Blogs and Stories
How to End the Nuclear Threat
Jonathan Fickies, Bloomberg News / Landov
Amid escalating violence in Pakistan and renewed threats from North Korea, Madeleine Albright and 13 other former foreign ministers provide an exclusive step-by-step proposal for keeping nuclear risks at bay.
This following is a statement of principles signed by 14 former foreign ministers. The group of ministers recently convened in Ankara, Turkey, under the auspices of the Aspen Atlantic Group, an organization that was conceived in 2003 by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. The group meets annually and brings together former foreign ministers from across the globe and the political spectrum to develop concrete, nonpartisan recommendations to help the two sides of the Atlantic address the next frontier of global challenges.
The stakes have changed since many of us were in government at the end of the Cold War.
We, former foreign ministers from 14 countries, recognize that the proliferation of nuclear weapons represents a major threat to international peace and security. The stakes have changed since many of us were in government at the end of the Cold War. The technology to build a bomb has spread, and the threat of a nuclear weapon getting into the hands of terrorists is real.
In recent years, there have been a number of strong proposals for dealing with the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Piecing together the many existing proposals, we support the implementation of the following steps, with the immediate goal of global arms reduction and a long-term goal of a world free of nuclear weapons:
Nuclear Disarmament
• We urge the United States and the Russian Federation to negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and to demonstrate leadership by working together toward a reduction in the number of strategic nuclear warheads deployed by each country to 1,000.
• We urge the United States to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and to intensify efforts toward its early entry into universal adoption. We strongly support the early commencement of negotiations on a verifiable Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty.
• In addition to these steps by the United States and the Russian Federation, we strongly encourage multilateral nuclear disarmament.
Nonproliferation
• We must work together to strengthen the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and welcome a Global Summit on Nuclear Security within the next year.
• We must continue to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear program and to encourage Iran to refrain from further nuclear ambitions, reminding leaders that Article 6 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty states that countries must work toward eliminating their nuclear weapons. We must push all nuclear powers, declared or undeclared, to disarm and not condone any new nuclear countries.
• We must collectively, in close cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, pursue a new framework for civil nuclear cooperation, including, for example, an international fuel bank.
• To ensure that terrorists never acquire a nuclear weapon, the international community must work together to redouble efforts to strengthen security of all vulnerable nuclear material around the world.
• The international community must increase efforts to break up black markets, detect and intercept materials in transit, and use financial tools to disrupt this dangerous trade.
Right to use nuclear energy
• We should consider the use of peaceful nuclear energy programs as one of the ways to combat climate change.
We realize that, given this complex agenda, in order to achieve the steps outlined above it is important for our countries to train and support the next generation of nuclear energy and arms control experts and negotiators who are not only good diplomats, but also knowledgeable about the newest scientific research.
Signed,
Madeleine Albright – United States
Halldór Ásgrímsson – Iceland
Lloyd Axworthy – Canada
Lamberto Dini – Italy
Jan Eliasson – Sweden
Rosario Green – Mexico
Igor Ivanov – Russia
János Martonyi – Hungary
Donald C. McKinnon – New Zealand
Niels Helveg Petersen – Denmark
Lydie Polfer – Luxembourg
Malcolm Rifkind – United Kingdom
Jozias van Aartsen – The Netherlands
Hubert Védrine – France
The Daily Beast is dedicated to news and commentary, culture, and entertainment. We carefully curate the Web’s most essential stories and bring you original must-reads from our talented contributors.









Great article :).
When I first clicked on this article I expected some substantive answers to nuclear arms, but what I got instead is ambiguity and talking points for Sec. Clinton.
without depleted uranium being labeled as a nuclear weapon, and ending nuclear power, we are still as threatened as before.
chernobyl brought down ussr
check the cancer rates for anyone near a military base where d.u. munitions were or are being used.
this is HOKUM. SELF IMPORTANT BLOATED NONSENSE.
HOW ABOUT DISARMING, BLANCHE?????
Redouble efforts to secure nuclear material? One of the first things George Walker Bush did as President was HALVE the American contribution to securing Russian nuclear material.
That said, this proposal, since it contains blatant hypocrisy, is going nowhere.
Ms. Albright, your plan is half-baked, pun intended. While it is impressive that you are one of 14 former foreign ministers who signed on to this proposal, where are the signatories from China, India, Pakistan, Israel, Iran, North Korea, & South Africa? Without including the whole of the nuclear club, the proposal lacks any merit or real sway when non-nuclear former foreign ministers from such robust countries as Luxembourg, Iceland, & Mexico sign on.
Where's the beef? Is this plan as well thought out as your North Korean deal?
Wasn't Albright the Sec. of State when North Korea acquired nuke hardware and money from us (with the promise of using it for energy)? That worked out well didn't it?
Reminding Iran of NPT Article 6 doesn't make sense. They'll just remind you of Article 4, that they have the "inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination". Since they are nearly a decade away from building a bomb (check Wash. Post article: Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb), their nuclear program, albeit suspicious, is peaceful - and we are discriminating. NPT must be revised to where bomb-grade enrichment would be illegal, because that's what they are doing.
They are right about the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty... we're the ONLY country that voted "no".
Disarming is a BAD idea. NK is notorious for breaking deals and we don't want them to be the only country w/bombs. They key is to make it so that no one else can arm up (i.e. ratify the FMCT).
Why did they leave out safeguards? Certain nuclear states have no safeguards in place to where any schmo w/access can individually launch an attack... now that's scary.
I still love Albright. She's just a great lady.
But there are no easy answers. Ever...
A bit late for the has beens. They were busy following the agenda's of their respective countries instead of looking to world peace when they were in a position of power and influence. I think that speaks volumes for me. World peace is a great idea if you aren't under daily pressure to secure everything else you need and you have no other agenda.
True, but that is true of all of them. That is why so many of us would love for Cheney to just shut up. At a certain point, free speech just becomes harassment.
If Iran can use nuclear power, why are we stuck with windmills.
LOL.... I love this website. You all are hillarious.
Oh and to your point, Iran has oil money. Nuclear power costs money. We ain't got any.
Ms Allbright conveniently gives a pass to rogue states with undeclared nuclear arsenals like Israel that contemptuously ignore UN resolutions, international treaties and the NPT and IAEA specifically; It even refuses to cooperate with the UN (which created it) and Spain in investigating its war crimes in Gaza. No wonder Iran wants nukes to defend itself from raving lunatics in Likud whose only eye is on Greater Israel.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.