Blogs and Stories
Was Madoff 'Victim' and Best Friend an Accomplice?
Chris Hondros / Getty Images
New evidence suggests Bernie had powerful accomplices in his scheme—philanthropist Norman Levy and a second accountant. Lucinda Franks reports on the international investigation.
It has always been hard to believe that Bernie Madoff acted alone to carry off his labyrinthine conspiracy. Now new evidence about two key associates—the late Norman Levy, a real-estate mogul and philanthropist who has previously been portrayed as a victim, and Paul Konigsberg, a second accountant for Madoff—begins to reveal that he may have had a powerful network of accomplices whom investigators on a U.S.-U.K. task force believe were involved in an international transfer of money.
"All these people, we think they were in it together," a source with knowledge of the investigation explains. "That is what we are trying to gather evidence to prove.”
Levy is believed to have helped accountant Paul Konigsberg funnel checks to London. And investigators in New York say there were apparently billions of dollars worth of checks going back and forth to between Madoff and Levy (or someone using Levy’s name).
"Konigsberg and Levy were very close to the center of Madoff action," the source continued. Levy was a towering figure in New York real estate—at one point he owned the Seagram Building—and he and Bernie Madoff had a special bond. Ruth and Bernie Madoff had an intimate relationship with Levy and his wife, Betty. Madoff and Levy contributed to many of the same causes and philanthropic organizations, including New York’s Yeshiva University and several smaller, more arcane charities such as Gift of Life, a South Florida charity for Jewish leukemia victims.
Madoff was long known to have been Levy's "fixer," obtaining everything from choice restaurant reservations to emergency medical care. Levy had offices one floor below Madoff's in New York’s Lipstick Building. It was Levy who introduced high-profile investors to Madoff.
One of those investors was Levy’s longtime girlfriend—following the death of his wife—model Carmen Dell’Orefice. In an April 2009 Vanity Fair article, which portrays Levy as a father figure betrayed by Bernie’s scheme, Dell’Orefice spoke of vacationing with the Madoffs, socializing in New York, Palm Beach, and the south of France, and celebrating birthdays and holidays together. But, Dell’Orefice told the magazine, “Norman and Bernie never talked business, except on the telephone.”
When Norman Levy died in 2005 at the age of 93, Madoff extolled him as a man whose friendship he had cherished and who had "taught me so much." Around the time Madoff’s business crashed, Levy's son Francis told Fox Business News that his father believed in Madoff: "If there's one honorable person,” he said, “it's Bernie." Shortly afterward, Levy's daughter, Jeanne Levy-Church, had to close the doors of her beloved foundation, JEHT, which helped the less fortunate, especially ex-convicts, because all her funds had been invested in this honorable man's business.
The extent and nature of Levy’s involvement is not yet fully known. Levy is believed to have helped accountant Paul Konigsberg funnel checks to London. And investigators in New York say there were apparently billions of dollars worth of checks going back and forth between Madoff and Levy (or someone using Levy’s name). Levy's family members could not be reached for comment.
Sources in London also reveal that a general ledger of Madoff accounts listed Konigsberg, of the reputable accounting firm of Konigsberg, Wolf & Co., as receiving $30,000 a month to advise the MSIL operations, and funnel client checks to the London office for Madoff's own use.
Read a response from an attorney for Paul Konigsberg and Konigsberg, Wolf










Great article :).
Wow - I disagree.
Poorly written and poorly researched.
Is this what Journalism is coming to?
I agree with lablahlablah, poorly written & researched. read the forbes article to compare.
What I want to know is, why aren't they locking up his wife and his kids?
We all knew that Madoff couldn't have done it alone. It is nice to see that we are not the only ones still thinking about who all benefited from his dirty actions and who should be in jail.
My hope and dream is that Soros is in the mix!
If all these shysters don't wind up in the poky, there is no god. Well, there is no god anyway, but you get the idea.
Wow. It just gets more and more intricate. As you say in your article, hard to believe from the beginning he could do this all himself, but the level and extent ... It gives me chills. Wonderful investigative reporting Ms Franks, as always.
What a "wicked web" of deceit.The ego, want of power and all the people that ran to him to grow their own money.The victims were guilty of their own greed and Bernie played into it.Yes he was a master of it all., but with that being said today every minute there are other people that are identical groups selling their wares...breeding on the ones that only want MORE money.Remember the jJudas ,Hitler, Mussolini, Caesar and all the others.If there is a hell then they are all there waiting for Bernie.What is the old saying "if it is too good to be true, then it is".Beware to the buyer."Beware my friend of the greed in your heart.Beides the people around you do not respect you.Secretly they are disgusted.....
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
Love Michael Levinson, too!
What I want to know is how Bernie is getting on with his "husband" in the lockup. I'm betting the gentle curl is gone from his hair.
We all knew he couldn't have done it alone, but the intricacies of this scam boggle the mind. What a great job of reporting by Lucinda Franks.....and love the Daily Beast. Viva Tina
are you dollyellen friedman from woodmere?
No, I am.
If their wives were aware of the money being transfered into their names they are accomplices. The court should take everything they have. Homeless is good.
Once again, Ms. Franks has shone a light into several corners of the corrupt labyrinth Madoff created. Everyone who profited, while aware of the scheme's illegality, should be prosecuted,
and stripped of his or her assets. The silver lining would seem to be that the pool for potential restitution is growing. In this
regard, Ms. Franks is not only insightful and informative, but exceedingly helpful.
Let's not forget our favorite Lady Macbeth in all of this, Ruth Madoff: http://is.gd/m9nz
Oh stop with the sobbing over the money you lost.....
Enough already. 50% of the blame in a scam goes to the victims. Scams almost always only work on greedy people. All those victims could have verified this independently and even if they did that, first rule of investing is to NEVER put all your money in one basket. No matter how good it is. In fact, if it is really good all the more reason to diversify.
Madoff saw your weaknesses and took advantage of them. Throw him in jail. Try and recover what funds you can. But stop your whining and get on with your life.
You gambled. You lost.
i agree, if it sounds to good to be true, it is.
opedanderson, well said.
who said, "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is?' or how bout this one: buyers beware...
these buyers were aware that they were getting more than others....i bet they never ONCE complained while the $$ was pouring into their accounts...nope, they lived well...now they have their memories...and maybe some new found humility...
I guess you wouldn't know what it is like to lose anything....aside from of course your wits.....I hate blaming victims. I would rather see pain inflicted on the criminals.
You're right and you're wrong. Right about the whining . . . there's a lot of it.
And who, including you, doesn't feel sorry for himself when the world screws
him in one way or another. But this isn't a simple case of investment loss.
It goes much, much further and is being ignored by people in high places
because they don't want to get caught being involved. There are lots of little
people who had a million dollars or less representing a life time of work invested in the SOB. A MILLION DOLLARS!, says you. Think about it.
What does that mean today after 40 or 50 years of breaking your ass.
On that score you're wrong. Curious to see how you feel after YOUR bank
fails anyway after the billions you're contributing to save it.
Nice. That's lovely advice for the charitable foundations. I dare you to say it to Elie Wiesel's face. You know, Elie Wiesel: survivor of the Holocaust, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, man who spent his entire post-concentration-camp life building up a charitable Foundation for Humanity to promote peace and assist help victims of genocide around the world; that's right, his foundation is wiped out. Right, you said it, he was so very, very greedy and irresponsible. The world just isn't that black and white.
Wondering if the late Norman Levy's children had their personal fortunes invested with Madoff.
Thank goodness Madoff was not a Political Friend of Obama or we would have never heard about his scheme. I bet he is sorry for not being a big supporter of Obama and Move On.Org.
hardly...we would have heard much more--
A video comment for the Ponzi Scheme Shyster Made-off:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DWtQNi2LlQ
lucinda,
keep on this---expose them all.
good reporting-thanks
I am really blown away by your false statements and unsupported accusations. I am a friend of Paul Konigsberg, have known him for many years, and have the utmost respect for him. Why don't you TELL THE TRUTH???
Yes--he knew Madoff and was victimized by him financially, morally, and professionally. Not only did he lose his money, but you are also infringing on his unparalleled reputation of honesty and integrity. He has not been to London in almost 20 years, so how could employees be "obedient" when he walked into the office. He does not even know where the office is. What duties did he have there that you claim he had???
Check the public records in Great Britain (as any good reporter should do) and you will see that he owned approximately 2/100ths of one percent. Your statement is 400% erroneous that he owns 4/10ths of one percent. This is public information!!! I spoke to someone that checked the public record and showed me the facts. Why didn't you do that??? The reality is that Madoff threw him a bone 25 years ago and it was ignored since then.
Check the KPMG audited financial statements and you will see that he never received a dividend, compensation, fees or anything else from Madoff London. And tell me this....one of the world's largest accounting firms found nothing wrong...how does this happen???
Check the attendees at the Zermatt trip and you will see that Konigsberg was one of approx 250 attendees, but Madoff was not there!!!! Also, Konigsberg paid his own way for the trip. Why don't you write that????
The reality of the situation is that Madoff knew that Konigsberg was a very knowledgeable tax accountant. That was the extent of their relationship, whereby Madoff wanted his clients to have competent tax advisors. Madoff was apparently quite shrewd in pulling in the innocent, whether they were investors, professionals, friends or family. This is the situation with Konigsberg.
What is your motivation to ruin a man that has worked tirelessly all his life to help make the world a better place for those less fortunate, has developed a reputation as an icon in his profession, and is now trying to help so many Madoff victims sort through this unconsiounable mess???
It seems to me that you should have checked your facts before just writing something that just "throws him under the bus". Your credibility would have been much better if you would just TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!
Paul K. is sitting right here next to me. He is my best friend and has never authorized you to speak for him. Stop the lies!
I know, unnamed sources all over this article! So much for editorial control!
The only writing not full of howlingly obvious mistakes and misspellings is the Bottega Veneta advertorials.
Konigsberg was on a $30k a year retainer to audit Madoff's foundation(s) so he was getting paid by Madoff. The owner or principal of his firm was knee deep in 1992 mess that Avellino and Bienes were in. There is a trail of accountants in this saga, that stretch close to fifty yeaers. Whether Konigsberg is not culpable in this scam or not, he is very close to the culprit. The timeline of this scam is going back to the 1960s. So there is a chance that setting up the London Office was an innocent endeavor.
Lucinda Franks's articles about Madoff may not be the best in accuracy, Paul Konigsberg should be sweating, because she is reporting what the prosecutors are focusing on, mainly Madoff's London office where the money laundering took place. No matter if Konigsberg had a minute of a share in the London office, he pops up at the crime scene.
If Paul Konigsberg is innocent, and has nothing to do with the Ponzi Scam, the information and paper trail will show that, but he is going nitpick by the press and US Federal Prosecutors because of his closeness to Madoff.
Not everyone who gets ripped off by Ponzi schemes is greedy. Most of them are ignorant and never heard of P.T. Barnum and his old axiom. I used to wish I had money to invest but now I am thankful I never did.
Lucinda, while your article makes great points, I have to take issue with your dismissive mention of the Gift of Life Bone Marrow Foundation as an "arcane... charity for Jewish leukemia victims." Not only is Gift of Life one of the largest bone marrow foundations in the world, their donor registry makes transplants happen all over the world, for patients of all backgrounds. I understand the point you were trying to make in mentioning the foundation this way, but I hate to see their work diminished.
Luckily for you, almost no one here knows what "arcane" means.
Those who continue to claim that the victims were greedy and they should have known better, that it sounded too good to be true, as well as never put your eggs in one basket, still don't know the facts and really should refrain from making comments about things they know little about.
But here, I'll explain it again, point by point:
1) the victims were not greedy. The fact that the fund was touted as conservative proofs that they weren't greedy. You're looking at it through the prism of today's financial crisis, but many funds in the late '90s and early tech boom period performed far better than Madoff. 20-40% returns, as opposed to 15-20%. (And to those who made 20-40%, do I begrudge them? No, of course not. I say good for them!)
As well, for a ten-year period, the S&P outperformed, yes, outperformed Madoff in that same ten-year period.
So that refutes argument #1.
#2: don't put all your eggs in one basket:
The only difference between those who invested in Lehman Brothers and Madoff was that only one turned out to be a fraud. All those who invested in a diversified portfolio of stocks at Lehman's got their money back, albeit at a discount. What did the Madoff victims get? Zero, zilch. I can't state it clearly enough: the Madoff investors believed that they were in a diversified portfolio of Fortune 100 stocks. It was diversified, if it were an honest business.
And to say that people should not put all their eggs in one basket, where do you think most Americans hold the majority of their wealth? In their homes, and how has that worked out for them?
The Madoff investment was twice cleared by the SEC in investigating him, and when investors called to inquire about the legitimacy of this man, the agency ENCOURAGED investors to do so. Not to mention he was the former Chairman of Nasdaq, and pensions and charities and the wealthy and many not so, in addition to the man sitting on SEC advisory committees and panels SANCTIONED by the SEC, and so well respected that former directors called this man to ask him his advice on regulatory policy, and possessing a 48-year stellar record.
So tell me, does that not sound like a pretty safe bet?
Or would you prefer to take your hard-earned dollars down to your local bank, where you'll speak to a financial advisor who is salaried and most likely going to push the bank's own products?
This is really strange how similar this article is to the one at the site I pasted below. The difference is the correction that to appears to have been made on it.
[This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: March 14, 2009
An article on Thursday about accounting firms that represented many of Bernard L. Madoff's investors misstated the type of subpoena received by one such firm, Konigsberg Wolf & Company. It was a civil subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission, not one issued by the grand jury conducting the criminal investigation of Mr. Madoff's Ponzi scheme. The article also misstated the recipient of the subpoena. It was the firm - not Paul J. Konigsberg, who is its senior tax partner.]
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/business/12accountants.html?fta=y
Whatever. My dearest friend P.K. requests that you stop using his name. He is my best friend in the whole world, is sitting right next to me as I type this, and is obviously not guilty of anything in the past or the future. Nor is any firm with his name on it. Case closed.
Sorry, but the case is definitely not closed whether you think so or not.
Ever since I heard that one guy - think it was Carl Shapiro - had lost half a billion with Madoff, I've been suspicious about the big money victims. Someone like that already has accountants they are paying so they do not just invest money with someone without having the accountants look the firm over. And Markopoulos said that within minutes he knew something was wrong; within 4 hours, he knew Madoff's firm was crooked. Is it credible that Shapiro didn't have his accountants looking into Madoff's firm for 4 hours before handing over a half billion dollars? I don't think its credible.
You win; you are thinking. Every big money person invested was aware or should have been aware that this was crooked. Strangely enough, many used this money to fund charitable donations and/or trusts and foundations. That is, big tax write-offs, big name recognation, limited exposure.
So now you are saying that Paul should have known it was crooked?
It's recognition, not recognation...where did you learn English???
To me, this is the saddest story of the past few decades-- that so many people could become content to exist screwing so many other people. And how many of my fellow human beings, including me, would not have done the same thing if we had the chance??? Human beings have a knack for justifying EVERYthing. Who among us has not taken advantage of another human being at one time or another? This whole mess is an allegory for our species. We are doomed to destroy ourselves (see "Global Warming," for example, as a partisan issue). Maybe the next round of evolution will produce a better race of beings.
Puh-leeze! Just because you would walk over your own mother to pick up a nickel, don't tar us with the same brush.
Dear Lucinda
Why do you think Ruthie and sons are still free? The whole situation is absurd. No mention of RICO- no mention of Ruthie and sons involvement and their ill gotten great wealth . Please respond to this- everyone wants to know!
Thank you-
Derida
By the way GUILTYBYSTANDER those of us who would not participate in such a scheme would be labeled as social outcasts by the elite theiving climbers. And though I do not own several homes and yachts and jet shares- I sleep well at night have fewer friends and am generally revolted by those who all belong to the same sort of exclusive "club". And a sucker is born every minute despite the way he or she chooses to dress, live and travel.
I have more respect for the Madoff servants than for any of them and the trash they associated with. Lock the garbage up enough of them already! Families and phony charity built on CRIME. No different than the Sopranos!
No, no different "from" not "than". Where did you "learn" English?
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.