Blogs and Stories

Asra Q  Nomani

How Danny Pearl Helped Save David Rohde

BS Top - Nomani David Rohde AFP / Tomas Munita for The New York Times As more reporters are held in Tehran and one is now free from the Taliban, Asra Q. Nomani—who was with Danny Pearl when he was kidnapped—on what the media has learned since then and how it is saving reporters' lives.

The survival of New York Times reporter David Rohde is a happy ending within a disturbing trend that has become part of journalism in the 21st century: the assault and targeted assassination of journalists from the Philippines to Oakland, Calif., and Iran—where 24, including a Newsweek correspondent, have been arrested in the last week.

But David’s kidnappers, who held him for seven months, are still out on the streets—or in the mountains, in this case—a reminder that assailants are getting away with crimes against journalists.

In 2002, Wall Street Journal editors and Dow Jones officials chose to publicize Danny’s kidnapping. Media outlets learned from Danny’s fate.

After I learned David had been kidnapped, in November 2008, I sent him an email with the subject line “prayers to you,” just as I had done when my friend and colleague, Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, was taken in 2002. I closed the message to David on a hopeful note: “Please, be well.” I volunteered my assistance to an editor and friend at The New York Times, and I set a Google Alert to his name. But no stories about his kidnapping popped up. The media was respecting a decision by The New York Times and the Rohde family’s kidnapping specialists not to publicize the news, on the premise that a kidnapping target’s value only increases with attention.

I understood—and I agreed. In 2002, Wall Street Journal editors and Dow Jones officials chose to publicize Danny’s kidnapping with interviews on Larry King Live and regular headline alerts on CNN.

Behind the scenes, some Pakistani investigators, FBI kidnapping specialists, and Wall Street Journal staffers didn’t agree with the strategy, with one arguing: “Get Danny’s face off TV!” Humanizing Danny was a gamble that would have been seen as brilliant if he had come out alive. Alas, he didn’t. No one is to blame. We all just do the best we know how to do at the time.

But media outlets learned from Danny’s fate. The Christian Science Monitor chose to keep a low profile in 2006, after journalist Jill Carroll was kidnapped in Iraq. I know that was the strategy this year, after the arrest of Roxana Saberi in Iran and Laura Ling and Euna Lee in North Korea. Roxana was freed. I hope for the same outcome for Laura and Euna.

To be sure, media outlets still go public. On Sunday evening, Newsweek—apparently operating under the assumption that the Iranian authorities aren’t seeking money or prisoner swaps but to silence the journalists—published an article on its Web site openly calling for the immediate release of its detained journalist, Maziar Bahari.

This weekend, I held my breath as I opened an email with the subject line “Good news—David Rohde escaped unharmed :).” Speed reading, I raced through the details of Rohde’s journey to freedom. I exhaled and sent him an email to read someday, many days from now: “Hallelujah, David. Hallelujah.”

Seven years ago, Danny met a very different fate when he was kidnapped in Karachi, Pakistan. We never got the call that David’s family and friends did. Instead, a Pakistani cop came to my rented home in Karachi and told Danny’s wife, Mariane, “I’m sorry I couldn’t bring your Danny home.”

According to an “Impunity Index” compiled by the Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based organization, 523 journalists were murdered between 1992 and 2008, and of those murders, the criminals got away with it in almost nine of 10 cases. In just 6.5 percent, there was partial impunity.

Back in 2002, we never expected Danny to die. He and Mariane had been visiting my house in Karachi when Danny went off for an interview and was kidnapped. The worst I imagined, as we worked around the clock to find him, was a long captivity.

Into the fifth week of our search, I turned to Mariane and said, “We have to be prepared that Danny might become another Terry Anderson.” (In 1985, Anderson, an Associated Press reporter, was kidnapped in Lebanon and wasn’t released until 1991.)

But at that moment in 2002, across town in the lobby of the Karachi Sheraton, a Pakistani man was delivering a video documenting Danny’s murder to an undercover FBI agent.

Back to Top
June 22, 2009 | 7:07am
Comments ()
bettymedsger

Asra,
Thanks for this important story. A question: what was the conclusion of the IRE panel? What can we do about these terrible cases?
Betty Medsger

|
|
Reply
|
1:37 pm, Jun 22, 2009
AsraNomani

Please subscribe to the alerts sent out by Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders. Sign onto their petitions, their protests. Donate, even, to their organizations. They are all that we have institutionally to protect journalists just doing their jobs--along with brave local groups with which they work. Please subscribe to our newsletter at www.scs.georgetown.edu/pearlproject, and we will update you on our advances in the Pearl Project.

|
|
Reply
1:10 am, Jun 23, 2009
salamander

A worthy analysis, maybe. But why all the self-reference? Who cares about your private email correpondence with Mr. Rohde? Doubtless hundreds of people did the same. It doesn't lend you more credibility. It just makes this article seem like yet another unsavory bit of media self-aggrandizement--appropriating somebody else's tragedy for a crumb of 'insider' cachet. Ick.

|
|
Reply
|
3:47 pm, Jun 22, 2009
AsraNomani

I understand your criticism. I thought it myself. Alas, the personal narrative is often now the vehicle with which to bring to life the often impersonal and foreign. It has its merits. It has its demerits.

|
|
Reply
1:08 am, Jun 23, 2009
travlr009

i read about the times requests that stories not be published about their reporter to protect him, and ask how many times has the NYT been asked by the US govt to refrain from publishing secrets that might cost intelligence agents or military men or women their lives ..........we all know the answer to that one......fortunately for Rohde, those others who refrained from publishing have more integrity then the NYT.

|
|
Reply
|
4:00 pm, Jun 22, 2009
djanimaequeen

Excellent point.

|
|
Reply
4:58 pm, Jun 22, 2009
vboone

Oh give me a break, it's sad the guy was killed but wht does everyone have to become some kind of martyr?

|
|
Reply
|
6:33 pm, Jun 22, 2009
AsraNomani

I completely agree. We so often create heroes to make sense of tragedy. That's not my point. I think it'd actually offend Danny to be considered some kind of martyr. My argument is just that some important lessons were learned from Danny's kidnapping. Danny is the personification of those lessons.

|
|
Reply
1:06 am, Jun 23, 2009
AacB27

I don't think it's about martyrdome. Rhodes was trying to get a story he would have tried to get before Daniel Pearl's murder. It's his job, and he knew that it was dangerous. Journalists seem to spend their careers and risk their lives to bring people and stories closer to home, and through that publicity, the violence becomes commonplace. I hope that the publicity surrounding Daniel Pearl's death has not anesthetized us against the crime committed against him.

|
|
Reply
11:47 am, Jun 23, 2009
aminahyaquin

This is a compelling and fascinating first eprson read. A deepneed insight into the dilemma and the human tragedy.
Thanks, Asra.

|
|
Reply
|
10:39 pm, Jun 22, 2009
AsraNomani

Thank you for your kind words.

|
|
Reply
12:05 am, Jun 24, 2009
guiltybystander

and would journalists refrain from reporting if it were a non-journalist captured? a resounding NO-- cuz that's news, right?

|
|
Reply
7:41 am, Jun 23, 2009
LOSERINO

Nomani is making her whole career about "knowing" danny pearl...yet she has done nothing herself. Stop writing this same story. He is not a martyr. He had bad luck. It's a risk of being a foriegn correspondent. This article is poorly written as well.

|
|
Reply
|
4:22 pm, Jun 23, 2009
AsraNomani

I understand this criticism and this perception. Trust me, I wish that knowing Danny wasn't a reference point for me, but the truth is that it was life defining. For that reason, Danny's life and death will continue to influence my work. But thank you for the feedback.

|
|
Reply
|
12:00 am, Jun 24, 2009
silasmorgan

Write on, Asra! I think your work is amazing and you are an excellent journalist and activist on your own right.

|
11:28 am, Sep 9, 2009
hwatt60

Your chosen user name, Loserino, is perfectly appropriate.
You criticize an article as "poorly written" but your spelling indicates a lack of thought or perhaps an understanding of spell check?
No matter, I seldom respond to the diatribes I see posted, but your air of judgmental dismissal on an article of a particularly sensitive subject written by someone who seems very gracious in her responses to your drivel, warranted a response.

|
|
Reply
1:49 pm, Sep 9, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

How Danny Pearl Helped Save David Rohde

by Asra Q. Nomani

Info
RSS
Asra Q  Nomani
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |