Blogs and Stories

Andrew Keen

In Defense of Sleazy Lobbyists

K Street Charles Dharapak/AP Forget "yes we can." We need the K Street pros.

It’s a lonely time to be a lobbyist in America. On January 20, when more than a million Americans will pour into the streets of Washington, D.C., to celebrate Barack Obama’s inauguration, the only people not invited to the national knees-up will be the unfashionable crowd from K Street. Last month, Obama’s Presidential Inauguration Committee (PIC) announced it will not accept contributions of more than $50,000 from any single individual, nor will it allow any donations at all to the celebrations from corporations, lobbyists, or political action committees (PACs). Apparently, the eight official balls, the concerts from artists like Bruce Springsteen, and the rest of the inaugural hoopla will all be financed by Obama’s famous army of small donors.

Why the purge against special interest groups? According to Obama’s Inauguration Committee, "We are committed to ensuring that these activities are organized in a way that reflects the American people's common values, shared aspirations and commitment to addressing our challenges as one, united nation." John Podesta, the co-chairman of Obama’s transition team, said last month that excluding lobbyists from funding the transition “is something the American public expects.”

Some American dreamers might consider the country’s national purpose to be exceptional, but its reality—like every other country in the world—is of chaotic competition rather than regimented unity.

Common values, shared aspirations, one united country, a commitment that the American public expects...It all sounds terribly uplifting, worthy of a movie with a communitarian title like Mr. Obama Comes to Washington. The only problem is the anti-lobbying talk is not true, in theory or in practice. The inconvenient truth is that lobbies are purely a mirror of our own interests. So when Americans say they hate lobbyists, what they are really saying is they hate themselves.

As Hillary Clinton told PBS’s Gwen Ifill in May, when she spoke in defense of special interest groups: “A lot of those lobbyists, whether you like it or not, represent real Americans. They actually do. They represent nurses. They represent, you know, social workers. Yes, they represent corporations that employ a lot of people.”

Exactly. And more often than not, those self-interested nurses, those self-interested social workers, and all those self-interested corporations are at odds over scarce economic and political resources. Some American dreamers might consider the country’s national purpose to be exceptional, but its reality—like every other country in the world—is of chaotic competition rather than regimented unity. Lobbies, therefore, are merely the intermediaries that reflect the interests of the diverse economic groups in society. The five top spending lobbying clients over the last ten years—the US Chamber of Commerce, the American Medical Association, General Electric, the American Hospital Association, and the AARP—collectively represent a much more accurate, albeit complex, snapshot of American interests than the self-congratulatory fiction of 100,000 “yes we can” small donors all supposedly united by the same common values and purpose.

An Obama skeptic—a rare bird in American politics right now—might point out the inconsistency in his highly virtuous assault on K Street. After all, Obama’s inauguration committee—the PIC that is picking on the PACs—is made up of Chicago notables like JPMorgan Chase Vice Chairman William Daley, McDonald's board member John Rogers, and Penny Pritzker, the founder of Classic Residence by Hyatt. How can we be sure that the Illinois triumvirate of Rogers, Pritzker, and Daley, all with their own obvious civic and dynastic interests, are cooking up a series of inaugural balls purely for a selfless love of country?

To have lobbyists and the PACs financing the inaugural celebrations would surely be a more honest introduction, a quid pro quo, to the complex problems of America in the early 21st century than the delusional promise of national unity. Take, for example, the financing and sponsorship of the Bruce Springsteen concert at the inauguration. Let’s say Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors all paid for the event. I hope they would have the chutzpah—what Obama would call the “audacity”—to get Springsteen to dedicate “Thunder Road” (“It’s a town for losers and we’re pulling out of here to win”) to Detroit’s downsized auto workers or executives. In a political town like Washington, D.C., where there’s no such thing as a free lunch, an investment in an inaugural concert would be no more than a transparent political commercial—the corporate first cousin of the blizzard of anti-lobbyist advertising to which Obama and John McCain subjected American voters in the fall.

Small has become the new big in the United States, where the cult of the honest small donor has become the latest comfortable illusion of the ruling class. This wild swing against lobbyists is not only bad news for corporations seeking to influence public policy, but also it doesn’t augur well for the future of representative democracy. As the father of American horse-trading democracy, James Madison, argued in Federalist Paper #50, the truth is that we all form into factions of one kind or another, and thus the small donor is just as self-interested as the large corporation. “If men were angels,” Madison reminds us, “no government would be necessary.” Until then, Americans should unashamedly cherish the value of a political system specifically designed to balance the competing interests of many rival corporations, lobbyists, and PACs. So, on January 20, I urge my fellow citizen to spare a thought for the lonely K Street crowd. Such selflessness will only add to our common values, our shared aspirations, and our commitment to addressing our challenges as one, united nation.

Andrew Keen is the author of the controversial international hit Cult of the Amateur, which has been translated into 15 foreign languages. Known as the Anti-Christ of Silicon Valley, he is the most hated person on the Internet.


Back to Top
December 3, 2008 | 6:05am
Comments ()
Nymalexis

Sure, these lobbyists represent people. They represent people with the money to hire them to flood politicians with a skewed view of what popular opinion on an issue really is.

|
|
Reply
8:44 am, Dec 3, 2008
mrl0226

Mr. Keen,

If you are attempting to build upon your self-described reputation as "the most hated person on the Internet," then this post makes complete sense. Otherwise...

|
|
Reply
9:11 am, Dec 3, 2008
terrance53

This article perfectly reflects how pernicious the Supreme Court ruling that conferred personhood on corporate entities has become. Professional lobbyists should be forced to wear special clothing when inside Washington DC. Tube tops with polka dots, black and white striped pedal pushers, roller skates and two-foot high dunce caps.

|
|
Reply
9:22 am, Dec 3, 2008
muddog

Blah Blah Blah.
Mr Keen, there is a difference between allowing the "K STREET" thugs to run the country like the Bush / Rove team did and pushing back a little like the Obama administration will do. No one is under any illusion that lobbyist will not have influence under Obama but most certainly it will be hampered down. I would opine that the Obama team will listen more to those lobbyists of the Nurses, Social workers, farm workers, I.E. Read Real People versus Big Oil, Club for Growth,Black Water etc that were the poster childeren of the Bush team.

|
|
Reply
10:09 am, Dec 3, 2008
TotalRecall9

What is this website? Advertisement articles for special interest groups? I didn't even read this biased crap. No way do we need highly-paid people hanging around Congress with tin cups for wealthy corporations. Congress should be defending the people against corporate corruption, not be co-conspirators! I can't wait for the day when Congress finally sets caps on salary, compensation, and benefits for all job holders to no more than $500k per year. The main reason lobbyists are in Washington is because of GREED!

|
|
Reply
1:30 pm, Dec 3, 2008
javester

Mr. Keen,
The inconvenient truth is, as lobbyists go, the self-interested social workers and nurses are small potatoes in terms of the money they pump through their lobbies.

Guess who were writing "draft" regulations for the prescription drug bill that disallowed haggling with the pharma companies?The drug lobby which fed former Rep. Billy Tauzin and his crew of thugs with the legislation which they then passed as their own.

After passage of the prescription drug bill, the whole gang then quickly left and became lobbyists themselves with Tauzin taking the cake by landing a $2 mil/year job as the head of PhRMA - the drug industry's main lobby.

What about the auto industry lobby endlessly fighting CAFE mileage standards all these years?

Or what about the financial industry pressing for deregulation that created a shadow banking system that landed us in this current financial mess?

Lobbyist, lobbyist, lobbyist!!!

And oh yeah - if those nurses, social workers, and corporate employees wanna be heard, they're more than welcome to do so by going directly to change.gov, writing their representatives, and donating their personal funds to the representative which best represent their interest.

|
|
Reply
1:32 pm, Dec 3, 2008
dmotion

I do feel sorry for lobbyists. To warm them up, I suggest that we build a big bonfire invite a crowd and roast them live on tv. That might be the best way to revitalize mainstream media

|
|
Reply
1:51 pm, Dec 3, 2008
javester

Oh and one more thing Mr. Keen, I doubt James Madison envisioned lobbyist as the subverting "legislator-former staffers-revolving door lobbyist" complex that it has become.

And the "small donor is just as self-interested as the large corporation" is like comparing a Ford Taurus to a Ferrari.

Or having a measly 90-pound weakling playing seesaw with a Sumo wrestler.

You should be honest enough to admit that.

|
|
Reply
2:38 pm, Dec 3, 2008
TwentyCharactersLong

Andrew Keen, the man who claims that K street is more diverse than the American people. At least he's consistently antidemocratic.

|
|
Reply
4:13 pm, Dec 3, 2008
kilograham

Andrew has a point, lobbyists represent the interests of workers, industries and special interests, like the Nature Conservancy.But you can ignore the incredible imbalance of lobbying power from industry's lobbyists in Washington. They are better funded and have better access.

|
|
Reply
10:55 am, Dec 4, 2008
ridetide

I very much enjoyed this, Andrew. It is refreshing to hear someone who's not afraid to be realistic. After all, if there were no people there would be no lobbyists.

|
|
Reply
5:55 pm, Dec 4, 2008
weeaver

Global Corporate Citizens should not be allowed to lobby as they are not American citizens and have become foreign bargaining units. They can however employ Americans and seek American investors who can vote and express their concerns to Congress.

|
|
Reply
8:47 pm, Dec 4, 2008
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

In Defense of Sleazy Lobbyists

by Andrew Keen

Info
RSS
Andrew Keen
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |