Blogs and Stories

Nicholas Schmidle

The Playboy Running Pakistan

Zardari Yoshikazu Tsuno, AFP / Getty Images As Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari heads for Washington—amid a fresh surge of violence in his country—Nicholas Schmidle explains how a Karachi playboy and accused murderer became our ally, and why his days are numbered.

Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari relishes politics behind closed doors. But as his army continues to battle Taliban militants in northwest Pakistan with fighter jets, air-dropped commandos, and helicopter gunships, Zardari has been keeping an exceptionally low profile.

Perhaps for good reason. Even though the military has reclaimed some of the territory overrun by the Talibs last week in Buner district, the Taliban are still holding some 50 kidnapped Pakistani soldiers hostage, tens of thousands of civilians have been displaced, and there’s a nasty ethnic conflict festering in Karachi that’s already left dozens dead. If part of a president’s job is to guarantee the safety of his people, Zardari is having an awful time of it these days.

Zardari is, in many ways, a fluke president. A Karachi socialite and playboy who reportedly turned his basement into a disco, Zardari stabled his polo horses at the prime minister's official residence during Bhutto's first term in office.

The Taliban’s conquest of Buner, an advance that brought them within 70 miles of Islamabad, triggered international alarm. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton went so far as to warn the Senate that "Pakistan poses a mortal threat to the security and safety of our country and the world." But Zardari’s office issued just one vacuous, disingenuous statement, declaring that military action was only "one aspect of the solution" and that his government "will not succumb to any pressure from the militants." On the first part, he’s right: Military efforts to crush the Taliban are only likely to breathe life into the insurgency. On the second point, however, he’s just bluffing: The fact is that Zardari's government—and Pervez Musharraf's before that—have already succumbed in northwest Pakistan, both having negotiating peace deals that allowed the Taliban safe havens.

When Zardari shows up in Washington next week, he’ll likely try to justify these concessions as part of a bigger strategy. But will the White House believe him? Could Zardari possibly have something else up his sleeve? It's unlikely, and here's why:

Zardari is, in many ways, a fluke president. Twenty years ago, he married Benazir Bhutto and was lifted from relative obscurity into Pakistan's most powerful political dynasty. A Karachi socialite and playboy who had reportedly turned his basement into a disco, Zardari stabled his polo horses at the prime minister's official residence during Bhutto's first term in office. Meanwhile, he earned the nickname "Mr. Ten Percent" for the kickback he purportedly took on government contracts. Zardari would spend most of his marriage in prison on charges ranging from corruption to murdering his brother-in-law. Though never convicted, he has always carried a certain, well, unsavory reputation as a crooked, back-room operator.

Zardari wouldn't remain in the shadows forever. After Bhutto's assassination in December 2007, Zardari succeeded her as chairman of the Pakistan People's Party. Two months later, the PPP won a plurality of seats in nationwide parliamentary elections. Zardari, at this point arguably the most powerful man in the country, put his glad-handing skills to good use. He cobbled together an unlikely alliance and the PPP formed a government. In August, he spearheaded the impeachment proceedings that forced Musharraf to step down. And just three weeks after that, he had satisfied enough lawmakers that they elected him president. (In Pakistan, the president is chosen by the sitting assemblies.)

But Zardari shared something—a certain nemesis—with Musharraf. In 2007, Musharraf had sacked the chief justice of the supreme court, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, twice as Chaudhry's court prepared to declare Musharraf's reelection bid unconstitutional. Thousands of lawyers, and tens of thousands of their supporters, massed in the streets to demand the rule of law and an independent judiciary. The street protests weakened Musharraf and resulted in his downfall. Zardari took power in September promising to restore Chaudhry. But he had his own beef with Chaudhry over past corruption cases, so Zardari deliberated. Pakistanis lost any trust in him and the lawyers returned in numbers. This time, they pledged to topple Zardari. Last month, Zardari conceded and returned Chaudhry to his bench. But he had already squandered every ounce of popularity that he—or the PPP—once had.

For Pakistan to wage a successful counterinsurgency against the Taliban, the government needs two things: the support of the people, and the army. A poll conducted in January showed Zardari's approval rating at 19 percent. And while cutting deals in the halls of power might have worked for some, the Pakistani military seems less impressed by his connivance. When the PPP-led government tried to exert control over Pakistan's supreme intelligence agency, the ISI, the military flat out refused, forcing Zardari and the PPP to back off. Then, after terrorists rampaged Mumbai and killed almost 200 people, Pakistan's national security adviser admitted that the lone remaining gunman was, in fact, a Pakistani. (Until then, the government had denied any involvement.) The national security adviser, a retired major general and former ambassador to the United States, was a valuable liaison between the civilian government and the army. But after his admission, he was promptly fired for "indiscretion" and the information ministry denied the gunman was Pakistani. Then, an hour later, the foreign office reversed course and concurred with the adviser's assessment.

Zardari would spend most of his marriage in prison on charges ranging from corruption to murdering his brother-in-law. Though never convicted, he has always carried a certain, well, unsavory reputation.

"Some very serious differences at the highest level in Islamabad had been spectacularly laid bare within the space of a few hours," said an editorial the next day in The News. And Zardari's response to the whole thing? He called the adviser to apologize, but since the adviser technically worked for the prime minister, who had sacked him, and not the president, Zardari confessed that he was powerless to do anything. It appeared that there were more than just divisions between the government and the army, the lawyers, the Taliban, the intelligence agencies, Afghanistan and India. They now existed within the civilian leadership itself.

Critics of Musharraf used to deride him whenever he bombarded the Taliban and categorize the operations as part of "Musharraf's War." Zardari has fallen into many of the same traps—mainly the public perception of doing America's bidding—but few people call Zardari's sporadic operations "Zardari's war." That would be almost giving him too much credit and control. When Musharraf was recently asked by a reporter to reflect on his tenure, he confessed to have resigned last summer because he feared being "impotent." Despite his playboy past, Zardari may find himself proclaiming impotence soon too.

Nicholas Schmidle, who lived in Pakistan from 2006 to 2008, is a fellow at the New America Foundation and author of To Live or to Perish Forever: Two Tumultuous Years in Pakistan, which will be published May 12.

Xtra Insight: Reihan Salam: Obama’s Pakistan Nightmare

Xtra Insight: Fatima Bhutto: Stop Funding My Failed State

Xtra Insight: Leslie H. Gelb: The Taliban Ticking Clock


View as Multiple Pages
Back to Top
April 30, 2009 | 9:25pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

saaddaas

I'm Pakistani and you are correct that this guy become President only because of his political machinations. He is corruption itself and can only make matters worse for Pakistan, the US and the world at large

|
|
Reply
3:04 am, May 1, 2009

drmarkklein

Oy vey, this is just like the harebrained White house meddling which brought the ayatollahs to power. The DC party circuit crowd decided the Shah wasn't up to snuff because his secret police were too nasty and what Iran really needed was democracy. Hence the papers were flooded with anti-Shah stories. Turned out the Hasidic lookalike ayatollahs who replaced him were anything but sweet natured scholarly rabbis. For the ayatollahs getting rid of chametz is cleaning the world with a final solution for all non believers. Let Zadari, aka Mr. 10%,, and the Pakistani Army do what needs to be done even it means a military coup and dictatorship.



















p

|
|
Reply
8:06 am, May 1, 2009

KEEPBRITAINCLEAN

'' Pakistan '' is in a mess and GOD help them, cause their so called leaders '' Asif Ali Zardari '' dont know what their are doing.

|
|
Reply
4:56 am, May 2, 2009

mikeoutwest

Wow! You lived for two WHOLE years in Pakistan??!! That's incredible, how did you pull off such a magnificent feat? Are you, like, a super hero?

America, and the entire world, should be very proud of your single and most unique achievement. Living abroad is unheard of, and living in the land of Pakis--living to tell the tale--was beyond what we'd ever imagined for the confines of bravery and saintliness.

Did you actually meet Pakistanis there? I am sure the cab drivers of Karachi still remember you fondly, as they remember the celestial light that came into their lives.

Yeah, milk it, dude. If your selling point is a couple of years in some joint and someone has given you a job over it, then you are king in the land of suckers.

|
|
Reply
1:33 pm, May 2, 2009

sulehria

stop talibanization in pakistan
o corrupt leaders of pakistan stop fooling the peoples of pakistan and let them live freely.
we have the right to have a free life

|
|
Reply
4:50 pm, May 2, 2009

maxiepad

What? The US - land of freedom, democracy, honesty and Tim Geithner - backing a corrupt, murderous, foreign authoritarian regime? Not since Hussein, Noriega, the Shah Pahlevi, Somoza, Marcos, Suharto, Duvalier, Batista, Franco, Idi Amin, Pinochet, etc etc etc, has something like this happened!

Stop the presses, the integrity and high moral character of the US has been compromised!!!!!

This call for a prompt expiatory war (of distraction): let's invade *dice roll* Yemen, why not, it's full of infidels and it looks small...

|
|
Reply
8:06 pm, May 3, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

The Playboy Running Pakistan

by Nicholas Schmidle

Info
RSS
Nicholas Schmidle
Emails
|
print
Multiple Pages
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |