Blogs and Stories
Is the Web to Blame?
Astrid Riecken, The Washington Times / Landov
James von Brunn was charged Thursday for the Holocaust Museum shooting, and new reports suggest his anti-Semitism was tied to theories about Obama that flourish on the Web. Why von Brunn’s network of online extremists are increasingly dangerous, and becoming violent.
Among other things, alleged Holocaust Museum killer James von Brunn is a “birther”—someone who subscribes to one of the many elaborate conspiracy theories regarding how Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be president, because supposedly he isn’t a natural-born American citizen. Today police found a note in von Brunn’s car, reading in part, “The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews.”
Brunn’s copious writings reveal him to be a straightforwardly paranoid racist and anti-Semite: in short, a representative from the lunatic fringe of American politics who it’s tempting to dismiss as a completely aberrant and marginal figure.
In the America of 2009, the lunatic fringe is becoming an increasingly viral movement—and it’s creeping toward the edges of what’s still considered the political mainstream.
A closer look, however, reveals that in the America of 2009, the lunatic fringe is becoming an increasingly viral movement—and it’s creeping toward the edges of what’s still considered the political mainstream.
The host for this political virus is the Internet. Like many journalists, I get lots of emails imploring me to visit this or that Web site, which reveals the terrible truth about this or that government conspiracy that’s being covered up by the mainstream media.
Lately most of these emails have been from birthers. A good number of my correspondents also subscribe to other popular conspiracy theories: They think Obama is secretly a Muslim, or that “the Jews” are controlling him (some especially creative thinkers hold both of these views simultaneously).
Most of these people are no doubt harmless cranks. Still, the Web sites they recommend are veritable fever swamps of right-wing paranoia, soaked in extremist rhetoric that denounces Obama as a “traitor” and “usurper in chief.”
Many are full of comments seething with rage and frustration at the failure of their fellow Americans to resist what’s characterized as an illegitimate dictatorship run by the radical Muslim equivalent of a Manchurian candidate. There are dark hints regarding violent government suppression of dissent, and the proud American tradition of armed resistance to tyranny.
All of this is characteristic of how technologies like the Internet and email are ideal incubators for certain forms of particularly unhinged political extremism, as paranoiacs leap from one conspiracy to the next, and reinforce each other’s views that “the truth” is being hidden by shadowy powers that manipulate and control everything.
Again, it’s tempting to dismiss such people as utterly marginal, even when, as in von Brunn’s case, they move from violent rhetoric to what some of them consider necessary and therefore legitimate violence.
Yet if we consider how paranoid Internet fantasies about Obama’s birth and religious affiliation are getting mainstreamed, the situation becomes more disturbing.
Extremely popular mainstream right-wing blogs like Pamela Geller’s Atlas Shrugs, which has hosted Web interviews with conservative luminaries such as New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former U.N. ambassador John Bolton, have given uncritical support to the absurd notion that Obama’s birth certificate was forged, and that a vast conspiracy is hiding this amazing fact from the American people.









This bigotted psychopath is to blame.
No one denies that. The question is whether the wingnut-inspired internet inanities of the Right contributed to the present climate. The campaign of lies that continues today is based on nothing except the insanity of soon-to-die old people who will never admit that a man with African blood in his veins could ever be President of The United States. Their collective demise through the passage of time will also hasten the end of the Republican Party.
BasPos, you could easily be confused with being an ugly, bitter homosexual. Set us straight, please. Oops!
Banjo,
Shut up. You're just acting like an ass now. That is way out of line...
Wow Banjo1, way to address the comments rather that just resorting to vitriolic and unfounded personal attacks.
Bas
Only in the eyes of a closeted, self-hating homosexual could you be confused with "being an ugly, bitter homosexual." Banjo's issues won't be resolved in this life. And it's the only life we can express any degree of certainty about. So let's all agree that we can't engage him in a rational and thoughtful discussion of this issue . (Besides, it might just set off his "I hate it that I'm a homosexual" button.)
Banjo is weird! The Fascist Bureaucracy Ink could very easily bugged his car so the bells would go off when his pattern changed. They knew he was on the edge - that he was more than just talk, but FBI are also Jew haters as was their drag queen Director, J. Edgarina, the Pervert of Dirt.
It's not just Atlas Shrugged. Have you read Hugh Hewitt or especially Michelle Malkin? Malkin has a picture today of a plane flying into the tower and the caption reads, "Mohammed, shouldn't we read them their rights first?" These bloggers along with the Becks and Hannitys and Limbaughs of the world are criminally irresponsible. I believe in first amendment rights - but rights do not equal license. There is a crucial element of responsibility that is missing.
Having spent most of my life working in psychiatry....this man was a delusional, paranoid, neurotic. Who knows what brain changes were additionally being experienced due to his aging (88 yo). Being left/right has nothing to do with it. Sick people drift to extreme causes. Perhaps reading internet blogs do incite such individuals to commit heinous crimes. However, conservatism believes in absolute social order and does not support crimes against the individual.
"conservatism believes in absolute social order"? Not quite sure what you mean by that. Conservatism is not really whats under fire here, its radical ideas which coincidentally are currently being spewed in mass from so called conservatives right now.
I don't live near any crazies so I don't really interact with them but if they do protest near your house please do the following.
Go online, print out a few copies of Obamas birth certificate (which he released during the campain) and just hand them out. I know I would get a kick out of it ;)
I hear a lot of "birthers" ranting in cyberspace, but I have yet to encounter one that can provide evidence that Obama's birth certificate was forged.
And why would it matter if Obama is Muslim? Does that mean his loyalties lie with Osama bin Laden? Yeah.
But it's also important not to dismiss these people who are "out on a limb" as insignificant. It's easy to brush them aside and believe that their views are not representative of many people, but as this article points out, this behavior and way of thinking are increasing. As much as it is a product of the web, I think it also has a lot to do with the increasing power of the executive branch. It is a backlash against the secrecy and unilateral actions taken by the executive branch of the federal government. (Not just Obama either.) I fear that violent reactions will increase, and hateful rhetoric will appeal to more and more people unless responsible members of government can convince the public that everything is under control, and the federal government is acting in the best interest of the citizens. And they can't just say it anymore because fewer people are believing it. They actually have to do something about it. Go figure.
I disagree with the pretext that the autor makes this as being "Right Wing".
many of these "birthers" also believe that 9/11 was a government conspiracy, that the Bushes are part of the Trilateral/New World Order, etc. etc.
This man, and others like him, are anti-government and in my opinion delusional.
Again, I resent the pretext of this being "Right Wing" by only choosing the issue of Obama "being a Muslim" and "citizenship".
I agree with Ozone69 - a bigotted psychopath is to blame
Neocons agreeing with each other, how Original!?!!
Oh here we go again.....
First of all, I'm impressed that a Fox person is willing to admit that their audience has a, let's say, higher-than-average ratio of hate-group members. Next, maybe they will admit that they purposely encourage those hate-groups.
I am sad that it has taken so many deaths already during the Obama administration for us to wake up and pay attention to these hate-groups and their online adherents.
I will be impressed when a MSNBC Host admits the same. The Shooter was a left wing nut. Not a right wing nut. You should check out some of his writings.
THE WHACK JOB WHO MURDERS
PEOPLE IS RESPONSIBLE.
PERIOD !!
It's frightening, and these days quite predictable
for a lawyer / professor to try to place blame
on something or someone other than the actual
perpetrator. Just one reason why people rate
lawyers on the same level as used car salesmen.
Where-O-Where are all the columnists on
Reverend Wright's anti-semitic remarks ?
Will MSNBC get "blamed" for Reverend
Wright's Anti-Semetic remarks ?
Do you honestly expect us to believe, that an 88 year old white man, who believes that the "negroes and jews" are out to get him, got ANY shred of his vitriol, from a BLACK preacher?
When MSNBC aired Reverend Wright's comments, the several times I saw, the reporter/show host condemned them. When Fox airs the same kind of speech from an extreme right-wing POV, they applaud them.
There is a huge difference.
I agree with Ozone69, only the shooter is to blame. I just can't believe the hyperventilation in the press about the sudden increase in "hate" speech. Have they forgotten the rhetorical excesses that occurred for 2000 to 2008 not in some isolated corner of the internet, but Chris Mathews talking about "frog marching" some "bastard" (Carl Rove) out of the White House? Do they not remember the fact that you could not turn around without seeing "Bushitler" smeared somewhere? Is there not recognition that frequent screeds against conservatives were as hate filled as anything found on the dark underside of the internet, but these were NYT editorials.
This is about censorship pure and simple. Progressives want to impose their policies and ideals on everyone at the point of a gun and then tell us it is for our own good.
The nutcase that killed that heroic guard was not motivated by internet conspiracy theories or Rush Limbaugh.He was a long fused bomb that just went off. To try to diffuse the blame to anyone but James Von Brunn is simply insulting to the memory of the man who was slain. Don't turn this tragedy into an opportunity to censor unpopular speech. Remember that only one man decided to go the the Holocaust Memorial and bring a rifle.
I thought the guy was dead.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
self hating black guy.
Rev J Wright is to blame. He's disilluisional, hate filled toward whites and jews - paranoid nut who speaks to an audience of equally whacky radicals... oh, wait, that was Obama's church!
Rev Wright is as much as a threat to ignite hate in others "crazies" as this dude. One white. The other black.
Wright isn't that bad. I've heard his rants. He is the things you mention just not to the same degree. But he is a jerk... I'll give you that.
You are aware that the shooter in this case was a white supremist, right? Maybe it's just me, but I don't think he would be listening the Rev. Wright.
JackJack still a retard I see.
White supremacy neo-nazi he's an (R)
As a one-time umpire at the Special Olympics, I dislike the use of the word *retard*, but language aside, your premise is accurate. I would love to be able to read JJ's account to see if there is one single post that could not have been written by a child with a personality disorder.
Connie should be hired to umpire the posts. We do have some "Special" posters, (challenged by reality).
Except it's highly unlikely that this white supremest would get ANY of his vitrol from Rev. Wright.
I hate the fact that the right-wing responce to this MURDEROUS RACIST PSYCHOPATH is to point out "hey, the left has crazies too!"
Yeah, but YOUR crazy just killed a bunch of innocent people. Please attend to that.
JackJack
von Brunn's craziness precedes the existence of Reverend Wright. Please examine the time line as it relates to these two people. Von Brunn's attitudes were likely being formed when Rev. Wright was a small child. (Or do you believe the Rev is THAT powerful in his sermon delivery?!)
I've long thought that Shep Smith is the only person at Fox News with any credibility. Limbaugh just called him a "liberal" and "whiner" for these comments.
Being insulted from Rush is really a compliment... never forget that.
Oh, I know. The funny thing is that Limbaugh is the radical and Shep is more of a conservative, if you look at what those beliefs actually center around.
It's interesting that Mr. Campos is so concerned about "right-wingers" when this deranged psychopath was a registered Democrat with the offices of "The Weekly Standard" listed as a possible target. Not a single mention of any left-wing hate sites. Perhaps Mr. Campos needs to take off his blinders and look at where the evidence is actually pointing, not where he wishes it would point.
If you can actually prove that this guy is a registered democrat, I will be very surprised. All the "he's a democrat" sources I have seen have been pre
Find me a left-wing hate site and I'll show you footage of a McCain Palin Rally or a Tea party full of racist vitrol. These are YOUR crazies.
Except he's NOT a registered Democrat, that's an internet lie.
No one knows what this guy's party affiliation was, at least so far. It's Sean Hannity and his friends who are spreading this rumor, and now you are trying to do the same. I wonder what your motive could be. Hmmmm.
It doesn't have to be a motivation, it just is intellectual laziness that accepts what a talking head on TV says, and never checks for themselves.
None of us have the time to confirm everything we hear, but we do have a choice about who we believe without independent verification. RightOfCenter chooses to accept things Sean Hannity says. It's a foolish and dangerous thing to do, but without a few hours of one-on-one time, it will be hard to prove that to them.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
This user is no longer registered.
The man was an individual psychopath no doubt. But if you visit the site Stormfront.org you can read some of his articles. There are many other articles of similar kind in this site. It is a confederacy of "losing dunces," closely aligned with the political right (f'ck news watchers et al.) that are extremely frustrated at their political views being cast aside by the majority of the American people. These are Nazi-like groups that want their way by force. The scream about freedom, but it is their version of freedom they want, and they are quite willing to squash others who don't agree. As to those on the right politically don't be so sure that we will not see more of this sort of futile effort from their camp.
America has chosen which way they want to go forward into the future. The conservative, repressed, poorly educated way with the most stupid leadership money can buy (Bush, Palin) will no longer hold. Let us hope America does not waver.
And Banjo, get out of the closet already!
The shooter is to blame. What a wild concept!
didn't read the article, but YES! the web is to blame
This is a test comment b/c you didn't print my last one.
web pages don't kill people, people kill people. Is this the precept of the left trying to stump out free speech?
No, it's about making the web less of a haven for hate-speech and those coordinating terrorist attacks and assassinations.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.