Blogs and Stories
An Old-Fashioned Wedding?
PA Wire / AP Photo
As rumors swirl about William and Kate, Andrew Morton says the whole thing feels like a time warp. She only exists to please him; and he and his fellow royals are clueless about the changing times.
This week, Prince Charles was in the land that time forgot, the Galapagos Islands, the archipelago that inspired Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. He was warning about species facing extinction, though curiously he failed to mention himself or the other rare breeds that roost under the eaves of the House of Windsor. Perhaps he knows something we don’t.
He named a baby giant tortoise after his eldest son, Prince William, as speculation hared through the European media that he was intending to wed his longtime, on-off, on-again girlfriend Kate Middleton this summer. No less an authority than Point de Vue, a French magazine that once intimated that Princess Anne had been, shall we say, “overly familiar” with an entire soccer team, announced that European royals had been told to clear their diaries for the big event.
We have of course been down this road before. In 2006, long before the receivers were called in, the forward-thinking management of Woolworths unveiled designs for mugs, thimbles, mouse mats, and sweets to commemorate the expected engagement of the heir to the throne. At the same time, Britain’s major commercial station, ITN, filmed a showpiece documentary about the couple, their confirmation of a royal marriage based on “impeccable sources.” Or should that be “sauces.” A few months later, in April 2007, the couple confirmed that they had split. Woolworths is now defunct and ITN on the endangered list, shedding jobs and programs—both victims of the laws of economic natural selection.
Whatever becomes of Kate Middleton, she will always be marked by the man she knew rather than what she knows. If Michelle Obama seems the acme of social modernity and progress, the romance of Kate and William harks back to another arcane era.
Meanwhile the House of Windsor plods on, its 1,000-year-old shell seemingly impervious to the shock of the new. Other European royal families have faced extinction because they have continued to paddle in the shallow end of the gene pool, insisting that royalty marries other royalty or high nobility. When the Windsors played the aristocrat card, their search for a white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant virgin yielded Lady Diana Spencer, and look what a fine mess that got them into. William’s long, slow courtship of a privately educated, perfectly pleasant, middle-class girl owes much to the disastrous union of his parents. Adapt and survive is the Windsor motto.
Yet there is an unmistakeable “back to the future” vibe about their relationship. For a start, William is beginning to look like his dad. He’s lost those boyish good looks along with his hair and, just like when his father was in the Navy, has decided to grow a beard.
At the same time, with no career to speak of, his girlfriend is a lady in waiting, spending her days grooming and hanging around waiting for her prince to come calling. Dubbed “Waitie Katie” by the tabs, she confided to novelist Kathy Lette during a polo match that she had to concentrate on every play so that she could discuss it with the heir later. Even in her salad days, Diana was never that enthusiastic about the game. Thus in this off-the-cuff comment was revealed a young woman whose self-defined role in life was accommodating her man. Her mission is to blend in and to conform, to choose the correct wardrobe—demure but flattering—for the three costume changes a day required at Balmoral or Sandringham. Is this then the ultimate ambition for the best and the brightest of her generation—to find and snare a man?
On this calculated throw of the dice she has gambled her entire future. If she fails to win her prince, no matter what she does in her future life—find a cure for cancer, rid the world of landmines—she will always be defined as the girl who tried and failed to get her man.
While comparisons are odious, the life of America’s new first lady serves as a telling counterpoint to the 27-year-old possibly-one-day-queen of England. Michelle Obama has it all because she has had to do it all: raise children, hold down an executive job, feed the family, and support her husband. Her achievements mean that a generation of women swell a little with pride when they see how far one of the sisterhood has come.
By contrast, whatever becomes of Kate Middleton, she will always be marked by the man she knew rather than what she knows. If Michelle Obama seems the acme of social modernity and progress, the romance of Kate and William harks back to another arcane era.







This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--MagiFoxwinlock
What a nasty little article.
Fitzhugh
What a creepy "biographer". I suppose his writing counts as beastly, but certainly not in a good way.
politicalmom
The monarchy is irrelevant and overrated.
Fitzhugh
Andrew Morton is the threadbare cuff of an otherwise excellent pair of trousers. Please cut him off.
iaintpeople
Heh. Cute article. Here's hoping it's completely false and these two well-educated, well-travelled. gen-x'ers aspire to even half the accomplishments of The Obamas. Class will out...
fenngibbon
I agree: Morton seems a tad peeved. What, did Miss Middleton put the kibosh on Kate: Her True Story?
As for the following:
"...whatever becomes of Kate Middleton, she will always be marked by the man she knew rather than what she knows."
As opposed to Michelle Robinson, who was, of course, well-known to all for her amazing accomplishments long before she met Barack Obama and he was elected president.
As for the young couple, it seems as if Miss Middleton is exactly what the House of Windsor needs; an attractive, emotionally mature woman who understands that it's not all about her. That was something seriously lacking in the preceding generation.
MargerySharp
We have it all? Is he kidding? Wouldn't it be a better world if we didn't have to work, didn't have to have babies and husbands supported US? What's this "supporting" crap? Morton you are living in your little dreamworld and must be bitter that the Royal gravy train finally stopped rolling for you. 1) Royals ain't the same as us and really don't live by the same rules. 2) If you wanted Kate to shop at Wal-Mart, you wouldn't have anything to write about you blood sucking leech (you and Paul Burrell btw, bam!). 3) If they weren't royal, they'd still be horribly rich and what do you think non-royal people do? They take $70,000 skiing vacations! Jesus. And finally, SISTERHOOD??? What the h*** do you know about sisterhood? I am white and American and I will tell you all American women are proud of Michelle, but I have to tell you 95% of black women do not think of us as sisters. They are looking at Michelle (doing a terrific job btw) and going, "In your face, Whitey!" If I were Black, I would be sitting there going "Huh" because the the last president was white and now we are circling the drain because of him! Okay, too many co-mingled rantings, but thanks, it felt great to get that off my chest! And leave Kate alone! You're just trying to do a Diana on her and they are two completely different people. Andrew MORON.
finderj
Just a minute here - are you saying that there is no room in today's world for a person of either gender to choose to be old-fashioned? Not everybody is cut out for the contemporary female role model of I-have-it-all-because-I-can-do-and-have-done-it-all, and some who could don't want to. Are you saying that a twenty-first century woman does not have the right to choose to be a nineteenth-century wife?
And let's take one more thing into consideration: Prince WIlliam will be king. Period. It is not a job he asked for, it is not a job he seems to particularly want, but it is a job he has been admirably well-trained for. He has little or no choice. He will be king. It is not a day-job, or a career. It is a lifetime position that can never, ever be hidden from. It is not a partnership operation. Kings do not have equal partners in anything. It matters not if that is his desire, it cannot be. The King of England has a Queen Consort, not an equal partner.
If Prince WIlliam chooses to marry, the woman must clearly, and to her very bones, understand that this is no marriage between equals, even in the privacy of their thoughts. The kingdom must come first, even in this day of constitutional monarchy. A true king must be willing to sacrifice everything, absolutely everything for his people, including the opportunity for a marriage between equals.
Sound silly? Romance novel? Yep. But a king who is not willing to be that is at best a figurehead, and a woman who cannot accept it does not deserve marriage with a man of that calibre.
TennDem
Morton is a bloodsucking tick.
jhub32
Your whole premise is that because Middleton cares enough about her boyfriend to take an interest in what he's interested in, she's small, old-fashioned and irrelevant? Were more couples willing to take an interest in each others' interests, for the sake of building closeness and having something to discuss at the end of the day, the divorce rate might be drastically reduced. The implication that there is no Kate in their relationship--that William doesn't pay attention to the things that Kate finds interesting or that their marrying hinges entirely on William's saying the word--paints a narrow little chauvinist portrait. So much judgment, so little substance.
martha01
To finderj
"But a king who is not willing to be that is at best a figurehead"
newsflah for you thats exactly what the king or queen of England is a figurehead-its a constitutional monarchy-they have no actual power., they are just rich people in big houses.
apparently
Egads, Morton. The comparison of Middleton to Obama is so silly. Compare her to your Diana not an American First Lady.
It's apples and oranges, you silly twit.
orangetrousers
Wow, I must say, this is one of the most impressive articles I have read on the Daily Beast. Bravo Morton. I commend how you addressed equality amongst all humans and the correlation between Michelle Obama's personal achievements versus Miss Middelton's. I dont belive the comparison is apples to oranges( like the commenter above me). They are both human and female. One is black. One is white. The difference one sees is based on upbringing, focus on personal achievement and equality between both genders. In order for the Monarchy to stay alive, I concur with Morton that it would be in the best interest of the royals to choose modern wifes.
orangetrousers
Finderj-
Are you kidding, or are you a Dinosaur? I suppose you believe the kingdom should acquire slaves and the king should have several concubines to pleasure him while his precious Queen awaits. News Flash! The royals are all figure heads with self imposed superior blood lines.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.