Blogs and Stories

Lucinda Franks

Was Madoff 'Victim' and Best Friend an Accomplice?

Bernard Madoff Chris Hondros / Getty Images New evidence suggests Bernie had powerful accomplices in his scheme—philanthropist Norman Levy and a second accountant. Lucinda Franks reports on the international investigation.

It has always been hard to believe that Bernie Madoff acted alone to carry off his labyrinthine conspiracy. Now new evidence about two key associates—the late Norman Levy, a real-estate mogul and philanthropist who has previously been portrayed as a victim, and Paul Konigsberg, a second accountant for Madoff—begins to reveal that he may have had a powerful network of accomplices whom investigators on a U.S.-U.K. task force believe were involved in an international transfer of money.

"All these people, we think they were in it together," a source with knowledge of the investigation explains. "That is what we are trying to gather evidence to prove.”

Levy is believed to have helped accountant Paul Konigsberg funnel checks to London. And investigators in New York say there were apparently billions of dollars worth of checks going back and forth to between Madoff and Levy (or someone using Levy’s name).

"Konigsberg and Levy were very close to the center of Madoff action," the source continued. Levy was a towering figure in New York real estate—at one point he owned the Seagram Building—and he and Bernie Madoff had a special bond. Ruth and Bernie Madoff had an intimate relationship with Levy and his wife, Betty. Madoff and Levy contributed to many of the same causes and philanthropic organizations, including New York’s Yeshiva University and several smaller, more arcane charities such as Gift of Life, a South Florida charity for Jewish leukemia victims.

Madoff was long known to have been Levy's "fixer," obtaining everything from choice restaurant reservations to emergency medical care. Levy had offices one floor below Madoff's in New York’s Lipstick Building. It was Levy who introduced high-profile investors to Madoff.

One of those investors was Levy’s longtime girlfriend—following the death of his wife—model Carmen Dell’Orefice. In an April 2009 Vanity Fair article, which portrays Levy as a father figure betrayed by Bernie’s scheme, Dell’Orefice spoke of vacationing with the Madoffs, socializing in New York, Palm Beach, and the south of France, and celebrating birthdays and holidays together. But, Dell’Orefice told the magazine, “Norman and Bernie never talked business, except on the telephone.”

When Norman Levy died in 2005 at the age of 93, Madoff extolled him as a man whose friendship he had cherished and who had "taught me so much." Around the time Madoff’s business crashed, Levy's son Francis told Fox Business News that his father believed in Madoff: "If there's one honorable person,” he said, “it's Bernie." Shortly afterward, Levy's daughter, Jeanne Levy-Church, had to close the doors of her beloved foundation, JEHT, which helped the less fortunate, especially ex-convicts, because all her funds had been invested in this honorable man's business.

The extent and nature of Levy’s involvement is not yet fully known. Levy is believed to have helped accountant Paul Konigsberg funnel checks to London. And investigators in New York say there were apparently billions of dollars worth of checks going back and forth between Madoff and Levy (or someone using Levy’s name). Levy's family members could not be reached for comment.

Sources in London also reveal that a general ledger of Madoff accounts listed Konigsberg, of the reputable accounting firm of Konigsberg, Wolf & Co., as receiving $30,000 a month to advise the MSIL operations, and funnel client checks to the London office for Madoff's own use.

Read a response from an attorney for Paul Konigsberg and Konigsberg, Wolf

Konigsberg also had a close working relationship with Madoff that went back 25 years. He even went on a ski trip to Zermatt, Switzerland, that Madoff had arranged. In addition to his duties in the London office, Konigsberg prepared the tax returns of two Madoff charitable foundations as well as the foundations of at least six of Madoff's close friends, including those of Norman Levy's, and Carl and Ruth Shapiro's (whose son-in-law Robert Jaffe is now under scrutiny by investigators as a business partner of Madoff). These foundations, as well as Konigsberg himself, said they were heavily invested in Madoff Securities and lost millions of dollars.

Moreover, in the 1980s the accountant was given a small share (less than .4 percent) of MSIL, which was otherwise owned by only Madoff family members. When Konigsberg showed up at the London office, a worker said staff members were very obedient to his instructions. Other times, he apparently directed certain operations in London from his chair in the New York firm. "It doesn't take a lot of footwork to wire money and transfer client funds from one office to another," said the London source.

Konigsberg's lawyer, Charles Stillman, said his client vigorously denies these accusations: "The London office was a virus. Paul had nothing to do with this operation or any other Madoff office."

Although Konigsberg says he did not solicit Madoff customers, his firm has been issued, and is cooperating with, a civil subpoena by the SEC investigating the Madoff affair. Moreover, one of his firm's principals, Steven B. Mendelow, solicited funds for Madoff, violating federal regulations, which he settled with the SEC in 1993.

The investigation of Konigsberg represents the second accounting firm implicated in the Madoff subterfuge. David G. Friehling, who headed a storefront office which simply rubber-stamped the Madoff finances, has been indicted and is now cooperating with federal prosecutors. Friehling, however, received only $14,500 a month for his services, less than half what Konigsberg received.

Madoff’s London office was largely dedicated to a fund for the benefit of Bernie and his family, and, according to sources, was also a laundering machine for money that was subsequently sent to banks in other countries. Other client funds were sent from New York to the London office and back again into Madoff's personal proprietary account in New York. It appears that some of the money also went to his inner circle of friends, possibly prominent figures who benefitted from the laundering. Sources in the U.S.-U.K. money laundering task force, had earlier told The Daily Beast that Madoff, as well as some of his closest friends, had put $75 million of London transfers in their wives' names. There has also been certain circumstantial evidence, which U.S. investigators are using to explore possible cases, that Madoff made deals with other philanthropists and titans in various industries; it is thought that he may have given them huge returns on small investments while they, in turn, gave vocal support and lured investors into Bernard Madoff Securities Ltd.

London sources said that a small part of the U.K. trading operations were legitimate, but that they were basically a front for the money laundering. "In one year alone, a billion dollars of transactions were filtered through the London office of Madoff Securities International Ltd," said the London source. "What we are trying to find out is for exactly whose benefit, besides Madoff's, this money was being washed."

Read a response from an attorney for Paul Konigsberg and Konigsberg, Wolf

Lucinda Franks is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author who was on the staff of the New York Times and has written for the New Yorker and the New York Times Book Review and Magazine. Her latest book is My Father's Secret War, about her father, who was a spy for the OSS during World War II.


View as Multiple Pages
Back to Top
April 23, 2009 | 11:14pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

exploora

Great article :).

|
|
Reply
|
12:04 am, Apr 24, 2009

lablahlablah

Wow - I disagree.
Poorly written and poorly researched.
Is this what Journalism is coming to?

|
|
Reply
|
11:23 pm, Apr 26, 2009

honestabe

I agree with lablahlablah, poorly written & researched. read the forbes article to compare.

|
12:59 am, Apr 27, 2009

mdelaney

What I want to know is, why aren't they locking up his wife and his kids?

|
|
Reply
2:13 pm, May 14, 2009

amandadaw22

We all knew that Madoff couldn't have done it alone. It is nice to see that we are not the only ones still thinking about who all benefited from his dirty actions and who should be in jail.

|
|
Reply
|
12:34 am, Apr 24, 2009

bitsyspider

My hope and dream is that Soros is in the mix!

|
|
Reply
11:14 am, Apr 30, 2009

Antinous

If all these shysters don't wind up in the poky, there is no god. Well, there is no god anyway, but you get the idea.

|
|
Reply
7:54 am, Apr 24, 2009

christine

Wow. It just gets more and more intricate. As you say in your article, hard to believe from the beginning he could do this all himself, but the level and extent ... It gives me chills. Wonderful investigative reporting Ms Franks, as always.

|
|
Reply
8:08 am, Apr 24, 2009

southred8

What a "wicked web" of deceit.The ego, want of power and all the people that ran to him to grow their own money.The victims were guilty of their own greed and Bernie played into it.Yes he was a master of it all., but with that being said today every minute there are other people that are identical groups selling their wares...breeding on the ones that only want MORE money.Remember the jJudas ,Hitler, Mussolini, Caesar and all the others.If there is a hell then they are all there waiting for Bernie.What is the old saying "if it is too good to be true, then it is".Beware to the buyer."Beware my friend of the greed in your heart.Beides the people around you do not respect you.Secretly they are disgusted.....

|
|
Reply
8:49 am, Apr 24, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
9:01 am, Apr 24, 2009

VenusMuse

Love Michael Levinson, too!

|
|
Reply
3:28 pm, Apr 26, 2009

Banjo1

What I want to know is how Bernie is getting on with his "husband" in the lockup. I'm betting the gentle curl is gone from his hair.

|
|
Reply
9:01 am, Apr 24, 2009

dollyellen

We all knew he couldn't have done it alone, but the intricacies of this scam boggle the mind. What a great job of reporting by Lucinda Franks.....and love the Daily Beast. Viva Tina

|
|
Reply
|
9:04 am, Apr 24, 2009

oldbbabe

are you dollyellen friedman from woodmere?

|
|
Reply
|
11:52 pm, Apr 25, 2009

scough

No, I am.

|
10:19 am, Apr 26, 2009

jrjenki

If their wives were aware of the money being transfered into their names they are accomplices. The court should take everything they have. Homeless is good.

|
|
Reply
9:06 am, Apr 24, 2009

bindish

Once again, Ms. Franks has shone a light into several corners of the corrupt labyrinth Madoff created. Everyone who profited, while aware of the scheme's illegality, should be prosecuted,
and stripped of his or her assets. The silver lining would seem to be that the pool for potential restitution is growing. In this
regard, Ms. Franks is not only insightful and informative, but exceedingly helpful.

|
|
Reply
9:09 am, Apr 24, 2009

AylinSenturk

Let's not forget our favorite Lady Macbeth in all of this, Ruth Madoff: http://is.gd/m9nz

|
|
Reply
9:11 am, Apr 24, 2009

opedanderson

Oh stop with the sobbing over the money you lost.....

Enough already. 50% of the blame in a scam goes to the victims. Scams almost always only work on greedy people. All those victims could have verified this independently and even if they did that, first rule of investing is to NEVER put all your money in one basket. No matter how good it is. In fact, if it is really good all the more reason to diversify.

Madoff saw your weaknesses and took advantage of them. Throw him in jail. Try and recover what funds you can. But stop your whining and get on with your life.

You gambled. You lost.

|
|
Reply
|
9:21 am, Apr 24, 2009

stellastar57

i agree, if it sounds to good to be true, it is.

|
|
Reply
10:35 am, Apr 24, 2009

museweaver

opedanderson, well said.
who said, "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is?' or how bout this one: buyers beware...
these buyers were aware that they were getting more than others....i bet they never ONCE complained while the $$ was pouring into their accounts...nope, they lived well...now they have their memories...and maybe some new found humility...

|
|
Reply
11:15 am, Apr 24, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--Portmanteau
|
|
Reply
11:38 am, Apr 24, 2009

snorton

You're right and you're wrong. Right about the whining . . . there's a lot of it.
And who, including you, doesn't feel sorry for himself when the world screws
him in one way or another. But this isn't a simple case of investment loss.
It goes much, much further and is being ignored by people in high places
because they don't want to get caught being involved. There are lots of little
people who had a million dollars or less representing a life time of work invested in the SOB. A MILLION DOLLARS!, says you. Think about it.
What does that mean today after 40 or 50 years of breaking your ass.
On that score you're wrong. Curious to see how you feel after YOUR bank
fails anyway after the billions you're contributing to save it.


|
|
Reply
2:18 pm, Apr 25, 2009

jhub32

Nice. That's lovely advice for the charitable foundations. I dare you to say it to Elie Wiesel's face. You know, Elie Wiesel: survivor of the Holocaust, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, man who spent his entire post-concentration-camp life building up a charitable Foundation for Humanity to promote peace and assist help victims of genocide around the world; that's right, his foundation is wiped out. Right, you said it, he was so very, very greedy and irresponsible. The world just isn't that black and white.

|
|
Reply
11:42 pm, Apr 26, 2009

Southpaw

Wondering if the late Norman Levy's children had their personal fortunes invested with Madoff.

|
|
Reply
9:38 am, Apr 24, 2009

bobmart

Thank goodness Madoff was not a Political Friend of Obama or we would have never heard about his scheme. I bet he is sorry for not being a big supporter of Obama and Move On.Org.

|
|
Reply
|
9:49 am, Apr 24, 2009

museweaver

hardly...we would have heard much more--

|
|
Reply
11:10 am, Apr 24, 2009

RClaus801

A video comment for the Ponzi Scheme Shyster Made-off:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DWtQNi2LlQ


|
|
Reply
10:35 am, Apr 24, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Was Madoff 'Victim' and Best Friend an Accomplice?

by Lucinda Franks

Info
RSS
Lucinda Franks
Emails
|
print
Multiple Pages
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |