Blogs and Stories

 The Daily Beast

Sizzling G-20 Wives

Carla Bruni caused a frenzy last year, and with Sarah Brown hosting and Svetlana Medvedeva attending, the first ladies of the G-20 summit have all eyes in London placed squarely on them.

Click Image To View Gallery

HP Main - G20 Wives 397


Back to Top
March 31, 2009 | 9:43am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

mdreader

Why is Cristina Fernandez De Kirchner included in this photo spread? She was elected President of Argentina after having been First Lady. Would Hillary Clinton have been included if she had won the election?

|
|
Reply
10:38 am, Mar 31, 2009

apparently

Sizzling? Must be a really quiet day at the old Daily Beast to reach that far.

|
|
Reply
12:24 pm, Mar 31, 2009

AliceJ

Who picked the picture of Michelle? The other wives are all quite modestly dressed. Why show Michelle "out of place" in her attire? Her dress is fine, but quite unlike the others.

|
|
Reply
12:31 pm, Mar 31, 2009

floratash

That Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner is an insult between the other women... Do you know what is going on in Argentina? There are no clean elections there, and she is just an incompetent liar... so is her corrupt husband...

|
|
Reply
12:33 pm, Mar 31, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
2:01 pm, Mar 31, 2009

Beerzie

Was this written by Meghan McCain?

|
|
Reply
2:33 pm, Mar 31, 2009

nickmagoo

What is this, Cosmo? What's next, sex tips from Capital Hill hookers? How to rate your cangressman in bed? Seriously, this site is going downhill fast - Meghan McCain's idiocies, the 'She's 48!?' bullshit, and this...If I wanted to read this kind of crap I'd subscribe to US or People.

|
|
Reply
5:50 pm, Mar 31, 2009

fk4711

Where are the first ladies of Japanese and Chinese priministers? Why just the whilte people? Are they more interesting that Asian women? I don't think so. I like to see their fashion too.

|
|
Reply
9:54 pm, Mar 31, 2009

bwoodruff

"Sizzling" is not quite the word I would use to describe some of these women. Is there a word a step below homely?

|
|
Reply
9:14 am, Apr 1, 2009

FNYGY1

Good grief - enough is enough. Can we PLEASE talk about women's accomplishments instead of their dresses?

|
|
Reply
9:41 am, Apr 1, 2009

Sahas24

Can someone please tell me:

What's the purpose of "the first ladies" attending the G20 Summit?

What's it costing for these women to attend--not to mention their entourage(s) and security--and who is paying for it?

|
|
Reply
11:10 am, Apr 1, 2009

sara601

Really, Daily Beast? This is news? I can't believe a site created by Tina Brown is subjecting us to this garbage. I'm with FNYGY1, nickmagoo and beerzie, if I wanted to read this crap I'd go subscribe to US Weekly. This is a totally sexist, meaningless fluff article. It's not exactly like there's a shortage of news right now!!

|
|
Reply
11:52 am, Apr 1, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
2:11 pm, Apr 1, 2009

FoolsLogos

TDS, you suck

|
|
Reply
3:20 pm, Apr 1, 2009

exploora

If we hate this article so much, why are we admitting to reading it, and looking at the pictures, by leaving comments?

I think Beast caters to its readership, which is us, who must be reading this, because we left comments, so we feed the Beast. I am glad we do.

|
|
Reply
5:08 pm, Apr 1, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Sizzling G-20 Wives

by The Daily Beast

Info
RSS
 The Daily Beast
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |