Blogs and Stories

Matthew Yglesias

Cheer Up, Liberals

Barack Obama Charles Dharapak / AP Photo Obama is on track to accomplish major changes despite some grumbling from the left.

When contemplating how to evaluate Barack Obama's first 100 days, it's important to keep in mind the proviso: Compared to what? Though some on the left are feigning—or perhaps even genuinely experiencing—disappointment at the realization that Barack Obama is a politician operating within the confines of the existing political establishment, it's not clear what they were expecting him to do.

Looking back at 20th-century presidents from the point of view of progressive reform, you find FDR and an agenda fatally compromised by a corrupt bargain with the forces of white supremacy. You find LBJ and the cleansing of Jim Crow jostling awkwardly side-by-side with Vietnam. And it's downhill from there. Realistically, if the health-care and education proposals in Obama's 2010 budget pass Congress—and there's good reason to believe they will—Obama will have achieved more in a few months than Bill Clinton did in eight years. Throw in a thaw in the Latin American Cold War, important bilateral arms reductions with Russia, an impressive economic-stimulus package, and an end to the Bush torture state and this looks like a very solid 100 Days.

The tragedy is that it may not be enough. The world urgently needs major polluting countries to sharply and quickly reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. And the odds of legislation robust enough to do that obtaining the 60 necessary votes in the Senate look very bleak. That's "political reality" and not a character flaw of the president's. But real-world reality is that the political constraints of the moment are condemning the world to disasters decades-hence that future generations will find difficult to forgive.

Matthew Yglesias is a fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. He is the author of Heads in the Sand: How the Republicans Screw Up Foreign Policy and Foreign Policy Screws Up the Democrats.

Xtra Insight: Read other takes on the first 100 days from The Daily Beast's all-star team of analysts.


Back to Top
April 28, 2009 | 9:16pm
Comments ()
TheNate

Matthew-

"Cheer Up, Liberals"
and then
"The world urgently needs major polluting countries to sharply and quickly reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. And the odds of legislation robust enough to do that obtaining the 60 necessary votes in the Senate look very bleak."

Why would I cheer up. Global Warming is depressing. I agree with the thrust of your opinion, though.

|
|
Reply
10:51 am, Apr 29, 2009
RRoseH1

After Norm Coleman finally decides to put the country first and concedes to Al Franken the Dems will have a filibuster proof Senate. The best a way forward to do the peoples work.

|
|
Reply
10:40 am, May 19, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Cheer Up, Liberals

by Matthew Yglesias

Info
RSS
Matthew Yglesias
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |