Blogs and Stories

Outing Sanctimonious Celebs

by Caryn James Info

Caryn James
 
  • Share

Barry Levinson Astrid Stawiarz / Getty Images A hot new documentary by Wag the Dog director Barry Levinson tackles the ugly truth about celebrities' misguided political interventions.

We always knew that Obamamania would have to give way to realism, like it or not. And on the evidence of PoliWood, Barry Levinson’s piercing new documentary about the mingling of politics and Hollywood, the director may be the ultimate realist for our media-centric, still-hopeful yet still-polarized age.

The film (which premiered Friday at the Tribeca Film Festival) first took shape when the Creative Coalition, the advocacy group of artists, asked Levinson to follow its members to the 2008 Democratic and Republican conventions and the inauguration. The project morphed so much it is now billed as “A Barry Levinson Film Essay,” and a good thing it did. What might have been a valentine to an admirable group (snooze) is now an eye-opening meditation, with Levinson appearing on camera to frame trenchant questions about the “unholy alliance” as he calls it, of politics, celebrity, and media.

“Everyone is selling something,” Levinson says matter-of-factly onscreen. “And that’s the democracy we have today.”

It’s territory Levinson understands well, having directed Wag the Dog, the prescient 1997 movie in which a political strategist wages a bogus war entirely on television to distract the nation from a White House sex scandal. PoliWood plays as if Levinson were explaining how we got to be such a Wag the Dog country—he casts TV as the villain—and why the media hounds keep getting more rabid.

The camera watches as Spike Lee challenges Gov. David Paterson about funding arts education in New York and actor Giancarlo Esposito speaks movingly about his mother’s emotional breakdown and the need for better mental-health care. Anne Hathaway plays the ingenue, worried about how to combine stardom with political responsibility.

But the two episodes of high drama come from events Levinson himself set in motion. At the Democratic convention in Denver, he asked pollster Frank Luntz to run a seminar advising Creative Coalition members how to convey their support for issues such as arts education more effectively. When Luntz mildly suggests that the actors tone down any in-your-face rhetoric, perhaps use language to sway opponents not antagonize them, actor Josh Lucas turns as red-faced as a kid whose toy has been taken away on the playground; he’s indignant at being told what to say. Actress Gloria Reuben actually compares Luntz’s advice to stomping on her First Amendment rights. Huh? This from people who make a living creating images.

Here we get an illuminating peek inside the bubble at least some stars occupy. Susan Sarandon is a voice of reason as she patiently explains, in what amounts to a Bush flashback, “I don’t talk about impeachment, I talk about accountability.”

Levinson took a more conciliatory approach during the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, asking Luntz to bring together actors and ordinary citizens to talk across the Hollywood-Main Street divide. Face to face with actors including Hathaway, Tim Daly, and Ellen Burstyn, the people in St. Paul (not all of them Republicans) were—what’s the opposite of star-struck? They practically spit venom. They are furious that showbiz millionaires get what one man calls “undue influence”; they angrily call the stars arrogant and out of touch; another man accuses them of not allowing everyday people to think for themselves. (Maybe he thought he was in a sci-fi mind-meld movie.)

The political gulf between Middle America and Hollywood is hardly a new idea. What’s fresh is this closeup view, so visceral it finally makes that abstraction real (especially to some of us in celeb-central New York).

May 4, 2009 | 5:48am
  • Share
Comments ()

Issywise

"Does Hollywood Control Washington?" This is a headline that stands up well against the Weekly World's assertion that six US Senators were space aliens. Will future Daily Beast articles discuss whether Elvis is still alive, living on that South American island with Hitler and John F. Kennedy?

Serrrrrrrriiiiiioooussss journalism.

|
|
Reply
7:23 am, May 4, 2009

robjh1

Hollywood has access because of their positions and deep pockets. I would be nice if the regular voter had this access due to their votes, which is equally powerful.

|
|
Reply
7:57 am, May 4, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
8:59 am, May 4, 2009

Hawnzz

And the right wouldn't want "one-party" rule? They pretty much had it at the beginning of the Bush era...

|
|
Reply
10:45 am, May 4, 2009

Spasticula

Oh your party lost... get over yourself! Bush didn't give a flying fuck if anyone liked him and big surprise: People can't wait to kiss his stupidity and his reign goodbye. The minute someone with a few people skills takes the office, it's described as "adulation" with you morons. Find some coping skills and some moderation while you're at it.

|
|
Reply
11:02 pm, May 4, 2009

ndulik

The end of "Avalon" said everything Levinson feels about television.

|
|
Reply
10:58 am, May 4, 2009

Plantagenet

The BOers and the limousine liberals and the supine media are happy now. Obama has created massive deficits and guaranteed the US will remain at high levels of unemployment, exposed US spy secrets to the world, and apologized to every tyrant and cretin on the planet. Hooray for Hollywood and President BO!

|
|
Reply
|
11:25 am, May 4, 2009

Genni2002

Obama "created" massive deficits: your statement is false. They were created under Bush don't forget that Sept 11 happened under Bush's watch -so unless you have been living in a bomb shelter somewhere with no access to the world... well, you know...

|
|
Reply
|
2:45 pm, May 4, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
4:02 pm, May 5, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
11:32 am, May 4, 2009

sophia5

You forgot Al Franken - D list comedian

|
|
Reply
|
7:31 pm, May 4, 2009

ThisThatTheOther

I think Al Franken is very funny! He wrote for SNL -- during the funniest years! And he was Stuart Smalley, so he is good enough, smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like him.

|
11:10 pm, May 4, 2009

mbgillil

Uh, have you checked his credentials? He's one of the most respected comedy writers of the last few decades. And I don't even like him.

|
2:45 am, May 5, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
4:06 pm, May 5, 2009

dm10003

fame is a stepping-off point. even sally struthers used it.

two words: Q Score. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_Score

|
|
Reply
12:37 pm, May 4, 2009

Rdschenkel

This is one of the few political article I read on Daily Beast that was actually balanced. Articles like this are what keep me coming back.

|
|
Reply
12:49 pm, May 4, 2009

Ozone69

Hollywood celebs are certainly entitled to their opinions. However, they lose credibility with their hypocricy. Wasn't Barbara Streisand supposed to move out of the country if George Bush was re-elected? How about Mike Farrell, Susan Sarandon, Ed Asner, et al, supporting convicted cop killer Wesley Cooke (AKA Mumia abu Jamal)?

|
|
Reply
|
1:47 pm, May 4, 2009

Spasticula

I like that celebrity (unless your Ronnie Reagan or Fred Thompson) disqualifies you from having opinions but being a total idiot like Joe the Plumber authorizes you to continuously say stupid things. This must certainly be the way forward. Teach me more.

|
|
Reply
10:59 pm, May 4, 2009

WorkerBee

If only we could some how raise the intelligence level of the public, then we wouldn't have to talk about how stupid celebrities make stupid comments. However, because so many Americans listen to the stupid comments and believe that it is the wisest thing ever said...We (the ones who think) are required to rebuke the dumb remarks to try to dispel mis-information from becoming popular "truth."

|
|
Reply
2:42 pm, May 4, 2009

Mary50

Can't wait to see the film. Frankly, I wish we could see an analysis that ultimately warns voters to turn off the TV for entire campaigns and ignore celebrity endorsements from now on. Americans should be required to read only a candidate's policy and voting record and transcripts of debates before voting. Imagine how different, and effective our government in all three branches would be if that was the case?

|
|
Reply
3:14 pm, May 4, 2009

jet2815

James leaves out one salient fact which unfairly skews the article to buttress her point. Frank Luntz is very well known as a REPUBLICAN pollster. And usually is identified as such when he appears on cable shows. He is not exactly the voice of objectivity; therefore the essay's premise becomes self-fulfilling.

|
|
Reply
7:09 pm, May 4, 2009

BruceColwin

"Asked during a Q&A how many Republicans were in the Creative Coalition, Daly said, "It's pretty obvious there's a low, low number of Republicans.""

What's remarkable is that it's not mentioned that the Creative Coalition was founded by one of Hollywood's rare, outspoken Republicans - the late Ron Silver - who spoke at the 2004 Republican National Convention.

|
|
Reply
7:49 pm, May 4, 2009

Spasticula

Yes... it's much better to be consistant.

People should profess contempt for everything and actually have contempt for everything. Because that worked so well for the last 8 years.

|
|
Reply
10:57 pm, May 4, 2009

FNYGY1

To read the comments is to see manifest what Levinson describes as the polarization of the country. I'm not sure TV causes the divide - that's too facile for me - but I know it exploits it and thus makes it worse.

TV thrives on story telling and cable "news" works to exploit events as stories. Stories work best when conflict is both obvious and heightened, which explains the black/white world of cable "news."

Possibly if people understood that they are being manipulated it might make it less potent - but I'm not sure. After all, roller coasters are popular BECAUSE they give us an adrenaline rush.

For me, the answer was to turn off The Carnival all together. I get my news from printed sources - not perfect but much less likely to stir my passions and get me in the mood for painting my face and going all "Braveheart" on anyone who disagrees with me.

|
|
Reply
|
9:43 am, May 5, 2009

nolalola26

I was just about to log in so I could say exactly what you just said. It seems most commenters didn't bother reading the article, just jumped on board for a chance to diss their opposing party.
Blind hatred & blind faith are dangerous, and I'm with you in avoiding going Braveheart on anyone!

|
|
Reply
3:17 pm, May 5, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

YOUR FRIENDS