremble in fear for civilization if they ever realize they have the exact same goals and join forces. Then, we're really screwed.
JD, NYC
I don't quite understand how anyone who says they love this country can ever with full sincerity bring about any religious concerns regarding an elected official.
If one truly loves this country, then they'd be familiar with the Constitution and some different parts of it. One being Article 6, which clearly states "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
The first amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...".
It's clear, the founding fathers were very much against religious involvement in the government. In a letter from then president Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists, Jefferson coins the term "Separation of Church and State". "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."
I do believe the founding fathers were religious men. I also believe that religion has no place in influencing our laws and those elected to propose, pass, execute, and review them. Perhaps when religious fundamentalists try to meddle with politics for the good of everyone while invoking God's name, they should pay more attention to the document that sets the framework for the nation.
Having said that, I pay no attention to what Dobson says as I view him as a traitor and someone who would burn the Constitution. I'd like to think most Americans agree. For those that don't, when they thump their bibles at me, I'll just point them to the Constitution.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.