Blogs and Stories
Rick Warren's Double Life
America's Pastor—just announced as Obama's choice to give his inaugural prayer—has a nice-guy image. But it is belied by what he says on Sundays.
Here is how evangelical superstar Pastor Rick Warren, who will deliver the invocation at Barack Obama's inauguration, described his philosophy this August: “I have never been considered a part of the religious right, because I don't believe politics is the most effective way to change the world.”
The mainstream press has been almost universally eager to indulge his self-description. Nicholas Kristof, the New York Times columnist, called Warren “an evangelical liberals can love.” Newsweek named Warren one of fifteen “people who make America great.” And even The Nation published an article puffing Warren as “America’s Pastor,” a figure who “disassociates himself from the religious right, noting that he shares its position on social issues but doesn't want to focus on them. He focuses on poverty, disease and aid to Africa.”
Even the public relations firms responsible for burnishing Warren’s image seem mystified by the press’s worshipful portrayal of their client.
At age 54, Warren cuts a drastically different figure than the hard-right dinosaurs that defined the evangelical movement’s image. The mega-best-selling author of “The Purpose Driven Life,” Warren prefers jeans and short-sleeved shirts, often with loud, Hawaiian patterns, to the cheap suits familiar to Southern Baptist firebrands. He has a pudgy face and a paunch that gives him a teddy bear-like quality. When Warren preaches, he does so in a measured, almost ponderous tone, without hectoring or hollering.
Warren’s acknowledgment of climate change, his reputation for open mindedness and his calm manner enabled him to draw both Obama and John McCain in August to his Saddleback Civil Forum on the Presidency, where he sequentially questioned the candidates on their faith. Warren’s stature was never higher than on that day. He was ascendant as the 21st century version of Billy Graham, pastor to presidents, minister of the national soul, but moving away from the hard right.
But his tolerant image is belied by what he says on Sunday.
A week before Election Day, here is what “America’s Pastor” told the 22,000 members of his Saddleback Church in Orange County: “Here’s an interesting thing: there are about 2% of Americans [who] are homosexual, gay, lesbian people. We should not let two percent of the population determine—to change a definition of marriage that has been supported by every single culture and every single religion for 5,000 years. This is not even just a Christian issue, it is a humanitarian and human issue, that God created marriage for the purpose of family, love and procreation. I urge you to support Proposition 8 and to pass that on.”
Warren has also supported every major ballot measure opposing gay marriage that sprouted up in his native California in the past ten years, a fact that is barely mentioned in accounts of him as the pioneer of a “New Evangelical” movement that sees beyond the old hobgoblins of the far right. Warren waged a sub rosa campaign to re-elect George W. Bush, but was still described as never having been ”written or talked about…in the context of any political issue,” according to the non-partisan Religion News Service. Fighting the culture war with a velvet glove, Warren has constructed an international platform using two powerful constituencies few figures before him have been able to reconcile: conservative evangelicals hungry for more sophisticated leadership and opinion elites frantically searching for post-partisan heroes.







This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--dsmntlrdeanpaul1
Warren's no different than Dobson: obsessed with the attention and the fame and willing to do and say almost anything to get there. The religious masses are as blind and ignorant as ever, willing to follow anyone who speaks down to them. Warren is just another evangelical trying to control people while making millions. Go away!
Charvi
I agree 100 percent..people can't see what is on the inside when these kinds of people are in the "acting career" they are able to convince or con people out of all of their monies and get them to do things because they love to "control" others..believe me..Jesus wasn't about money and when he raised that large amount of money believe me he gets a cut of it which is an abomination to God...he loves to be the center of attettion and the way he talks down to people isn't Godly..I am an ordained minister myself and I don't have to parade around like a so-call ":big shot" as this one and many other Evangelist do...the outside of the cup is pretty or handsome what is on the inside of that cup...they love the fame it is all centered on them not Jesus in Corithians it says it isn't about the "messenger" it's about the "message"...this man isn't humble at all he is a popous man out to act like he is a "God"..beware..of the false prophets...you hit him really good.
Evangelist Fran Perry Missouri
pani211
Why be surprised when an evangelical pastor has evangelical Christian beliefs? Why be surprised when a liberal or Conservative holds to those philosophies? Last time I checked the Constitution, we still have freedom of speech and worship. Pastor Warren has every right to espouse his beliefs as everyone else does.
Charvi
First it is the "message" that should be important not the "messenger"..true we have "feedom of rights" to have the right to speak out but in the position this man takes as a representative of Jesus Christ it is different...it better be what the word says and not his opinion..believe me..read Corinthians he better not be the Head and putting Jesus as the "Tail"...when you take all the attention away from the real Man you are not very humble at all being the servant...but, Rick Warren believes in his-self totally
Evangelist Fran Perry Missouri
SallyM
Max,
SallyM
Max, I showed up to protest at Warren's church and there were about 200 of us, not thousands. Exxagerations hurt our cause. Also the Orange County Register pointed out that the supposed gay "member" was not a member at all, but an occasional attender of the church. I don't agree with Warren but no church has done more for gays with AIDS than Saddleback has.
Laire07
This is the major problem with religion its not based on any intellectualism or critical thinking. The genius of religion is you don't have to prove anything.
coloradokarl
I live in Colorado Springs. Dobson's Focus on The Family has a Highway sign on I-25 ! 95% of humans are permanently "asleep" the "Sheep", The flocks to be shepherded by the responsible 5% who can realize "The Big Picture". The Heard Mentality is alive and well in the Human Psych. Evolution is slow and the survival instinct is our strongest asset. Wolves come in many colors and some wear the clothes of the shepherd.
AndreainNY
"But his tolerant image is belied by what he says on Sunday."
Perhaps it's time to examine the definition of "tolerance." Is it a requisite that every liberal position be supported? If so, it's liberalism not tolerance that is questioned.
Using a liberal litmus test on Christian Evangelicals is useful insofar as it highlights the differences in their positions, but it is a narrow dimension upon which to judge their "tolerance."
And what of liberals' tolerance? Can a liberal be tolerant of a Christian Evangelical?
sincereblue
I had never heard of this guy before seeing Obama and McCain at the Saddleback forum. Anyone who paid very close attention to Warren's TV appearances afterward knows this guy is a liar and a -- since it's the word of the day -- jerk.
Brendino
@deanpaul1 - Mr. Warren gives away 90 percent of his income.
I hold a level of respect for the man. He takes his stances when he needs to, but he's not unnecessarily inflammatory. I think the reason he really is a media darling is because people like him. What'd he sell, like 40 million books? If you can get over a tenth of America to do anything, you're going to get attention.
Charvi
Please spare me the "drama"..it isn't about money with Jesus Christ..Psalm #1 says it as your soul prospers for the perpose in serving Jesus Christ not making yourself the important one and putting Jesus Christ as the Tail..he should be more modest and not wanting so much attention..and how do you know what he gives away..he shouldn't have his thoughts on money any way like I said when you take the attention away from the "message" and put it more on the "messenger" something wrong..he cons people our of a lot of money and what he does with it he is the one that knows...watch out getting involved with these kinds of religious leaders...I am not into this man at all I see things through the "spiritual eye" and I know better than believe in man anyway...I am not into the spirit of religion or people's doctrines..only the Word which is Jesus.
Evangelist Fran Perry Missouri
MauchChunk
The most disappointing moment in the Presidential election was when Barack Obama appeared at this guy's church. It's not like any of these people were going to vote for him anyway. You can put lipstick on a bigot but......
maisgar
Add hypocrite to Warren's description. I never for a moment thought his little dog and pony show with the candidates was going to be non-partisan and now we know it wasn't. Religion used to be a unifying experience now it's divisive and judgemental, shame on all of you!
Charvi
I agree to this calling it out "Hypocrite"...in Matthew Chapter 24 or 25 Jesus got very upset with people called the Pharisees because they loved to tell people what to do and how to live and what to believe..but they didn't do it and Jesus said "Oh you hypocrites!"....this is just one of many Pharisees.
Evangelist Fran Perry
rlord49
I like a description that I attribute to the very smart, and very inflammatory Christopher Hitchens about Religion.(I could be wrong about the author of the thought).
There is no good deed done in the name of faith that CANNOT be done without that faith and there are no evil deeds done in the name of faith that CAN be done without that faith, in short we can all be good without religion, but some of us can only be bad because of religion.
Pastor Warren has presents himself differently than the likes of James Dobson, but in his own words is not all that different, in his social beliefs.
This leads me to the very good reason our constitution specifically provided a clear distinction between church and state. In building a democracy, those fine gentlemen recognized the dictatorship of religion. As evidenced by Pastor Warren and the Mormon church, who gave instructions to the faithful about what to do in regards to gay marriage, which they followed. If that isn't a dictatorship I don't know what is.
As a spiritual agnostic it is entirely offensive to the world we live in that any religion can flex that power of division and subversion to deny any other American their rights under civil law, all with the protection of the constitution of America.
No marriage performed in any church in this country is legal until it is validated by a civil contract recognized by the state and then it becomes a marriage in the state and the country and is afforded all the manner of rights and responsibilities that go along with it, and the sudden grasp of ownership of the word and the institution is a smokescreen to rationalize bigotry towards a minoritiy in America.
The pastor also mis-spoke, (the political word for lied), about the number of gays and lesbians in America. Kinsey estimated that 6% to 8% of the population is gay, but note the word estimated. There are alot more of us in the closet, hiding in plain site than there are who are out and fighting the hard fight that women and people of color have had to fight for the past 200 years.
Charvi
Rick Warren is the author of his own thoughts it isn't Jesus Christ talking or God talking through him..when he told Jeriamiah..when I come into your heart to sup when you open your mouth I will come out..meaning He will do our communicating for us and His spirit will come out of us..not what comes out of Rick Warren..which is his own thoughts to control and to get others to do his will..believe me these are the False Prophets that are around the world
Evangelist Fran Perry
magicman
To Laire07:
The Ontological Proof for the existence of God has been around for quite some time...and can be found in such secluded corners of the world such as LIBRARIES? With the exception of Immanuel Kant, and a few others, most Modern Philosophers become speechless by the conclusions already arrived at by such noteworthy persons as Sir Isaac Newton and Saint Thomas Moore. I don't pretend to believe that Nuclear Physics doesn't exist simply because I do not understand it, do I? And how exactly do the Philosophies of Immanuel Kant gibe with the Rhetoric of Today, embodied in the closing line "Yes, we can!" Or, is it going to be the same, I'm lost, down in the mouth Liberal Argument, "No, we Kant!" Surely you must be that brand of Puritanism that detests the mere notion that someone else would be happy with the simple things in life, like knowledge of the existence of God, and not mere belief. Knowledge does transcend belief once the issues philosophical are addressed squarely. And wasn't it the Puritanical Protestants that banned Christmas for the first 60 years of this Country's Life and preferred, instead of Plum Pudding, to hold sessions of Congress on that hallowed day? Or was it the example of such notable American Authors, who wrote "Bracebridge Hall", in an effort to 'introduce' the idea of an American Christmas, that broke the dark spell?
princessbuttercup79
I have heard every reason why gay marriage is wrong, and the ones given by this pastor is just the usual reasons. I have read his book "the Purpose Driven Life" and I do have respect for him, but for him to use his pulpit as his soap box is wrong.
I hope people realize institution of marriage was a financial and not a religious institution from the very beginning. To say the concept of 1 man and 1 woman is the traditional meaning of marriage makes me laugh. Jacob from the old testament, who later changes his name to Israel, had 4 wives who were all sisters and his first cousins. Not one, not two, not three, but four. That's not 1 man and 1 woman. How about the polygyny that was practiced in Tibet, where all the brothers marries 1 woman, so the family land and wealth won't be split up? Dads have been marrying off their daughters for centuries with a dowry, "paying" her future husband to take her and take care of her.
So many cultures have it where it's not one man and one woman. And, it's only in more recent times that people romanticized marriage and make it seem like something it wasn't intended to be. You hear of some older women who can't leave their husbands because they have been out of the work force too long or never been in it in the first place, so they can't support themselves. I guess it still is in some ways a financial institute.
There is no such thing as a traditional marriage. It has evolved with time along with people who practice marriage. And with changes that has happened in recent times, it is only fitting that marriage changes with it, to meet the needs of the time.
The best man in a wedding no longer is the man who is the best swordsman in town picked to assist the groom incase the bride runs away. And people don't stick around after the wedding and reception to see/find out if the marriage is consumated or not anymore. There is no such thing as a traditional marriage. Get over it people.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.