Blogs and Stories
The President Vs. the Press
Ron Edmonds / AP Photo
Last night’s press conference showed Obama’s long-term thinking at odds with the media’s short-term baiting. So who’s in control here?
Viewed from above, it would be easy to cast last night as a kind of psychodrama that pitted Obama’s intentions—fixing the multiple messes he inherited from the Bush administration and reorienting America’s priorities in a direction of greater equity and sustainability in the face of a massive economic crisis and growing populist outrage—versus the press corps’ desire to exploit that outrage to get Obama to blow his cool, show some emotion, and make some noise.
The key moment came when CNN’s Ed Henry tried to stir up some trouble. Here’s his question:
Thank you, Mr. President. You spoke again at the top about your anger about AIG. You’ve been saying that for days now. But why is it that it seems Andrew Cuomo seems to be, in New York, getting more actual action on it? And when you and Secretary Geithner first learned about this, 10 days, two weeks ago, you didn’t go public immediately with that outrage. You waited a few days, and then you went public after you realized Secretary Geithner really had no legal avenue to stop it.
This is a presidency defined by cable news food-fights and Maureen Dowd-style armchair psychoanalysis.
And more broadly—I just want to follow up on Chip [Reid] and Jake [Tapper]—you’ve been very critical of President Bush doubling the national debt. And to be fair, it’s not just Republicans hitting you. Democrat Kent Conrad, as you know, said, quote, “When I look at this budget, I see the debt doubling again.” You keep saying that you’ve inherited a big fiscal mess. Do you worry, though, that your daughters, not to mention the next president, will be inheriting an even bigger fiscal mess if the spending goes out of control?
Note both Henry’s tone and content. First off, the question has no relationship to substance. Instead it’s about
a) An alleged political horserace between Andrew Cuomo and Obama that, as far as I can tell, does not exist
b) Why Obama “waited a few days” before “go[ing] public with that outrage?”
c) And following up on his bros “Chip and Jake,” he wants to know, why isn’t Obama’s budget enjoying universal praise, as “it’s not just Republicans hitting” him, but a conservative Democrat is as well.
Obama tried to explain the relationship between the priorities of his budget and the recovery he predicts, as well as the eventual reduction in the deficit he both inherited and will be increasing. But because Obama, unlike George W. Bush, decided to allow follow-up questions, which vastly reduces the ability to dodge questions he does not like, Henry was able to focus again, laser-like, on the president’s refusal to act out about AIG as quickly as Henry would have liked, and again raised the so-far nonexistent Cuomo vs. Obama contest: “So on AIG, why did you wait—why did you wait days to come out and express that outrage?” and goading him again, into a contest with Cuomo by using that most favored of journalistic weasel words, “seems.” (As Hamlet should have taught us, the word “seems” is a license to make shit up. “Seems madam?” he says to his lying mother, “Nay it is. I know not seems.”) “It seems like the action is coming out of New York in the attorney general’s office. It took you days to come public with Secretary Geithner and say, look, we’re outraged. Why did it take so long?” Obama’s answer: “Well, it took us a couple of days because I like to know what I’m talking about before I speak.”







connie47
"Well, it took us a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak."
How refreshing.
RussianHatGuy
Good work E. An honest and fair assessment of the show.
opedanderson
The truth is the truth. A lie is a lie.
Obama is a liar. He didn't wait "a few days" for his AIG outrage. Those bonuses have been common knowledge for months. His outrage came when he saw he was cornered by the public's hostile reaction (the Professor thinks we are all stupid) and had no way to wiggle out of the mess. And he resorted to his usual M.O.
- I never heard Rev. Wright say anything bad
- I didnt know Rezko had a bad reputation
- I didn't know Ayers was a terrorist
- I wasn't aware of Blago's corruption
- No one told me about any AIG bonuses
Sound familiar?
Actually, it is better that he is lying than not knowing about them because it is worse for us all if he was unaware. What else is he "unaware" of?
EdinNJ
It's really very simple. Obama is not going to give short soundbites as answers because he really does involve himself in policy-making. He's wonkish because he's a wonk. He doesn't have talking points delivered by Rahm Emanuel every morning, as opposed to the Bush and Clinton way of doing things. It's a different world for the journalists. They will continue to attempt their gotcha moments for awhile, under the guise of being responsible journalistss, but eventually, they will be forced to adjust. Unless they want to be universally mocked for their stupidity like Ed Henry.
mitch600
The problem with the Washington Press Corps is that 60 days into a new Presidency they still think there covering the half-wit with the veeps hand up his ass. What they need to do is realize that our current President uses facts not his gut and is not afraid of being himself. And since he's not about to change its the press corps that really needs to find a new approach to dealing with the President. Faux rage and gotcha questions from the press only diminishes them and not the President.
gditty
Obama's displayed competence/stability last night, while he answered questions completly with cool & calm demeanor....But this morning, every word he spoke has been parsed, disected, and reviewed for any hint of contridiction while being attacked daily and relentlessly. How many gaffes will he make? Is he reading the teleprompter? How will he be received? This will make or break time for Senator Obama, how will he handle the pressure....oooooooh! Fortune teller journalism is all the rage nowadays. The eternal wishy washy MSM media, journalists, and political pundits who traffic these days in nothing but speculation with their capacity to dote on the negativity before a situation even materializes as slaves to the voracious 24/7 news cycle. Faux news have even brought in psychics & lie detectors to pycho analyze his tone and body movements, but this is our media today. Slow news day? Make something up. Look for the worst possible scenario. Get the Rethug talking points and go wild.
Panic everyone. The end is near.
Now, who wants lemonade?
Ritarita
In all fairness
We should give the press corps
a little time
to catch up
Most of them trained
during the
Mad Max years.
StateoftheInitiative
Refreshing is in the word.
And it was quick and sharp too.(As if to say, we're done with this) I don't think Ed ever saw it coming. This was the definition of the b.s. the media endorses.
That's a very unique (and wrong) interpretation Opedanderson.
I am 100% certain if this happened under the Bush administration we never would have heard about it this quickly and there would have NEVER been the kind of action there is from so many fronts to stop it.
And if by months you mean weeks and if by common knowledge you mean the AIG execs who new they were getting them, sure. sure. Whatever you want to continue to attempt to undermine the good work we've seen in just 2 months.
Jessica150
opedanderson--tired, tired, tired.
connie47--I'm with you! Last night's press conference was like a drink of cool water after the intellectual desert that was Bush II.
My husband and I were watching and saying things like, "Isn't this nice? He's explaining his entire approach methodically and succinctly. What an improvement."
mbstrong
It will take awhile for all of us, including the MSM, to get used to an intelligent president who actually understands the issues he's trying to deal with. His press conferences may not be theatrical enough for some people, but I'll take a wonky professor over a smirking illiterate anyday!
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
Bettie
I was so disappointed that the President refused to answer the Ebony reporters question. The president gave a non answer about taking care of the homeless/hungry. He tried to sidestep the question by turning it in to a "military vets" question, when clearly it was not.
Lots of double talk from the guy that I voted for. He is just another hack we are stuck with for 4 more years. But he will be voted out after that. I'm afraid that the President is already in his bubble and doesn't have a clue about the real anger out here in the heartland.
Bettie
Click212, well said, my feelings exactly. I was one of the whites caught up in the hysteria. But, I still wouldn't have voted for John McCain. It was a lose, lose election.. a rock star or an old has been .. that was the question. Sigh
Ritarita
@click212
I just got a new
Puppy
And I want to thank you
For supplying
The name
That I've been
FIshing around for
Cronie Brazile
It's perfect.
(Has a much nicer ring
Than black opportunistic hyena)
bencharif
How nice for the Republican attack dog pack that they have opedanderson and click212 doing their dirty work for them. Thanks, Eric, for recalling what actually occurred and how desperate the media are to make controversy out of nada. Another win for the Prez, easy.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.