Blogs and Stories
The Man Behind Proposition 8
The Emperor’s succession plans began to erode when Ahmanson turned ten and his beloved mother served his father with divorce papers. She died a few years later. When Howard was 18, his father died, too, sinking him into depths of despair. With his $300 million inheritance, he was now California’s—and perhaps America’s—richest teenager. But he was without direction, afraid and utterly alone. The tics, twitches and uncontrollable verbal spasms caused by his Tourette’s syndrome worsened. He could not cope with his emotions and during increasingly stressful episodes he would uncontrollably blurt out shocking statements. Unable to look people in the eye when he spoke to them, he became socially paralyzed. Diagnosed as schizophrenic, he spent two years at the Menninger Clinic, a Topeka, Kansas psychiatric institution. "I resented my family background," he told the Register in 1985. "[My father] could never be a role model, whether by habits or his lifestyle, it was never anything I wanted."
After graduating from Occidental College with poor marks, Ahmanson became drawn to a heavily politicized brand of Christianity that was growing popular in evangelical circles. He discovered the writings of a radical right-wing theologian whose family was massacred in the Armenian genocide, R.J. Rushdoony, Rushdoony’s book, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, in which the theologian mocked wealthy liberals, struck a particular chord with the young Ahmanson. “The guilty rich will indulge in philanthropy, and the guilty white men will show 'love' and 'concern' for Negroes and other such persons who are in actuality repulsive and intolerable to them,” Rushdoony wrote. Ahmanson read avidly as though Rushdoony were describing his own life.
While Ahmanson gave no indication he shared Rushdoony’s crude racism, through the theologian’s scathing critique of “the guilty rich” he began to release himself from the burden of responsibility to carry on his father’s legacy. He promptly sold his stock in his father's company and invested it in lucrative real estate acquisitions, with a goal of earning returns of 20 to 25 percent per year. That assured that his wealth would grow quickly, but it also made him vulnerable to people who manipulated his residual guilt complex to get a cut of his fortune.
Rushdoony’s political ideas provided Ahmanson with a framework for his philanthropic machinations. Describing his philosophy as “Christian Reconstructionism,” Rushdoony painstakingly outlined plans for the church to take over the federal government and “reconstruct” it along biblical lines. He provided detailed plans for how it would provide healthcare, pave roads and reorganize schools, and how it would mete out justice.
Calling for the literal application of all 613 laws described in the Book of Leviticus, Rushdoony paid special attention to punishments. Instead of serving prison sentences, criminals would be sentenced to indentured servitude, whipped, sold into slavery, or executed. “God's government prevails,” Rushdoony wrote, “and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them.” Those eligible on Rushdoony’s long list for execution included disobedient children, unchaste women, apostates, blasphemers, practitioners of witchcraft, astrologers, adulterers, and, of course, anyone who engaged in “sodomy or homosexuality.”
After Ahmanson’s awakening, R.J. Rushdoony reveled in his discovery of a financial angel willing to fund the growth of his think tank, Chalcedon, while expanding the influence of Reconstructionist philosophy. He rewarded Ahmanson’s generosity by giving him a seat on Chalcedon’s board of directors. Ahmanson was profoundly grateful. At last, in Rushdoony he had found the attentive and approving father he yearned for his whole life. "Howard got to know Rushdoony and Rushdoony was very good to him when he was a young man and my husband was very grateful and supported him to his death," Roberta Green Ahmanson told me. The Ahmansons were at Rushdoony’s side when he died in February 2001.
Roberta Ahmanson was not reticent about her and husband’s political views. When I asked her if they favored biblical law as a governing model for the United States, for example, she casually responded, “I'm not suggesting we have an amendment to the Constitution that says we now follow all 613 of the case laws of the Old Testament... But if by biblical law you mean the last seven of the Ten Commandments, you know, yeah.”
How Rich People Smoke Pot
Paul Schrodt is a writer living in New York City. He has contributed to New York magazine, Radar, and Esquire.com.
Justice Clinton?
As vice chairman of Public Strategies and president of Maverick Media, Mark McKinnon has helped meet strategic challenges for candidates, corporations and causes, including George W. Bush, John McCain, Governor Ann Richards, Charlie Wilson, Lance Armstrong, and Bono. McKinnon is co-chair of Arts & Labs, a collaboration between technology and creative communities that have embraced today's rich Internet environment to deliver innovative and creative digital products to consumers.
The War on Christmas Peters Out
Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast, writing fellow at The Nation Institute and author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books). Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.
Palin's Wing-Nut Rival
Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast, writing fellow at The Nation Institute and author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books). Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.
Un-Pelosi: The Senator Who’ll Kill the Stupak Amendment
Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast, writing fellow at The Nation Institute and author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books). Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.
smdunne
I don't like the sound of anything Ahmanson stands for, but he is perfectly at liberty to spend his money anyway he chooses to.
The more perplexing question to me, is why David Geffen, who is openly gay and worth billions, has donated a pretty paltry $100,000 to the No on Proposition 8 Campaign.
The same question could be asked of Ellen Degeneres, worth around $65M, who has also donated $100,00 and Ellen Degeneres just got married in California.
Seems to me that between them, Geffen and Degeneres could easily afford to outspend Ahmanson and it's embarrassing to both of them that they haven't.
smdunne
Apologies, Degeneres' donation should read: $100,000
Deschanel
What a monster this guys sounds. I wonder if destroying gay people's legal recognition of their relationships will give him any satisfaction. I rather doubt it.
SMDunne- one hundred thousand dollars isn't paltry. It's a massive amount to give. Very few people could give as much as that.
muellerp
Separate but equal has no place in America. Vote no on prop 8.
princessbuttercup79
In my opinion, the group of people that are threatening traditional marriage, are people like me. People like myself who refuses to marry his/her partner and co-habitate happily along with our "bastard" childrens(I really hate that B word I used there, but Evangelical Christians call people like me sluts and children born out of wedlock with such a hateful word.). People like me have consciously rejected marriage. We are the ones who are giving traditional marriage the finger, not gay people.
For the same reason straight couple gets married, gay couple wants to get married to legally become family, to become one. What is wrong with that? It's almost like gays are saying, "Traditional marriage is awesome. We want that, too!" Compare "We're getting married!!" to "We're getting Civil Unioned!!" Compare "This is my husband." to "This is my Civilly unioned live-in partner." It's just not the same.
Like Ahmanson, I resent my background. I have grown up in a family with no freedom of religion. My mother believes "gay love" is mental disease. She also believes one can pray the "gay" and "addictions" away.We had nightly bible study(even on Sundays) where dinner was witheld if you didn't participate in reading of the sculpture and prayer sessions that lasted a good 45 minutes. I actually know the bible very very well. And, it took me 2 decades to runaway from that life, all that oppression and no room for questions.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think everything about Christianity is wrong. A lot of what it teaches, I actually think it's great. The bible teaches people to be a good person in day to day life. I still believe in some of the teachings such as do unto others as you'd like them to do to you. Stuff like that which helps me to be a better person i embrace, but other rubbish, I reject.
And I live in San Diego, so I've seen all the ads for an against it on TV, street signs, coworkers' bumper stickers.... I know that people who support prop 8 believes their intension is good and they are doing their God's work. I know they do, since I've talk to some. But, I believe more harm then good has been done on Earth in the name of religion, and there's a reason why we have a saying, "The road to hell is paved with good intensions."
I guess it's all really weird for me, since if prop 8 was proposed 5 years ago, I would have supported it. But today, i find myself thinking, "Enough already."
laura2b
If this Prop passes it will be a very sad day...
We teach our children to share and be kind, shouldn't grown-ups do the same?
**EVERY** person deserves the same rights; regardless of gender, age, race, sexual orientation, social or economic status.
California VOTE NO on Prop 8!
smdunne
Deschanel - Bruce Bastian, Robert W. Wilson, David Bohnett, David Maltz and John Stryker have all given at least $1 Million to the No on Proposition 8 Campaign. Many others have given amounts far in excess of $100,000. You can check out the list of some of the donors here:
http://achievementgap.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/honor-roll-no-on-prop-8- donors-contributors/
JohnJay60
The New Testament forbids divorce among devout believers (Mark 10:1ff ... He answered, "Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. 12And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.")
Prop 8 should be rewritten to say "Marriage is defined as the first and only marriage between a man and a woman. Any other definition of marriage is illegal and damaging to society."
TrustingHim
We sing God Bless America. And then we condone the sin of same*** marriage and the killing of the unborn. I just don't think that we "get" it. God created man & woman. Adam & Eve. NOT Adam & Adamand Eve & Eve.
TrustingHim
God made woman for man. Homosexual sin came from man...Romans chapter 1 verses 22 - 27 : Professing to be wise they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man-and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lust of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served teh creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. AMEN For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their woman exchanged the natural for what is against nature.Likewise also the men leaving the natural use of the woman,burn in the lust of oneanother, men with men comitting what is shameful,and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which is do them. Note I just wrote what GOD says. Practicing homosexuallity is a SIN. God loves the sinner and Gave His Son to die for them. BUT one has to repent and ask for forgiveness and turn from their sinnful ways. By His Grace and mercey they can give up homosexual SIN. Heteral sex outside of Marriage is also a sin and God can forgive those that have done so forgiveness if they humble themselves and ask Him to.
stufalk
Presbyterians Against Proposition 8
Brothers and Sisters of many faiths,
Let us be absolutely clear that in our opposition to Proposition 8 we are asking nothing more than what already exists in the respectful balance between the beliefs and practices of our many faiths and California constitutional law.
Within the many communities of faith in our State we have conflicting doctrines and beliefs that already govern the practice of marriage.
Our Roman Catholic, Mormon and many of our evangelical churches do not and will not marry persons who are divorced. But that does not mean that those who are divorced are constitutionally prohibited from the right of legal marriage in our state.
Likewise, our Roman Catholic, Mormon, and some Jewish and Muslim faith traditions will not marry persons of different faith traditions. But that does not mean that interfaith couples, or those of no particular faith tradition, cannot be married in our state.
Our California constitution honors all religious traditions by respecting our differences about religious marriage while at the same time providing and protecting the right of all couples to marry the person of their choice.
Prop. 8 would ELIMINATE the constitutional right of same sex couples to marry. That is unfair and unjust. California constitutional law already honors and respects religious differences. No religious institution is forced to marry anyone. But that does not mean that any person in our state should lose their constitutional right for legal marriage.
I urge you to protect our constitutional rights as well as our right to religious diversity and pluralism by voting NO on Proposition 8.
Thank you.
#
Rev. Daniel E. Smith
Pastor, West Hollywood Presbyterain Church
7350 W. Sunset Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90046
Ph: 323-874-6646
E: dsmith@wehopres.org
Worship Service: Sundays at 11 AM
West Hollywood Presbyterian Church
7350 Sunset Blvd at Martel St
(between LaBrea and Fairfax)
Los Angeles, CA 90046
323/874-6646
www.wehopres.org
jccrosby
Rev. Smith- thank you and bless you! jcc
BrideofSatan
What a fascinating story. The poor little lonely rich boy takes out his aggression on the world. And, history has shown (I'm talking to you Ted Haggard Larry Craig) that the more anti-gay someone is, the more likely they're angry at their own homosexuality.
VOTE NO ON PROP 8-KEEP RELIGION OUT OF GOVERNMENT
jccrosby
So true and this man's hatred/fear has caused untold problems in my beloved Episcopal Church. Bravo to you-
earnric
Keep religious silliness out of our secular constitution(s) ...
Believe what you want -- but keep such non-sense out of our laws.
hexmansmitty
I recently attended the civil uinion of my friend Roger to his partner Ron with my wife, and from everything supporters of prop 8 have told me I expected an immediate diminishment of my love for my wife, oddly I felt nothing different. At the reception someone slipped and wished the happy couple luck on thier new marriage, surely this was it I thought, the complete destruction of my own marriage, once again I found I still was in love with my wife. As the night progressed I never once found that the expression of anothers love ever affecting my own marriage in any mesurable way. I was also surprised that despite predictions the vengeful hand of God seemed very much in abbeyance, I was so concerned I asked the minister who performed the ceremony when I could expect to find polygamy,incest and bestiality all acceptable as I had heard gay marriage was the gateway to all of them, unfortunately he had no ansewers just some spiel about if God is love how could affirmation of that love be an affront to Him, yadda, yadda.
It's been 5 months now and I am still waiting for my marriage to be snuffed like a candle in the winds of gay marriage, and for the complete moral break down of society the right has been promising me. I am begining to suspect that they may be incorrect, but it could be my understanding of thier message so if anyone can explain it to me without quoting the bible I'd really appreciate it.
haveyouheard
I am not gay but I for one think it's not our choice for who the people of America want to marry. I would hate for anyone to refuse me to marry who I love and I'm sure anyone else would too- it's just the blind faith people of this country who make it that way.
Anyways they are not hurting their chances with religion just by voting no on question 8. Love is love.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.