Blogs and Stories

Chris Matthews

Chris Matthews on the Buckley Mystique

Buckley Family The MSNBC host celebrates Christopher Buckley’s lively tribute to his parents—and says Losing Mum and Pup answers JFK’s key question about biography: What were they really like?

Jack Kennedy once said that the reason people read a biography is to answer one question: What was he like?

What was the late William F. Buckley Jr. really like? And what of his wife, Pat, that formidable New York socialite? What could a son make of her? And what were those two, Bill and Pat, like together? What on earth was it like growing up in the middle of all that?

Novelist Christopher Buckley spends every page of Losing Mum and Pup spelling out the lively answers. He told one reporter it’s the best thing he’s ever written. And if he left some things out as he takes us through his parents’ last months, it’s like one of those plays by Harold Pinter. What he doesn’t say says a lot.

Certainly, it’s the best material any author could want. “Is it name-dropping,” Buckley asks, “when they’re your own parents?”

Certainly, it’s the best material any author could want. “Is it name-dropping,” he asks, “when they’re your own parents?”

And what of the world these three shared? The Park Avenue social whirl, Christmas sailing in the Caribbean, then off to Gstaad and drinks with David Niven?

If Losing Mum and Pup reads as debonair as the settings, there’s toughness as well.

Here’s a Bill Buckley you never met on Firing Line.

“Why don’t we agree that the next call you get from me will be when she’s dead.” He’s telling Chris that he, a man as in love with his wife any man could be, simply cannot bring himself to see his dying, comatose wife one more time.

Or this snappy little note from the father on his son’s most recent novel, which had elsewhere been extremely well received. “This one didn’t work for me. Sorry.”

Pretty tough. Then again, if you know fathers of that generation, not at all surprising. The Greatest Generation was tight with its trophies.

And what a life the old man shared with his boy. “My father had always had the notion of sailing across the Atlantic, and this we did in 1975. We set off from Miami on June 1. A month and 4,400 miles later, we dropped anchor in the shadow of Gibraltar.”

Buckley writes about “Mum,” who died first and not by that many months before “Pup,” with more exuberance. She had come dashing into Bill Buckley’s heart as a Vassar roommate of his sister’s. Despite all the spats and all the years, she never left it.

What a glow she left in these pages. “I’ve got the best legs in the business.” What other son can claim to have heard his mother drop that baby?

Among those hundreds of photos, he writes, there wasn’t one bad one. “She made love to every camera that came her way.”

Now try putting all this together.

“I don’t think I once heard Mum utter a religious or spiritual sentiment.”

Yet here is the portrait he paints of the great American Catholic’s wife visiting the Vatican. “She wore more black lace than a Goya duchess; the effect is that of the Magdalene, as dressed by Bill Blass.”

“Generally, she was defiant—almost magnificently so—when her demons slipped their leash.”

And yet, what a sport she could be when she, Patricia Buckley, decided to be.

“My mother deserves a word of appreciation here. She was the dutiful yachtsman’s wife. Lord, how she worked at it. In earlier times, the term for this occupation was 'galley slave.' She had been raised as a debutante, a beautiful, delicate orchid from Vancouver, Canada. Now she found herself cooking for eight men and scrubbing the toilet aboard a small boat with no hot water. She would mutter darkly, ‘I was made for better things.’”

Back to Top
May 3, 2009 | 7:04am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

Banjo1

One phony promoting another. This is how the establishment works, folks.

|
|
Reply
|
8:19 am, May 3, 2009

Kirbonicus

What is a 'phony' and how does it apply to these people?

|
|
Reply
9:59 am, May 3, 2009

Ritarita

Banjo-
Maybe if
You practice
Real hard
You can string
The words together
To make one
Positive
Statement.

|
|
Reply
1:45 pm, May 3, 2009

TavernWench

So the Bush Party now purges the Buckleys. There's your sign!

|
|
Reply
6:13 pm, May 3, 2009

drkaza12

banjo; there are definitely a couple of strings missing on the old banjo.

promptly, once again your spreading your unique trademark of vitriol; bless us this time it is contained in two sentences. The second would have been served best as a question though.

word to the wise, which is a daring assumption on my part; banjo me dear old mum used to say; "if you have nothing decent to say, say nothing at all". I add too this pearl; if you have nothing to add to any conversation except self evident vitriol, silence is your only redemption.

Banjo; why do you hate America?

|
|
Reply
4:44 pm, May 4, 2009

princeminski

Jeez, having seen a few of your posts (and other people's responses) I figured you were a standard right wing knee-jerk naysayer. Apparently it's more pathological than that.

|
|
Reply
8:52 am, Sep 14, 2009

connie47

This is a great review. It makes me want to know more.

|
|
Reply
|
8:40 am, May 3, 2009

southernyankee

I find reading books by Chris Buckley is easier to read than his father's books.

|
|
Reply
5:41 pm, May 3, 2009

Johnnorth

Obviously Chris Buckley can make death interesting. Must read it. Chris Matthews surprises with this well-written revew. Write more, Matthews, scowl less.

|
|
Reply
|
8:54 am, May 3, 2009

drkaza12

I too was surprised and delighted

|
|
Reply
5:43 pm, May 4, 2009

Johnnorth

Banjo1 must be one of a helluva of a bore with such a raging inferiority complex

|
|
Reply
8:55 am, May 3, 2009

scough

What were they really like? Nasty drunks who chain-smoked? Gawd! Enough of the endless promotion of this book!

|
|
Reply
9:41 am, May 3, 2009

GPatton

Hey B**J*1, shut your pie hole, numbscull. George Patton

|
|
Reply
9:46 am, May 3, 2009

Banjo1

What do I mean by phony? Matthews was a Democratic functionary until he got a job in TV passing himself off as an objective talking head playing it down the middle. Then MSNBC went nuts and he was free to be himself. Buckley, a vivid demonstration of how blood thins between the generations, would have been nothing without the help of his distinguished father. If Dubya is a phony who rose to his level of incompetence because of Poppy, how is Buckley any different? Is nepotism a word still used? But keep dipping your snout in the swill, Johnnorth. Doesn't matter if it's true or false. Tastes the same to you.

|
|
Reply
|
11:02 am, May 3, 2009

xbainx

I am glad to see you finally bash Bush. Let us go down the line:

Nixon gets us Watergate.

Reagan gets us Iran/Contra

Bush I gets us the rise and fall of Sadam.

Bush II gets us two wars and raises us a depression.

Republicans are treasonous dogs. But just because your party is terrible and you hate fags, doesn't mean the rest of us are without hope.

We liberal scum, we're running the show now. And you won't ever thank us Banjo, but that's not important. What is important is never letting another Republican rule. You're right to dislike Buckley. His father used to write articles praising fascists and segregation. So let's hope that blood is really watered down.

|
|
Reply
11:38 am, May 3, 2009

genoftheheart

But don't you wish you could write as well as Christopher Buckley? I do. The insight into the importance of his family is just the medicine this country needs right now. Americans have wasted too much energy chasing upward mobility instead of family stability. Buckley has suggested that I quote less, but I can't resist this one from John Gatto, author of Dumbing Us Down. "Family is the engine of education." The values that are instilled in us from childhood determine our identity, our motivation and inspiration. So really Banjo1, what were your parents like?

|
|
Reply
11:39 am, May 3, 2009

jackbutler5555

Are you really asking what's the difference between George W. Bush and Christopher Buckley? Matthews never passed himself off as objective. He has always been opinionated as they come. Have you ever watched Hardball? You ever hear him take off on the Clintons? I think you're attacking Matthews because you disagree with him. That's fine. However, you might want to do some homework first.

|
|
Reply
12:01 pm, May 3, 2009

connie47

The flaw in your argument is that if the younger Mr. Buckley does not come up with the goods, no one will read him and he'll be out of business.

|
|
Reply
11:29 am, May 4, 2009

tomforcomm

Nicely written review, I'll be sure to read this book, not just because of this review but because Chris Buckley can actually write.

|
|
Reply
12:00 pm, May 3, 2009

TK798999

Chrissy, does Buckley give you a tingle up your leg?

|
|
Reply
1:00 pm, May 3, 2009

Banjo1

You must be light-headed from whatever goes on in the bath house, xbainx. (No, we don't want to know). Republicans are "treasonous dogs," eh? The foaming-at-the-mouth left keeps expanding the category. Pretty soon only West Hollywood, the Castro and the parts of Palm Beach with antique stores will be considered non-treasonous. You've got scales covering your eyes, xbainx, and I don't want to think about what else you've picked up. But if you want to call yourself liberal scum, be my guest. I prefer "deluded." It's more polite.

|
|
Reply
|
1:16 pm, May 3, 2009

Ritarita

There's
That bath house
Reference
Again.
I'm getting the
Creeps.

|
|
Reply
|
1:50 pm, May 3, 2009

TavernWench

Me
Too.

|
6:14 pm, May 3, 2009

xbainx

What I meant was I am going to rape you. But in a heterosexual way. Seriously though dude, I don't even get the gay jokes. What if every post I made somehow referenced fat girls?

I think you would begin to assume I secretly had a passion for fat girls. And I do.

|
|
Reply
12:24 am, May 4, 2009

purpleme

It helps me make some sense of my" being "when someone else can articulate these "things" most of us stuff down. I look forward to the human insight.

|
|
Reply
1:33 pm, May 3, 2009

nabeltdb

Why all the nasty comments? One man wrote a book about his parents, and another man wrote a favorable review about that book. It's not about politics.

|
|
Reply
|
2:43 pm, May 3, 2009

marymargaretstp

Truly, why all the nastiness? Must a warm review about a writer (C. Buckley) that can eloquently turn a phrase about his fascinating (and perhaps controversial) family, descend into disagreeable diatribe?!??! Lighten up Francis...um, Banjo.

|
|
Reply
10:28 pm, May 8, 2009

camper

Mathews is a pundit if ther ever there was one but this was a well written review. I will read this book. I hope it reads like real life salinger.

|
|
Reply
|
3:11 pm, May 3, 2009

princeminski

Pierre?

|
|
Reply
8:54 am, Sep 14, 2009

PietrH

"Laborare est orare" not "laborare est orarare!"

Come on Chris, what happened to your Jesuit Latin? I think Bill B., Sr. would smile wryly at such an error.


|
|
Reply
3:37 pm, May 3, 2009

perkins

Just

|
|
Reply
4:11 pm, May 3, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Chris Matthews on the Buckley Mystique

by Chris Matthews

Info
RSS
Chris Matthews
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |