Blogs and Stories
Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?
Hepp / Getty Images
At a secret summit Tuesday night at George Will’s, Barack Obama dined with the biggest stars in the conservative constellation, including William Kristol, Larry Kudlow, David Brooks, Rich Lowry, and Charles Krauthammer. Whose brilliant idea was that?
A dinner party that will be heard 'round the world came off in gentlemanly confidence on Tuesday evening in Washington, hosted by the dapper George Will and with a table that included the Republican right's most comely voices and a surprising guest of honor, President-elect Barack Obama.
My first reaction to learning of the dinner from a savvy source was that this was Nixon to Mao, clever and timely. Obama wants very big things from Congress very much in a hurry, such as the rest of the unspent $350 million TARP cash and then another $1 trillion in a so-called stimulus package as early as February. The right wing's operatic editorial voices mainline directly into the Republican remnant in the Senate and the House, so for Mr. Obama to go to the opera house itself—George Will, conductor—is expedient as well as gracious.
Did the Obama team—and especially his Rasputin in the guise of Rahm Emanuel—actually read any of the remarks made by the guests during the late campaign season?
The cast tonight of ten includes men who can sing everything from Puccini to Wagner and hold the GOP's attention for the next four years, among them: William Kristol of The Weekly Standard, David Brooks of The New York Times, Paul Gigot of The Wall Street Journal editorial page, Larry Kudlow of CNBC's Kudlow and Company, Rich Lowry of National Review, Michael Barone of FOX and US News & World Report, Charles Krauthammer of The Washington Post.
Word of the dinner filtered only in the last 48 hours through elite conservative circles and generated anxiety, envy and pouting. When Neil Cavuto of the FOX Business channel learned he did not receive a privileged invitation he was blue.
Obama breaking bread with these stars of the conservative constellation is enough of a marvel that all we have to do is stare at the stage when the curtains rises, without a word being said, without a note of music, and we will break into applause.
Then again, whose idea was this? Did the Obama team—and especially his Rasputin in the guise of Rahm Emanuel—actually read any of the remarks made by the guests during the late campaign season?
Mr. Lowry wrote that Obama encouraged "messianism." Mr. Barone said Obama represented, "liberal snobbery." Mr. Krauthammer identified Obama as a "platitude salesman." Mr. Kudlow judged that Obama "bungled" tax policy. Mr Gigot hosted a solid year of editorials and TV panel discussions of Obama that left little doubt his opinion was not cheerful. And Mr. Will's most generous comment was that Obama’s foreign-policy statements amounted to "cognitive dissonance."
Leaving aside the hoots and scowls of the Democratic Party (and liberal pundits) as it learns of the event, the fact of the dinner party now sits before the Republican Party as a quandary. Why did Obama want this to happen? No Republican president in memory has ever engineered a meeting before or after his inauguration with the most potent voices of the left—not George W. Bush, not Ronald Reagan, not Richard Nixon. Imagine George Bush taking coffee with Frank Rich, Paul Krugman, Hendrik Hertzberg, Eric Alterman, Michael Tomasky, E.J. Dionne, and Katrina van den Heuvel. To what end? Never happened. And why not? Because it is futile to hope to persuade or convince or flatter the opposition. Not one of these men tonight would vote for Obama or his party ever, and together these men have persuaded tens of millions of Republicans to vote against the whole of Obama's ticket. And they will again in 2012.
The only credible explanation for the dinner party heard 'round the world is that Mr. Obama believes his personality is more substantial than his politics. That he believes charm, soft words, candlelight, good wine, and stagey entrances will overpower ideas, ideology, and partisanship. Unless the dishes were served cold tonight, unless there were food tasters at every station, the conversation from the right could only have been the most obvious and futile in the ear of a president-elect who presents himself as a confusion of Lincoln and FDR: cut taxes, cut taxes, cuts taxes.
John Batchelor is radio host of the John Batchelor Show in New York, Washington, D.C., San Francisco, and Los Angeles.







Banjo1
No room at the table for O'Reilly and Limbaugh? Couldn't Will put in a couple extra leaves?
Jessica150
The author misses the point. As a former conservative gone moderate, I can tell you there are many areas of agreement between the right and left, and a civilized dinner might be just the place to discover the areas of overlap. If more people engaged in political discourse over dinner, I suspect we would make a great deal more progress as a society. The left/right dichotomy is an anachronism! Wake up!
Government is not going anywhere, so why don't we all just accept that and work to make it better and more efficient.
intelligentbydesign
I can think of another reason for such a conference - being an informed individual.
Personally, I find myself reading the musings of many of the named pundits on both sides of the aisle. And I frequently find that both sides have good points. Obama has spoken of his hope to hold conversations with all sides of an issue on many occasions. It is wholly possible that the reason he held this conference is just that - to open a dialogue with the other side of the aisle in order to balance all viewpoints.
Some would point out that's a bit of an optimistic viewpoint. But maybe, just maybe, Obama is actually trying to listen to the most intelligent voices of both sides in order to better govern the whole of the country. Whether that proves to be the case or not will only be told by the actions of the next few years. But Batchelor seems to completely disregard this possibility with no suggestion as to why he so doubts Obama's stated goal of inclusive government.
Logical
Mr. Batchelor is embarrassingly uninformed and lacking in ability to reason. The notion that Barack Obama requested this dinner party in order to persuade conservative commentators move toward his positions is laughable on its face.
If Barack Obama had invited these commentators to the White House, then this piece might appear credible. George Will invited Barack Obama to his home as the guest of honor. It appears it is the conservative commentators who are the ones desperate for Obama's attention. In his absence, they are irrelevant.
I look forward to hearing further commentary from Will and Brooks.
DrFrann
On the campaign trail, Obama spoke about reaching across the aisle. Why does it come as a surprise when he reaches across the dinner table? While everyone has a position in life, what if his is really about rebuilding the foundations to make the United States once again the greatest of nations, from the inside out. Retooling and rebuilding relationships, one step at a time. I stand behind my vote for him. The tasks ahead are enormous.
I hope it was a good meal for all concerned!
coloradokarl
I sure hope this is a keep your friends close and your enemies closer thing. If Obama is the please everybody, never take a stand guy that some people say he is our already precarious situation could become dire. These are the mud slingers that brought us the Iraq war and its $1 trillion legacy and now their at the table for another $ trillion !?!
letuckerchicago
Obama is exactly who he says he is and who he has always been. He has the confidence to be in the room with these adversaries. Can you imagine Bush demonstrating the cojones for a comparable "summit? I don't get the point of this writer - there is no basis for his conclusion. Since we are merely speculating, I speculate that Obama went because somebody approached him about doing it. He went because he is not afraid of the right-wingnut pundits and he wanted them to know that - in a nice way! One of these days people on the left and right will realize that Obama is the real deal.
I love the fact that the fake conservatives - Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilley etc. were nowhere near the premises. Keep hating, boys!
goodwaterbetty
I didn't vote for Obama but I am hoping for the best with the new administration and feel that we all have to do the same. This being said, perhaps he is trying to reach across party lines to try to find the areas on which we can agree in an effort to move this country forward. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt until proved otherwise. Hope that others will do the same.
Martyz42
I hope Obama remembers how the "other" party has treated the liberals over the years & I hope he does not forget "who brung him to the dance". I also hope he does not go overboard with this love fest for the people who hate him & I hope her remembers 59 seats in the do nothing part of the congress. I also hope he knows to sharp woman in Maine that will for the most part vote with him & not against him meaning he does not need 80 votes in the do nothings but only 60.
mervie
I absolutely agree with Jessica150. However, I doubt that President Obama went to dinner to change anyone's mind. This reminds me of the poker games he participated in when he was in the Illinois legislature. He wants to create bridges, because horror of horror, we are, indeed, all in this together! Mon dieu!
All I want to know is what was for dessert.
Knollsgerbils
John Batchelor should read "McCain Loses His Head" By George F. Will Tuesday, September 23, 2008; A21-
It isn't so far-fetched that Will would host this dinner and be gracious to Obama.
TallulahBankhead
Funny, there doesn't seem to be a mention of any women attending the dinner.
mommadona
He chose his dinner partners, each for their own reason.
It's up to them.
Kristol was charmed with halibut cheeks.
I do believe the adults just might pull this off.
magicman
@ Banjo 1
I take it those fews extra leaves would only fulfill Limbaugh's needs, and still deprive room for O'Reilly to be seated. How many extra leaves can any Host really be expected to have handy?
Here's the rub. Getting these boys on board makes Keen sense. When the ship blows, the Republican/Conservatives will be aboard for the fireworks. Anyone heard anything from Keynes lately? He seems silent on the History of Boondoggle Spending Projects in the face of National Financial Disasters. And then there is this matter of proportion. Do we add twice or three times as much stimulus as is needed and can anyone approximately calculate the correct numbers? My guess is that they are all guessing, just as Cramer did when he announced the U.S. Economy was suffering from a Housing Shortage, the moment before the Great Ship of Real Estate began plunging off the side of an economic ravine.
This should be fun. Liberals and Conservatives, Democrats and Independents, all agreeing on one thing. The NEED FOR MORE PORK. Well, they are all Politicians, not economists, now aren't they.
Say Goodbye America. It's over. Your interest expense has now outstripped your income.
Beethy
I am not surprised. For a guy who nominated his chief rival to a position that one of his major promoters wanted, spending a 'polite' dinner with expected "cognitive dissonance" should have been no problem. This guy is not afraid to walk in a lion's den. Apart from his self confidence, he is trying to build bridges where there none (forget those burned during Republican terms, say, from Reagan -- the host's favorite -- to GWB).
To bring this about, even before inauguration, promises a period where you disagree, WITHOUT yelling at each other.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.