Blogs and Stories
George Mitchell's Pointless Trip
Yes, Arab leaders want American leadership essentially to correct what they regard as Israeli sins, but they haven’t begun to understand that no American president ever would or should do as Arab leaders wish. Past American presidents have leaned on Israelis as well as Arabs to make concessions, and I’m sure the Obama administration will do the same. But what the Arabs and Palestinians will have to understand is that they will have to give some important things as well as receive some important things.
What everybody is going to have to understand in the immediate future is that American leadership can’t simply or mainly be about twisting Israeli and Palestinian arms. Those arms are not twistable in the current circumstances. Too many bad things have happened on all sides to allow for the necessary political compromises.
It is an iron law of international negotiations that one should not expect at the negotiating table what cannot be supported in the larger political arena. Negotiators can make compromises only when they are politically possible and politically supportable. And needed compromises are more difficult to come by today than they have been for many years. The political strength of those who favor compromise has been severely weakened on both sides, and the political fortunes of those who want to just dig in their heels have greatly increased.
Thus, the next big step in American leadership is not once again to parade Israelis and Palestinians to the negotiating table where they can only fail in the foreseeable future, but to work with both sides to build from scratch the political power of those who would fight for peace and make compromises possible at the negotiating table.
In other words, America’s main diplomatic track must be to do in the Holy Land what the British and the Americans did in Northern Ireland—to strengthen the hand of peace groups such as women’s groups and businesses. These are the actors who eventually put pressure upon Irish and Protestant leaders to make settlements in Northern Ireland and to reassure those leaders that they could make such concessions and survive politically. This is the ground-breaking task that lies ahead for George Mitchell (who negotiated and understands the lessons of Northern Ireland), the Obama administration, and the U.S. if they are to lead both Palestinian and Israeli parties to their promised lands.
Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of the forthcoming HarperCollins book Power Rules: How Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.







queensplate
No comments ? Begs the question as to the validity of this site
martis
this site is a complete joke. almost as bad as HuffPo. just because someone writes some opinion piece or posts some light reporting does not mean its worth reading. Garbage 2.0
ardeth
I enjoy The Daily Beast, lightness, heaviness and all.
However, I disagree fundamentally with Gelb. I've never believed the Jews had the right to move in and create their own state in the Middle East, displacing those already living there, and I still don't.
loki13
Maybe you (ardeth)should read a little history and see its not as black and white as that. Regardless though, saying something like what you said is a non-starter, since Israelis are not going to pack their bags up and move to Miami en masse.
drkaza12
Any accomplishment in the region has to occur multilaterally--by a unified field of representatives in the entire middle east region--and diplomatically by an appeal to the incorruptibility of rational choices.
Something we might have to facilitate by reaching outside the traditional disciplines of political think tanks and political science; a science appealing not only to the hunger of the body, but appealing to the starvation of the soul.
Choices appealing to the centrist rational for food or medicine not the extremism of guns and ammunition, to feed a sick and starving nation.You don't feed a hungry person stones, or systems of governance; you sit them down and feed them a sandwich or something.
I think George Mitchell's trip on the cusp of Obama's interview was more about supporting the centrist in the region, even if by its silence it appears as two tears in a bucket of water to you Mr. Gelb. Change occurs by degree, and it never enters through the front door.
tomfarr
The Muslim claim to Jerusalem is bogus - a fantasy about an angel taking Mohammed there for a night visit.
It is historically the Jewish capital, and was for a thousand years.
The Muslims conquered it, as they conquered the rest of the Middle East. They have no more right to a part of Jerusalem
than the Jews have to a part of Mecca.
troutcor
Gelb wants the Europeans to help patrol the Gaza/Egypt tunnels? This is ludicrous. Wouldn't it be easier to open the border crossings and inspect commerce? Or is Gelb so blindly pro-Israel that he doesn't even see the idiocy of officially recognizing the blockade AND the tunnels? This is crazy, Gelb.
DICKERSON3870
Mr. Gelb's post is one of the most supremely idiotic things I have read in a very long time. Meir Kahane made more sense!
DICKERSON3870
FROM JEFF HUBER: ...Leslie Gelb, who hasn't been right about a single aspect of U.S. foreign policy from Vietnam on, avows, "They're making decisions there, at the White House. On everything...
SOURCE - http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/05/04/dumb-like-a-maliki/
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.