Blogs and Stories
Hedge Fund Managers Are the Heroes of this Crisis
Why the Fawning
But leading members of Congress didn’t fawn over these men merely because they are rich or, as some cynics might suggest, because of political contributions. Yes, hedge fund managers gave $14 million during the latest election cycle, two-thirds to Democrats. But those numbers are peanuts compared to donations from banks and insurance companies, and legislators have been skewering executives of those companies.
Instead, the hearings sought to praise these men, not to bury them, for the valuable role their funds have played in the markets. They have reduced risks and stabilized prices by buying low and selling high. They have been an early warning signal by uncovering bad news. They have generated value for investors by pressuring entrenched managers to focus more on shareholders. In a recent Journal of Finance study I co-authored with professors from Columbia and Duke business schools and Vanderbilt law school, we found that hedge fund activists generated large positive returns to investors for precisely these reasons.
Legislators might envy a billion-dollar payday, but they see that these men make money from incentive fees only if their clients make money. Moreover, unlike the Wall Street banks that collapsed this year, these hedge fund managers didn’t try to make money through massively leveraged bets.
Paulson is a typical example. His central investing insight is simple: “Watch the downside, the upside will take care of itself.” He made his fortune by buying insurance against a decline in the prices of securities tied to subprime mortgages. In early 2005, he saw that “exuberance in the credit markets and the massive liquidity was severely mispricing these securities.” As he told Pensions and Investments, “We thought it was a terrific risk-return tradeoff where you can risk 1% and make 100%.” He spotted early problems in the mortgage markets, and questioned the risks held by major banks and insurers. He put his money where his mouth was. Congress should have listened to him a long time ago.
Too Much
At certain points, the legislative kowtow went over the top. It was fine for John Yarmuth of Kentucky to call everyone’s testimony “candid and thoughtful.” Or for Elijah Cummings of Maryland to thank George Soros for his philanthropy. But then New York Democrat Carolyn Maloney held up her copy of Soros’s book, thanked the men for “insightful and important testimony,” and even asked Soros for an autograph.
It was too much when even Republicans nearly wept as Philip Falcone described “a father who was a utility superintendent and never made more than $15,000 per year, while my mother worked in the local shirt factory.” Congress can subpoena testimony from nearly anyone, yet Representative Waxman nevertheless praised Falcone just for showing up, and noted that he “had to reschedule an overseas business trip to join us today, and I particularly appreciate the fact that he is here.” No one had asked about Richard Fuld’s travel schedule when they hauled him in to discuss Lehman Brothers.
Still, we can excuse a few toady moments in exchange for some confidence that during its financial manhunt Congress can tell friends from enemies. Not all hedge funds are equal, and some are as much to blame as the bankers, traders, and credit rating agency executives who mislabeled complex investments, hid risks, and nearly destroyed our financial system.
But the five billionaires who testified on Thursday are the good guys. Four of them even agreed to new regulations requiring increased disclosure, especially of derivatives. During these times of crisis, it is heartening that our legislators seem to know where to paint the bulls-eyes. Or at least where not to.
Frank Partnoy is a law professor at the University of San Diego and has written several books about financial markets, including The Match King (forthcoming 2009 from PublicAffairs), about Ivar Kreuger, the wayward financial genius of the 1920s, and the greatest financial scandal in American history, at least until today.








magicman
Well now here is a refreshing example of truth. Hedge Fund Managers who take 'counterparty' positions at great risk based on intelligence and a Keen sense of markets. And nobody is here commenting? Very interesting. Is it that all of you out there can't recognize success when you see it? Perhaps Christ was right ... you know ..... from the Last Supper ... when he said "he who is greatest amongst you will be the one who renders the most service." What could Christ have been talking about? Guys like Soros who 'see' where service/help needs arise in Financial Markets? Or in Philanthropy also? Could that have been Christ's point? Or is it simply Christ's miracle of 'the fish and the loaves of bread' that has appeared here? And yet no one at the Daily Beast is commenting? You must be speechless by the example presented here. Go GEORGE! I guess Congress has finally figured out that we need more like you! And it takes a Depression for them to learn this? Yikes! Of course, none of this works without the 'vision thing'. God forbid that there should be an 'enlightened eye' out there actually making a Billion Dollars being disciplined, courageous, gutsy, intelligent and yes....supportive of markets by taking the opposite side in mentally ill, 'manic' markets such as the ones which we have just witnessed. You Go GEORGE!
ptveite
Ummm, there aren't 538 members of the house of representatives....there aren't even 538 members of congress (although that's closer). You sure you did all your math right there comparing those numbers?
donatello
Gee magicman, Soros and Christ? Again? Sounds like you've found a new idol to worship.
alencharlesreport
What that is NOT told is that much of these folk's success comes from being allowed to sell other people's stock, using this sell as a way of driving down the value of the stock only to replace it with a now lowered valued stock of the same kind. This is a kind of robbing Peter so Paul can attain wealth. Very GOOD for Paul but NOT so good for Peter.
magicman
Yes. There are some bets that you do indeed stake your life on. Soros is an example of that in his trading. He actually does what he believes in his trading. It is an act of fidelity to truth. You can bet your life on it. That's the message. Had Soros been wrong we wouldn't be having this conversation. What you're not understanding about his decision making process is that it includes facts, which convert to the application of Laws, which are finally screened by a 'gut' intuitive decision, particularly in regards to time. That is frequently our Via Doloroso...if you understand the drift.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.