Blogs and Stories

Richard Wolffe

Why Obama Won't Talk Tough

BS Top - Wolffe Obama Iran Jewel Samad, AFP / Getty Images; Sipa / AP Photo The easiest way to demonize the reformers in Iran, a senior administration official tells The Daily Beast's Richard Wolffe, is for the U.S. to align with them. Inside the Obama's PR strategy.

Plus, read more insight on Iran's election from other Daily Beast writers.

Is President Obama going wobbly on Iran?

His former presidential rival John McCain declared on the Today show that “he should speak out that this is a corrupt, fraud, sham of an election.” Other conservatives and neo-cons have piled on with the condemnations of both the regime in Tehran and the one housed at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Eric Cantor, the House Minority Whip, attacked Obama’s position as “a step backward for homegrown democracy in the Middle East.” Nile Gardiner, a Heritage Foundation commentator, who once worked as a researcher for Margaret Thatcher a decade after she left Downing Street, termed the president’s policy “cowardly, lily-livered and wrong.” Them’s fightin’ words—which is precisely what the Obama White House wants to avoid in dealing with the Iranian regime and a disputed foreign election.

“We respect Senator McCain. But we saw the same philosophy on North Korea, where he badgered the Bush administration to be tougher. Now we have North Korea with enough material for several nuclear weapons.”

“We respect Senator McCain,” one senior administration official tells me. “But we saw the same philosophy on North Korea, where he badgered the Bush administration to be tougher. Now we have North Korea with enough material for several nuclear weapons. And we saw that the ‘tough’ approach on Iran employed by the Bush administration led to the Iranians now spinning a large number of centrifuges.”

Inside the Obama administration, the notion of tough talk is seen as highly counterproductive. The easiest way to marginalize and even demonize the reform movement is for the United States to align itself with the opposition. “Given the long history of the U.S. and Iran over the last 30 years, the issue is that you don’t want to insert yourself too much,” the senior official says. “Because otherwise it gives the Iranians a pretty easy excuse to paint one side as being with the U.S.”

That has left the White House with a complex problem of communications. How to express outrage at the violence without taking obvious sides and playing into the hands of a repressive regime?

“Using Obama’s moral authority—which he established very well with the Cairo speech—in a targeted, surgical way makes a lot of sense,” my well-placed source continues. “We have to be very smart as to how the president addresses this issue in the press and public statements.” Thus, in public, Obama has been careful—if not surgical—in talking about the elections, frustrating liberal friends and conservative critics alike.

“I do believe that something has happened in Iran where there is a questioning of the kinds of antagonistic postures toward the international community that have taken place in the past, and that there are people who want to see greater openness and greater debate and want to see greater democracy,” Obama told reporters in the Rose Garden on Tuesday. “How that plays out over the next several days and several weeks is something ultimately for the Iranian people to decide. But I stand strongly with the universal principle that people’s voices should be heard and not suppressed.”

Back to Top
June 17, 2009 | 7:03am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

Dave1959

The inherent problem is that in doing nothing now, when the time comes for obama to act, he just might over-react !!

|
|
Reply
|
7:23 am, Jun 17, 2009

SC0TTBL4M

The fact that he's constraining himself from doing anything now is good evidence that he won't over react when/IF the time comes.

|
|
Reply
12:11 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Bulldoglover100

What a childish assertion Dave1959! and how inane to assume that someone as smart as out President would be as stuid as the Neo Con Right Wing LOL He beat them at their own game in the election so I have faith he is quite a bit smarter LOLOLOLOL
he is making the right call as Ahmadinejad is just waiting to blame all of this on the devils in the US and the idiot dill weed Republicans are soooooo full of hope that they too can find something to blame on Obama ....helps divert attention away from 2 Wars and a crashed economy THEY created.

|
|
Reply
5:43 pm, Jun 17, 2009

OHNOTAGAIN

What should he do? Invade Iran? Should he invoke sanctions with the idea that they do as America says and not as it does? Did America set those 80 men, women and children on fire? How the heck can America, with it's history even in Iran, can you say Iran-Contra, drugs for weapons, tell any other Nation what to do. All these Angry White Males spitting hate for President Obama, what a twisted message we send overseas.

What do you want him to do......invade?

|
|
Reply
1:48 pm, Jun 19, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
7:38 am, Jun 17, 2009

lynnstev1

Obama is such a jerk.

|
|
Reply
7:40 am, Jun 17, 2009

Progressive2

Who cares what the GOP say especially on foreign Policy?

|
|
Reply
|
8:49 am, Jun 17, 2009

Bulldoglover100

Who cares what they say regarding anything? THEY crashed the Economy, THEY started 2 Wars and they have behaved like small children since they lost the election. Their arrows have been so stupid that really the majority of people in this country now just laugh at them. Vitter? A Joke, Limbaugh? A Joke, Palin/McCain? A Joke and the sad little list of idiots goes on and on.

|
|
Reply
5:47 pm, Jun 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--misterdon
|
|
Reply
|
9:55 am, Jun 17, 2009

overtimegoal

well, yes, but back in the days of communist Poland, the US actually had some moral authority. It has all been squandered since then.

|
|
Reply
|
10:32 am, Jun 17, 2009

Narpak

"well, yes, but back in the days of communist Poland, the US actually had some moral authority. "

You mean seeing as US and UK politicians pretty much abandoned Poland to Stalin; helped cover-up (or wilfully ignored) the Katyn massacre, and (in the case of the UK) treated the Polish soldiers that fought alongside the British and American (including but not limited to Monte Cassino) like crap.

Certain decisions and compromises might be defensible from a strategic or pragmatic point of view; but moral authority is simply a handy propaganda tool used to placate the average citizen.

|
1:03 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Bulldoglover100

HE has brought change already LOL The only things he has to change are the wars YOU GUYS started, Fixing the economy YOU GUYS trashed and making us a proud Nation again after BUSH ruining us all over the globe!
Deal with facts and do us all a favor misterdon, DONT reproduce since you have such a hard time with facts.

|
|
Reply
5:49 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Meghanisgreat

Mr. Wolffe,
You are wrong about considering the Mousavi led so called opposition, a real opposition. Mr. Mousavi is a member of the Islamic mafia ruling Iran and part of the same gang. The real opposition is in exile and the U.S. has placed them on a sham terrorist list as part of the appeasement policy towards the criminal mullahs. The U.S. administration ( President Obama's or any other) should take them off the sham list so that the real Iranians can take their country back. The mullahs' regime has to go just like the Hitler's regime had to go. The highest courts in Europe ordered the group off such lists in Europe for lack of any evidence. It is high time that the U.S. will do the same.

|
|
Reply
|
10:41 am, Jun 17, 2009

Robadude32

You are so right Meghan. Its a real sheam the "mainstream" media cannot see him for what Mousavi really is.

|
|
Reply
12:44 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Mhussein

after 8 years of yelling and screaming ai Iran and NoKo, to no avail...only John MaCain would think it was productive and want to do it again.
Please remember that after "the axis of evil" speech, whatever was left to our relationship with Iran was gone....
Can the gran ol' party, with emphasis on OLD please STFUP

|
|
Reply
10:46 am, Jun 17, 2009

maryfrost2

Obama won't talk tought because the road he always takes is down the middle. He tries to placate each side. The Iranians that are fighting and risking their life for freedom, needs to know that we are behind them. President Obama, this is the time to speak out--use that backbone if you have one.

|
|
Reply
|
11:02 am, Jun 17, 2009

DonDiego

Are you kidding me? Do you want to go back to the Bush - Cheney foreign policy? This is absolutely the right way to deal with Iran. We tried meddling - it doesn't work. A calm, thoughtful leader is what we need - not a cowboy. The clearest way to alienate ourselves even more from Iran is to pick a side.

|
|
Reply
12:54 pm, Jun 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
3:19 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Ritarita

Mary-
Here's hoping
That you're not in charge
Of anything important out there in the world
Because you sure don't know
How to play your cards.

|
|
Reply
5:36 pm, Jun 17, 2009

maryfrost2

I did not like George Bush, but at least we had no doubt as to where he stood on an issue. President Obama, speak up on the issue of freedom for the Iranians.

|
|
Reply
|
11:03 am, Jun 17, 2009

scott1607

Yeah, our own house is on fire and we need to be concentrating on putting it out before we're all out in the street, but sure, go ahead and poke a stick in the wasp's nest that is Iran.

|
|
Reply
3:11 pm, Jun 17, 2009

yorkie1280

Oh, please. Do you really not know where any U. S. President would stand on this issue? Does anyone think that President Obama would not like the people in Iran to have freedom?

Now I understand why 30 percent of Americans can't grasp this President's policies.

By the way - I read Richard's book - fantastic! If you are involved at all in politics, this is a must read. In fact, I am going to read parts of it to the Constitution class I teach.

|
|
Reply
10:52 am, Jun 18, 2009

maryfrost2

President Obama almost never speaks out on an issue at the beginning, he'll wait and see which way the "wind blows" before he takes a stand--which still leaves us wondering where he stands.

|
|
Reply
|
11:05 am, Jun 17, 2009

connie47

The worst thing the President could do right now is shoot off his mouth and give Iran a platform from which to accuse him of meddling in their affairs. The best thing he can do is keep his mouth shut, at least for now.

|
|
Reply
2:23 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Hawnzz

The article is spot on with the logic of the Obama administration.

Obama doesn't just plan his next move. He plans the next three of four. This isn't just about a photo op, it's about strategy.

It is highly unlikely that the regime will fold. In the end, we'll still be stuck dealing with the same problems. If as antagonize the regime we'll have even less room to maneuver. The world already knows what we think on the subject.

The same foreign policy that we've always used hasn't worked. Perhaps a new approach is necessary. What have we got to lose? Not much... (The old way only made things worse and never stopped these regimes from completing their goals regardless.)

|
|
Reply
|
11:28 am, Jun 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--misterdon
|
|
Reply
11:48 am, Jun 17, 2009

Hawnzz

Well, you nailed it. Realpolitik. Pragmatism. Thoughtful engagement...

The fact is we don't have a magic wand or all that much influence. We like to think we are an uber-nation but in reality, we are in a severe recession are fighting two wars.

I think Obama is doing the best and all that he can do. We can ask no more.

|
|
Reply
12:10 pm, Jun 17, 2009

webb04

For someone so popular, the Prez really can't win. "He's doing too much!" "He's not doing enough, get off the tv!" "Call out Iran!" "Do something about those pirates!" And its only been 5 months...

|
|
Reply
12:04 pm, Jun 17, 2009

ThinkAgain

Bottom line, no matter what happens they're going to get nukes. there's no indication whatsoever that either outcome will change that. We need to prepare for what that does to the power dynamics in the Middle East and avoid doing anything about these internal events that might create new problems.

|
|
Reply
|
12:10 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Robadude32

Israel will stop them or die trying I would think.

|
|
Reply
|
12:55 pm, Jun 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
4:37 pm, Jun 17, 2009

reelfeel

Mr. Wolfe your great in making things clearer to me. What the Obama administration including Sec. of State Clinton is to align with other allies especially around the middle east to make change for the reformers. We can not go in this one alone like the Iraq conundrum...I think that we have a better chance diplomatically with the middle east thanks in part of the Obama speech in Cairo to go in as a group with common values and interests and influence and help Iran in its new reform. Let us all pray for all the Iranians in succeeding in this goal.

|
|
Reply
12:45 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Plantagenet

Obama's foolish decision to not speak up for democracy has one fatal flaw.....the Mullahs are linking the opposition to the US anyway. Today the Admadinejad government accused the opposition of being in league with the "great satan" and accelerated their arrests and crackdown. Obama's silence simply gave the Iranian Islamo-fascists a green light to become more and more repressive and violent.

|
|
Reply
|
1:26 pm, Jun 17, 2009

DonDiego

But now at least the rest of the world knows the US is not meddling.

|
|
Reply
|
2:21 pm, Jun 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--misterdon
|
2:48 pm, Jun 17, 2009

Hawnzz

There are good arguments for both camps. Neither has obvious merit over the other...

|
3:14 pm, Jun 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--toodogs
|
|
Reply
4:36 pm, Jun 17, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Why Obama Won't Talk Tough

by Richard Wolffe

Info
RSS
Richard Wolffe
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |