Blogs and Stories
Will Knox's Boyfriend Sacrifice Himself?
Stefano Medici / AP Photo
His father took the stand, but alleged co-ed killer Amanda Knox's one-time beau may not testify in his own defense to avoid undermining her alibi.
On most Fridays and Saturdays in Perugia, Raffaele Sollecito walks into the courtroom wearing a pastel shirt and a sheepish grin. The enigmatic “former boyfriend” of superstar murder suspect Amanda Knox always glances shyly at the cameras and hugs his lawyers. He looks young and studious, like the boy next door.
The two defendants ride in separate compartments of the same police wagon from nearby Capanne prison but enter the courtroom separately, flanked by armed guards. Sollecito watches Knox intently, trying to catch her gaze like a schoolboy with a crush before settling down quickly in a puffy chair directly in front of the judge. She smiles back coyly before the lawyers step between them. In a letter to Sollecito last February, Knox wrote "we got to exchange a few more glances than usual, though I have to admit I’m not good at reading the subtle messages that one passes through the features of the face."
During his original taped deposition, which he has not retracted, Sollecito said he did not know if Knox spent the night of November 1 with him.
In stark contrast to his co-defendant, Sollecito clearly does not revel in his notoriety. He acts nervous and uncomfortable in the spotlight of this epic trial. While Knox spends her days in court with the confidence of an Oscar winner, Sollecito instead sulks with the humility of a murder suspect.
The two are accused of sexually assaulting and murdering Knox’s British roommate, Meredith Kercher, in November 2007. Under the prosecution’s scenario, Sollecito held back Kercher’s arms while Ivory Coast native Rudy Guede, already convicted for his part in the murder, sexually assaulted her and Knox slit her throat with a knife. Sollecito’s DNA has been identified on the tiny metal clasp of the bra that was cut from Kercher’s body after she was murdered. The jury has heard that a knife with Knox’s DNA on the handle and Kercher’s on the blade was found in his kitchen. Expert witnesses for the prosecution have also testified that a bare footprint in Kercher’s blood found on a blue bathmat next to the crime scene matches Sollecito's.
“I have nothing to do with this situation. I am not a violent person and it has never entered my mind to kill anyone,” he told the court last February, near tears. “Anyone who knows me will tell you I wouldn't hurt a fly.”
The 25 year-old information-technology graduate, who finished his degree during his 19 months of incarceration, spends his time in court taking notes, studying his lawyers’ dossier and eyeing Knox. Last month, he helped co-prosecutor Manuela Comodi fix her computer so she could play the crime-scene footage she was using to make the case against him. When he has chosen to address the court—as defendants are allowed to do in Italy—he reads softly from a handwritten script. "I don't know why I'm in this situation,” he said the last time he made a statement. “I regard myself as the victim of a judicial error."
But if he is convicted, it might be because of an error of judgment. He is not scheduled to testify in the trial, although he faces the same possible life sentence as Knox. His lawyers have not explicitly ruled it out, but they say there is little chance he will take the stand. For one thing, his testimony would be the most damning to Knox so far because he cannot corroborate her alibi for the night of the murder. During his original taped deposition, which he has not retracted, he said he did not know if Knox spent the night of November 1 with him, as she claims.
On Friday, Sollecito's father Francesco, a well-connected doctor in Puglia, testified that he was his son's "confidant" and that they spoke daily, with Raffaele sharing the most intimate details of his life. Sollecito had told his father about the budding relationship with Knox, and the doctor testified that they were at the beginning of a "beautiful love story" when Kercher was killed. He also told the court that he had once received a letter from the local police in Bari about his son's drug habit, and that his son collected knives and almost always carried one in his pocket. "It was a habit he had since he was very young," the elder Sollecito said. "I had told him not to carry a knife around."
Dr. Sollecito added that he believed the police had bungled the investigation. "Some very big mistakes have been made," he said. "My son is innocent." Earlier, in an interview on Italian TV, he said of Knox, “She has ruined my son's life. I damn the day he met her."









The foot imprint on the crime scene bathroom mat is not slamdunk evidence in itself because it only matches Sollecito's foot size and shape.
"Someone" that matches Sollecito's foot imprint was there, awash in the victim's blood.
This is a photo of the blue bath mat:
http://tinyurl.com/n8c2fu
People will call it a "coincidence". Police call it a "fact".
DNA from both Sollecito, Knox, was found on the deceased's bra strap. Explain that... Both of them were using drugs. Both of them are guilty, like the guy who was already tried... Money won't make this go away...
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
Somewhat off thread: If I see Barbie's by-line, I see an exciting story.
Thanks once again for excellent reporting from the courtroom. Your observations on the relationship between the two suspects and their defense teams, and the strategy of the latter, are invaluable.
This is a strange case. The Italian police and prosecution are either inept or caught in their own web of procedural nonsense. For heaven's sake, they have already convicted someone of the murder and surely know exactly what happened. Yet they have raised so many conflicting questions and made a mess of the prosecution.
Any one familiar with Italy's Monster of Florence case and the religiously hysterical misconduct of prosecutor Magnini, who is also under indictment, can easily see through this kangaroo court and its blatant effort to railroad Knox and Sollecito. Everyone, that is, except this idiot reporter who seems content to drink the local Kool-Aid exclusive of any real investigation on her own. This is not a journalist, but an ignorant and uninformed blogger who should be paid little credence.
I just finished reading that book and was going to reference the well documented trials agains the innocent (but scuzzy) fellows who were initially eyed as being the Monster. Not that Karla Homolka and Karl Bernardo haven't proven that the most angelic looking couples can prove to be the most heinous. I wouldn't want to have my life hinging on a bloody footprint and DNA in my own apartment.
At this point in time Mignini could be a Hare Krishna and that wouldn't change any of the evidence gathered by the police investigators. If Mignini were to retire this summer, when the trial reconvenes Raffaele's DNA will still be on the bra clasp, Meredith's and Amanda's DNA will still be on the Double DNA Knife, Raffaele's statement of not being sure of Amanda's whereabouts for 3 or 4 hours on the night of the murder will still be a valid statement, the bathmat footprint will still match Raffaele's foot (in spite of the Friends of Amanda group shrinking an image of Rudy's footprint to schoolgirl size - 23 centimetres - on their site to make a couple of toe characteristics fit).
Really, at this point, Mignini is rather irrelevant to the judicial future of Amanda and Raffaele. The main character is Judge Massei, plus the jurors, and how they evaluate the evidence. It looks like a tough situation to me.
By the way, when pro-Amanda types keep insisting that "Rudy has already been convicted" of murder, they make it sound like Amanda's and Raffaele's indictment is a separate, more recent after-thought of the prosecutor. The truth is that the indications of involvement of all three in the murder of Meredith resulted from the same investigation; the judicial starting point for their trials was the same last fall. The only difference is that Rudy opted for a short format "fast-track" trial.
American investigators have gotten into this finally... and they are horrified at how poorly the investigation was done. The evidence does not even closely match their conclusions.
I really feel badly for this poor girl. (And not just the one that was killed.) Ms. Knox, based on the evidence shown thus far does not appear to be guilty. If knew credible evidence is found that could change... but what they have now is flat out CRAP. These are the lives of TWO girls... not just about one.
knew = new
Hawanz,
;) we knew
To Kahill, is that the family name of the lady [Procuratore Generale] in the fiction Walker Texas Ranger? Get rel baby someone can get hurt because of yor childish parlare...
The story: Drugged, drunk and self-gratifying, this couple indulged in carrying out their sexual, homicidal fantasies on the murder victim. Their stories have inconsistencies, and contradictions? They were both too messed up to remember the train of events of what they did. Case closed. Verdict guilty.
Judging from the statements the two defendants made when arrested, it leaves no doubt in my mind they were in the apartment when the murder was committed. Physical evidence places them there. In my opinion they both are guilty. I haven't heard or read what Rudy Guede said about the murder. I do know that he had a swift trial and a lengthy sentence, however it was determined that he did not actually committ the murder. So, which one of the two defendants killed Kercher????
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Let's move on, shall we.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
I am leaning more towards innocence after reading Anne Coulter's recent rant on the case. Has she ever been right?
The Coulter rant has this gem:
"Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on the knife.
Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible Raffaele went to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got home, while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife."-SARecord
http://tinyurl.com/kjkwo7
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.