Blogs and Stories

Justin Ravitz

So Why Aren't You Watching Damages?

BS Top - Ravitz Damages L to R: Andrew McPherson / FX; Mark Seliger / FX FX’s dark, suspenseful series has plotlines as complex as Lost, writing worthy of Mad Men, and a cast that includes Glenn Close, William Hurt, and Marcia Gay Harden. Justin Ravitz argues that all it needs now is an audience.

Among the many mysteries embedded in the addictive, Mobius-strip narrative of Damages: Why hasn’t it generated a cult following as obsessive and vocal as the likes of Mad Men and The Sopranos before it? With a reinvented, always-revelatory Glenn Close at its helm, the FX drama couldn’t be timelier, homing in on pandemic corporate corruption and its terrifying enemy: a zealous, egomaniacal attorney (Close) with a fractured psyche, a bitter, overworked underling, and a city full of enemies.

There are difficult bosses, and then there’s Close’s titanium-boned Patty Hewes, the rageaholic, corruption-busting NYC litigator of Damages. Her handpicked second-year associate Ellen Parsons (the deceptively delicate Rose Byrne) struggles to punch in at the office, and it’s not just the 70-hour work week or Patty’s fire-and-ice, no-boundaries management style—in season one, Patty may have tried to have Ellen murdered. She definitely hired Ellen under false pretenses and killed her fiancé’s sister’s dog, all for a case against pension-stealing CEO Arthur Frobisher (Ted Danson), whose goons successfully murdered Ellen’s fiancé, a brutal crime for which Ellen was briefly charged. Devil Wears Prada, this is not.

“If you do a scene with Glenn Close, you don’t want to be the idiot who doesn’t know his lines.”

The tightly, elaborately coiled series, in fact, hews as closely to the flashback/forward mindscrews of Lost (without the supernatural) and Jacobean revenge tragedies as it does to crime and legal procedurals. Particularly in season two, which concludes Wednesday, Damages’ crackling, darkly comic, psychoanalyst-fodder dialogue suits a distinguished cast which now includes William Hurt, Marcia Gay Harden and alumni of The Wire. Close—a five-time Oscar nominee, never a winner—has made the role of Patty as indelible as the deeply human monsters of Fatal Attraction and Dangerous Liaisons.

If you’re just catching up now, here’s the CliffsNotes guide to Damages:

In this season, Ellen is still in Patty’s employ, secretly colluding with FBI agents to bring down Patty, and still hoping to snag Danson’s character. Patty’s firm, meanwhile, takes on a case Erin Brockovich would love: UNR, a global energy behemoth, primping for a merger, covers up a toxic killer, stages brownouts, manipulates stock prices (via a cocaine- and hooker-loving analyst and a Cadillac) while the wife of a hired scientist (Hurt) turns up dead; that moody scientist also happens to be Patty’s ex. By last week’s penultimate episode, a newly vulnerable Patty has shown signs of maternal affection toward Ellen, Ellen’s duplicitous new boyfriend Wes (Timothy Olyphant) has to kill her, and UNR’s jerky CEO Walter Kendrick (John Doman of The Wire) has outwitted his lead counsel Claire Maddox (Harden). And then there’s that flash-forward scene that has been replayed, shuffled and elaborated upon throughout the entire season: Ellen, swigging whiskey, waves a gun in Patty’s face (or someone else’s?) in a hotel room; Patty eventually stumbles out, bloodied.

So…what gives? The Daily Beast interviewed some of the show’s cast and crew, all stoically refused to divulge any spoilers about the finale and its probability of wrapping up so many labyrinthine plot threads.

The show’s creators are Daniel Zelman and brothers Todd and Glenn Kessler, known collectively as KZK, all with experience as writers, directors and producers. (Todd A. Kessler wrote several episodes of The Sopranos, and that show’s brutal beauty is apparent here.) KZK were once young, would-be protégés under the thumb of “powerful, twisted people” in the entertainment industry, Zelman said. “All the ideals you were taught in college aren’t what runs the world or what motivates people.” Their interest in writing about the evolving dynamic between a female boss and an underling (“men in power had been explored a lot”) led to the law, which by nature dips into a wide array of other arenas.

Patty’s character is an amalgamation of real-life figures, including David Boies, an omnipotent, helicopter-traveling attorney who once deposed Bill Gates in an antitrust lawsuit and defended Al Gore versus the Supreme Court in the 2000 Florida election debacle. (John Doman, as the down-and-dirty UNR CEO, said that his character is “inspired by a real person, which I won’t get into. I don’t want [KZK] to get sued.”) While KZK didn’t specifically have Glenn Close in mind when they pitched the show, script-less, to FX, the network suggested the actress, who had just ended a fruitful season on The Shield. The team wrote the pilot imagining Close-as-Patty, and she quickly signed on. “There was never any discussion of any other actor,” Zelman said.

Although the show, built essentially around the Patty-Ellen relationship, isn’t “ripped from the headlines” in the style of the Law & Order franchise, “there are so many articles relevant to our show daily—another episode of corruption here, another executive hanging himself there,” Zelman said. The breakdown of corporate culture and the veritable castration of crooked executives in the real world, Todd Kessler conjectures, is part of Damages’ timely appeal. “There is fascination worldwide with what corruption actually is. And here’s an American show where corruption is front and center.”

Back to Top
March 31, 2009 | 6:10am
Comments ()
TheRamblingExpatriate

Thank you Mr. Ravitz for this article. This show is premiere television and suffers from minimal marketing. There is simply no better acting in the world than Ms. Close. She does more in the weekly, tricky scripts given to her with a sideways glance than any crash, bang or boom of some of the other shows mentioned. Every person I know who has seen the series is hooked after 15 minutes.

Living abroad I can tell you I look forward to this weekly iTunes download more than any other!

I encourage all fans of this show to get the word out so we can enjoy a 4th season as well.

|
|
Reply
7:05 am, Mar 31, 2009
dsycks

Thank you for pointing out first rate entertainment. Sadly this will most likely follow suit with all the other great shows on TV of late and be deemed too expensive to produce and be slashed from the airwaves.

|
|
Reply
7:51 am, Mar 31, 2009
ApresSki

This is the show the networks need to let people know how much those reality shows SUCK!! You need real actors who know what they're doing.

This show is soooooooooooooooooooooooooo HAWT, I don't even know why there's a column on it. After my 1st viewing, I was hooked and downloaded every show until I had them all! The acting is outstanding and plots textured and complex.

Shame on the networks for not having this in late night instead like Dexter. Go to www.hulu.com, grab some popcorn, something to drink and sitback. Truly pure, intelligent entertainment.

|
|
Reply
8:51 am, Mar 31, 2009
BernieO

I started watching this season after reading a review like this one. However I found I needed to watch last season. It was not available to rent from my local video store but luckily I am a member of blockbuster.com and found it there. It was well worth the effort.

|
|
Reply
8:53 am, Mar 31, 2009
Shotcaller

I watched the first season, and couldn't stomach the dialogue of Glenn Close. It was embarrassing to listen to. Maybe it's improved, but it was enough to send me packing. No comparison with Mad Men, the writing of which is first-rate.

|
|
Reply
8:54 am, Mar 31, 2009
jaguarxjs

'So Why Aren't You Watching Damages?'

Because I have a life.....................................

|
|
Reply
9:12 am, Mar 31, 2009
FNYGY1

Love it, love it, love it! Damages is fantastic. In terms of comparing it to other excellent shows like Mad Men - silly exercise, really. Both are exactly what they set out to do and thus, vastly different shows.

|
|
Reply
9:19 am, Mar 31, 2009
Cforchange

I watch TV only when I want to - get the program out on Hulu or Netflix. Cable and tv by their schedule is a thing of the past.

|
|
Reply
11:32 am, Mar 31, 2009
FancyFrancie

I AM watching. Damages is superb.

|
|
Reply
12:27 pm, Mar 31, 2009
AliceJ

I've watched Damages from its inception and my TiVo is set to automatically record it incase I'm not home to watch the show. However I can understand that it's not to everyone taste. Very, very quirky and I get tired of the back and forth timelines. Glenn Close, however, is worth putting up with the things I don't like about the show.

|
|
Reply
12:49 pm, Mar 31, 2009
atthemoney

Could it be that many cable providers don't have FX on HD?

|
|
Reply
12:53 pm, Mar 31, 2009
Cyclysm

There has never been a better period for television drama, and Damages is proof; a show with high-drama, relevant story lines and an almost unimpeachable cast of quality actors. As for those who don't watch television, you might want to turn in your candlestick for light bulb, your horse for a hybrid and come visit the future - it's a nice place even without the City section (insert: tears).

|
|
Reply
12:56 pm, Mar 31, 2009
cheesemonkey

What in God's name are you talking about?

The dialogue in this show is pitiful, and Rose Byrne's Ellen could not be more wooden if she were a carved mannequin (which she now appears to be).

Glenn Close is the only interesting thing in this entire show, and her character is grotesquely unlikable, which makes the whole enterprise tiresome.

No wonder nobody's watching it.

|
|
Reply
1:10 pm, Mar 31, 2009
matthewf

Wonderful show, def. better than the other crap that clogs the air waves.

|
|
Reply
10:54 pm, Mar 31, 2009
NHBill

I watched the first season and was looking forward to the second but the premier episode left me cold. I moved on. "Breaking Bad" is the best show on TV hands down!

|
|
Reply
12:36 am, Apr 1, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

So Why Aren't You Watching Damages?

by Justin Ravitz

Info
RSS
Justin Ravitz
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |