Blogs and Stories

Tina Brown

The Quake at Condé Nast

BS Top - Brown Si Newhouse SIPA / Newscom The closing of Condé Nast’s smart business glossy Portfolio is a terrible loss for the media business. But saddest of all is the unprecedented sight of the magazine world’s last big believer, Si Newhouse, throwing in the towel.

Portfolio, Condé Nast’s business magazine, got the ax today. This is terrible news. It’s not just that the cratering ad market has claimed another victim. Condé Nast chairman Si Newhouse had been admirably supportive of Portfolio for the last two years. The fact that he elected to close it, as suddenly as he folded Domino, Men’s Vogue, and the men’s fashion trade mag DNR suggests a worrying element of panic engulfing the steadfast publisher I worked for so comfortably for 17 years at Tatler, Vanity Fair, and The New Yorker.

Si Newhouse had a strong hand in the idea for Portfolio’s inception and wanted it to succeed. It was to be expected that not all the other well-coiffed 800-pound gorillas at the publisher’s upscale monthlies would be happy about Lipman’s status as Si’s new favorite.

You certainly can’t say that media commentators encouraged Newhouse to give Portfolio more time. Press coverage of the two-year-old magazine was relentlessly snotty. No one eats their young (or themselves) more hungrily than journalists.

It always baffled me why so many on the sidelines rooted so eagerly for Portfolio to fail. Its editor, Joanne Lipman, who was already a star at The Wall Street Journal, came out of the launch gate in April 2007 with a self-assured, smart competitor in the suit segment of boring business books. She ran some first-class narrative journalism such as Lloyd Grove on Sumner Redstone as King Lear and “Boomtown, Iraq” by Denis Johnson and reinvented Michael Lewis as the most influential commentator on the current economic meltdown. I remember being especially impressed by Robert Priest’s art direction. When I was flailing around at the start of Talk magazine six years before, it took me about 10 issues to get layouts that looked as crisp as the ones in Portfolio’s first issue. I think I was one of the few media snobs who liked the first Portfolio cover, an arty photograph of the New York skyline by Scott Peterman. Even though experience told me it was not the kind of cover that would exactly leap off the newsstand, it showed vitality and sophistication. Love it or hate it, at least it wasn’t the usual portrait of some spruced-up suit peering over a high-concept prop that tends to be the solution of choice in publications aimed at the boys’ club sector.

And yet rumors about Portfolio’s being “troubled” plagued Lipman from the outset. Every petty little hiccup that beset its launch was magnified as an index of its chronic malfunction. Some of the malice, no doubt, was spread from inside Condé Nast itself. The court of the Sun King is a rats’ nest of competing favorites who jostle for the 81-year-old supremo’s attention. Si Newhouse had a strong hand in the idea for Portfolio’s inception and wanted it to succeed. It was to be expected that not all the other well-coiffed 800-pound gorillas at the publisher’s upscale monthlies would be happy about Lipman’s status as Si’s new favorite.

Some of the unpleasantness was just the usual destructive hostility to process from blogosphere critics that now seems to accompany anything new. Everyone knows that it takes time to get something right, yet the inevitable trial and error of doing so is accompanied by a such a snarkfest of leaks and jeers that it distracts the staff, frightens off new contributors, and panics skittish advertisers.

Lipman shouldn't have too hard a time getting another job. She is an accomplished business journalist with a lot of fans. And most of her big-ticket writers will wind up with book deals or other Condé Nast writing gigs. But for a lot of the talented galley slaves who polished and sculpted and fact-checked and researched and copy-edited Portfolio and made it a slick and solid piece of work, it’s going to be a tough summer.

That’s sad. What’s even sadder is the unprecedented sight of the magazine world’s last big believer, Si Newhouse, exhibiting what looks like signs of throwing in the towel.

To own magazines or newspapers (or movie studios for that matter), you have to love what you own with almost impractical passion. Such passion was shyly evident in the owner of The Atlantic magazine, David Bradley, in a piece by Howard Kurtz in the Washington Post. The story discussed Bradley’s coveted off-the-record dinners with top Washington players like Tim Geithner and Rahm Emanuel. The dinners, it is clear, play no real business or journalistic purpose. Bradley started them, he admitted to Kurtz, “for the romance.” Owning magazines has always been the sexiest calling card in pursuit of a more interesting social life.

Si, to his credit, never much liked going out, but he’s always loved the vicarious thrill brought to him by entering his magazines’ worlds. That, as much as commercial success, was always the prime return on his investment. It was his passion for the smarter, edgier, more adventurous glossies like Vanity Fair, Condé Nast Traveler (founded by my husband), The New Yorker—and, dare I say it, Portfolio and Domino—that kept him patient for profit.

But that was then and this is now. Today the great Newhouse empire originally built on newspapers no longer looks impervious to downturn. (The Internet has never seriously interested Si—it’s too granular, too physically insubstantial.) He’s a great collector of art, and it’s not surprising that he prefers the sensual luxury of his glossy pages. Until now, he was always the media emperor who could live and do as he chose.

But there has been a lurching inconsistency to the way he closed down clever, promising Domino (and then, I am told, experienced regret when he read its glowing obituaries) and cut back Portfolio’s excellent Web site while vowing to keep the magazine alive—only to close it anyway. All this is so unlike Si that it’s a scary sign of how desperate the times are for the magazine-publishing business.

And worse, without Si, there are few other options.

Domino was a beautiful bauble, but its disappearance was a fairly minor loss to the wider culture. Portfolio had the potential not only to help us understand the complex issues of the volatile economy but help police the business world and keep (or make) it honest. Now we have to trust the Obama administration to be on that particular case. When Si Newhouse bought The New Yorker, though, he took upon himself the responsibility for an institution that is part of the nation’s cerebral cortex. Let’s hope this pitiless economy doesn’t force him to cap his noble career by performing a lobotomy.

Tina Brown is the founder and editor in chief of The Daily Beast. She is the author of the 2007 New York Times bestseller The Diana Chronicles. Brown is the former editor of Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and Talk magazines and host of CNBC's Topic A with Tina Brown.


View as Multiple Pages
Back to Top
April 27, 2009 | 6:32pm
Comments ()
flyoverland

I haven't like Newhouse since he shut down the old St. Louis Globe Democrat and left us with the Post Dispatch.

|
|
Reply
7:12 pm, Apr 27, 2009
amf215

Tina, why is there an ad for Bottega? I find it distracting and in bad taste in this forum.

|
|
Reply
|
7:20 pm, Apr 27, 2009
scough

"Bottega"? How funny. All the cognoscenti refer to the brand as "BV". you must feel all embarrassed and middle-class and icky.

|
|
Reply
7:38 pm, Apr 28, 2009
blissfulight

He better not close the New Yorker. It's the only magazine I still subscribe to, and will continue to subscribe to, until death do us part.

|
|
Reply
|
7:31 pm, Apr 27, 2009
scough

Death is not a distant event for most "New Yorker" subscribers.

|
|
Reply
7:39 pm, Apr 28, 2009
Alexius

Anything can happen in a volatile economy. I bet even the roof on top of the venerable Anna Wintour's bob had some cracks on it. Hope The Daily Beast can sail through this storm.

..............
http://alexius-locker.blogspot.com/

|
|
Reply
8:04 pm, Apr 27, 2009
rick164

Oh, give me a break Tina.

Easy to say Newhouse should keep a money-losing magazine about finance going in a deep recession--you are not writing the multi-million dollar checks to subsidize it.

This entire screed--about the bad reviews, about the owner insisting a money losing magazine close--sounds like you are still smarting over how you ran "Talk" into the ground. And you didn't even have the economy to blame. Talk sucked so did Portfolio. Good riddance.

|
|
Reply
8:38 pm, Apr 27, 2009
ibisko

this is heartbreaking!
that stupid maslow and his jive hierarchy of needs.
those cry babies who just got their dental coverage cut from medicaid, and the "nasty" rotten kids who demand programs in school, don't appreciate that the homeless used to use conde nast for rainwear.
folks in iraq and afganistan , who when they come back from patrol can't wait to get their Dominoe before they gaze at the pictures of their kids.
without the traveler, what would our trip to mexico be like?
screw the polar bears..we must save vanity fair !
could the marketplace actually be indicating demand?

|
|
Reply
|
9:02 pm, Apr 27, 2009
quinwithey

i don't think there's any saving vaniiy fair

|
|
Reply
10:55 am, May 25, 2009
rjcrawford33

I admit to feeling embarrassed at my schadenfreude at Portfolio's closing. But honestly, its high-roller arrogance was a sickening sight - there was snottiness on both sides. Portfolio also was more of a superficial mag than we would like to admit, an attempt to present business via gloss, instead of the slog it is for lots of us. The formula no longer works.

|
|
Reply
1:32 am, Apr 28, 2009
hockeydog

Tina, thank you for clarifying for me, that Conde' Nast was not an abbreviation for Condelezza Rice. Although I am familiar with Vanity Fair and the New Yorker, the only one of these publications referenced in your article that I am passionate about is The Atlantic.

The Atlantic has taken a page from the Beatles' playbook, by continually reinventing itself. This gives it a refreshing air. As a journal with ongoing substance, The Atlantic has also pioneered a bridge to its internet presence.

Although I haven't used that bridge very much (due to limited time on my hands), it ran an article that referred to a satellite video, on its website of special forces closing in on some miscreants on a beach. In this instance the magazine acted as a teaser for greater, in-depth coverage on its website.

The only connection I have to the Atlantic is as a reader, and subscriber, so please do not misunderstand this posting. But, this whole internet-information vs. traditional news outlet, thing is still evolving, and an ongoing process.

I think that The Daily Beast is also an ongoing process, and that when the dust finally settles, somewhat, both The Atlantic and The Daily Beast will be still standing amidst the ruins.

Keep up the good work, but trim the time alloted to the Bottega-type ads. I like your new mugshot too!

|
|
Reply
7:17 am, Apr 28, 2009
Bulldoglover100

Tina...if you ever want to beat HuffPo on the net? You need to hire more experienced and better writers than you have here. I am about to the point I am going to remove the Beast from my clicks on the computer. I am tired of the school girl rants that have no basis in fact. Hire people who are able to support their points of view with fact please. I am tired of watching them dribble spit down their chins when they write of people and things they disagree with. Rather like watching 2 dogs fight over who gets to eat the turd.

|
|
Reply
|
8:21 am, Apr 28, 2009
JLRoberson

Couldn't agree more. I've been watching this site since its start, and as far as I can tell, it's just about Tina Brown's friends talking amongst themselves. One could argue that's true at least of HuffPo's bloggers, but at least Arianna knows people who are in touch with current reality, while this site only shows me more and more that the cultural dominance of the northeast wanes as communication has decentralized and they have drifted further from the actual culture.

Christopher Buckley's bio picture encapsulates the sort of person thsi site gives the impression of being by and for: the out of touch moderate upper class WASP.

|
|
Reply
4:43 am, Apr 29, 2009
slobone

What she needs to do is write more often herself -- nobody's better than Tina.

Arianna wrote a column for Huffpo almost every day the first year, till she felt it was properly launched. Now she's cut back to about once a week, and the blog just ain't as good.

|
|
Reply
10:11 pm, Apr 29, 2009
Banjo1

What is happening is the age of the professional writer and editor is passing. What is taking its place is the age of the amateur writer full of opinion about subjects he usually doesn't fully understand or echoes other bloggers who suffer from the same handicap. As the professionals disappear, the people who trained themselves for print media and know how to do the paint-chipping work that eventually yields a well formed and reliable piece of journalism, the public will be left with bloviators of one sort or another. We'll choose the unreliable source who best approximates our own world view and it will be as if the rest of the picture and any inconvenient truths therein don't exist. The deconstructionists say there is no truth anyhow.

|
|
Reply
|
8:46 am, Apr 28, 2009
scough

Zzzzzzzzzz! Snort! What? Don't bury the lead, Frenchy.

|
|
Reply
7:44 pm, Apr 28, 2009
rick164

Even if you thought it was a great magazine (I did not) it was not commercially viable. Tina, please explain how they could have kept Portfolio going when ad pages were down an amazing 45% from last year. Plus the circulation was only 450,000, with 20% from free, bulk copies (usual ratio is only 10% free copies). Frequency and staff were already cut 6 months ago, and the red ink continued.


It says a lot about Tina Brown's sense of entitlement that she thinks magazines are some sort of obligation, rather than a profit making enterprise.

|
|
Reply
8:51 am, Apr 28, 2009
rittrohs

"But for a lot of the talented galley slaves who polished and sculpted and fact-checked and researched and copy-edited Portfolio and made it a slick and solid piece of work, it's going to be a tough summer."

Tina, Thanks for remembering us worker bees who toil beneath the glamour. Barb

|
|
Reply
10:16 am, Apr 28, 2009
davisull

"Everyone knows that it takes time to get something right,"

Well, actually, no, they don't. (And having time, alas, doesn't guarantee you will get it right either.)

On such shoals is the ship of journalism foundering -- the belief, jet fueled by the internet, that while any individual may know more about any particular subject than I do, all are equal in judging what it all means, and if I disagree with your conclusion, it's because you're an entitled elitist, an arrogant bloviator, whatever -- not that, perhaps, you might have access to more information than I do, or training or ability to judge its meaning. It really puzzles me, the number of people who feel that drawing a conclusion based on reporting and editing is beyond what a journalist should do.

|
|
Reply
10:31 am, Apr 28, 2009
Steak1

I'm certainly sad to see good magazine journalists lose their jobs in this climate, but not so sad to see Portfolio go away. A lot of the magazines that have failed lately seem to have something in common: They were launched to create an advertising environment more than to serve a demand from potential readers. Was there really a large demographic of business magazine readers who wanted an alternative that was glossier, fancier, and more stylishly written than Fortune, Forbes et al? You could level the same criticism at Best Life, Domino, Men's Vogue, and many other titles that have left the building. They all seem like great places for a Lexus ad, but without serving the real needs of real readers, some magazines may deserve to die.

|
|
Reply
11:01 am, Apr 28, 2009
wrywriter

Portfolio was very pretty but that was about it. It never "mattered," was never a "must read." That's a failure of the editorial team at the top.

The ultimate mistake, however, was to start it with a fire hose of money; Si would have been better off to make it Conde-worthy without adding so much ballast that it couldn't fly. Portfolio wound up being gold-plated but hollow. There were lots of A-list names but they didn't have much interesting to say.

I'm just sorry to see writers, editors, etc. out of work.

|
|
Reply
11:45 am, Apr 28, 2009
clarissa

hmm, a 2 year old glossy as a keystone of financial journalism? please!

portfolio was not timely, in the literal sense. i'd get my FT, WSJ, and other specialized morning updates by 6AM. Portfolio's would roll in around 11AM. financial news must be timely. it wasn't worth reading and the market had already reacted by the time their information came out.

with respect to the magazine, it was politics (always) over insight. portfolio didn't offer any specialized information or provide any understanding into an issue that couldn't be found elsewhere.

writing about finance topics is not the same as financial journalism.

|
|
Reply
4:34 pm, Apr 28, 2009
cowboylove

I still subscribe to vanity fair. It is the last of my magazine subscriptions. It is, however, a magazine one likes to curl up with and have a night or two of guilty pleasure.

The internet, though still a bit juvenile and unprofessional, is becoming the place of choice to read about news and business. News and business journals and magazines had better get with the times and make the transition.

By the way, there is no news in the sexiness of owning or editing a major magazine or newspaper. It is why most people are in the business - access to power, the ultimate aphrodisiac.

|
|
Reply
|
7:15 pm, Apr 28, 2009
untorrid

No matter Portfolio's potential, the timing was off. Hanging onto it would only pull down the few parts of the company able to make some profits. I saw it not as a sign of "throwing in the towel" but a sign of maturity. I saw a man running a business, or maybe what we saw was other executives getting SI to listen to reality. I'm just sorry that Domino had to die for it. But glad more CNP magazines and websites get to live another day because of the money saved.

|
|
Reply
7:35 pm, Apr 28, 2009
scough

Whatever, Brokeback!

|
|
Reply
7:41 pm, Apr 28, 2009
scough

Tina, print is dead. If it were not, people wouldn't be so desperate to create crappy websites full of advertorials. Whoops! Sorry. I meant, yeah, what a shocker.

|
|
Reply
7:40 pm, Apr 28, 2009
wrathhound

Actually, I have to agree with bulldoglover. I think the Beast is a great idea that could have easily become an integral part of my morning online reading regimen, but I have clicked on too many poorly written opinion pieces and am drifting away. Which is a pity. I'm sure you're doing this on a fraction of your VF budget, but still. If you're promising Big Fat Stories, Buckley chewing his glasses or McCain's daughter writing for whatever frickin' reason isn't going to cut it. Please take this the right way.

|
|
Reply
4:23 am, Apr 29, 2009
Gerontius

"well-coiffed favourites" - that can't include Graydon, then?

|
|
Reply
|
7:17 am, Apr 29, 2009
scough

GB, "hi" from NB, Rikkor.

|
|
Reply
9:09 am, Apr 29, 2009
brankobrkic

In Nov 2005, me and bunch of journalist friends launched South African magazine called Maverick, bearing tagline A Business Magazine for People with Brains and Money. The photography was previously unseen at any local magazine worth its salt. The sharp humor was peppering the read, making it difficult just to browse the magazine. With all the financial problems we've had, not helped by the chaotic situation on the South African market, we saw our baby taking off and being recognized for what it is, a magazine of great promise. (Unfortunately, South Africa's dying market was simply not big enough and Maverick folded after 31 issues.)

In March 2007 with great excitement I read about the imminent launch of Conde Nast Portfolio, moving exactly into the same space we've been committing our lives to for the previous 18 months. For us, it was an affirmation that we were right all along.

And then Portfolio actually launched. But when I saw the magazine and heard about the squabbles in the team, I couldn't help but feel terrible disappointment (me, the life-long admirer of Cond� Nast magazines). What I saw was the magazine without a strong personality that will actually force the readers to take it into their hands and read it, and look at the world differently after they went through it. Reading it and reading about it, I couldn't help but ask: What happened to the editors' gut feel? What happened to their instinct as a decision-making tool and imagination as a magazine-personality building tool?

Portfolio suffered from being over-staffed, over-hyped and personality-less in the unforgiving market. Personality, personality, and again, personality, methinks. If magazine is to survive the onslaught of the online world, it has to have a personality. A strong one, defining one, the one that reader will aspire to. It is 21st century all around us, and we need to give a reader much, much more than just a good read. We need to give them a reason to pick it up and spend their time with it. Kind of difficult with Portfolio magazine.

The saddest thing is, it was probably the media's last chance to create a really good global magazine for people with brains and money.

|
|
Reply
7:58 am, Apr 29, 2009
ScottRose

At this juncture, the faltering economy is so overwhelming a factor that one can not reasonably claim that any particular aspect of Portfolio not related to its bottom line caused SI Newhouse to shutter it.

That the magazine evinced world-class professionalism from the first issue is an absolute.

People carp, people pick; there is no one magazine that excites everybody equally. You can certainly find a majority of the public sneering at The Economist, saying it is boring and badly done.

Does that rejection on the part of a majority make The Economist a bad publication? I think not.

I have a particularly hard time respecting people who take broad swipes against a publication, when they are not in any position to have to argue against opposing views.

Many excellent individual pieces were published in Portfolio.

|
|
Reply
|
10:55 am, Apr 29, 2009
nickmagoo

And also utterly unbearable tripe - in a recent issue was the eye-gougingly cringe worthy article of some 'anonymous' wife of a high up mucky-muck banker explaining the hardships she's had to endure recently (like having to fly 'commercial' (not coach! commercial!) instead of using a company jet). I believe it was reprinted on this site...

It was a magazine for, by and about rich people. It lost tens of millions of dollars, unable to sustain it's own lavish and outlandish lifestyle - how ironically unsurprising.

And now it's gone. Boo-freaking-hoo.

|
|
Reply
3:29 pm, Apr 29, 2009
GoodNews

Galley slaves :-) Love It!

|
|
Reply
1:11 pm, Apr 29, 2009
brianpaul12

Personally, I really liked Portoflio Magazine from the moment that I picked it up on the newsstand in some long forgotten airport. I read a really interesting piece on the business of being Britney Spears. And to anyone not interested in Britney, it actually outlined how much money she generated to industries other than her own bank account. It was the tabloids, the magazine writers, the TV anchors, photographers, fashion designers, et al and it was something to the tune of $140 million dollars. Of course, this was at the time that she was seriously out of control of her personal life and what that was worth to everyone who paid attention. To me, it was big business making sure that she was on suicide watch. I liked the fact that there was a publication that instead of making fun of her antics, they were paying attention to a serious side of downfall and what that was making to people wanting to sell it.

I thought it was one of the smartest magazines out there and I even subscribed to it. No, I didn't read Forbes or Fortune because I felt that they were too dry and quite frankly, boring. Portfolio was great writing and I agree with you that it should have been kept.

This is a sad piece of the economy not just losing jobs but also losing voices that can change the way we do business.

I am a great believer in magazines for their editorial content and images. (Where would we be without he iconic Life Magazine and, no, I am not talking about that trash that was circulated in newspapers across the country for a couple of months.

|
|
Reply
4:30 pm, Apr 29, 2009
sophia5

It's too bad we're entering an age of "VIRTUAL REALITY"
where the tangible printed word is in danger of
becoming extinct.

There's something special about waking up in the morning
and grabbing a newspaper or magazine with coffee or
tea.

The paper's being replaced by the web,
no offense to "The Beast,"
and the spoken word replaced by text messaging.

The more we are "connected" the less we are "connected."

Even the fruit is virtual. Apple . . . Blackberry . . .

|
|
Reply
10:22 pm, Apr 29, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

The Quake at Condé Nast

by Tina Brown

Info
RSS
Tina Brown
Emails
|
print
Multiple Pages
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |