Blogs and Stories
Tarantino’s 'Biggest Hit' Ever
Sean Gallup / Getty Images
In his first U.S. interview about his new war film, Inglourious Basterds, provocateur Quentin Tarantino opens up about directing Brad Pitt and that "God" comment at Cannes.
“It would be wonderful to get nice reviews,” veteran French critic Pierre Rissient, a longtime adviser to the Cannes Film Festival, told Quentin Tarantino as the reaction to Inglourious Basterds started posting. “But you’re a provocateur. Nice is not always best. You need to shake it up, say ‘fuck you.’”
The 46-year-old American auteur took some comfort in Rissient’s words as he found himself the victim of the inevitable: Cannes backlash. No film could have lived up to the hype surrounding his homage to Sergio Leone spaghetti westerns and World War II movies, Inglourious Basterds. Tarantino’s fifth Cannes entry after Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction (which won the Palme d’Or), Kill Bill: Volume II, and Death Proof was doomed to fall short of overloaded expectations.
Critics described Inglourious Basterds—starring Brad Pitt as the leader of a renegade Nazi-hunting brigade in German-occupied France—as “an obese, pampered adolescent” (The Guardian), “a distinctive piece of American pop art with a Euro flavor” (Variety), “blithely neglectful of basic storytelling tropes in order to indulge his auteurist peccadillos” (Time Out New York), and “a fairytale of unusual and thoughtful daring, a return at last by Tarantino to his combustible and operatic best” (The London Times).
“This is nothing new for me,” Tarantino says, remembering some of the bad reviews he got on 1994’s Pulp Fiction, especially. But the Cannes reviews were “frustrating,” he admits, because he has always relied on character and dialogue. “Who says a playwright has too much dialogue?” he asks. “The one time I eschewed dialogue with Kill Bill: Vol. I, all the critics complained.”
And Tarantino says he has always given his movies more novelistic than cinematic structures: “Separate film chapters tell our story. I create mosaics, following this story and that story, and eventually they all converge—unless you’re dealing with Reservoir Dogs or Death Proof, which have straightforward storytelling.”
View Our Gallery of Red Carpet Moments at Cannes
It’s been a whirlwind year for the director, who has long believed in making films slowly to stand the test of time. That is, until Death Proof, which did not benefit, he says, from too much overfiddling. So he put Inglourious Basterds on a tight schedule with a Cannes deadline.
After finishing last July the 165-page script he had been writing on and off since 1999, Tarantino obtained backing for a $70 million picture from loyal patron Harvey Weinstein and Universal Pictures, landed his most megawatt star ever, Brad Pitt, almost canceled the October shoot before he finally found the multilingual Christoph Waltz to star in a pivotal role, and stayed on schedule during 10 weeks of shooting on location in Germany. And after three months of editing, he delivered a dripping-wet print to Cannes—a place he considers “Cinema Nirvana,” where “cinema matters, it’s important”—at a running time of two hours, 27 minutes: 13 minutes less than Pulp Fiction and 19 minutes less than he needed to retain final cut.










Well, even good movie critics can eventuallyturn into whores without merit.
Look at Rex Reed, and Roger Ebert. Whatever these two write, I have learned that the exact opposite is the truth.
I love Ebert. Whore? You couldn't be more wrong about him.
I find that most reviews on films (or art, or literature for that matter) tend to expose more about the reviewer than about the actual film. What they like or hate has much more to do with their own emotional or intellectual filtering than the overall "goodness" or "badness" of the film in question.
Bingo!
just like people who endorse political candidates..., it never changes my opinion of the candidate, just of the endorser.
Anything has got to be better than his half of Grindhouse.
Really? Too bad you didn't get it.
OMG Grindhouse was gratuitous crap! I'm wondering if he is over reaching here. The Third Reich as a canvas for a cinematic mosh pit of clashing formats.? Well that's Tarantino pushing and stretching, this is why we love his work. Can't wait to see it!
Grindhouse or Death Proof were ok but I loved Hell Ride for which he was Exec Producer; great homage to bikers films and spagetti westerns all in one.
Why does the Daily Beast insist on deceptive headlines. You have to read to the last sentence to see where they got it from and it takes on a totally different context as a headline -- perhaps they should have put a question mark next to it...
Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of Tarantino. But I will be surprised if this is a big hit, let alone his "biggest." I just saw the trailer screened at a theater today and the audience reaction was deadly silence -- and not in a good way. It just seemed to strike the wrong cord at this particular time, it felt off. The movie may turn out to be great, but I just don't see any appetite for it outside of his core fan base and the Pitt die-hards.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
Ummm...she was quoting Tarantino ("I think it will be the biggest hit I have ever done"). Did you actually READ the article?
This user is no longer registered.
Who would bet that this movie isn't a glorification of gory violence?
When does this fellow think the public's tolerance of his violence fetish will wear thin?
Could this blood-covered fetishist tell a story that isn't steeped in blood?
thanks to tarantino, says laurent, 'women can be independent in a period film' wow
You claimed on your Front Page, 'Exclusive' Tarantino on Directing Brad Pitt, you sucked me in and had nothing to say about how Tarantino directs Brad Pitt. You wasted my time and many others with a false 'come on.' What's to make me trust what you have to say in your sub heads, if you pull this kind of trick to gain readership?
His views on directing Brad were certainly worth highlighting. I surely couldn't find anything to question in the post.
Tarantino has seen the same Hong Kong swordplay adventures I have and he full well knows those "period films" were filled with independent women. Cheng Pei Pei, anyone? So maybe QT should lend Laurent some DVDs?
A Tarantino script that's overbloated with rambling dialogue? Hard to believe . . .
The man is in love with the sound of his own voice, especially when it's someone else saying the words. Too bad he's run his own mouth to anyone who would listen. Once I realized ALL his characters only ever talk "Tarantino," I quickly lost interest. I can't even see Uma--all I can see is his nerd ass in a yellow jumpsuit, delivering one more inane rant that he thinks is sooooo clever.
Oh, now he's written something better than an extended racist joke? Wow, he must be so pleased with himself. What a fucking hack.
You're one of those people who don't know how to have fun, aren't you?
Wow, what a bunch of narrow, lame comments. Tarantinto is a true lover of film. It's obvious in the work. Watching his material is a joy once you see that. If you need a film to come to you like a happy dog, or sing you a lullaby in the proper 3-act format, then I guess you just don't get it.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.