Blogs and Stories

Elizabeth Hayt

Wives Gone Wild!

the cast of The Real Housewives of New York City Andrew Eccles / Bravo Bravo’s Real Housewives franchise doesn’t just showcase America’s funniest home catfights. It’s a post-feminist nightmare that preys on women’s shallowest, least-attractive qualities. And I can’t stop watching.

Even before the start of Bravo’s back-to-back episodes of the season finale of The Real Housewives of Orange County and second-season premiere of The Real Housewives of New York City, I was already transfixed, pinned at the edge of my living-room sofa as the coming attraction caused my heart to race:

“HOLY CATFIGHT!” screeched Bethenny Frankel, one of the New York posse, as she was broadcasted reading a New York Post Page Six banner item about the show’s feuding, arriviste cast members.

“To exploit your life is revolting but to explore your life is exciting,” Kelly Killoren Bensimon said. “I wanted the world to see I have a strong moral code. I just wanted to be authentic and genuine.”

Embarrassing as it is to admit, especially since I like to think of myself as a feminist—if not exactly in practice, then surely in principle—my particular reality-TV craving is for sit-dramas powered by a distinctly voracious strain of enmity-cum-amity between two-faced, fire-breathing, airtime-hogging females.

The current formula goes something like this: Trail a geographically specific coterie of attractive-enough extroverts with double X chromosomes and manageable personality disorders. (Read: OCD, histrionic, narcissistic, paranoid, borderline.) Toss a Cinderella- or Stockholm Syndrome-type victim into the mix and presto! The claws come out, the viewers tune in.

“Reality TV looks for someone who is a drama queen—feisty, forthright, a colorful character—at the same time, without so much pathology that they won’t crack up on the set,” confirmed Dr. Jean Cirillo, a Long Island, New York, psychologist who evaluates reality-TV participants. “They want women because they don’t resort to bodily injuries as men do. They choose a person who has exaggerated traits that everyone has to some degree, whether it’s sexual aggression or cattiness. Their conflicts make for a good story. If everyone was nice to everybody all the time, there’d be no plot.”

Ergo, Bravo’s winning soap triad: The Real Housewives of Orange County, which premiered in 2006, followed by last spring’s The Real Housewives of New York City, and this past fall’s The Real Housewives of Atlanta. (A fourth series featuring New Jersey housewives is in the works.)

Rejecting old-school notions of feminist solidarity, Bravo's she-beast housewives are constantly vying to stay ahead of their own pack, even if—no, especially if—it demands catfights, gossip mongering, and disloyalty. Without ever pulling a punch, they engage in actions that are as ruthless and harmful as physical violence, TV's unlady-like ladies’ alternative to professional wrestling’s simulated battering and theatrical chest-beating. More specifically, the housewives’ antics, both verbal and nonverbal, are diagnosed as “female relational aggression," a socio-psychological term referring to the specific way girls and women use relationships to hurt another, pitting individuals against each other, and forging alliances to deliberately exclude someone. A barbed tongue remains a female's most lethal weapon, instigating a war of words curdling with ridicule and betrayal.

No one knows this better than the media-savvy sextet of New York City housewives, or “skinny bitches,” as they called themselves, clinking Champagne flutes. In last week’s premiere episode, which filmed the cast mostly summering in the Hamptons, fangs were bared because Alex and Simon McCord, the show’s wannabe socialite couple from Brooklyn, had been written up in New York magazine, wherein Simon made a dig at one of the other housewives, Jill Zarin, implying she was déclassé because she was from Long Island. She, in turn, retaliated by getting Cindy Adams, the New York Post gossip columnist, to print the banner headline item that earlier prompted Bethenny's "Holy catfight!" alert. It said that Simon was a lush, prone to insults. Would the adversaries come to blows when they spied each other at the same East End party? If only!

Back to Top
February 26, 2009 | 5:56am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

mayelinden

Your likening it to professional wrestling seems correct. It is 90 percent fake.

|
|
Reply
11:00 am, Feb 26, 2009

bigwurzz

Yeah, I never understood how a man could beat his wife until I watched that show. Now, I still don't condone it but I understand.

|
|
Reply
12:15 pm, Feb 26, 2009

southernyankee

I have watched the one with the women of New York. I just can't get into the others. I don't understand why I watch because these people seem kinda shallow to me. Why don't they do a show with middle class women who are bookkeepers, teachers, clerks now that would be interesting to the average woman to see how they are coping with this economy. These women seem to busy patting themselves on their backs.

|
|
Reply
1:03 pm, Feb 26, 2009

steff47

it's voyeurism baby in it's higher form. now we know how they went to hell in a golden hand basket. it all for the money,it always for the money

|
|
Reply
2:03 pm, Feb 26, 2009

galintexas

I am horrified by my addiction to this series. I just can't look away. And I even read the message boards! Yikes! It's like people who go on the Dr. Phil show, exposing themselves to a bazillion viewers - who on Earth wants this type of exposure? Well, I can answer that myself: the women who agree to be in these series. The faux reality of it doesn't even compare to the willingness of these women to be humiliated, criticized, analyzed, become objects of scorn for being on these shows. And, the horror, the horror of it - I am an enabler!

|
|
Reply
2:53 pm, Feb 26, 2009

joymars

So is this how The Beast makes its money? Not-so-subtle "product placements" in the form of touting something in a blog?

I'm not buying. If you say it's shallow, I believe you. Thanks.

|
|
Reply
4:47 pm, Feb 26, 2009

kinky-neo-con

This "article" has 4 pages? I couldnt even get past the first page. Uggh, 'real housewives'... No wonder I will NEVER get married; Im keeping my $$$ and sanity (if I get lonely there's always a huge market of Asian hookers!)

|
|
Reply
5:27 pm, Feb 26, 2009

aaroneous

ack, elizabeth! i went to your site and was bombarded w/ autoplay. why? i'm already listening to music and i can assure you it's way better than whatever you can throw at me. however, you're super hot. like younger guys?

|
|
Reply
8:43 pm, Feb 26, 2009

opedanderson

Wives!?

Calling these women "wives" is an insult to all married women....

They are hookers who happen to be married to their clients.

|
|
Reply
8:48 pm, Feb 26, 2009

Chipster

I am a well educated , mature European male living in the US for the last 20 years and I suppose I should turn up my nose to this type of television as being shallow .....but I find it riveting to watch how these beautiful women go through their daily grind ....However, I would not want to be married to any of them ....I expect they would chew up and spit out my 401K in a nano second .......what can I say ....its America warts and all !!!

|
|
Reply
11:40 am, Feb 27, 2009

janet1003mn

I hate to say it, southernyankee, but no one wants to see a show about middle class housewives. To get a dose of that, most of us just need to ring up a few friends and go out for dinner...or invade a friend's place with a few bottles of wine and the makings of dinner -- given the new economic "realities" and all. Unfortunately, these would be gatherings of women who actually LIKE each other and provide little, if any dramatic catfights between frenemies. So, no drama and not a producer in the world is going to take that on. Think of it this way, though: the purpose of these women is to provide entertainment for the rest of us.

P.S. I completely agree that the only part of this franchise that interests me is NY.

|
|
Reply
11:57 am, Feb 27, 2009

nickmagoo

"We wanted to see if there was a modern Peyton Place where women were redefining the dream of what it means to be a modern housewife." Andy Cohen should be smacked around by his wife a little - assuming he has one. I suppose I understand the fascination with these pathetic human train wrecks, but after watching an episode for 3 minutes I just wanted to gouge out my eyes and run head first into the tv. But I guess it's better than having to know them in real life...

And I can see why you have a nagging interest in being a part of such perversely inane tripe - fake breasts, self aggrandizing 'erotic' memoir, restylane lips, won't leave home w/out makeup, and an award for Journalistic Achievement from the American Society for Plastic Surgeons (now THAT'S comedy!!)...You and Andy Cohen are made for each other...

|
|
Reply
4:20 pm, Feb 27, 2009

exploora

I don't know why this article reminds me of the anti sex league.

|
|
Reply
7:49 pm, Feb 27, 2009

Southpaw

What not mentioned in this article are the offspring of these prima donnas. Some seemingly well adjusted, others disturbingly without ambition living off the family largesse.

|
|
Reply
6:09 am, Feb 28, 2009

Clevedark

These shows are very funny, but for those of you looking for something with a little more pizzaz try one of those wife-swapping shows. I especially enjoyed one episode where a type A family from the NY suburbs traded moms with a family of traveling carnies.

I also recommend the Nanny 911 type shows where a professional nanny fixes a family of crazy parents and spoiled children. I liked the one where the young mother let her pet goat eat food from the table and her kids eat food from the floor. Awesome!

|
|
Reply
3:38 pm, Feb 28, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Wives Gone Wild!

by Elizabeth Hayt

Info
RSS
Elizabeth Hayt
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |