Blogs and Stories

Kim Masters

Octo-Mel's Split Personality

Is Mel Gibson a devout man of God or an anti-Semite? Devoted father of seven or a middle-aged guy about to have an eighth child with his Russian girlfriend? Kim Masters on what his year of living dangerously could cost his career. Plus: VIEW OUR GALLERY of Octo-Mel’s family album.

Mel Gibson and his estranged wife, Robyn, have been separated for two-and-a-half years, so maybe it’s his business that he’s expecting a baby with one of three Oksanas that he’s been linked with in the press in recent weeks.

But Gibson has been popping up on the talk-show circuit, appearing on Jimmy Kimmel in February and joking with Jay Leno on Monday night about the fact that baby No. 8 is on the way with Russian musician Oksana Grigorieva. “I guess I’m Octo-Mel now,” he said.

Click Image Below to View Gallery

Mel Gibson

Jeff Vespa, WireImage / Getty Images

The line got a courtesy laugh but behind the appearance is a serious motive.

Next year Warner Bros. will release Edge of Darkness, Gibson’s first starring role since M. Night Shyamalan’s Signs in 2002. The British thriller has a good pedigree in that it’s directed by Martin Campbell (Casino Royale) and written by William Monahan (The Departed). The question is how Gibson now plays to the public.

Clearly he must care or he wouldn’t be showing up on the late-night talk-show circuit. At the same time, he seems so off-message that one hopes he doesn’t care too much.

“Mel didn’t build his career on being a bad boy. We’re not talking about Kiefer Sutherland here.”

Gibson has already had to apologize for his exercise(s) in anti-Semitism. Decide for yourself whether you want to count The Passion of the Christ or his wink-wink Holocaust denials of the time. But there was no room for quibbling after Gibson’s arrest for drunk driving, when he launched into a rant in which he blamed “fucking Jews” for “all the wars in the world.”

Even then it seemed possible that Gibson might have damaged himself more with women than people who don’t like Jew-bashing. (Not only had the married father of seven been caught carousing with young women at a bar, but he famously referred to a sergeant at the Malibu police station as “sugar tits.”)

Gibson apologized for his diatribe against the Jews, but with women he’s digging himself in deeper every day. He told Jimmy Kimmel that he never used the phrase “sugar tits” but wished he had. Then on Monday he had an exchange with Leno that sounded like it was from five decades ago. First Gibson explained that he was drawn to Grigorieva before he ever saw her, when he heard her sing.

“So you were attracted to her voice,” Leno deadpanned. “Did you hear Susan Boyle?”

Gibson laughed and then replied, “I could put the squeeze on Susan Boyle.” (Who would doubt it?)

“There’s very few people who are man enough for Rachmaninoff,” Gibson continued.

“And I assume she has a nice Rach-maninoff?” Leno leered.

This followed an exchange in which 53-year-old Gibson revealed his girlfriend’s age. “She’s going to kill me for this—she’s almost 40,” he said. “Now I’m going to have two women mad at me.” Ah, yes—your 39-year-old friend and the wife of 28 years who bore you seven children.

But are women paying attention? That depends on whom you ask. A veteran marketer says Gibson’s female fan base is and they won’t like this recent turn in his life. “A great percentage of the audience is female,” she says. “It wasn’t guys who were paying for What Women Want or even Ransom.” She believes the same will apply to Edge of Darkness, which involves a father who investigates the murder of his activist daughter. “Avenging the death of a child skews female,” she says.

Another problem is that Gibson’s behavior is perilously at odds with his image, she continues. “Mel didn’t build his career on being a bad boy,” she says. “We’re not talking about Kiefer Sutherland here.”

But a well-known producer who has worked with Gibson believes that the public—women included—may very well give Gibson a break. “He’s a huge talent,” he says. “I don’t think he’s susceptible to what happened to Kevin Costner or Ben Affleck or Tom Cruise.”

This producer points out that Passion of the Christ brought Gibson “a very devout following.” And despite the fact that his life is a “shambles,” he continues, people seem to cut the Traditionalist Catholic Gibson a lot of slack. “I would have thought the whole anti-Semitic thing would have destroyed him,” he says. “But I’ve sat at dinner tables and heard people defend his behavior. `Well, it’s not his fault. His father raised him that way.’ ” This industry veteran says people—especially women—see Gibson as “a wounded animal." The cute kind.

Certainly one major player seems to feel that way. After Gibson’s outburst following his arrest, agent Ari Emanuel—now presiding over the newly minted super-agency WME—publicly called on Hollywood to boycott him even if Gibson apologized.

“Now we know the truth,” he wrote on the Huffington Post in 2006. “And no amount of publicist-approved contrition can paper it over. People in the entertainment community, whether Jew or gentile, need to demonstrate that they understand how much is at stake in this by professionally shunning Mel Gibson and refusing to work with him, even if it means a sacrifice to their bottom line. There are times in history when standing up against bigotry and racism is more important than money.”

Having engineered the takeover of William Morris, Emanuel’s agency now represents Mel Gibson. And apparently Emanuel no longer intends to shun him. Those fences have been mended, we’re told. What’s not yet clear is the amount of money that Emanuel’s agency won’t have to sacrifice by standing up against bigotry and sexism.

Kim Masters is the host of The Business, public radio's weekly show about the business of show business. She is also the author of The Keys to the Kingdom: The Rise of Michael Eisner and the Fall of Everybody Else.


View as Multiple Pages
Back to Top
May 26, 2009 | 11:22pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

Ritarita

They should
Recast the new
Three Stooges movie.
Michael Jackson
Tom Cruise and
Mel Gibson would be
More appropriate.

|
|
Reply
|
7:11 am, May 27, 2009

SpeakEnglish

Hypocrisy = non-Catholics judging Catholics. Gibson is an excellent actor and we all know he's being criticized and reviled not for his behavior, but for his beliefs. He's just too conservative; he's just too religious.
And how dare he make mistakes? Isn't he supposed to be godlike by now?

|
|
Reply
|
9:23 am, May 27, 2009

johnjohnson68510

Yeah, there is some Catholic-bashing at the heart of this. Many people in Hollywood divorce, but look at the ire in the journalist's article here for Mel. Do they have the same ire for non-Catholic divorcees? I doubt it.

The anti-semitism is a major character flaw. Is it worse than being anti-Catholic?

|
10:09 am, May 27, 2009

Ritarita

SpeakEnglish-
Speak sense.
How the heck
Do you know I'm
Not Catholic?
Mel is a drunken
Womanizing
Anti-semitic
Egomaniac
Who cheats on his wife.
Love him at your peril.

|
12:26 pm, May 27, 2009

dailyplanet

Dah!? Mel Gibson IS the hypocrite here. He's always professed to be a devout "traditional" Catholic, arguably as conservatively pious in defending dogma as Torquemada of Spanish Inquisition repute.. yet he's obviously had an adulterous affair, which has resulted in a pregnancy. And Gibson professes to be religious??? He's a lunatic, plain and simple, a sorry condition that has fueled his alcoholism or is the result of it.

|
12:41 pm, May 27, 2009

jeffzekas

Okay, everyone in the room who has NEVER made a hypocritical statement, please raise your hand! (no hands appear).

Everyone who has NEVER screwed up, speak up (deafening silence).

Every person who has NEVER made a racist or prejudice statement, speak out (again, more silence).

Every GUY who has NEVER thought about cheating on his wife, raise your hand (no hands go up).

Sorry, Kim, but you are either incredibly naive, or just being absurd... and, those of us who have been men, raised as men, seen life as men, grown up in a world of men-- we understand Mel Gibson.

Yes, Paul Newman was faithful to his wife for many decades... but what makes this interesting, is that he is the EXCEPTION in Hollywood-- and an exception in most of California or the United States.

Now that we know Mel is imperfect, may we go on to the next story?

|
2:59 pm, May 27, 2009

xbainx

I'm Catholic. Eff Mel Gibson. But my God, his going crazy has really helped his films. "Apocalypto" was great and "The Passion of the Christ" was the most poetic two-hour beating I have ever seen.

As for him personally he can't act and really, it looks strange to be cheating on the wife you built a cathedral for in Australia. Wow, maybe he was always crazy.

|
6:23 pm, May 27, 2009

Genni2002

SpeakEnglish..perhaps it is you who is being sooooo acceptable of Mel and his apparently tiny 'mistakes' and giving him the nod in spite of his hypocritical loutish behavior because he is a Catholic?

Meanwhile, he exposed himself as a finger pointer at everyone else hypowack job. The guy seems to be a few bricks shy of a load (perhaps a closet glue sniffer?) nutcracker and now it looks like his prego GF is mad at him...

|
5:36 am, May 28, 2009

sippewissett

The so-called Catholic bashing is more pointed than that; it's Gibson-bashing. Gibson has set himself up as the defender of a VERY conservative brand of Catholicism -- masses in Latin, belief that Jews killed Christ so they continue to deserve punishment from the Church in the 21st c. and outdated views on men and women. There's no place in that belief system for divorce, let alone playing around on the side with younger women. He's just another hypocrite, but there's some revenge: he looks like "road kill". Wonder what his seven kids think of him now as a religious role model.

|
4:23 pm, May 28, 2009

ncopas

Your "poems" could
just have all the
hard returns removed,
and they'd just be
Sentences.

You're not a poet.

|
|
Reply
|
3:47 pm, May 27, 2009

Ritarita

371.
You're right
I'm not a poet.
And guess what?
They're not poems.

|
4:33 pm, May 27, 2009

SteveStephens

I wouldn't necessarily throw Jacko in with the other two, as they are interested in beautiful women,and something is wrong with that? Plus, they have 100 million in the bank,each, and that means they can do whatever the fuck they want.

|
|
Reply
11:37 pm, May 27, 2009

liberatorquest

What an airhead!!! You're the Three Stooges all rolled into one Ritarita!!!!

|
|
Reply
12:30 pm, Feb 4, 2010

Genni2002

A 'huge' annoying jack-ass zealot is more like it - no offense to jack-ass'.

|
|
Reply
|
8:02 am, May 27, 2009

rpagan2

Or as we like to say in my generation - the man is a pig and that is an insult to the pig ---

|
|
Reply
5:04 pm, May 27, 2009

Banjo1

Mel needs to go on the wagon and stay there.

|
|
Reply
|
8:23 am, May 27, 2009

stevensnell

He needs to start drinking?!

|
|
Reply
1:26 pm, May 27, 2009

photoshock

In the words of a world-wise and astute marketing agent,
' Any publicity, even bad publicity is better than no publicity at all.'
Well, to say the least possible 'bad' about Mel Gibson, he sure has screwed up a career, that has taken him a lifetime to build.

|
|
Reply
8:26 am, May 27, 2009

sophieozz

Cost his career? That ship has already sailed.

|
|
Reply
9:53 am, May 27, 2009

irish119

While everyone seems focused on Gibson's horrible anti-semitism, I'm seeing a total betrayal of what he professes to believe regarding his Catholic faith. This man built his own Catholic church! And yet he has a woman, who is not his wife, pregnant. Now I understand these are the fast & loose rules of many, especially in the entertainment industry. But one would have hoped at his age, and after all his proclamations about his faith, he might have chosen to actually live that faith. He's clearly a better actor than anyone thought.

|
|
Reply
10:08 am, May 27, 2009

Veronicaxy

The essay isn't "Catholic bashing", it's bashing Mel for being a profoundly messed up soul, and using Catholicism as a morally superior stance in Hollywood yet not even allowing himself to be held accountable.

It worked for a long time. The idea he was this incredibly sex man had a wonderful wife and tribe of kids at home was definitely part of his appeal.

One of the creepiest things I've ever seen on tv was Mel being interviewed by Barbara Walters to promote MacBeth in the 90s. Watch what happens when she questions his faithfulness to his wife. His answer was a hissing threat of a Shakespearean quote addressing Barbara as, well, a slimey woman who had gone into dangerous territory.

After that, I couldn't watch him without being creeped out, there was something really messy going on.


|
|
Reply
10:34 am, May 27, 2009

Jafly08

Gibson has used a conservative Catholic stance in the past, when to his advantage. But now that he wants to stray, suddenly the rules of the Church no longer apply to him.

Last time this former-Catholic checked, divorce was not allowed in the Catholic Church. Has something changed during all these years that I'm unaware of perhaps? Oh well, I don't believe in 99% of the Catholic Church's "laws"anyhow -- but still find it annoying (or maybe typical?) that another Vatican whore like Gibson shows himself to be such a hypocrite.

|
|
Reply
|
10:45 am, May 27, 2009

Genni2002

Totally typical. These people who profess to better because they are this or that religion ALWAYS turn out to be WORSE than everyone else, break all the rules of their own faith and turn out to be really awful hypos!

|
|
Reply
11:44 am, May 27, 2009

CarolineB

Mel Gibson no more represents the Vatican than you do. He's actually on record saying that he believes the post-Vatican II church is way too liberal--in his exalted opinion!

|
|
Reply
|
1:27 pm, May 27, 2009

spinozareader

Actually, CarolineB, Gibson's disdain for the post-Vatican II church would make the uber-Catholic by the current Pope's standards. (Pssst...This current Pope views all that Vatican II stuff as way too liberal. And I fondly recollect it as a brief Golden Age for the Catholic Church.)

|
10:36 pm, May 27, 2009

Megson

I will never go to see another Mel Gibson movie. He makes me sick, I can barely look at him he is just a hypocrite! I'm one of those females they talked about in the article who used to be his fan base. He even said his own wife was going to hell because she is not Catholic, something to the effect of ..even though she is a better person than I am she is still going to hell because she is not Catholic... It's one thing to be Catholic but another to be in a cult and that's exactly what he created with his own church - give me a break! I hope in rots in hell and he never makes another dime at the box office - not that it would matter to him with all his money. He looks washed up and he is.

|
|
Reply
|
11:47 am, May 27, 2009

Zelduh

He totally creeps me out too. I'm a former Catholic, and I think he represents the hypocrisy that is Catholicism. Look at the millions paid out to rape victims in the US over the last 20 years.

Look at the recent news in Ireland where, on May 20th, a 2,600-page report by Ireland's Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse found that for decades rape was "endemic" in more than 250 Irish Catholic care institutions from the 1930s to the 1990s, and that the church in Ireland protected pedophiles in its ranks from arrest. Also, severe beatings were so commonplace that children in their care lived in constant fear. (Google it. BTW - a new, and further damning report should be coming out from Dublin next month.)

Thus, Mel is simply a product of Catholicism; which says that if a Catholic is in a position of power, the strict moral rules espoused by the church simply do not apply to him.

|
|
Reply
|
2:25 pm, May 27, 2009

liberatorquest

Mel has nothing to do with your useless analogy!!! Did he rape anyone? NO, so stick to the subject please!!!

|
11:18 pm, Feb 5, 2010

liberatorquest

There is something to be said for kicking someone while they are down. You're no better than him Megson, you have just shown all the despicable traits of a ruthless puritan, who must be just as full of flaws as him, but thinks she is allowed to pass judgement on him!!!! If you were foolish enough to believe he was any less human than any other man on this planet, than shame on you for being so naive. We just like to watch him on screen, that's all!!!

|
|
Reply
11:01 pm, Feb 5, 2010

hammer

All the signs of his narcissistic personality became prominently evident with his alcohol fueled anti-Semitic rage a few years back. Then he issued a pathetic insincere apology because his movie flop on the Central American Indian was due to premiere. After that the powers in Hollywood deemed him yet another aging talentless action hero dud. Gibson didn't care because these same Hollywood powers gave him the opportunity to be a egoistical wealthy cad. With fading acting prospects, a diminutive stature, aging appearance he decided to sows his oats with another tired sun wrinkled former beauty that made Mel fell like he was on top of the world. Instead, now the world knows Gibson has always been foolish troll.

|
|
Reply
3:22 pm, May 27, 2009

mimi410

Yes, Mel is a big fat hypocrite! Live your faith instead of preaching it to others.

But unless he daudles with children, I will go see his movies. I can separate the actor from his/her personal life. If he continues to give good performances, make good movies, I will support them. I'm tired of knowing every dang thing about celebrities and famous people. Gossip has gone beyond in the picket fence into a kind of viral inferno that's bordering on psychotic now. I don't know Mel, don't really want to know him personally and all this stuff about his persona business is TMI in my book. Ditto all the celebs.

|
|
Reply
3:29 pm, May 27, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--charles116
|
|
Reply
3:42 pm, May 27, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--charles116
|
|
Reply
3:47 pm, May 27, 2009

ncopas

anyway, religious banter aside, you're all just jealous cuz he got rich then utilized his millions to acquire a super-hot woman, i am not necessarily a fan of his, but it is sad to watch little people post asinine comments like these.
Who cares if he gets drunk a lot, I would too if I could. Who cares if he bangs hot models, I would too. Who cares if he's an anti-Semite, religion is generally an aimless endeavor anyway...

|
|
Reply
|
3:51 pm, May 27, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
5:54 pm, May 27, 2009

Ritarita

Come on Daily Beast
We're grown-ups.
Stop the censorship already.

|
5:34 pm, May 29, 2009

spinozareader

ncopas
No. Not jealous. Not at all.
Please, please tell me you're in your late teens or early twenties. You get a coupon for stupid when you're that young. (But those coupons DO have expiration dates.) Now, scoot along to Hooters and pound down some wings and beer. And may all your romantic relationships be as deep as your thoughts. But be careful, the clock ticks for you, too. And in the blink of an you'll have less hair, a lot more gut, and the same pathetic seat at Hooters.

|
|
Reply
|
10:48 pm, May 27, 2009

ncopas

haha, nice retort, I'm actually about thirty and working on that gut... and no signs of balding yet... why would that matter anyway?.. Oh right! Because you're one of those who likes to say that beauty is only skin deep, then turn around and criticize people for their physical ugliness. Nice, nothing hypocritical there. (btw, not all old people are fat and bald)

If it wasn't a little bit of jealousy in there, you wouldn't need to defend yourself. "coupon for stupid," good one. Too bad they don't offer them for people your age (I assume you're older by your aloof, condescending, wannabe-father tone). Your contempt for the intelligence of youngsters is indicative of your pervasive insecurity.

I can really see where you get the Hooters reference, you must've deduced that from my... oh wait, there's nothing that indicates that at all :/ hm. Actually never been to one, irrelevant anyway..
As for romance, I'm in a 3-year healthy relationship now, which is just as deep as my thoughts, thanks for the warm wishes!

...btw, my anti-semite comment was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek. I do not think it's okay to be anti-semitic (or really anti-anything), however I do think religious motivation is the single most destructive force in history.

|
6:16 pm, Jul 6, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
3:51 pm, May 27, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--charles116
|
|
Reply
4:24 pm, May 27, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Octo-Mel's Split Personality

by Kim Masters

Info
RSS
Kim Masters
Emails
|
print
Multiple Pages
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |