Blogs and Stories

Salameh Nematt

Will Obama Really End the Iraq War?

soldiers in Iraq Chris Hondros/Getty Images With Iraq’s parliament poised to pass the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) next week, it’s time for the president-elect to say where he stands on the withdrawal timetable.

What does President-elect Barack Obama mean when he says he will end the war in Iraq?

For all practical purposes, the nearly 140,000 U.S. troops in Iraq today perform something closer to a peace-keeping mission than an all-out war with major combat operations. Indeed, it has been a while since we’ve heard of a substantial mobilization of forces inside the country, while casualties on the American side have declined to the lowest levels since the war started.

With Al-Qaeda in Iraq largely incapacitated, and the pro-Iranian militias, such as the Mahdi Army, all but contained, the so-called war in Iraq appears to be morphing into an extension of the broader war on terror. So when Obama says he plans to end the war, the question is, first: whom does he identify as “the enemy” in the soon-to-end war? And second: is he willing to end this war even if “the enemy” decides to resume fighting and the country veers, again, toward civil war?

Sources say the SOFA is now backed by 143 members of parliament in the 275-member house, with 41 Sunni members of the “Accord Front” still undecided.

So far, the President-elect has made no substantive comment on the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), which Iraq’s cabinet approved last Sunday, and which is now undergoing a third reading in parliament. Although the SOFA timetable differs very little from the plan Obama proposed during the campaign, he has yet to say he would honor the agreement. So much for campaign slogans.

To be fair, however, circumstances on the ground have prompted both Obama and Bush to adjust their withdrawal plans to the point where there is little difference between the two. So Obama may be content to let the Bush administration make a deal. The notion of leaving Defense Secretary Robert Gates in his job under a new administration, for a few months at the very least, suggests that Obama has no intention to rock the boat on the Bush plan.

In all likelihood, the Iraqi parliament will pass the agreement with a comfortable majority by next week, despite the opposition of Iranian-backed elements such as Shiite cleric Muqtada Al-Sadr. According to well-informed Iraqi sources, the SOFA is now backed by 143 members of parliament -- including 87 members of the government’s coalition and 56 Kurdish members—and opposed by 106 members in the 275-member house. The 41 Sunni members of the “Accord Front” have not yet decided either way.

Needless to say, “ending the war” does not end U.S. military engagement in Iraq under either Bush’s or Obama’s plan. Both project a “residual force” of 40,000 to 55,000 U.S. troops that would remain past a pullout of combat brigades that could occur in 2010 at the earliest, or 2011 at the latest, whether or not permanent military bases are established in Iraq.

Back to Top
November 21, 2008 | 6:35am
Comments ()
cajola

I certainly hope so, we have been there far too long...shouldn't have been there in the first place.
I also don't think we need to have a permenant base over in Iraq either....the troops need to ALL leave that country.

|
|
Reply
7:11 am, Nov 21, 2008
AndreainNY

"Colin Powell argued that to win a war you need to go in with overwhelming force. But Donald Rumsfeld's view was that you go with the army you have."

Rumsfeld sought to minimize US casualties and to avoid taking over the country and the appearance of an occupation. Those are valid considerations.

Those who now claim we should have gone in with massive force should then also project what the response of the Afghans would have been and where we'd be today had we done so.

Second guessing on Afghanistan and Iraq is usually limited to a simplistic view and little discussion of the repercussions of recommended actions. In fact, proponents of initial massive force should ask themselves how the Middle East would have responded to a large scale occupation of Afghanistan.

Obama will respond to events on the ground just as Bush has had to do. One temptation I hope he avoids is the tendency to view pushback from our enemies as a signal of our failure. And Obama must now consider the consequences of an American pullout -- something conveniently ignored until now.

|
|
Reply
8:28 am, Nov 21, 2008
mikeoutwest

The author tries to cram too many points (by my count eight points) without fleshing them out further, rendering the piece unreadable. Mr. Nematt should either stick to one or two points and give them the elaboration and treatment that they deserve, for they are interesting points, or he should write longer essays. Otherwise, this piece suffers from the same liabilities as was the case with Mr. Nematt's past pieces for the DB: unreadability and messiness.

|
|
Reply
10:56 am, Nov 21, 2008
dxgmmpa

We need to have a presents in the Middle east somewhere. The 23 Moslin countries are hanging by a thread and can destablize the world's economies if they war on which other and there is no alliance similar to NATO to step in. On the other hand I have often thought we should consider removing our troops from South Korea, West Germany, and Bosnia. These are less important then the middle east. Also why are we in Africa? If we do not want to go to war to protect American economic interests we should not send our troopers anywhere in the world. While we are on the subject less end our participation in the United Nations. It is a worthless body that has no teeth to resolve any conflict.

|
|
Reply
10:42 pm, Nov 21, 2008
misha1000

I predict that in 2012 we will be as deeply involved in Iraq, as we are now.

It is another Vietnam, and we'll be there for 20 years.

http://www.newyorkleftist.blogspot.com/

|
|
Reply
8:45 am, Nov 22, 2008
DonKrieger

We have posted the text of what appears to be the signed Status of Forces Agreement of November 17:
http://publicservice.evendon.com/SOFA-17Nov2008M.htm

Don
Pittsburgh, PA
http://publicservice.evendon.com

Everything on our site is free and permanent.
Loading is very fast.
Each page includes a highlighted link which you can copy/paste to cite the page online.

|
|
Reply
9:02 pm, Nov 22, 2008
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Most Popular
The Sex Lives of Male Hookers
July 6, 2009
Palin's Brilliant 2012 Play
July 7, 2009
Jackson's Needle Problem
July 8, 2009
Most Recent
How Michael Jackson's Funeral Ratings Stack Up
July 9, 2009
The Ultimate Michael Merchandise
July 9, 2009
Jessica Lange's Spine of Steel
July 9, 2009
More From This Author
Iran's Nervous Neighbors
June 25, 2009
How Arab Media Is Covering Iran
June 17, 2009
Is Iran's Regime Cracking?
June 16, 2009

Will Obama Really End the Iraq War?

by Salameh Nematt

Info
RSS
Salameh Nematt
Emails
| |
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+