Blogs and Stories

 The Daily Beast

Iran on the Brink

Shocking updates from Iran: The Iranian military is charging a "bullet fee" to the families of slain protesters who want to collect bodies for burial, according to the Wall Street Journal. There are rumors of a general strike Tuesday, and Iran's government is setting up a special court to try protesters arrested in violent post-election demonstrations, an official announced on state TV. Meanwhile, protesters attempted to gather in Tehran to mourn the death of Neda, the young woman whose violent death has become a rallying cry for the revolution. The mourners were met with a violent crackdown by police attacking with tear gas and firing shots in the air. The Daily Beast provides interviews, photos, and reporting from the streets of Tehran.

Iran protests AP Photo The Crisis in Iran Is Just Beginning
by Gary Sick

Gary Sick, the key White House official during the 1979 hostage crisis, says this revolution may be more of a marathon than a sprint, with no clear winner or loser. The watchword for Obama: Do no harm.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

BS Top - Parsa Neda How Neda Divided My Family
by Telmah Parsa

Not everyone believes the shocking video of a woman shot in Tehran. Telmah Parsa writes from Iran on why many Iranians—including his mother—refuse to accept the horrific video tells the whole truth.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

Click Below for Photos of the Deadly Protests

Deadly Protests in Iran

______________________________________________

Ayatollah Khamenei Hadi Tabrizi / Getty Images Iran's Supreme Revolutionary
by Reza Aslan

By inexplicably inserting himself into the election controversy, Ayatollah Khamenei is destroying his reputation and tainting himself with an aura of corruption, Reza Aslan writes. Worse, he’s unwittingly turning a protest into a revolution.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

BS Top - Video Blog Iran Explosive Protest and Police Brutality Videos from Iran
by The Daily Beast Video

The Iranian government may have banned foreign journalists from covering protests, but that hasn’t stopped a flood of user-generated videos—many quite disturbing—from hitting the Internet.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

BS Top - Sick Mousavi Alfred, Sipa / AP Photo Mousavi's New Revolutionary Manifesto
by Gary Sick

The Iranian protest movement reached a tipping point today, writes Gary Sick, the key White House offical during the 1979 hostage crisis, and what has emerged is nothing short of a platform for a true Islamic democracy.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

BS Top - Iran Protests - Faezeh Hashemi AP Photo Exclusive Tehran Account: Rejoicing Rafsanjani's Daughter's Release
by Parvez Sharma

In his second online chat with Tehran photojournalist NS, Parvez Sharma witnesses Iran media breaking news on the release of former Iran President Rafsanjani’s daughter. NS details another brutal attack on a loved one during a protest—a male photographer attacked with large Ghameh knife, a weapon traditionally used during the Shia mourning ritual of Muharram. NS also finds a video with the title “Basiji beats 7 year old boy Tehran Iran” but can’t watch it—her access to YouTube is blocked.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

Leslie H. Gelb, Iran to the Iranians Saul Loeb / Getty Images Leave Iran to the Iranians
by Leslie Gelb

As experts clash on how to deal with Iran’s turmoil, Leslie H. Gelb says Obama is right to keep his distance—this is what Iranians want, and they have smart, sophisticated reasons for it.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

BS Top - Sharma Iran Farhad Rajabali / Reuters Memo from the Streets of Tehran, Part III
by Parvez Sharma

Arash Aryan has not been silent or quiet. He has been on the streets and with a power and poignancy that is now becoming familiar. Parvez Sharma presents his latest report from Tehran, today on the day everything might have changed.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

Kadivar Lucas Jackson / Reuters Stay Out Of It, Obama
by Benjamin Sarlin & Roja Heydarpour

Critics have urged Obama to "go green," to side with Iranian protestors more vocally. But in an exclusive interview, one of Iran's most high-profile opposition clerics, Mohsen Kadivar, tells The Daily Beast that the reformers don't want any help. He also says the protests are about the presidential election, not about overthrowing the Ayatollah.

MORE >>

______________________________________________

Iran cell phones AP Photo Marked for Death by Twitter
by Eric Pape

Social-networking sites are being celebrated as conduits for information out of Iran. But with the supreme leader vowing to punish dissidents, these digital footprints could prove deadly.

MORE >>

 

Back to Top
June 10, 2009 | 11:46pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

Hawnzz

I think anyone but the current President and the ultra conservative would be an improvement.

|
|
Reply
|
10:23 am, Jun 11, 2009

al-nafs

Don't speak too soon. Lets see who the Iranian people choose. Ayatollah Khomeini may be the Supreme Leader, but he'd be a fool not to listen to the voice of his people. His father came in on the tides of revolution, it cuts both ways.

|
|
Reply
|
9:15 pm, Jun 11, 2009

Narpak

Ali Khamenei is the current Supreme Leader; and he is not the son of Khomeini.

|
11:44 am, Jun 14, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
4:21 pm, Jun 15, 2009

MadMatt35F

What is interesting is the lack of understanding that Supreme Ayatollah is a Shia religious ranking. Everyone fails to remember that this is a nation run by religious leaders not politically elected ones. The Ayatollah could care less what the people want because he leads every Shia Muslim in the world and can declare a Fatwa that cannot be overturned by anyone.

|
7:13 pm, Jun 16, 2009

NYUKULELE

Just think -- if the American people cared as much about the election here in 2000 as they seem to care about Iran's election now, Busch might not have been president.

|
10:54 pm, Jun 18, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
2:52 pm, Jun 22, 2009

piktor

HEY, DAILY BEAST, YOU WROTE "meeting in Qom about a possible overthrow of Ayatollah Khomeini"...

It is K-H-O-M-E-N-e-i !!! (Ayatollah Khomeini has been dead for years)

|
|
Reply
5:45 pm, Jun 21, 2009

Ritarita

I have questions.

Why did the clergy panic?
Did they see something larger than
Mousavi being elected?
Did they declare a fraudulent winner
Because they saw the beginnings of a
Wave that might sweep them out of power?
Is there enough pent up anger in young Iran
To fuel a complete wipe-out of the regime?
Is the resistance strong enough
To fuel a Civil War?

Please jump in.

|
|
Reply
|
9:07 am, Jun 15, 2009

Josh-Narins

Why _exactly_ do you think Mousavi really won?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2009/06/14/AR2009061401757.html

If I had to guess, it was because Mousavi's people
have taken lessons from someone
who took lessons from someone
who worked for the Tammany Hall
machine.

|
|
Reply
|
1:40 pm, Jun 15, 2009

veryneatmonster

Even if Mousavi lost, this election has been a sham. None of the other candidates won their own districts. NONE. In our last election, would you accept Obama not winning Illinois or Mccain not winning Arizona? Ahmadinejad would have gotten away with it had it been fixed to look like a close call, but a landslide? C'mon now, these are the acts of a vainglorious dictator and you now it.

|
9:51 am, Jun 16, 2009

garryboyle

The article you reference has been rebutted convincingly, to me, by Nate Silver.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/did-polling-predict-ahmadinejad-v ictory.html

In the Ballen/Doherty poll Ahmedinejad had 33%, Mousavi had 13%, but 42% refused to give an answer.

|
11:08 pm, Jun 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
|
Reply
4:34 pm, Jun 15, 2009

spinozareader

Rita
Here's my take. I suspect that, though there was an initial strong run from the gate in favor of Mousavi--after the poorer, outlying provinces votes were counted the race may have been either closer to a dead heat, or maybe even slightly in Ahmadinejad's favor. Who among us here will ever really know (short of allowing a Jimmy Carter-like outsider's monitoring of the voting)?
Since Mousavi's supporters include people who appear to be more aligned with advocating things like modernity and democracy and freedom of thought and expression, I think it would've been politically expedient for the clerics to side with the less-educated and fundamentalist voters who supported Ahmadinejad.

|
|
Reply
7:01 pm, Jun 15, 2009

piktor

Ritarita -- This is no longer about "who won". The Supreme Council will play this to their advantage. The negotiations now are with Mousavi and friends.

If the Supreme Council decides to boot Ahmadinejad -or not- will depend on what makes the Council look better inside Iran and what makes the Council look strong to the outside world.

If my theory is correct, the result is a no brainer, from the outside looking in. I have no idea what the situation is on the ground inside Iran.

This is a play by the Supreme Council now.

|
|
Reply
8:04 am, Jun 16, 2009

drmarkklein

It's Humpty Dumpty time for the Iranian Revolution. All the ayatollahs' horses and all the ayatollahs' men can't put Humpty back together again. The same coalition of merchants, intellectuals, students and moderate clerics which brought down the Shah will bring down the current regime sooner rather than later.

|
|
Reply
|
1:52 pm, Jun 15, 2009

Josh-Narins

Please show me one poll that indicates the Ahmadinejad supporters aren't in the majority.

Thanks in advance.

|
|
Reply
|
2:00 pm, Jun 15, 2009

drmarkklein

The answer to your point is a complete ballot count under foreign observer supervision. The regime lost all credibility when two hours after the polls closed, it announced a winner.

|
2:55 pm, Jun 15, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
4:27 pm, Jun 15, 2009

Ritarita

Josh-
If the Ahmadinejad supporters
Are clearly in the majority-
Why did the Mullahs have to
Engineer such a clumsy and transparent
'Win' of such unbelievable margins
Merely hours after the polls closed?
Everyone knew the ballots
Had to be hand counted.
If Ahmadinejad could have won
Without a sham result-
Why would they manufacture one?

|
5:35 pm, Jun 15, 2009

spinozareader

Josh
Precisely. We have NO way of getting a handle on the real vote count. And we can't march into Iran to obtain one; nor can we demand a re-vote--unless we're willing to open up another front of war (and if we do, we'd better keep our finger's crossed that North Korea doesn't give us the nuclear raspberry 'cause we'll be clean outta available troops).

|
7:08 pm, Jun 15, 2009

Josh-Narins

RitaRita,
the Iranian Mullah's first choice
last time around
came in third place
and when it came to the second round (Ahmad vs Rafsanjani)
they came in second place again.

The first thing you should understand
is not to talk about fight club,
I mean,
they have no history of rigging elections.

The second thing to understand
is that polling suggests
that the victory
was exactly in line with the polls.

Dr. Mark Klein, there is no way in Ache Ee Doubly Hockey Sticks you would suffer to have America's ballot count supervised by foreigners. The only polling I've read is right in line with the actual result, and (see what I wrote to RitaRita above) the Iranian's don't have a history of rigging elections.

Nor, honestly, do I think it is line with loony Ahmadinejad's character.

|
7:51 pm, Jun 15, 2009

Ritarita

Josh-
Thanks for the reply-
Although the missing puzzle piece
For me is-
Why the polling should be trusted
When the election results clearly are not.

PS.I hope your rhythm is better
When dancing.

|
8:35 am, Jun 16, 2009

Ritarita

Oh and Josh-

I was just teasing.

|
7:04 pm, Jun 18, 2009

Josh-Narins

I don't
know why
you think the polling results
clearly "are not."

You mentioned
how fast
they counted
the ballots,
when they count them
just
as fast
in Canada (similiar populations, much larger geography)

|
10:05 am, Jun 21, 2009

Saphes

Josh-Narins...sadly enough , you will never see such a thing as the true polls in this situation...these people fear for thier lives. They will be punished beyond belief for voting against Ahmadinejad, not openly as you would think, but when no one sees them fall in death to the ground from a passer by, they will know who ordered this thing. Do not be fooled by the term freedom in this situation...these people have none. that is what they are willing to die for.

|
11:13 am, Jun 22, 2009

Johnnyappleseed

40 plus years since the shah departed, seems like a long time, but you are right it's time to move on and let those people who have been laboring in the trenches so to speak to form a new government.
What it will morph into is anybodys guess, hopefully for the better.

|
|
Reply
10:04 am, Jun 21, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
|
Reply
|
4:02 pm, Jun 15, 2009

ottodaorange

There were good reasons that our founding fathers chose separation of church and state!

|
|
Reply
2:06 pm, Jun 19, 2009

ottodaorange

Democracy was never intended to be a gift. It is something you must fight for or lose.

|
|
Reply
|
2:26 pm, Jun 19, 2009

den123

Agreed. This is no longer just about an election or any one person. Humans have this desire called FREEDOM and it will be realized at any cost. The Mullahs of Iran have to know this.

|
8:40 pm, Jun 21, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
|
Reply
|
4:23 pm, Jun 15, 2009

drmarkklein

The previous presidential election was relatively clean because the opposition which turned out this time stayed home four years ago.

|
|
Reply
5:48 pm, Jun 15, 2009

magicman

It would be a very good idea for the U.S. Press to make a complete catalogue of the martyrs currently giving their lives in Iran. The greatest support that we can give Iran, right now, is acknowledgement of their sacrifice as martyrs for Freedom. This single impetus will be enough. We must remain quiet and pay reverence for their Dead. A deeply somber and sober tone from us will be all the encouragement the People of Iran will need. Paying tribute to their martyrs is the Olive Branch of Peace that we offer to them as fellow human beings who have suffered and died in our own cause for Freedom here in the States.

|
|
Reply
|
3:52 am, Jun 16, 2009

Josh-Narins

Is supporting Mousavi supporting "freedom."

I have no earthly idea how you come to that conclusion.

|
|
Reply
|
10:06 am, Jun 21, 2009

Saphes

It's not that they are all in support of Mousavi, but desperately need to move away from the narrow-minded-controling-by-fear Ahmadinejad. This man seeks to be the secon Husane (sp). and will align himself with anyone to further this cause...consider his personal relationship with Castro, and others who are openly dictators from South America, and the old Communist Party of Russia.

|
11:24 am, Jun 22, 2009

Redhead5050

The people protesting in Iran remind me of the 60's protests in the US...where great change followed.

|
|
Reply
6:53 am, Jun 16, 2009

PARRYISLE2

These protests do not compare to the ones perpetrated by the CIA to overthrow the legally elected government which had the temerity to natioinalize their oil industry thus depriving British Petroleum of its lucrative five decade monopoly. Or the later one which brought the Mullahs to power under Ayatollah Khoumeni. Perhaps we could see a real democracy emerge if Washington and Tel Aviv would cease threatening them with nukes.

|
|
Reply
|
9:55 am, Jun 16, 2009

leomarka

excellent point.....command economies/dictatorship flourish when the nation is surrounded by hostility. Same phenomenon kept Russia under the heel for generations.

|
|
Reply
3:38 pm, Jun 21, 2009

muddog

Just like here in the US, the younger generation is finding it's mojo, here we elected a young, bright, African American, in Iran ( where the consequences are higher ) they are looking to the US as an example, to get out the old crusty conservatives and in with the new ideas.

Some are comparing this to the overthrow of the Shaw, not sure it's the same as then as it was a wholesale ( I.E. the entire country ) was behind the "Revolution", today it is the younger generation and the intellectuals.

I hope they pull it off..... Ahmadinejad is not going quietly, this will make Obama's reaching out approach much tougher.....


Some are comparing this to the overthow of the shaw, noit usre it's the same as then it was a wholesale ( I.E. the entire country ) was behind it, today it is the younger generation and the intelectuals.

|
|
Reply
|
9:56 am, Jun 16, 2009

Ritarita

I think there IS an
Obama factor
In their coming out
To vote
And not staying home
Like they did last time.

|
|
Reply
11:13 am, Jun 16, 2009

magoo363

It is bad over there and I hope they get it worked out but looking at the pics it reminded me of the Lakers' "victory" celebration, only toned down.

|
|
Reply
11:17 am, Jun 16, 2009

donatello

Beware the fanatical religious right that wants to dictate their beliefs to the people. This is the type of government one gets.

|
|
Reply
5:14 pm, Jun 16, 2009

ObamaLover227

Let the Daily Best change their colors to green until this is over! I hope the young people of Iran are successful and just pray there is not huge bloodshed.

|
|
Reply
|
6:36 pm, Jun 16, 2009

Uberjeff

Here here, replace the red with green in support!

|
|
Reply
|
8:03 pm, Jun 16, 2009

Saphes

I second the motion, and call for a vote to the floor.

|
11:28 am, Jun 22, 2009

whispar

Iran - the whole world is watching and we will not forget all that we have seen and heard. We have seen courageous people - stand up against the sham democracy that is being stage managed by the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad. No matter the window dressing - we now know the truth!

|
|
Reply
7:37 pm, Jun 16, 2009

Ritarita

Where does this leave
Ahmadinejad's standing even
If he wins?

|
|
Reply
8:55 pm, Jun 16, 2009

hashemrouhani

I hope this is the beginning for a better life for all Iranians. These acts of defiance have been long overdue. I've been writing and posting videos on my site, to show my support and spread the message by sharing information.

http://www.examiner.com/x-7528-SF-Top-News-Examiner~y2009m6d17-Irans-opp osition-leader-calls-for-more-protests

|
|
Reply
6:57 pm, Jun 17, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Iran on the Brink

by The Daily Beast

Info
RSS
 The Daily Beast
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |