Blogs and Stories

John Avlon

Sanford Should NOT Resign

BS Top - Avlon Sanford Mary Ann Chastain / AP Photo As Governor Sanford’s former constituent in South Carolina, I understand how angry residents feel. But like Spitzer in New York, hounding him out of office now would prompt resignation remorse later.

“Will you resign the governorship?” The question hung in the air as South Carolina’s Mark Sanford departed his press conference. It was the only inquiry left unanswered in the 18-minute televised confessional. It remains unanswered—possibly even to the governor himself—but Sanford should not resign.

As a former constituent of Sanford’s in Charleston, I can appreciate the shockwaves going through homes all over the Palmetto State today. He was widely considered one of the good guys in politics: thoughtful, honest and unassuming—even if you disagreed with him on policy. He slept in his congressional office to save money, brought a pig into the state legislature to highlight pork-barrel spending, fought for deficit reduction and enjoyed approval ratings above 70 percent. As it was in New York when Eliot Spitzer’s infidelities were exposed, the breaking news felt close to a moral impossibility, contrary to everything we thought we knew about the character of a once-popular chief executive. A smart and principled man behaved in ways that were neither smart nor principled.

Soliciting prostitution is illegal; adultery is immoral. Spitzer was felled by lust; Sanford evidently by love.

Hypocrisy is the unforgivable sin in politics. In Spitzer’s case, the hard-driving prosecutor with a zero-tolerance policy for human frailty set himself up as a political piñata. He’d advocated tough new laws against soliciting prostitutes and then done the same thing himself. He’d utilized money-laundering techniques that he had prosecuted. He’d made enough enemies during his short time in office that few tears were shed when he resigned.

But in South Carolina, there is genuine sadness mixed with the shock and disappointment. Sanford had been viewed with pride as a leading Republican presidential primary candidate in 2012—completing the half-century evolution from Strom Thurmond to Fritz Hollings to Sanford. Throughout his career, his wife Jenny had been a steadfast political partner and his love for his four boys remains palpable. But despite knee-jerk anti-Southern assumptions, Sanford had never subscribed to the Moral Majority or discrimination coded under the term “family values.” He was a man of faith, but did not use it as a political banner or polarizing weapon. A staunch fiscal conservative—which led to most of his fights with the free-spending state legislature—he did not climb on the soapbox of social conservatism. Instead, he advanced the idea of the big tent.

After Spitzer’s resignation, chaos in the New York state legislature has left many citizens feeling that the inmates are in charge of the asylum—a condition exacerbated by the fact that only one of the state’s four statewide elected officials in Albany were actually put into office by the voters less than three years ago. Unexpectedly, some folks in the Empire State now have resignation remorse. Hounding Sanford out of office in this moment of maximum pain and political damage could have a similar effect in South Carolina.

There’s an additional caution: Soliciting prostitution is illegal; adultery is immoral. Spitzer was felled by lust; Sanford evidently by love. All this is not by way of excusing, but explaining, Sanford’s combustible midlife crisis and epic lapse in judgment. For all the heated “Bill Clinton must resign” impulses after the then-mind-blowing Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, most Americans now see that would have been a mistake in terms of the Constitution and the country.

To his credit, Sanford did not indulge in an extended spin after getting caught—he was painfully honest in public. And as we have seen from Jenny Sanford’s subsequent eloquent letter to the press, no one ever really knows what goes on in a relationship except the two people in it.

Back to Top
June 25, 2009 | 7:57am
Comments ()
urbangulfguy

Is it really asking for perfection to ask a state governor to keep it in his pants for 4 years?

|
|
Reply
8:46 am, Jun 25, 2009
jaguarxjs

Yeah, no extended spin, nobody told the press he was 'hiking' instead of out of the country and with his mistress. He should resign for the simple fact that he used taxpayer money to fund his trips to Argentina to carry on his affair.

Of course I'm sure he has a reason why those travel expenses benefited the public..........

|
|
Reply
|
9:04 am, Jun 25, 2009
gregmcd

I would agree with Mr. Avalon that Sanford need not resign but his reasons given are flimsy. Here was a man who voted for the impeachment of Clinton because Clinton broke the sacred vow of marriage. Give me a break.

|
|
Reply
|
10:11 am, Jun 25, 2009
threedogs

Exactly. Guys like this Christian cultist are the first to throw stones while they are groping women on the dance floor.

|
7:28 am, Jul 11, 2009
SeeingI

I understand and sympathize with your point of view - and I definitely feel for the Governor and his family. But you fail to address his serious dereliction of duty - he lied to his staffers about where he was going, and I'm sorry, no governor has the luxury of being incommunicado.

Plus, to your mind he might not have indulged in Moral Majority politics, but his opposition to any kind of gay marriage, even civil unions, falls into that category for me. Once again, it's the hypocricy. Gays can't damage the institution of marriage any more than its most ardent defenders.

|
|
Reply
|
9:07 am, Jun 25, 2009
daniel66

I think both of you are off base. The taxpayers did fund three trips. However, the affair alledgedly only began one year ago. So the taxpayer funded affair argument needs some shoring up.

On dereliction of duty, are you kidding? Thats why there is a LT Governor. Governors are entitled to breaks too.

Governor Sanford should stay in office. His personal affairs should remain between he and his wife. Didn't we learn anything from the Clinton affair?

|
|
Reply
|
9:27 am, Jun 25, 2009
SeeingI

The Lt. Governor did not know where the Governor was, or if he should take over in his stead. The state of SC was essentially rudderless for the past week. Have you not been paying attention to this story at all?

I agree that the Governor's personal affairs should not affect his duties. His lying to his staff about his whereabouts and effectively abandoning his post definitely should.

|
9:40 am, Jun 25, 2009
travlr009

no..... he was derelict. He wasnt on a "break", he deserted his post. No one knew where he was, He was not only absent from the state, but he was absent from the country.
The Lt gov couldnt take over because there was no legal basis....the state was without a governor. no different then the captain of the ship being absent from the bridge in wartime. He should be impeached , not for his personal indiscretions , but for dereliction of duty.

|
10:11 am, Jun 25, 2009
Absurdist

As Rachel Maddow so delightfully pointed out, Sanford ran on a "Christian Family Values" platform to win the governor's mansion. He pimped those kids out hard to get elected as an upright family man. He should melt into a puddle on that basis alone. Clinton didn't run on the principles of Christian Virtue (and anyone with a brain who would have believed him if he had needs to be smacked).

And as far as his "personal affairs remaining between he [sic] and his wife," let's see...

HELL TO THE NO. He was one who not only voted for Clinton's impeachment, but called for Clinton's resignation. He has also called for the resignation of other public officials caught in sexual impropriety. He gets no passes on this one.

|
2:26 pm, Jun 25, 2009
threedogs

Why do you believe a liar?

|
7:29 am, Jul 11, 2009
etu2000

how is that hypocricy because one supports the definition of Marriage is between a man and a women? that has nothing to do with what he did.

|
|
Reply
|
10:24 am, Jun 25, 2009
threedogs

Yes it does. He does not stand for marriage. He stands for making our with outer women, feeling up other women, and having sex with other women while abandoning his post as governor. These new laws are called "Defense of Marriage" so how has this guy acted in its defense? He has humiliated his wife, over and over, in public. He has betrayed his children and destroyed any trust they could have in him. So please tell me why we are all supposed to rally around straight marriage when Christian cultists behave like the rest of the nameless rabble?

|
7:34 am, Jul 11, 2009
DBFan2009

actually, from what i understand, mark sanford does believe in the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman and another woman from argentina.

|
|
Reply
|
2:59 pm, Jun 25, 2009
Makkabee

He believes in traditional marriage -- one husband, one wife, as many concubines as the husband can juggle. It's in the bible so it must be okay!*

* Not the first time South Carolinians used that argument to defend a controversial position.

|
11:41 am, Jul 7, 2009
EdinNJ

So this is how the spin is going to be?

Here's a guy who was derelict in his duties, while banging his chick on the side (while supposedly working on a reconciliation with his wife). He also abandoned his 4 boys on Father's Day to dip his wick in Argentina, and had his staff lie to his constituents for days while he desperately tried to cover his tracks. Only after he realized the mess he created did he confess and show contrition.

But now we are going to hear about how Sanford is conflicted because he's in love? As if perpetuating an 8 year courtship on the taxpayer's dime without your wife's knowledge is somehow preferable and more commendable? Please.

Sanford needs to resign for a couple of reasons. First, as someone who has repeatedly called for others to resign when caught cheating, he needs to practice what he preaches. And secondly, and most importantly, he cannot be trusted to perform his duties. No one wants a governor who allows the little head to control him to the point of abandoning your family and work responsibilities.

|
|
Reply
|
9:26 am, Jun 25, 2009
jaggededge

if the little head drags you to another continent, you've got some serious priorty issues that don't bode well for serving as governor

|
|
Reply
|
10:34 am, Jun 25, 2009
EdinNJ

And now we find out that the only reason he even admitted he was in Argentina was because a reporter figured out he was there and surprised him at the arrival gate. Otherwise, we would still be hearing about his hike on the AT and getting even more moronic posts from daniel66 and his ilk.

|
11:45 am, Jun 25, 2009
cbeenthere

Adultery is immoral. But check out the LAWS on morality and decency on the books of SC, and then get back to us.

|
|
Reply
|
9:36 am, Jun 25, 2009
SeeingI

I would never call for him to resign over his personal affairs, but he, himself, has said that such conduct makes a person unfit for the trust of the people.

|
|
Reply
|
9:42 am, Jun 25, 2009
cbeenthere

I would not either. Just quoting the author who stated adultery is immoral, and pointing out the antiquated laws still on the books in SC which really do state fornication is unlawful. I did not make the laws in SC.

|
10:18 am, Jun 25, 2009
Downriver

Avalon suffers from an anal cranial inversion

|
|
Reply
|
9:47 am, Jun 25, 2009
DBFan2009

a very dark place, indeed; so much so, that i fear avalon cannot see the light of truth.

|
|
Reply
3:01 pm, Jun 25, 2009
FransBevy

"But despite knee-jerk anti-southern assumptions, Sanford had never subscribed to the moral majority or discrimination coded under the term "family values."
You're kidding, right? Or do you have a short memory? Mr. Sanford was very harsh on both Bob Livingston and Bill Clinton when their peccadilloes came to light and led the charges against them. Frankly, I don't care where Mr. Sanford puts it but his was an act of hypocrisy through and through.

|
|
Reply
9:48 am, Jun 25, 2009
liviapeacock

What???

Are you deluded?

Your memory is very selective Mr. Avalon. Here is Sanford's PUBLIC VOTING RECORD.

* No civil unions; define one-man-one-woman marriage. (Nov 2002)
* Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)

This man is just another sexual hypocrite who practices what he feels, not what he preaches (AND VOTES).

Your defense of him defies logic and facts. You're basically saying, "yeah, but look how sorry he is..."

You're a total boob.


|
|
Reply
10:14 am, Jun 25, 2009
etu2000

He should resign for lack of sound judgement. His yearning for this women should have made him sought counsel in his own marriage. His pride and arrogamce stopped him from doing this. In this day and age you don't send e-mails, the affair cause him to lie about cross country visit. Get rid the bums i don't care what party they are.Rather clean house now than if he would have been in higher office.

|
|
Reply
10:21 am, Jun 25, 2009
macwilliams

He should resign, but not because of the affair. He should resign because he went AWOL in his capacity as Governor. He is guilty, at the very least, of negligence and dereliction of duty. If spending 5 days in Argentina "crying" is his way of handling pressure, you have to ask how fit he is as an individual to hold an office that may require him to make some very serious decisions under very serious pressure. THAT'S why he should resign.

|
|
Reply
10:26 am, Jun 25, 2009
AmiBlue

No lust involved with sanford? Are you as stupid as you sound?

|
|
Reply
10:33 am, Jun 25, 2009
AlwaysOptimistic

The Republicans need to find a new platform, because obviously "family values" ain't workin' for them.

Republicans thy name is hypocrisy..

|
|
Reply
11:02 am, Jun 25, 2009
DrEvil

http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/06/red-state-upd ate-hiking-appalachian.html

Too Funny

Red State Update "Hiking The Appalachian Trail"
Adult Humor and Language, Warning: Don't watch if you don't have a sense of humor.

That's right Andrea Mitchell, you don't know Rednecks as well as you think you do.

|
|
Reply
11:05 am, Jun 25, 2009
dahniuru

I think the whole thing is a clever orchestration of a situation to bring to the attention of the world that Sanford really is ready to become president of the USA.

|
|
Reply
11:17 am, Jun 25, 2009
Progressive2

"The bottom line, though, is I am sure there will be a lot of legalistic explanations pointing out that the president lied under oath. His situation was not under oath. The bottom line, though, is he still lied. He lied under a different oath, and that is the oath to his wife. So it's got to be taken very, very seriously." [Sanford on Livingston, CNN, 12/18/98]

"We ought to ask questions...rather than circle the wagons for one of our tribe." [Sanford on how the GOP reacts to affairs, New York Post, 12/20/98]

"I think it would be much better for the country and for him personally (to resign). I come from the business side. If you had a chairman or president in the business world facing these allegations, he'd be gone." [Sanford on Clinton, The Post and Courier, 9/12/98]

"The issue of lying is probably the biggest harm, if you will, to the system of Democratic government, representatives government, because it undermines trust. And if you undermine trust in our system, you undermine everything." [Sanford on Clinton, CNN, 2/16/99]

|
|
Reply
11:51 am, Jun 25, 2009
JeffreyinLA

Let's not mix the personal with the professional. Sure, he's a bum who cheated on his wife. Sure, he's a hypocrite who waves a flag for marital virtue that he doesn't apply to himself. Those are moral failings, and let's not fall into that Moral Majority toilet of trying to police the behavior of others.

But the man walked away from his job and left no one in charge. It's also important to remember that SC law doesnt' say when or under what circumstances the Lt. Governor can step in. The state was left to fend for itself while the virtuous man who slept on a cot in his office and borught a pig to work was getting some side action with taxpayer funds.

Let's see: Misappropriation of public funds, dereliction of duty. Resign, douchebag.

|
|
Reply
12:54 pm, Jun 25, 2009
hwatt60

It seems that once again the hypocrites have proven that throwing rocks from the safety of a glass house isn't prudent.

Remember the old saying- "Karma means you don't get away with nothin'."

|
|
Reply
1:12 pm, Jun 25, 2009
DBFan2009

question: would he have held a public press conference if he hadn't been caught?

didn't think so.

|
|
Reply
3:03 pm, Jun 25, 2009
teach66

Of course he should resign...its the same as Spitzer...hypocrisy. An untra conservative harping about gays getting rights and reserving the sanctity of marriage...get 'em out of there!

|
|
Reply
3:53 pm, Jun 25, 2009
RRWineGuy

Sexual transgressions only become the public's business when the politician makes sex his selling point. "Outing" a presumably straight politician who has a boyfriend on the side is wrong, unless that politician is promoting an anti-gay agenda. Sanford's promotion of family values makes him a valid target for straights and gays.

|
|
Reply
4:31 pm, Jun 25, 2009
RavenRaving

Are you sure you are writing about the same guy we have been seeing on television and reading about? Sanford 'never subscribed to the Moral Majority or the discrimination cloaked as Family Values...' Who was that using Sanford's name and loudly calling for Clinton to resign? Sanford fell 'by love'? He left his state leaderless and in limbo, for a piece of poontang. What if it happens in time of emergency? Not to mention letting his boys know what was really important to him by deserting them over Father's Day. He has demonstrated his judgement is too poor for him to remain in office. Out he goes. South Carolina, you get another chance. Get someone who has your interests in mind and doesn't just vote 'No' on all things democratic. Get yourselves an advocate.

|
|
Reply
8:49 pm, Jun 25, 2009
Makkabee

What a ridiculous whitewash job. Of course Sanford is Moral Majority material. He's called for the resignation of other politicians who got caught in infidelity, and so is now like Spitzer a proven hypocrite hoist by his own petard. And not a "Family Values" politician? Look at his record on gay rights, abortion, etc. It's an insult to your readers' intelligence that you pretend Sanford isn't a hard-right ideologue on social issues.

|
|
Reply
11:34 am, Jul 7, 2009
threedogs

Yes, there was no lust on the governors part, no lust in his other encounters with women in which he did not "cross the line." He is a member of the highly conservative DC Christian club who believes in no social programs and an accumulation of wealth by the rich who then give to the poor. He lied to his staff, his state, and of course to his wife, and he used state money to fly down to Argentina. All of his trips to Argentina were bogus and brought no money to this fiscal fool's state. He made his ridiculous case to the press about my "soul mate" to cover his tracks with the cult he's in, but forging a close relationship, having a woman as your "dear dear friend" and confidant is an affront to your marriage, which the Republicans hold so sacred that it has to be between a man and woman. Oh, I mean, a big fat lying cheat and a woman.

|
|
Reply
7:27 am, Jul 11, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Sanford Should NOT Resign

by John Avlon

Info
RSS
John Avlon
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |