Blogs and Stories

Tina Brown

Why Michelle Wows the Brits

Michelle Obama Jim Young / Reuters For starters, she has similar qualities to the Queen: dedication, authenticity, and a very different attitude to clothes than Carla Bruni.

The excitement British women feel about the arrival of Michelle Obama in London for the G-20 summit is spiked with awe. She’s so big-time. So self-confident. So devoid of rainy, British diffidence. In a country where most political wives and female members of Parliament are the stylistic equivalent of a tufted ottoman, Michelle’s kind of striding self-assurance, glamour, and broad demographic appeal feels thrillingly 21st-century. The fact that she's African American adds an inspirational magic.

I am told by her closest courtiers that she—and all the royals—are very excited about meeting the president and Mrs. Obama.

It was smart of France’s ravishing first lady, Carla Bruni, to let her husband go to the conference without her. The second Madame Sarkozy was a big wow when she visited London last March, but she’s a shrewd enough PR hand to know she would suffer in comparison to the first and only Mrs. Obama. Carla is old news next to Michelle. Sure, she’s more beautiful in the cover-girl sense—looking good is her profession, after all—but an Italian heiress who strums the guitar and made a predatory move on France’s reigning little Napoleon isn’t the best poster girl for the scariest economic downturn since the 1930s. The Brits went off Carla almost as soon as she was back in Paris. That fake-demure little Dior suit she wore to lunch with Queen Elizabeth seemed in retrospect like the kind of get-up a reformed hooker might wear to meet her latest CEO for lunch at the Savoy.

One of the many appeal points of Michelle to the Brits is that her casual elegance feels as if it came out of her own closet on her own salary. The clean lines of Mrs. Obama’s jewel-colored shift dresses, skinny cardigans, and ballet flats have that effortless air that always gets high marks in dress-down Britain, where “she’s trying too hard” is the ultimate putdown. Tony Blair’s wife, Cherie, never learned this lesson. Eight years into her husband’s premiership, she was still striving for fashion approval through a succession of car-crash wardrobe ensembles. Britain’s current first lady, Sarah Brown, is a handsome, charming woman, but her body language is so apologetic that everything she wears suggests she’d rather be somewhere else. Even Princess Diana took a long time to get it right. She took a fraught sartorial journey through operatic Ascot hats and bodybuilder shoulder pads before she arrived, in those final three years before her death, at an easy, breezy freedom of style that Michelle exudes already.

The Queen, with whom the president and first lady will have tea this afternoon in the private apartments at Buckingham Palace, will very much approve. Those images of Michelle digging in the White House vegetable garden will have resonated with Her Maj, a country woman down to her sensible shoes. The Queen was never all that enamored of either Hillary Clinton (too strident) or Nancy Reagan (too California); as for the Bush Juniors, the less said the better. Nor could Elizabeth abide Cherie Blair, whose loathing of trips to Balmoral—where Mrs. Blair’s allergies to the fur and feathers of the stuffed animals and hunting trophies adorning the castle’s walls kept the PM’s wife preoccupied with trying not to sneeze in the sovereign’s face—was a legend in Downing Street. The Queen will see immediately that Michelle has the qualities she most values in a working woman: Dedication. Authenticity. A sensible attitude toward rearing her children.

The immediacy of Michelle will make up for any mild chill that the president may bring to his first meeting with royalty. Unlike his predecessors, Obama is not big on Masterpiece Theatre nostalgia. He’s the first almost-colonial president to be in the presence of the monarch since John Adams, a point he underscored when he unceremoniously removed from the Oval Office the bust of Winston Churchill so prized by George W. (This would not have gone down well with the Queen, who gave a warm farewell dinner for the hero of World War II when he stepped down 22 months after she ascended the throne.) And she is sure to have noticed the dissing of Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who, when he visited Washington earlier this month, gave the president a pen holder made from the timbers of the Victorian anti-slave ship HMS Gannet and, in return, was presented with a cheesy gift set of 25 classic American movies—which, to add insult to injury, don’t even work on British DVD players. (The Fleet Street tabloids, which do not go unread at the Palace, treated this White House gaffe as practically an act of war.) The Queen has met ten of Obama’s presidential predecessors in her 56 years on the throne and is very good at being Her Britannic Majesty when she senses the slimmest whiff of royal disrespect.

But I am told by her closest courtiers that she—and all the royals—are very excited about meeting the president and Mrs. Obama. Deeply worried about the financial crisis now sweeping Europe, the woman who has reigned longer than almost any other British monarch is as eager as all her countrywomen to come face to face with the future. When she looks into Michelle’s wide, warm eyes, she will see someone whose strength she will recognize at once as a new kind of Queen.

Tina Brown is the founder and editor-in-chief of The Daily Beast. She is the author of the 2007 New York Times best seller The Diana Chronicles. Brown is the former editor of Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and Talk magazines and host of CNBC's Topic A with Tina Brown.


Back to Top
March 31, 2009 | 8:44pm
Comments ()

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
9:28 pm, Mar 31, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
9:31 pm, Mar 31, 2009
Exocet

Clearly, Tina, this article is only for American consumption. I mean, writing like this is toe curling in its obsequiousness. It smacks of Blairish poodle.

For example you write:

"the woman who has reigned longer than almost any other British monarch is as excited as all her countrywomen to come face to face with the future. "

Oh come on! The Queen is rarely excited save by her race horses and maybe watching her grandsons passing out at Sandhurst. But if it greases the wheels of Anglo-American diplomacy to have the gullible think that the queen is excited by her umpteenth President, then so be it. The Queen is doing cart wheels up and down Buck House galleries at the thought of meeting the President Obama and wife. The Queen is a consummate professional, even better, the Foreign Office is skilled at buttering up American Presidents, they've probably pegged Obama's elitist streak and will play it for all its worth. The very subtle lesson the FO wants to get across to the neophyte, poorly read President Obama is, never ever again forget who your friends are. The Queen will undoubtedly help Obama understand this lesson.

As for the business of the Queen coming face to face with "the future," this is a woman who has seen so many futures turn to past before time (her Prime Ministers and an ex daughter-in-law notwithstanding), that the word "future" attached to anyone might perhaps to her hint at sheer hubris.

|
|
Reply
11:11 pm, Mar 31, 2009
NHBill

Face it. The Queen is just a tourist attraction. I never could understand why Americans swoon for the British royals. They stand for everything America rejected. Monarchy makes communism look appealing.

|
|
Reply
12:29 am, Apr 1, 2009
joymars

A bit on the gushy side, Tina.

The pics of the trip should be fun to see.

|
|
Reply
1:57 am, Apr 1, 2009
smdunne

Tina, given that you wrote a biography of Diana I would expect you to remember that she was divorced from Charles for almost a year before she died in 1997. They were separated in 1992 and the divorce was finalized in 1996. I'm not sure how that adds up to Diana's "final three years after her divorce from Charles."

|
|
Reply
7:21 am, Apr 1, 2009
Southpaw

Carla's 'fake-demure little Dior suit'. Meow.

|
|
Reply
7:37 am, Apr 1, 2009
apparently

Oh, that's right ...Mrs. Obama is on that 'little island off Europe'.
The dvds were better.

|
|
Reply
8:06 am, Apr 1, 2009
drywallgirl

I think all these negative comments about Machelle Obama and the president are fueled by jealousy.We should be supporting them as America is not looking so good in the publik eye right now,the president has a hard enuf job to do,why make it worse by giving criticism from his own country,I really think the president is trying to get this country back on track financially

|
|
Reply
8:31 am, Apr 1, 2009
marmitelover

Love your stuff Tina but this is pure puff. Nobody is 'excited' about Michelle Obama. Who the hell have you been talking to?
Maybe in your elevated circle but ordinary women don't really care.
Too busy trying to keep their jobs, pay their bills, afford to go to Primark perhaps?
Black British women are probably very excited but that's a different issue.
Also why is it always neccessary to put other women down when one woman is complimented? To compare? So destructive.
MsMarmitelover

|
|
Reply
9:17 am, Apr 1, 2009
marmitelover

Anyway I'm off down to the city to hang out with my anarchist mates, smash up the royal bank of scotland and cause other mayhem...
That's where the real action is!
Cheerio
MsMarmitelover

|
|
Reply
9:19 am, Apr 1, 2009
nikkya

this is among the first article that i have not only agreed with but had occasion to chuckle at whith some of the comments the only thing missing was what she thought about (the quaker oats lady) elder lady bush

|
|
Reply
9:33 am, Apr 1, 2009
idiotking

Queen Latifah's a lot classier than you'll ever be, philipjames.

|
|
Reply
9:50 am, Apr 1, 2009
chica2285

Tina, I find your evaluation of Carla Bruni's outfit not only insulting but completely off the mark. Since when is a gray, knee-length suit paired with flats (which you praise on Michelle Obama) the attire of a "reformed hooker"? Carla Bruni is an intelligent woman, who's poetry, music, and comments on numerous French television shows demonstrate over and over again the sophistication of her mind as well as the "down-to-earthness" of her character, despite a long life of privilege. I love Michelle Obama, but let's not denigrate Carla Bruni on false grounds so at make Michelle shine even more. Mrs. Obama does not need a straw-woman.

And sidenote: And Michelle has an "effortless air"? Please, Michelle wears much more make-up and jewelry than Carla.

|
|
Reply
10:23 am, Apr 1, 2009
beastfan

Brilliantly written, as always. Gotta love the White House garden and Michelle's plans to have the school children return to watch the garden's progress. Love her J. Crew wardrobe, too. She does indeed appeal to ordinary working women like me.

|
|
Reply
10:23 am, Apr 1, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
10:30 am, Apr 1, 2009
drevilo

You have got to be kidding. This is the biggest bunch of "hooey" ever written.

|
|
Reply
10:35 am, Apr 1, 2009
william1

I agree with marmitelover ("Also why is it always neccessary to put other women down when one woman is complimented? To compare? So destructive."), Tina!

|
|
Reply
10:38 am, Apr 1, 2009
ejrobinson

Mr. Sarkozy is now married to his third wife.

|
|
Reply
10:40 am, Apr 1, 2009
rpmosby

This sort of writing is the reason I signed up for The Daily Beast! Sadly, it's been lacking and most of the writing has been dull. Tina Brown, you need to find writers more like yourself or do more of the writing yourself. I come here for smart fun! This is a smart, fun story.

|
|
Reply
10:47 am, Apr 1, 2009
ardeth

Regarding the "fur and feathers of the stuffed animals and hunting trophies adorning the castle's walls", remind me to never set foot in Balmoral. Mounted dead animals is the saddest, ugliest interior decoration I can imagine. It would be great if Michelle said something diplomatic about that to the Corgi-loving Queen, but somehow I doubt she will.

|
|
Reply
11:01 am, Apr 1, 2009
Cforchange

I'm with rpmosby but will look for MsMarmitelover cuffed an on the evening news.

|
|
Reply
11:11 am, Apr 1, 2009
grasiv

Is it me or is this article awfully catty towards Carla Bruni? The topic, tone and style of this article seem unworthy of Tina Brown.

When The Daily Beast was first published it's style and substance got me hooked on knowing and understanding current affairs. I fear I'll soon be going back to watching Entertainment Tonight and TMZ instead.

|
|
Reply
11:12 am, Apr 1, 2009
Sahas24

"Inspirational magic," "wide, warm eyes," and "a new kind of Queen?" Really, Tina? Excuse me while I vomit.

|
|
Reply
11:13 am, Apr 1, 2009
Northview

Who cares what this relic Elizabeth thinks about anything? How quaint. And didn't we wage a war to be rid of this monarchical foolishness? Who bloody cares?!

|
|
Reply
11:28 am, Apr 1, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Why Michelle Wows the Brits

by Tina Brown

Info
RSS
Tina Brown
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |