Blogs and Stories

Mark Salter

The McCain I Know

John McCain’s victory in the New Hampshire primary last January led, although not inevitably, to securing his party’s nomination two months later and the opportunity to square off against the richest and largest presidential campaign ever assembled. Our gifted opponent, and his talented and exceptionally disciplined staff, were enough of a challenge to contend with. But the environment we ran in, which grew worse the closer we got to Election Day, made a very difficult task close to impossible. Americans, tired of war and deeply anxious over a bad economy, were ready for change. The incumbent president‘s unpopularity, a historically high wrong track number, and the Republican Party’s squandered reputation for competent governance and fiscal discipline made Americans readily receptive to our eloquent opponent‘s message of change, and helped overcome their doubts about his inexperience and liberal record.

It seemed to us there were more investigative stories about our candidate’s spouse than about Senator Obama.

By the end of the campaign, our own polling revealed over 60 percent of voters recognized Senator Obama as a political liberal, while only a little over 20 percent of voters identified themselves that way. It didn’t matter. Americans wanted change, and a majority of them were willing to gamble on the young man with a short resume, whose positions on issues were often at odds with theirs, because he offered the most change. Any Republican, even one with a reputation for political courage and a record of challenging his party’s leadership, would have a hard time satisfying the public’s desire for sweeping change. The R after his name indicted him in the public mind, and Senator Obama’s campaign, with millions of dollars in advertising and an intense focus on its message, expertly prosecuted the case: McCain equals four more years of Bush.

The senator’s selection of Governor Palin, like almost every major decision in the campaign, was viewed as a cynical and self-interested choice intended to excite social conservatives, who hadn’t shown much enthusiasm for the top of the ticket. Surely, no one would have advised our candidate to choose a running mate who would have lengthened the odds against us. But overlooked in the brisk dismissal that Governor Palin might have qualities other than her social conservative credentials and obvious retail political skills was her actual appeal to John McCain. It also fails to credit his advisers’ conviction that, given the environment we were running in, a message of experience over the untested new guy would not succeed even if we executed perfectly. Arguing that John McCain actually had a record of risking his career to reform the institutions and practices of politics and our opponent didn’t had gotten us nowhere. To reporters and many voters, Senator Obama was change personified and John McCain was yesterday‘s news.

Every candidate for office who takes on an incumbent runs on a message of change and reform. Few live up to their promise. Sarah Palin ran against the political establishment in Alaska with the promise to clean up the self-dealing and corruption that had finally worn out the patience of Alaskan voters. She defeated an incumbent Republican governor and a popular former Democratic one, an impressive accomplishment in itself. But she didn’t just run as a reformer. She governed as one. That was the source of her appeal to John McCain. He holds in high esteem anyone of either party who keeps their campaign commitments to reform. He greatly admired Senator Russ Feingold and the late Senator Paul Wellstone for that reason, despite their liberal credentials and views on most issues. He chose Sarah Palin to underscore his commitment to reform and help him keep his promise once in office. He recognized she had little experience in foreign affairs, but so did his opponent. She was well-versed in the area of energy security, which would have been a priority of a McCain administration. She is hardworking, intelligent, and a quick study, and he believed she would learn by study and experience all she would be required to know as next in line to the presidency.

No doubt, we made our share of mistakes. In hindsight, the decision to briefly suspend our campaign to help find support for legislation to address the collapse of the global credit system is probably one of them. But the criticism that it was nothing but a stunt that failed is mistaken. The morning of the announcement, senior economic advisers to the campaign impressed on the candidate that failure to pass some rescue package would lead to a disaster of monumental proportions. We were also aware that support for the legislation among House Republicans was virtually nonexistent.

He and his senior staff believed he had three options. The most politically appealing was to remain quiet, and then weigh in against the legislation as it was put to a vote, which would have put him on the side of about 70 percent of voters. The second was to offer a vague appeal for improvements to the bill and then keep his distance, mindful that it would probably fail because of House Republican opposition. The third was to become personally involved in finding a compromise that could pass with Republican support and try to convince Senator Obama to join us. He chose the third course, and all his senior staff agreed with him. And while it turned out to be politically costly, I don’t think it was anything less than the responsible decision. Nor do I think it proved to be a fatal injury to his campaign. The financial crisis he was responding to had already very likely made the steep hill he was climbing insurmountable.

The people who worked loyally and as hard as they could to help elect him, whether they had been with John McCain for years or had worked on President Bush’s campaign, were all proud to do so because they respected the reputation he had risked so much to achieve, and took it as their personal responsibility to protect it. Rick Davis kept the campaign together long after most people had given up on it, and Steve Schmidt brought a new vitality and focus to it. They worked well and creatively together. Steve encouraged the candidate to campaign in places Republicans seldom visited and remained as vigilant about protecting the “McCain brand” as anyone. Rick Davis managed the typical disagreements that occur within campaigns so tactfully that they seldom became a serious cause for dissension. The senior staff made most decisions by consensus, after all arguments were fully debated. Our successes and our mistakes were a shared responsibility.

Back to Top
November 10, 2008 | 5:53am
Comments ()
gustave

I am so pleased that you're proud of the guy. I'm also aware that 1/2 of marketing a product is convincing the buyer after the fact that they've bought the right one. No real opportunity to do that here, though, with the 365 to 162 (projected) result.

I read your justifications and the selective choices you highlight and I don't doubt that you were able to pick and choose things to celebrate. Maybe we all will do the same, later. For now, I recall how angry McCain appeared, how he called his opponent 'THAT ONE' in a debate and how he, in announcing her, ogled the woman who he'd had foisted upon him when it was plain Tom Ridge or Lieberman (can't type this w/o feeling sick to my stomache) were more to his liking re: governance. Bill Kristol--whose idea was it to listen to this clown?

You would have lost even if you'd chosen someone less laughable than Bible Spice, but you would have done so with the respect of people you respect yourselves, not just that of frothing, ignorant (I didn't say stupid, just ignorant) clay-Americans who can't tell the difference between a Christian with dark skin and the boogeyman you tried to make of him.

|
|
Reply
6:47 am, Nov 10, 2008
smdunne

Sounds like Salter has taken a long deep swig of the McCain Kool-Aid.

|
|
Reply
7:45 am, Nov 10, 2008
franksmith

You are insulting the intelligence of the American people. We didn't need Obama to tell us that McCain was likely to continue Bush policies. The McCain campaign, with it's endless smears, was so similar to Bush (Rove) campaign tactics that the similarity was obvious. I was a big fan of the "classic McCain", but the campaign turned me off to the "new McCain". Although I was raised Republican, the party's focus on fear, hatred and lies disgusts me. Apparently, many other people feel the same way.

|
|
Reply
7:49 am, Nov 10, 2008
Yankintex

What's missing here is any real acknowledgment that the choices the McCain campaign made -- Palin, suspending the campaign, trying desperately to link Obama to "radicals" -- were POOR CHOICES. I don't subscribe to the idea that people are one-dimensional. John McCain is not evil. Hell, even George Bush isn't. They are complex figures with many beliefs, motivations and contradictions. And they make mistakes. Big ones.

|
|
Reply
8:25 am, Nov 10, 2008
susquehannastudio

When all three of the Republican candidates turned out to believe more in Bible stories than evolution I felt that there was the possibility of returning to the 1850's, not withstanding John McCain's service to his country. I admired McCain and think he might have made a good president at an earlier time.

|
|
Reply
8:29 am, Nov 10, 2008
pourmecoffee

Get a room.

|
|
Reply
8:36 am, Nov 10, 2008
sakura

Are you proud that McCain stooped to insinuating that his opponent was a terrorist, a radical, a far-left liberal and un patriotic?

|
|
Reply
8:44 am, Nov 10, 2008
ritchotte

Wow. There is so much revisionist history in the piece, I wonder what parallel universe Mr. Salter has been living in the last 22 months.

|
|
Reply
8:44 am, Nov 10, 2008
msilverstein

The world according to Mark Salter. John McCain believed the pr spin Sarah Palin put out....the reformer...and he was not smart enough to 1. Have her veted and 2. Meet with her himself because if he had done either or both he would have seen what the rest of us saw...not ready for prime time. Shame on him and he said country first.

|
|
Reply
9:24 am, Nov 10, 2008
CarmenD

This article is a waste of time. I was expecting insight as to how the once honorable John McCain came to employ the same robo call firm that smeared him against Bush. I wanted some specifics as to how McCain chose to make 'Joe the Plumber' who is unlicensed and does not pay his taxes his personal 'hero.' At last, during his graceful concession speech, the John McCain I remembered began to emerge again. There's always hope.

|
|
Reply
9:28 am, Nov 10, 2008
milkbone

I've respected John McCain when he crossed party lines to get things done. I respected John McCain when he was working in the senate as a real "maverick", not worrying about about what his colleagues thought about a particular bill. I's a pity, but the John McCain i'll remember Is the one who would sell his soul to be President.

sandman


|
|
Reply
9:30 am, Nov 10, 2008
indieinva

This article is proof that the McCain campaign staff was, and apparently still is, out of touch with reality. John McCain ran a terrible campaign. He turned into the polar opposite of what made him attractive and endearing to so many moderates. His VP selection was disasterous. His message was erratic. His attacks on his opponent led his supporters to become an angry, hate-filled mob. But, according to Salter, it was only America's displeasure with Bush and the opponents ability to fool the American electorate with his eloquence that lost McCain the election?

Time to break through the bubble you have been living in the last couple of years, Mr. Salter, and join the real world.

|
|
Reply
9:34 am, Nov 10, 2008
ssewnauth

Nice try, Mr. Salter. Where was John McCain in the middle of the campaign when he encouraged his VP to go out there and make comments that were so reprehensible that people started to call Mr. Obama a terrorist. Nice try, trying to rehabilitate Mr. McCain's image. As someone who staunchly supported him in 2000 against George Bush, I am deeply disappointed in him. You would have been well served to not write anything. This is very transparent.

|
|
Reply
9:36 am, Nov 10, 2008
milkbone

I am not a first time reader of this column. I have written at least 10 comments for cheat sheet. E-mail me at kennysibbett@gmail.com

|
|
Reply
9:45 am, Nov 10, 2008
wolverine1987

I voted for Obama, but am constantly amazed at the contemptuous nature of many liberals, demonstrated quite often on this site in the comments section. I have come to believe that many liberals are happy to be for the common person, unless that person happens to be so stupid as to be a republican. If the plumber had challenged McCain, no investigation of his past and no character assassination would have occurred. McCain wasn't for me for many reasons, but he is an honorable man (as the latest evidence, look at his gracious concession speech) who did not lose that distinction because he made poor choices. Or would you say that Obama lost his honor when he asserted in many southern commercials, that McCain was anti-hispanic and anti-immigrant, against all evidence? No in both cases.

|
|
Reply
10:32 am, Nov 10, 2008
beowolf

In no uncertain terms, it was the Republicans voting in lock step for every Bush idea or nearly so that sunk every one of them for me. McCain's pick of Sarah Palin and his insistence on running the Atwater/Rove/Schmidt campaign strategy was just digging a deep hole deeper.

|
|
Reply
10:35 am, Nov 10, 2008
pencilbox

I voted for mccain in the 2000 primary in my state (as an independent, I was not allowed to vote in the Dem primary at the time), and I would have voted for him in the 2000 election had he been the candidate.

Salter ignores exactly the reason that I believe put this election past mccain when he writes along the lines of "the R after his name was too much for some people to overcome".

It wasn't the R. It was playing to all the other Rs. McCain's appeal was that he had *never* done that. Before now.

And he did it big. Where his record was strong on bipartisanship, it was erased by rallying the far right. Where he once stood as an independent, he then fell over the body of failed conservative policy.

Salter is right about this: McCain *was* there in all of those places defending his center-ist record. But he was also on TV (a lot, in my state) and the internet, touting a completely different record.

Now we know which one the voters heard.

|
|
Reply
10:43 am, Nov 10, 2008
waltshaw

sounds like a litany of excuses based on circumstance. mccain chose to run the campaign he did--based on fear mongering and reactionary measures--and in the process devalued his brand.

|
|
Reply
10:45 am, Nov 10, 2008
harlowe

"It seemed to us there were more investigative stories about our candidate's spouse than about Senator Obama."

How can a person take anything he says seriously when he makes a weak, whiny comment like that.

Poor you, poor McCain, Palin was a fabulous choice.

Someone already mentioned, there is no mention at all of the crappy, divisive and fear-mongering choices these candidates and their campaign made along the way.

What a waste of space this article is. It's just a big whine-fest.

|
|
Reply
10:54 am, Nov 10, 2008
thedudeokc

Seriously Wolverine? You think that the background research on "Joe the Plumber" was merely a liberal smear campaign? Both sides are looking for any edge that they can get, and when a major forcus of the campaign becomes one person, you can bet that he is going to get put through the ringer. Did the liberal media keep him from getting his plumber's license? or paying his back taxes?

The McCain campaign used the same "liberal media conspiracy" excuse about Sara Palin's horrible showing on the public stage. This faux-offense from the conservatives when the other side adopts a page from their own play book just doesn't fly for me.

|
|
Reply
10:57 am, Nov 10, 2008
desidiva

Your VP candidate was winking at the American people! You lost all credibility as a serious campaign.

|
|
Reply
11:00 am, Nov 10, 2008
pacifistgunslinger

Someone in the camp should have stopped McCain from performing self-satire. He turned himself into a caricature with his insistent "My friends, I know how to (fill in the blank)" when it was obvious he had no such ability. "I know how to catch Osama bin Laden." Dragging in the Governor Mrs. Palin only heightened the comedy, especially when she opened her mouth.

|
|
Reply
11:07 am, Nov 10, 2008
sandrac

Talk about trying to save face. I actually liked McCain before this campaign started. It has to be one of the worst run campaigns I've witnessed in a couple decades. Yes McCain had an uphill battle as a Republican - but the campaigned strategist killed his chances in picking Pallin and focussing on Ayer instead of issues. I would guess that not too many independents voted for Pallin - can we please remove her from the stage now. If she plans on running in 2012 don't forget she will be almost 50 - the age that women disappear from the media. How will they feel about her then? I'll be glad to see her gone.

|
|
Reply
11:10 am, Nov 10, 2008
yourdailyslice

Regardless of the campaign that John McCain ran, he is an honorable man whom deserves the respect of the American people. He is unselfish, sincere and compassionate. America felt it was time for a change and spoke. What a defining moment in history. I pray for Barack Obama and hope that with the people's support, he can lead this great nation where it needs to be...A nation of unity, hope, morality and prosperity.

|
|
Reply
11:12 am, Nov 10, 2008
tob1303

I was reading because I like John McCain...then you got bitter and started making your excuses...don't insult the electorate by blaming the R next to your name....maybe blame

- choosing a moronic VP candidate for a 72 year old man
- a candidate with the charisma of a phone book
- a candidate who has based his entire career on military training
- real americans for not voting enough
- the fact that you can't win without being religious

|
|
Reply
11:17 am, Nov 10, 2008
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

The McCain I Know

by Mark Salter

Info
RSS
Mark Salter
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |