Blogs and Stories
The Orgasm Gap
Why are men still twice as likely to climax as women? New research is shedding light on one of the most enduring forms of gender inequity.
Women are shattering political glass ceilings, surpassing men in the workforce, and even winning Indy-car races. But there’s one area where the gender gap has proved particularly stubborn.
“The orgasm gap is an inequity that’s as serious as the pay gap, and it’s producing a rampant culture of sexual asymmetry,” says Paula England, a professor of sociology at Stanford University.
New academic research conducted by England and others is shedding light on one of the world's most familiar bedroom problems. In a study to be published later this year by W.W. Norton in the book Families as They Really Are, researchers found that college women have orgasms half as often as men on repeat hookups (meaning hooking up more than twice) and only a third of the time in first-time hookups. And they concluded that a lack of sexual reciprocity could be a key reason for this orgasm gap. The study was conducted by a team of researchers from Stanford and Indiana University.
The male psychology on women's orgasms is comparable to their psychology on housework: Men don’t pull their weight on either front because no one makes them.
Their research confirms that the orgasm gap is widespread among young people in both casual hookups and relationships. Surveying 12,925 undergraduates from 17 universities, researchers examined four sexual contexts—a first hookup, one to two previous hookups, three or more previous hookups, and a relationship—and found that in all cases, men were twice as likely to orgasm. That gap is far wider in hookup situations than in relationships. In the context of relationships, women orgasm about 80% as often as men.
It’s not just sexual neophytes on college campuses that are having trouble. After looking at 32 studies that included mostly married women and spanned the past 90 years, Dr. Elisabeth Lloyd, author of The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution and a professor of history and philosophy of science at Indiana University, found that a third of women never had an orgasm during intercourse.
Where does this orgasm gap come from, and why is it so much more pronounced in instances of casual sex than in relationships? Analyzing data from the survey, the researchers found a few possible explanations, one of which has to do with the amount of effort expended in bed—and who’s expending it.
England’s study found that women give oral sex to their male partners in all contexts—from casual hookups to relationships—at higher rates than men do, sometimes dramatically higher. The study’s anecdotal evidence backs this up. “The ratio of oral sex was 4-to-1 in his favor,” says writer Kimberlee Auerbach, 36, of her last long-term relationship. (She adds that despite the lopsided ration, he was still invested in her orgasm.)
In casual hookups it’s much worse—during the first few times they hook up with a man, women are far more likely to give him oral sex than to receive it. Men receive oral sex about 80% of the time in first-time hookups, whereas women receive it less than half the time. This discrepancy goes a long way toward explaining the orgasm gap, according to the study’s authors. In 1976, the Hite Report on Female Sexuality empirically established a fact that’s been confirmed by subsequent studies in the years since: Many women need oral sex, along with intercourse, to reach orgasm.
Why aren’t they getting it? Michael Kimmel, author of Guyland and a leading writer on men and masculinity, sees the male psychology on orgasms as comparable to housework: “Men don’t pull their weight on either front because no one makes them.” But he also sees sexual asymmetry as an impoverished view of sex. “The grown-up version [of sex] is certainly not thinking about giving oral sex as akin to some kind of community service, but that it gives me pleasure to give you pleasure. I know that’s certainly true for me personally.”
Another possible—and possibly related—reason for the orgasm gap is that while many men are happy to be passive recipients when it comes to oral sex, they want to be the proactive one when it’s time for intercourse. Courtney Martin, 29, author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters, says she believes passivity in intercourse among some women prevents them from sculpting the sexual experience to their preference.
“A lot of these girls end up forgoing asserting themselves in order to avoid the awkwardness of doing clitoris 101,” says Ms. Martin. “One girl at a small-liberal arts school in the East told me that being with most guys felt like ‘they are masturbating into you.’”
Natalie Angier, a science columnist at the New York Times, say that clumsy sexual behavior should not be misinterpreted as male disinterest in the female climax. “He may never call her again, but he wants her to come,” says Angier.
But that may be optimistic, at least in certain scenarios. The research doesn’t bode well for the late-night booty text, one-night stand, or random fornication in the fraternity house as pathways to an orgasm. In the one-on-one interviews included in the study, one man explained that with his girlfriend, “definitely oral is really important [for her to orgasm],” but that with a casual hookup, “I don’t give a shit.”
“Women and men are more ambivalent about the importance of women’s sexual pleasure [outside] of relationships,” says England. “Our findings suggest that both women and men have absorbed a notion that women are entitled to sexual pleasure in a relationship, but not necessarily in casual scenarios.”
Another male college student interviewed for England’s study put it this way: “Now that I’m in a relationship, I think [her orgasm is] actually pretty important. More important than [in a] hookup. Because you have more invested in that person…When it’s a hookup you feel less investment.”
The bright spot of the study is this: Even though folklore has it that women don’t achieve orgasms with strangers because they need emotional attachment to feel that sort of pleasure, the truth is that women’s orgasms are not usually the result of emotional attachments, but simple physicality. Which is why Angier says she believes the sexual paradigm of women as passive receiver and man as sexual agent needs to be stamped out if women are going to get serious about their orgasms.
“The woman really has to be the boss of the sexual experience, because it’s harder for women to have an orgasm through a straightforward sexual position. Women need to start understanding how their clitoral nerves are positioned,” says Angier. Speaking from her own experience, she says multi-orgasmic women take responsibility for their own pleasure. “Personally, I made that my pet project.”
Although Sigmund Freud argued that a clitoral orgasm was adolescent and that the vagina was the fountain of the more “mature” orgasm, there’s evidence that theory is not only misguided, but is also fueling the orgasm gap.
“Stimulation of the clitoris is what gives a woman an orgasm. It’s the center of orgasmic function,” says Dr. Lloyd. “The clitoris is the homologue of the penis—they have the same tissue. In embryos, the same organ that turns into the penis, turns into a clitoris."
Clitoral stimulation, however, is not an image that gets a lot of airtime.
Laura Sessions Stepp, the author of Unhooked, a book about hooking up on college campuses, points to the popular television series Gossip Girl.
“Watching that show, you’d think all you have to do is poke it in her and she’ll have an orgasm.”
Hannah Seligson is a journalist and the author of New Girl on the Job: Advice from the Trenches, a career guide for young women. Her second book, A Little Bit Married: How to Know When to Walk Down the Aisle or Out the Door, will be published by De Capo this year. Her website is www.hannahseligson.com









This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
i can remember being in college and thinking, "i can barely figure out my own physiology, why should i make him figure it out for me?" it was only after i went out with someone for a long time who had the time, patience, and creativity to figure these things out did i finally get it. i'd like to think that if i did hook up with anyone again, i would be assertive in directing him where to go and what to do, but honestly, i haven't been with anyone since and i don't know if i'll just creep back into passivity again. then again, if whoever it is turns out to be really bad, frankly, i'd rather he'd just get it over with and get out. but thanks for highlighting this issue -- it's one of those things that you think you're alone in, but is far more common than you realize!
This is a dumb errand you're on, Ms. Seligson. The sexual arena is not a politically correct one, nor should it be. The enjoyment of power struggles inherent to sex is more to the point, that's actually what's fun about it, not the person trying to make things fair. Who wants fair sex? Boring, repressed people. People who have no concept of fantasy. Stop putting the blame on men and move on to something more interesting.
You've got to be kidding? Right? A sexual asymmetry? Who designed the study? and how did the measurements for this "scientific study" take place?
I firmly believe that this is a biased and skewed political study that has nothing to do with the facts of sexual pleasure. We are living in an age, when people of dubious academic quality, can and do put out "studies" that have actually nothing to do with the subject of the study.
Therefore, I will be neglecting to read the rest of the article as I have better things to do with my time than listen to some sholck study that cannot truly represent the physiological and psychological reasons for this so-called, "sexual asymmetry."
It's harder for women to have orgasms because their male partners have no idea what they're doing! A man can rub against a tree and he will orgasm, women need much more specialized stimulus and the guys are clueless, but once a women gets the right stimulus watch out because she can have a way more intense orgasm than a man can and her orgasms get more intense the more she has, something else a man can't do. My wife out orgasms me 10 to one. I only orgasm once per sex session (usually at the end) and she orgasms 3-6 times per sex session on average. That's awesome, if I could do that I would never leave the bedroom! But if I didn't know how to pleasure her just the right way and if I didn't actively seek that please and make it the priority I doubt our sex would be so good and that she would have so many orgasms. The only inequality here is that women are far superior to me at sex and orgasms, it's just that Men have no clue what to do and no understanding that the purpose of sex is to feel a woman orgasm, it's greatest feeling ever.
Except for the fact that we're not married, my boyfriend could have written this. I think it really comes down to the fact that men orgasm easily - there is no special skill involved. Orgasm for women, OTOH, has to be learned. First we have to figure out what does it for us, which can take some time, and then we have to be able to communicate that to a lover. And, of course, that lover has to be open and interested in understanding us. But I don't actually believe, as is the basic assertion in this article, that men have it better than women when it comes to orgasm. I am multi-orgasmic. I have ten (or more!) orgasms to every one that my boyfriend has. So when it comes to casual hook-ups, yeah, men do better than women on the orgasm scale - but with a man that knows you (and cares about your pleasure) we beat them every time. And that gap widens with age - since women can continue to have multiple orgasms pretty much forever, and men need more and more recovery time as they get older. I think the real key in this is that women need to learn to be comfortable with their sexuality and actually want to figure out what will make them multi-orgasmic. Until my late 30's I was uncomfortable with my sexuality, and actually believed that multiple orgasms were a fiction. It wasn't until I made a conscious effort to explore my sexuality that these things became possible.
Very shortly I'll explain why the entire MO and understanding within this article is hogwash. First of all, look at what is highlighted --- a (hot) woman bemoaning her condition, then an excerpt from the article which states, "... Men don't do such and such because no one makes them". In bold, there is a leadoff tease that talks about gender "inequity."
Well, first off, is there something wrong or abnormal about inequity? The answer to this question is an obvious "No", as we could cite many things like strength and speed physically, or visuospatial things mentally. But this question is posed to create a sensation that women are on the hard knock of things --- again. It of course depends on the point of view and is very cliche in that it begs the question that men and women aren't equal unless women are LIKE MEN in every way.
There are several biological reasons that this is so. Since a look at evolutionary biology is bypassed, for better or worse (or ignorance, willingfully or not), let's look at why this might be the case:
While I won't dispute the cultural & social reasons and statistics about oral sex, one reason why women would have a tougher time achieving orgasm would be a very good one: they have to be selective about a partner as there resources (time, eggs, food, etc.) are limited. If every woman had an easy orgasm with random partner X, then she would not have a selecting capability to determine more accurately male X's fitness. Fitness includes attractiveness, strength, wealth, power, etc. all these types of indicators.
This is actually a VERY GOOD THING. I would further hypothesize then that finding a fit mate who they have subsequently analyzed (given time to ponder consciously and unconsciously) would most likely lead them to more orgasms in the future, probably with more time spent and raised attraction levels.
This debate is NOT about "inequity." It is another example of women (or a woman singularly, the writer) disappointed that they aren't men. Perhaps if they changed their focus the complaints would not reign. But that would take recognition of the real differences in life; it's easier to think that everyone is out to get you so that you can get something out of it, yourself.
"The grown-up version [of sex] is certainly not thinking about giving oral sex as akin to some kind of community service, but that it gives me pleasure to give you pleasure. I know that's certainly true for me personally."
Bingo. If you don't make your girl come, you're not a man. Full stop.
MarineLtCol hehehehe...'Nuff said
I am constantly amazed at how little Everyone knows about their bodies and their health. When I went to nursing/midwifery school I was sure there was a huge percentage of women craving guidance for gaining knowledge of their bodies. I was wrong...at least so far as I've seen. It is not an uncommon thing to ask a woman what her surgery was for and what was taken out and for her to answer "I don't know." WHAT??? A uterus here and an ovary there...c'mon people...you have a body so read the manual. It is out there in print and online and those medical records are about you and should be available to you (hopefully someday online). Anatomy is not rocket science and there are legions of people who want to help make it easy to understand so don't leave that to ANYONE else. With all that in mind, I can't imagine leaving such an important aspect of living to someone else no matter how much I like or how well I know them. Once a woman understands her anatomy, it is her responsibility to decide how her needs get met and how much investment/education is warranted for any given partner. Personal responsibility is an issue that is not only effecting our sex lives but also our happiness, health care, and in part our economy. Personal responsibility is a must and has to become the "catch phrase" of the day.
My wife has 10 orgasms to one of mine, so the universal balance is maintained through guys like me.
BTW: Tina, this ain't 'news' - it's pop fluff. Chuffin' Norah, there's got to be better stuff than this. Why not an article on 'advanced techniques of high-quality foreplay?' Then, maybe these silly people in polls will learn something useful for a change.
This author quotes the Hite Report as an authoritative source , making it obvious that she knows little about scientific social research. Any survey research, such as the HIte Report, has to be based upon a random sample of the population it proposes to measure. The Hite Report was not. The author needs to take Social Statistics and Methods 101 at any junior college.
Also, who the hell cares anymore what Freud wrote? He was astrology for intellectuals. Happily, now no one cares.
I thought we were passed this? Men get to orgasm every time and in exchange women, albeit less frequently, have multiple orgasms. With a little practice and patience, I think women have the better side of the deal.
Women are less likely to orgasm for 3 reasons.
1, many of them haven't fully explored their own sexuality enough to figure out how exactly to have an orgasm.
2, their clitoris is too small to be stimulated during normal intercourse.
3, different women orgasm via different methods.
Now, men can work with women to figure out how each specific person reaches climax, but that usually only happens in the course of a relationship. Men's bodies are much simpler. If you prime a man's pump enough, eventually it will go with or without his permission. Women, on the other hand, need the right mood, the right scents, the right pressure, the right speed, and who knows what else. It's a beautiful thing when it does happen, but it's not easy.
I agree with most of what you've said. But, at least for me, orgasm during intercourse has nothing to do with the clitoris - it is the friction on the g-spot. However, in order for the g-spot to get sensitive enough to produce an orgasm, I must be very, very excited, which means LOTS of foreplay. Wham, bam, thank you ma'am sex will never produce that result.
@webhead pretty much got it right. The basic problem is ignorance. Most college boys, and many an older man really don't have a clue to the overall anatomy of the female. A little helpful guidance by the college girls will go a long way towards resolving this "issue" of lopsidedness of orgasms by the college boys.
I don't know about all of this business of "hook ups" versus relationships, but it would seem likely that the idea of a hook-up lacks certain qualities that would be part and parcel of a relationship. In a relationship, one cares about the needs of the loved one, and the joy shared. If the term "hook up" is synonomous with a one night stand, then what the heck!
So much has been written about women's sexuality it is time to publish some bare facts to explain, unpolished, the other side of the equation; men.
When it comes to sex, men are by nature predators; women are selectors. That happy mix ensures the continuation of our species.
Men are not by nature monogamous; that explains their wandering eye. Indeed consciously or unconsciously men are constantly and compulsively on the hunt.
For example, that guy you passed in the hall has already mentally undressed you, decided if he would have sex with you; and how. So does every other man you meet unless he's gay, then he's looking past you and focusing on the guy standing beside you. Surprised? Hurt? Flattered? Don't be, its men's nature. And in the great scheme of things, meaningless.
Sex drives men from puberty through old age. It is their "raison d'etre", their purpose in life; to reproduce. Everything else is, well, fluff. It diminishes with age but never disappears. Sex is a primitive - primordial - urge.
The sex urge drives them hard; it is wired deep into the primitive levels of their brains; alongside the other basic drives. The bottom line? Without this urge we would never survive as a species.
Men are emotional animals too. They can and do meet and stay faithful to one woman for life. They fall in love and trust completely. Men have been compared to dogs; bright, fun to be with, a hair dumb at times and if unfixed, constantly horny. If we're dogs, then women are cats and have all the traits that go with the feline makeup. That, however, is another story.
Women have sex drives too, however theirs is not driven by a unique glandular and hormonal combination. A German study found that while women's sex drives drop significantly after they enter a secure relationship, men's don't.
Unlike girls, at puberty, boys are given two special and important gifts from nature; testosterone and a prostate gland. The prostate is the main producer of seminal fluid and once it's turned on it never turns off. Manufacturing semen 24/7, its fluid lubricates the urethra and ensures reproductive system health; in addition to its primary purpose of ensuring the safe delivery of sperm. Testosterone is what drives this system and injects aggression into the mix.
As an active gland the prostate insists on being emptied frequently. Depending on age, and the man, this may be as often as once a day; maybe more. Less as they age and hormones diminish.
This is accomplished through sex, masturbation or nocturnal emissions. And it's not an option; it has to be done to maintain health - mental and reproductive. In a practical sense frequent emission of semen ensures healthy sperm.
There are many other glands that makeup the male reproductive system that also produce fluids. There is the Cowpers Gland (Bulburethral gland), glands of Littre, seminal vesicle, vas deferens, epididymis (where sperm are stored), and of course, two testicles. The testes produce billions of sperm on a weekly basis; billions that don't take kindly to sitting in the epididymis for long. They want out. Men produce an estimated quadrillion (1,000,000,000,000) sperm in a lifetime.
As any sexually active woman knows, her significant other is driven to have sex. This is nature at work, pushing the male to reproduce above all else; sometimes to the expense of all else. The reward is an orgasm, relief, a reduction in stress, emotional bonding; and the start of a countdown until the next time.
If sex is not available, men masturbate. If they don't, nature empties the glands while he sleeps. The prostate doesn't care; when it's filled to capacity it has to eject; fortunately not spontaneously. In many men a full prostate is painful.
Men are visual when it comes to sex; it is part of the feedback loop. That's why women appear pretty or sexy. It's what attracts men to women.
How does pornography fit into this picture? Simple. It is a visual feedback stimulant.
Many men have a need for additional stimulation. This is accomplished in various levels depending on a combination of factors including character, sex drive, sex life, stress, hormones - any number of things. Porn adds a visual stimulant that helps taper or increase the sex drive. Porn adds pleasure during masturbation also filling in for an absent female. Porn is material fantasy; a replacement for, or supplement to mental fantasy. Women get confused about this. Men aren't having sex with the models in the pornography, the stimulant is watching others having sex.
Some men find a trip to Hooters stimulating. Others frequent strip joints. Some up the ante with drugs or alcohol. Others employ the world's oldest professional, prostitutes. Still others are compulsive cheaters. The testosterone is all controlling, demonstrable through male risk taking and aggression (an observation, not an excuse).
If you want a demonstration of how primitive men's sex drives are add some beer to the mix. Watch as his social barriers diminish and his sex drive take over. Men will have sex with just about any female after a few drinks; hence the term 'beer goggles'. Some men need alcohol to have sex as they need help in reducing inhibitions or they find their mate unattractive. Too much liquor however and all bets are off.
Many readers may disavow this article and they're welcome to. Men are however all wired the same and subject to the same urges. Indignant women may think "my husband's not like that." Knock yourself out. Sex drives all men from Presidents to the preachers and all in between. What differs is the intensity of the drive and the means used to satisfy it. Like all other aspects of our personalities, life experiences and morals may add further tweaks to that mix.
The male sex drive has been around since the beginning of time. When it disappears, so too shall we.
info@goldcoastmedia.net
Women seem to discover their Bartholin glands only after they have been diagnosed with a cyst, known as a Bartholin cyst. I guess out of sight is out of mind.
{They secrete mucus to provide vaginal lubrication.[2][3] Bartholin's glands secrete relatively minute amounts (one or two drops) of fluid just before a woman orgasms.[4] The minute droplets of fluid were once believed as important for lubricating the vagina, but research from Masters and Johnson demonstrated that vaginal lubrication comes from deeper within the vagina.[4] The fluid may slightly moisten the labial opening of the vagina, serving to make contact with this sensitive area more comfortable for the woman.[4]}[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartholin%27s_gland]
Unbelievable waste of blog space. Zero news here.
Even the posts are a bore.
Why don't they do a study on women's orgasm rates with circumcised vs. uncircumcised males. That would be interesting.
Also, real news was revealed in a New York Times Sunday Magazine article Feb. 5. "What Do Women Want?" Studies of female sexuality in general. Very interesting.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/magazine/08Letters-t-WHATDOWOMENW_LETT ERS.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=female%20sexuality&st=cse
This is the full link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq =female%20sexuality&st=cse
I agree that this whole blog was useless.
Oral sex for a man and a woman are two completely different animals. So are the sexual dynamics in general. Please, leave love alone. It is the last place where we can be politcally incorrect and that is a good thing. Everyone likes different things and has different needs. That is what makes it so much fun.
And if hookups produced the same kind of sex that you have once you get a chance to feel each other out a bit then why would we stay in a relationship?
The women I have encountered for the most part have had very disappointing sex lives. I have always worked Hard to to improve the reputation of my fellow males. Alas most men are DOGS and have little concern for their female's well being. I lose interest upon orgasm, as such save this pleasure until long after my mate has achieved mindless Nirvana.
First, buttlerreport, are you kidding me? You expect me to read all of that? Please work on pithy, or submit your rather verbose comments as an article...
Second, I recommend the book "Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science & Sex" by Mary Roach -- it is an excellent scientific and funny study of the physiology of sex.
"The grown-up version [of sex] is certainly not thinking about giving oral sex as akin to some kind of community service, but that it gives me pleasure to give you pleasure. I know that's certainly true for me personally."
There you go
Ammendment to my earlier post, there was a typo. it should read:
"The only inequality here is that women are far superior to 'men' at sex and orgasms, it's just that Men have no clue what to do and no understanding that the purpose of sex is to feel a woman orgasm, it's greatest feeling ever."
This might be a good argument for "hook-up" situations. But imposing political equity (which is noble outside of the bedroom) into relational situations (where polarity is the source of electricity, magnetism and dang good sex!) will eventually lead to resentment, bitterness, emotional gridlock. Sex will either stop all together or dissolve into distant emotionally uninvolved rudimentary 'check the box' routines. Doesn't that just open the door for our partner replacement fantasies to turn into actual affairs?
There's some interesting stuff in this article, but it's delivered under the auspices of an obvious agenda. The whole thing is written from the perspective of "women are being discriminated against in the bedroom, and men need to stop being so self-centered and do the work of getting their woman to climax."
How is it, for example, that the most obvious reason for the statistical discrepancy is not even mentioned? The fact is that, for the most part, the man will have an orgasm in virtually 100% of sexual encounters. That's usually how the end of a sexual encounter is determined, is it not? Once the guy orgasms, it's over.
It is also much easier to bring a male to orgasm. Women don't have to give oral sex, or work especially hard, or act a certain way--they don't actually even have to do anything, strictly speaking, for a male to achieve orgasm. The simple act of intercourse is almost universally sufficient for the male, if not the female. The whole biological purpose of the act, after all, is mainly centered on the male orgasm, since that's all that's required for procreation. Accordingly, there is a physiological bias toward the male orgasm in human sexual encounters.
The female orgasm, on the other hand, is not as ubiquitously accessible a concept--many men don't understand the "mechanics," the requirements for achieving female orgasm seem to vary far more significantly from female to female, and there is a far greater proportion of females who report being unable to achieve orgasm at all--even in the context of long-term relationships. While some of that may certainly be due to indifference or ineptitude on the part of the male partners, the fact that the female orgasm is so comparatively esoteric, and so comparatively difficult to achieve, makes it intrinsically less likely to occur in the long run. A fifth grade health class provides sufficient information for a male to achieve orgasm in a sexual encounter, but a much more thorough and practiced education is needed for a male to consistently induce a female orgasm.
If it's the case that the majority of men out there cavalierly parade into the bedroom with entirely selfish expectations and goals, without giving a thought to reciprocity, then I certainly agree this would argue for women asserting themselves more strongly and taking more control and ownership of their own sexual gratification. I also won't deny that chauvinistic attitudes toward women generally and in the bedroom specifically constitute an unfortunate reality that society would do well to reconcile.
But that said, this idea of an "Orgasm Gap," and the statistics presented in this article, are ultimately misleading. Given the differences in what is required for the different sexes to achieve orgasm, and given the fact that the male orgasm is more or less understood as defining the duration of a sexual encounter (an understanding derived from our physiology), then there can probably not ever be, in any realistic way of thinking, a strict 50-50 split, where both partners all across the country/world are achieving orgasm with roughly the same frequency. As such, to point to statistical gaps, and take them at face value without qualification, is a misleading thing to do.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.