STR / AFP / Getty Images
Why is the University of Texas naming a chair of Pakistan Studies after the notorious U.S. congressman who helped destabilize that country? Fatima Bhutto—niece of the late Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto—demands an answer.
Pakistan’s new government, the only in the world headed by two former convicts—who have their fingers on the button of a nuclear-armed state, no less—is nothing if not a keen purveyor of irony.
There’s currently an effort underway by the Pakistani diplomatic mission in Texas to raise funds for a chair of Pakistan Studies at the University of Texas in Austin. The chair, a dream of the Pakistani diplomatic community, is to be named after Charlie Wilson. For those who missed the movie, it’s worth noting that of all the people to name a chair of Pakistani Studies after, Charlie Wilson is possibly the stupidest.
Why Pakistan would chose to honor Wilson is beyond everyone, even the Texans.
“Good-Time Charlie,” as Wilson was affectionately known by Afghan warlords and Texan socialites alike, has the dubious reputation of being the godfather of what would later be known as the Taliban in Afghanistan. (He was also buddies with Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza.) In the 1980s, Wilson led Congress into supporting the CIA covert operation aimed at funneling money and arms into Afghanistan through Pakistan’s military and secret services, the ISI. That money, it should be said, did not go to Afghan refugees fleeing the Soviet’s communist invasion. No, it went to the mujahideen in the form of $17 million worth of anti-aircraft weapons, armaments, and other war toys. By the end of 1983, Wilson had managed to siphon $300 million of unused Pentagon cash to the Afghan mujahideen. Before they were the Taliban bad boys of the region, the mujahideen were one of Wilson’s pet projects. And now, Pakistan has decided to honor him by naming a chair of studies after him.
Personally, this is a source of great revulsion for me. My aunt, Benazir, and I never agreed on much, and though she's no longer alive to debate the point, my guess is that the idea of such a chair would be one more thing we'd not see eye to eye on—she had quite a different relationship with the Taliban than I do.
Why Pakistan would choose to honor Wilson is beyond everyone, even the Texans. According to the university’s newspaper, the Charlie Wilson Chair prompted several professors to send a letter to the dean questioning the naming of the chair. And the Pakistanis? The liberal arts development office at the university said that it “has not heard any concerns from the Pakistani community about the naming of the chair.”
Well if that’s the case, count me as the first. There’s no need to go back in history to find this choice outrageous. Wilson’s legacy remains omnipresent in Pakistan. Inspired by the success of its neighbors, Pakistan now has their very own Taliban (thank you, Charlie), and the ISI continues to exert its might over the country in a distinctly undemocratic way.
Before 2008 was over, Wilson’s boys, the Taliban, had trickled from Pakistan’s northern tribal borders into the heart of the country. They took over Peshawar, once a garden city known for its Buddhist heritage, and in December attacked the Peshawar Model School. The school, which offers co-education to approximately 12,000 of the city’s underprivileged girls and boys, had twelve of its school buses set afire, and a tightly packed set of dynamite detonated in the principal’s office. Several groundskeepers and staff were critically wounded by the explosion and the school was forced to shut down for several days.
But that’s nothing compared to the militants’ hold on the northern city of Swat, the site of a violent civil war that the militants are considered to have won over the past year. The Taliban has set a January 15 deadline in Swat for girls to stop attending school. The choice given to Swat’s parents: take your girls out of school voluntarily, or face Taliban-style justice. Young schoolgirls have already been attacked, a warning of what’s to come should the city continue with its dastardly plan to educate girls.
Tracy Quan's latest novel is Diary of a Jetsetting Call Girl, set in Provence and praised in The Nation as a "deft account of occupational rigors and anxieties before the crash." Tracy's debut, Diary of a Manhattan Call Girl, and the sequel, Diary of a Married Call Girl, are international bestsellers. A regular columnist for The Guardian, she has written for many publications including Cosmopolitan, The Financial Times, and The New York Times.
Joe Mathews is a journalist, an Irvine senior fellow at the New America Foundation, and a contributing writer at the Los Angeles Times. He previously served as Justice Department reporter for the Wall Street Journal and as a city desk reporter at the Baltimore Sun. He is the author of The People’s Machine: Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Rise of Blockbuster Democracy.
Gerald Posner is the award-winning author of 10 investigative nonfiction bestsellers, ranging from political assassinations, to Nazi war criminals, to 9/11, to terrorism (www.posner.com). Posner lives in Miami Beach with his wife, the author Trisha Posner.
The Daily Beast is dedicated to news and commentary, culture, and entertainment. We carefully curate the web’s most essential stories and bring you original must-reads from our talented contributors.
Renata Espinosa is the New York editor of Fashion Wire Daily. She is also the co-founder of impressionistic fashion and art blog TheNuNu and a sometimes backup dancer for "The Anna Copa Cabanna Show."
Amanda Fortini has written for The New Yorker, Slate, Elle, and New York, among other publications. She lives in Los Angeles.
Fatima Bhutto is a graduate of Columbia University and the School of Oriental and African Studies. She is working on a book to be published by Jonathan Cape in 2010. Fatima lives and works in Karachi, Pakistan.
Fatima Bhutto is a graduate of Columbia University and the School of Oriental and African Studies. She is working on a book to be published by Jonathan Cape in 2010. Fatima lives and works in Karachi, Pakistan.
Fatima Bhutto is a graduate of Columbia University and the School of Oriental and African Studies. She is working on a book to be published by Jonathan Cape in 2010. Fatima lives and works in Karachi, Pakistan.
As a student at the University of Texas, I could not disagree more with Ms. Bhutto. Yes, the Mujahideen transformed into the Taliban in the early to mid '90s, and there is no disputing that fact. However, was Charlie Wilson's intent to destabilize Pakistan and Afghanistan by pushing a "right-wing dictatorship? Not in the least. Lest Ms. Bhutto forget, Charlie Wilson's actions were colored and tempered by the heightened Cold War, a time when any and all means of destabilizing the Soviets were pursued. His initial actions were taken, in case Ms. Bhutto didn't see the movie or read the book, because he empathized with the displaced people being targeted by the Soviets.
Hindsight and history are always 20/20, and we don't always do things perfectly. Should we have taken a more active role to ensure that the area wasn't negatively affected by the Taliban? Of course. But saying that Charlie Wilson was wrong and "stupid" for not seeing 30 years into the future is like saying that FDR accomplished nothing fighting World War II because he imprisoned Japanese-Americans. Was it the wrong move? Probably. Does it overshadow the accomplishments? No.
While we may agree with some of the sentiment, there is a pretty large inaccuracy, and that is that Good Time Chucky created the Talibs. They actually emerged after the Soviets had left in response to the hideous warlordism that had wracked the country. So indirectly, maybe he did help them come about - but certainly not in the direct way that you suggest here.
Charlie Wilson's responsible for the creation of the Taliban? What an unsubstantiated leap! Criticize his lifestyle, his connections to Zia, and his covert methods in support of the mujahideen's campaign against the Russians in Afghanistan... but spawning the Taliban? Surely it was the West's collective neglect of Afghanistan following the Soviet withdrawal that gave rise to the Taliban. Not Charlie Wilson.
Great article, Ms. Bhutto.
Yeah, Ms. Bhutto, let's say Charlie Wilson actually has future-seeing powers - what good does it do for you to gripe about his actions from 30 years ago? Could you please invalidate his actions by telling us, using your alternate-universe perceiving powers, what conditions would be like in Afghanistan and Pakistan had Wilson not influenced events there? Could you also tell us how and why things would be better?
It's nice that you're trading on your name, and nice that the Beast is happy to pay you to write sophomoric crap like this, but really, this is a bit of an insult to the average reader's intelligence.
On the button, Fatima. Its too bad, some of the comments here do reflect exactly what the problem is here: a lack of grasp of issues and problems in Pakistan, Afghanistan & India.
Charlie Wilson is absolutely not an appropriate name for Chair of Pakistan Studies. To anyone familiar with Pakistan or Pakistani Studies/Culture, its almost laughable and ridiculous. Come up with a name of someone more decent and truly relevant to Pakistan and its complex culture.
Ms. Bhutto, excellent article, I like your bold and different views on this subject, not sophomoric at all by the way. Keep writing!
While I agree with the overall point of this article I must take issue with the rather simplistic and spurious claims made in this article. First or all, it is quite correct to call into question the legacy of Charlie Wilson and his support for the mujahideen. However it is worth pointing out that the bulk of the aid went NOT to the Taleban (which didn't exist until well after the Soviet withdraw) but rather to disparate groups fighting the Soviets such as Gulduddin Hekmatyar and his Hezb-e Islami faction or Jalaluddin Haqqani and his fighters in southeastern Afghanistan.
While nominally these two groups have collaborated with the Taleban in numerous instances, these groups are distinct in their leadership, scope, and overall aims. The fact is that, the shortcomings or American police notwithstanding, the Taleban were and remain a Pakistani phenomenon born, bred and continuously supported there.
While I concur that history should not look kindly on the legacy of Charlie Wilson, I am rather puzzled why the author chose to focus so much attention on something relatively minor when right this second madrassas in cities like Wana and Miram Shah supported by her government are training young men to kill us.
It is amazing that Americans still deny the link between funding the muj and the rise of the Taliban. Let me get it straight. You dump $4 billion in guns and arms on the fundamentalists, then are surprised when they turn out to be, well, fundamentalists. Pure coincidence, right? And of course the conduit through which the money was fed, the Pakistani ISI, is above reproach.
hahahaha, people can't take any criticism at all when it's directed towards them. yep, you guys are right. the US always does the right thing; if something bad occurs as a consequence of our actions it's someone else's fault. Also, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Perhaps two issues are being conflated by most commentators. She is merely pointing out that Charlie Wilson is the not the best person to be naming a chair connected with Pakistan Studies after, due to the negative outcomes of policies he promoted, be such consequences intentional or not. It is certainly debatable whether the Afghan policy itself had any real feasible alternative, but giving Mr. Wilson a pass due to the fact that one could only see in hindsight the consequences of a call to arms and even Jihad by Zibignew B. and himself, is rather disingenuous. Many Pakistanis and Americans knew what was going to happen if mullahs and fundamentalists were to be armed and trained, such fears were communicated. It doesn't take a genius to see what Jihads and Crusades are all about. Ms., Bhutto's point is clear and accurate, there are better people whom such a chair could be dedicated to, and whose personalities do not color the academic integrity of such an honor nor directly relate forward to 9/11. Personal attacks on Fatima are a product of an extreme defense mechanism by those eager to defend everything concerning US foreign policy in context of larger and vague agendas such as the "cold war" and the "war on terror".
What comes out of Fatima's mind is a true sentiment of a young liberal Pakistani women frustrated by the dubious behavior of Pakistani and American politicians. There might be a little bias because of her family feud, but over all it is a good article.
Fatima has misplaced her disgust with the Taliban at The University of Texas.
Charlie Wilson might have recieved more credit than he deserves for ousting the Soviets, but naming a chair of Pakistinian studies after him is UT's business. Good for them, that is what universities do.
To call Charlie Wilson the "godfather" of the Taliban could not be more incorrect. Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia has that distinction. He funded the ISI, and exerted infulence that led to the Taliban. Yes the US gave some money to the ISI to purchase weapons, but not the support Saudia Arabia gave or as long. Wilson just got public support, and did specifically direct funds.
Even to say Mujahideen turned into is the Taliban is incorrect. Sure some of the Mujahedeen might have been involved in the Taliban's take over, but not all (Massuod for example). For all practicle purposes the Mujahideen ended with out US support and the Taliban sprang up as an answer to a lack of a central government The Taliban were sponsered by the Suadi's and the ISI.
There is no logical reason why Fatima Bhutto should have a problem with UT establishing a Charlie Wilson chair of Pakistan studies. Now I must question her motives. Maybe a UT booster did not that final bribe payment to to her Uncle for the the rights to build a gas pipe line across Pakistan.
Hardline Islam is what destabilizes Pakistan.
As a Pakistani Canadian, much as I support Fatima Bhutto's articles on human rights and Pakistani corruption, I for one am glad she isn't getting involved in politics. The Bhuttos have been an absolute disaster for Pakistan, starting with her grandfather Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's refusal to accept the 1971 elections which saw Sheikh Mujibur Rehman's Bengali party win a majority in Parliament and his assassinations of political opponents. And, starting with her cousin Bilawl Zardari, they all seem to have an absurd sesnse of entitlement.
take any religion, radicalize it, and you have a perfect recipe for disaster...works every time..
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.