Blogs and Stories

Julie Satow

5 Big Shot Investors Who Predicted The Crash

Why did Mort Zuckerman predict the housing market collapse—while Alan Greenspan missed it? View our gallery of winners and losers.

No one’s predicted every turn of the downward spiral in the credit crisis, but here are five who saw enough of the trouble coming to get out or switch strategies. Then there are those who badly misjudged the housing-to-mortgage defaults-to Wall Street implosion. Perhaps they were trapped or blindly hopeful, but for what ever reason, they’re now on the losing side.

Click below to view the Good and Bad Bets on Housing gallery.

BS Article - Satow Greenspan

CLICK HERE TO VIEW PHOTO GALLERY

Five Who Knew

Mortimer Zuckerman
The head of Boston Properties says he began to realize the housing market wasn’t sustainable at the beginning of 2007. “The same thing was true in commercial real estate, so we sold more than $4.25 billion of properties at the end of 2006 and 2007, realizing that prices were extraordinary, and unsustainable.” And they bought the $2.8 billion trophy Midtown GM building. He is keeping his money in cash for now. “I have been an optimist all of my life, and I hate to be a bear, but this is going to be a very serious recession.”

John Paulson of Paulson & Co.
In 2005, a hedge fund manager from Queens became suspicious of undue optimism when his bets that certain bonds would lose value weren’t paying off, even though some of the companies were in bankruptcy. John Paulson, or J.P. as he is known, urged his traders to buy up credit default swaps, or insurance instruments that would pay out if mortgages began to sour. At first, they lost money, but in January 2006, Ameriquest Mortgage Co. paid $325 million for improper lending practices. Paulson doubled down. Last year, his two funds dedicated to betting against the housing sector rose 590% and 350%, respectively.

Brooksley Born
In a speech in 1998, the former chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission warned that the $60 trillion derivatives market “may pose grave dangers to our economy.” But she was up against formidable opponents in Alan Greenspan and Robert Rubin. Some months later, she admitted defeat and left her post when Congress imposed a six-month freeze over her regulatory authority. In 1999, almost exactly a year after she made the speech, Greenspan and Rubin recommended Congress permanently rescind the CFTC’s role regulating derivates.

Charles Munger
A constant companion of Warren Buffet, Munger has long warned about derivatives. His take on the accounting methods for derivatives in 2002 is a classic: “It is a sewer, and if I’m right, there will be hell to pay in due course.” Munger “made the observation that derivatives make risk relatively unimportant, that the risks become so widespread that if the worst happens, there is little harm being incurred by any one party, but the system as a whole collapses,” said John Slain, a professor of law emeritus at New York Law School. “He’s been warning of this day for ten years.”

Jonathan Miller
Three years ago, Miller, president of appraisal firm Miller Samuel, became frustrated with the appraisal industry, concerned that some of his colleagues were complicit in creating a housing bubble by purposefully inflating home values. “Most mortgage brokers and lenders we dealt with were interested in only making ‘the number’,” Miller said of the stress to appraise a home for the same value as the purchase price. “If you couldn’t make them happy, they would find someone who would.” He added, “there seemed to be no oversight on a federal level, and entities like ratings agencies had their hand in the cookie jar as well.”

And Five Who Missed the Cues on the Housing Market Slide.

Ken Thompson and a Dishonorable Mention for Ken Lewis
Last May, then-CEO of Wachovia, Ken Thompson, was feeling confident that his $24 billion acquisition of mortgage lender Golden West Financial Corp.—negotiated over a single weekend a year earlier—would result in "Credit quality is not an issue," said, adding the deal would "hit the ball out of the park." Instead, 18 months later Thompson and Wachovia are gone. As for Bank of America Chief Executive Ken Lewis, while he has managed to steer his bank out of danger, he also spent $4 billion to buy notorious mortgage lender Countrywide. The deal led to a settlement estimated over $8.6 billion.

William Donaldson
In April 2004, the SEC under then-Chairman Donaldson instituted a voluntary program to manage the risk of the five largest broker dealers. The so-called Consolidated Supervised Entities program allowed the banks to blow past the limits for debt-to-net capital ratio "The SEC modification in 2004 is the primary reason for all of the losses that have occurred," said Lee Pickard, a former director of the SEC's trading and marketing division. "They constructed a mechanism that simply didn't work. The proof is in the pudding." Three of the five largest broker dealers are now gone.

Harry Macklowe
When 71-year-old Harry Macklowe took 10 days in February 2007 to snatch up a $7 billion portfolio of prime Midtown Manhattan office buildings, entirely paid for with bank loans save for $50 million of his own money, it was touted as a sign of the real estate market frenzy. Weeks later, the heightened pace of deal-making came to a screeching halt. Macklowe couldn't afford to pay the interest on the short-term loans he took out to finance the purchase, and was forced earlier this year to give one of his chief lenders, Deutsche Bank, control of seven properties.

Alan Greenspan
The former Fed chairman kept interest rates at historic lows—bringing the key interest rate to 1% for much of 2003—creating cheap debt and spurring the housing bubble. Saying he was "in a state of shocked disbelief," Greenspan testified to Congress last week, admitting to some misjudgments. But to many, it is too late. "Greenspan was wrong on three fronts: he gave the green light to President Bush's tax cuts, he kept rates too low, and he refused to intervene in regulating mortgage lending," Mort Zuckerman said. "He was at the heart of the problem."

Robert Toll
As the largest luxury American homebuilder, Toll Brothers has been whipsawed by the housing meltdown as much as any one in construction. Despite the fact the company's revenue declined 34% so far this year as home sales slid to a 10-year low, Toll, the chief executive, remains optimistic. "People's natural desires have always put them in a place where they want big, better homes and I think we'll see it again," he told CNBC earlier this month.


Back to Top
October 28, 2008 | 5:47am
Comments ()
sophia5

Experts? I'm a regular working stiff and I saw this coming four years ago telling my co-workers not to buy homes at the time because they will drop in value. They laughed. There is no housing crisis. Its' a CORRECTION. I had enough common sense to realize the price escalation in homes was not sustainable. What is happening in America today is a correction to all of our gluttonous behavior. We are bloated ... fat. Walk through a grocery store and just try to navigate around disgustingly obese people pushing shopping carts full of snack cakes and sugary drinks, and you just want to grab them and shake them and scream "don't you get it, try a vegetable." America needs to go on a diet both fiscally and physically.

|
|
Reply
|
10:47 am, Oct 28, 2008
redserpent

Wisdom of the workingStiff? same here ... I saw it comming but not this soon and not this visible. I kept seeing this great looking developmnets going up all over $250K to $350K(upstate NY. Population Approx less 400K then) homes when the main employers had shed over 60Kjobs in 10 years and population was dropping (Now less 300k). I saw the systematic destruction of the manufacturing base and trades & crazy rise of imports because the profits were good for shareholders. Took me a long while until I decided to self educate in $$ maters that the biggest shareholders are the executive making the deciions to close the plants. One Big closed Oligarchc loop. Papers did not report politicians did not peep out a sound.

|
|
Reply
4:49 am, Apr 15, 2009
keep-sweet

Don't forget Bill Marriott, the supposed real estate genius at the head of Marriott hotels. Marriott opened hundreds of hotels over the last 5 years, some of which--Starbucks style--are yards away from each other. When the market for business travel and commercial real estate softened, Marriott opened another 42 (!) hotels in Q2 2008 and didn't slow down in Q3. Now Marriott is completely dependent of a $2.4 billion revolver. What happens when that runs out and the hotel business is still slow? Nothing good.

(PS. the heir Dave Marriott was secretly known by Boston co-workers as 'dumbass Dave' before he was unsurprisingly promoted to the top sales job at Marriott, and then sales went flat on his watch, so the future isn't brighter than the present.)

|
|
Reply
1:33 pm, Oct 28, 2008
BostonYankee

Lets not forget (which means u shud listen to these people going forward) : Jim Rogers & Robert Shiller

|
|
Reply
1:48 pm, Oct 28, 2008
maxpower1013

You forgot one of the most important people who predicated the crash: Ron Paul

|
|
Reply
11:30 pm, Oct 28, 2008
watchingmarcitz

And to think this whole mess could have been predicted by the movie "Animal House". See how at:

http://watchingmarcitz.wordpress.com/the-financial-bailout-according-to -animal-house/

|
|
Reply
3:06 am, Oct 29, 2008
spark123

It was one thing to bring rates down low in '01-'03 to avert financial meltdown but what about Bernanke's raising the interest rates unmercifully 17 times in a row after that? The likes of which eventually left many adjustable rate (prime and sub prime mortgages) written by the ship load to fail. (A 500k mortgage went from 2k ish a month to service to 3.8k ish) On what planet was it a good idea to kill the real estate market to keep the price of a loaf of bread down? (Oh, excuse me, that would be on Planet Hedge Fund.) The Fed chose an outdated method to tame (slay) Global inflation of the day. The raising of the interest rates had no bearing on the price of bread or oil for that matter. What a "freaking" expensive lesson -- where we have to see the financial markets unravel, then socialize with little haste and for the world to head into Great Depression II to realize this silly/horrific game? Where is the protection for the people? Where is the concern for their homes? The real Moral Hazards are the greedy Dukes of Derivatives and the Ignorant Fed driven by the witless banks.
This will not correct until the real estate market is healed. This arrogant comedy/tragedy of errors has broken the back of the American consumer (who are 2/3 of the domestic economy and the economic engine of the world-despite what they say about China!) Don't get me started about the consumer --don't blame them for using their homes as piggy banks when the facts show that real incomes for regular people have not increased since '00. While Joe the Hedge Fund Manager enjoyed his gilded billions and Joe CEO and Joe CFO of many a public companies enjoyed exaggerated mulit-million dollar compensation packages, not a penny trickled to regular folk.Why did they do it? That is to say, why did the Banks, The Fed, The Hedge Fund managers, the CEOs, the CFOs, the investment banks, the insurance companies do it? -- because they could. Cronie, rabid, foaming at the mouth capitalisim is not capitalism at all. Let's not kid ourrselves.

A childhood song comes to mind "...and all the kings horses and all the kings men couldn't put Humpty Dumpty back together again.
I

|
|
Reply
9:22 pm, Nov 26, 2008
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

5 Big Shot Investors Who Predicted The Crash

by Julie Satow

Info
RSS
Julie Satow
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |