Did the person who wrote the tagline for this posting even read it?? Stoddard makes a perfectly good argument, but it has absolutely nothing to do with "men who can't get laid." If anything, he is saying men are victim to the assumption every man is constantly wanting to get laid, which is presumed in the tagline. DailyBeast, I know "Sluts vs. Losers" makes for a catchy headline, but read your own material first.

Men need to be wooed too. The idea that every man will hop into bed with any woman who invites him is absurd. Men would never make that assumption about women. As Frank Sinatra sang, "Nice 'n' easy does it, every time."

I don't know if any of the commentators on this article are women, but I know one thing for sure. Most women today are not at all careful about who they sleep with!

I know this because my girlfriends, my co-workers, relatives and nearly every woman I have had any close acquaintance with has and does have sex with just about anybody they find attractive, humorous, etc.

Also, Mr.Stoddard makes a very good argument concerning how a man is treated if he does not perform up to a woman's standard or if he is just not interested in having sex at any particular time. I have heard many a woman emasculate a man to her friends because he was not freaky enough, could not last, not physcially endowed enough, etc. The list goes on and on.

However, I do believe Ms.Breslin makes very good arguments. Women as a rule ARE held to a different standard than men. Even by other women. Most women I know (including myself) have called another woman a slut, which in some cases was like the pot calling the kettle black.

The reason that women make the assumption that most men will willingly hop into bed with any even moderately attractive woman is that most men will.

I know a lot of single guys who only require the slightest nudge from a woman to do whatever she wants. Hell, I know a lot of guys in relationships who would do the same, depending on their level of sobriety and/or the (physical) distance between them and their significant other.

Please, guys, don't turn the women down. It will only make them more afraid than they already are to pursue men. Do it for your less-fortunate brothers. Take one for the team.

We men are easy, despite what Mr. Stoddard avers.

Well, I would sympthize with you a lot more, normally. But the big elephant in the room when it comes to sex is the still epidemic sexual violence against women, which still happens to one in four girls and women in this country alone. I think that is why their behavior is so confusing, sexually. Once this problem is dramatically reduced, I think you'll see a lot less women engaging in confusing sexual behavior and a lot less difference in the sexual behaviors of both genders.

The other thing not talked about is that women now have the ability to control the outcome regarding procreation. Until there is a pill designed for men they can be potentially subjected to financial and moral obligations resulting from a pregnancy they don't want. All this is the potential cost of a one night stand because condoms break - regularly. They are a man's only assurance with a woman he doesn't know well . . . and they break regularly. Men should be more careful for their own sakes, and because the tables are clearly turned. The woman controls all aspects of hooking up now and don't often exhibit the discretion regarding "kiss and tell" behaviors that they ask of men. Most of the men I know are very protective of the women they've been with. On the otherhand, I've heard women friends routinely describe the size and shape of a man's penis as if he's a piece of meat.

The best way to counter the stereotypes which generate so many hang-ups about sex is to : stop believing them & stop caring about whether people you know are stupid enough to use them as a basis for character judgments.

I have to admit that as a guy I find it very offensive if a woman assumes that I think like "all other guys" in that they may think I can and want to have sex at the drop of a hat, have to be thinking of something in dirty terms, or perhaps that I (or anyone) would be good/bad in bed based entirely on a cursory examination of appearance, physique , and personality. I do think both sexes need to wake up to that idea that just because you are, or are not interested, in someone, or doing something, it doesn't make you a slut or homosexual or impotent. It just makes you human.

Much of the reason why men's attitudes toward sex have changed is because the liabilities they experience related to sex have shifted.

In the future you will see women becoming much more aggressive, partly because their liabilties for aggressive acts have decreased. They are now encouraged to be much more aggressive by society, which accounts for increasing criminal behaviors in young women.

Aggression in young males, on the other hand is decreasing. Young men are increasingly becoming more withdrawn from sexual involvement, delaying marriage or bonding and instead attempting to defer maturity to some far off time and place.

For example, divorce is initiated 80% of the time by women, and women typically gain financially from divorce, whereas men tend to loose substantial amounts of money.

Men also loose custody of children, and in many instances any parental contact, because the state benefits through higher awards from the federal government, by minimizing contact with fathers.

In effect our society has raised a generation of males without fathers as role models, while at the same time encouraging women to act on their aggressive impulses.

Consequently men often experience intimate relationships with women as a liability, whereas women experience relationships with men only on it's entertainment value.

Grant, 104 undergrads from the University of Saskatchewan are hardly a balanced sample! 104 young guys from middle class families in Canada's least diverse province do not a cross section of North American manhood make!

No sex from a man who doesn't want it in the first place is better then uninterested sex. Shouldn't be that big of deal - really.

Kind of like: "Do you want cream or sugar?" "No coffee for me thanks". I still think there should be a place you can go in during your daily busy chores to get things taken care of.

I must say that I have noticed how sexually uninhibited women are becoming. The 4 girls I have dated regularly over the past year...I ended up having sex with on either the first or second meeting. In each case they initiated the first time. I never make the first move because I tend to be both overly respectful with a complete lack of self confidence. Honestly in each case the sex was fantastic and long lasting and thank you Eli Lilly for Cialis because anything longer than a half an hour I need a little pick me up. Anyway. The last girl I dated..we did not have sex...AT ALL. She never made a move or seemed interested and after a week I felt slighted but I guess ive been spoiled...lol

This also has to do with sex between man and woman.

Why was Mike Tyson convicted of rape on the say-so of a woman who visited him in his hotel room at 3AM?

Real injustice there.

Just because he was a black in the mold of a tough guy?

May be GStoddard here can answer my question.

Anybody here wants to help?