Blogs and Stories

Lucinda Franks

The Mysterious Madoff Charity

BS Top - Franks Madoff Charity L: Stephen Chernin / Getty Images Bernie Madoff quietly slipped $2 million into a foundation created by son Mark as the walls started closing in. Was this part of a scheme to divert cash? Lucinda Franks investigates.

Authorities laboring to return to victims what is left of Bernard Madoff's ill-gotten gains have been discovering a web of maneuvers he used to divert millions of dollars of clients' money to his family. The fact that so many of these gifts and transfers were made in 2007 and 2008 suggests that Madoff knew his Ponzi scheme was about to collapse.

Now, it appears that Mark Madoff, who worked for his father’s firm but has not been charged with any crime, created a nonprofit foundation that served as a repository for some of Bernie’s scammed funds. An examination of the tax returns of both the foundation and the personal returns of Bernie revealed the following:

  • In the last month of 2007, the Mark and Stephanie Madoff Foundation, as it is formally named, was established, but its tax return for that year, called a 990, is remarkably white. Most questions are left blank because the foundation did not do anything. It gave no grants, it employed no people, and it had only three board members—Mark, Stephanie, and Andrew Madoff—each of whom worked zero hours. The total assets declared were $2 million. But this number is puzzling.

“It looks as though Madoff could see the Ponzi scheme running out of steam much earlier than we thought and wanted to move as much money as he could out of his company so he could shield his fraudulent assets.”

  • Mark’s name appears on the 990 form next to the $2 million contribution that served as the fund’s initial assets. But Bernie—whose personal tax returns have been made public—declared a gift of that amount to the foundation in 2007 and took a tax deduction for it. That gift saved him approximately $1 million in taxes. It’s unknown whether Bernie contributed the money but let Mark take public credit—perhaps as a way to mask it—or whether Mark claimed a tax deduction to match the money his foundation says he contributed, which would be a clear case of tax evasion if he did so without donating the funds. We don't have access to Mark’s return, because he has not been charged with a crime.
  • Bernie's tax accountant, David Friehling, who is under indictment and cooperating with authorities, could not be reached for comment. Mark Madoff's accountant for 2007 referred me to another accountant, who also could not find any sign of Mark Madoff in the computer.
  • There is no evidence of who or what The Mark and Stephanie Madoff Foundation was intended to serve. It gave away no money in 2007 and only $135,000 in 2008, which is slightly above the federally required minimum of 5 percent of the fund’s assets. The foundation does not appear in the 2007 and 2008 New York City phone books, and the number listed on the tax form is no longer active, so it is not clear whether the foundation has continued into 2009, or what happened to the $2 million. The tax returns of the foundation, which are public, have not yet been filed, thus we cannot know what its charitable contributions in 2008 were, how much is still in the fund, or, if the foundation has been dissolved, where its assets went.
  • Instead of employing an accounting firm in New York, where the foundation was based, Mark’s foundation used Price Waterhouse in Pittsburgh. But when I tried to locate the accountant who had prepared and signed off on the foundation’s 2007 return, a staff member there failed to recognize Madoff’s name. After looking in what she said was every possible file, she said, "I just can't find any Mark Madoff Foundation in the computer."
  • Finally, the Price Waterhouse staffer discovered a mention of the foundation, but only that it had been granted an extension of several months to file its 2008 tax return. She said perhaps the account had been turned over to Lehman Brothers with several others in 2008, "though we should have a record of their taxes." She put me on to a person at Lehman Brothers, who told me that the foundation gave out $135,000 in 2008, but not who the money went to. "Let me give you the number of the woman who prepared the foundation's 2008 tax returns," she said, citing the name Nancy Minami. Calls to Minami were never returned.

Bernie Madoff loaned more than $30 million to various family members in 2007 and 2008, including $6.5 million to Mark and Stephanie for a house in Nantucket and $9 million that he gave his brother, Peter Madoff, the firm's compliance officer, on December 12, 2008, just nine days before Bernie was arrested. Bernie also bought a $4.5 million New York apartment for his son Andrew. Although none of them have been charged with a crime, all the assets of Mark, Andrew, and Peter Madoff have now been frozen by the court. The trustee who has filed suit against many Madoff operatives to gather money to compensate the victims has not brought suit against the foundation.

Back to Top
June 26, 2009 | 10:09pm
Comments ()
exploora

Great article.

This kills me, in 2007, I had to send a profit and loss statement for 06, which I was thanked for, and then someone like Bernie, who was supposed to send one automatically, and of course if he had someone would have noticed (you would hope), that something wasn't making sense, and then possibly they would have questioned why his accountant was saying he wasn't auditing to avoid the peer review then, if I understand it right, was certifying Bernie's financial documents as being audited implying they represented his true financial situation. Which of course as we know was a fiction, he made no trades at all, and now his accountant is being accused of alledged fraud, which is different than knowing about the Ponzi scheme, he just is being accused of misrepresenting the work which was actually done related to auditing. That is what I don't get. How no one investigated, and how his propriety rights were given more consideration than the public's need to be assured the records of such a huge fund which feeder funds, charities, and all kinds of people were depending upon to reasonably accurate. And the fiction was allowed to continue, so how can a person trust the system again?

|
|
Reply
|
10:55 pm, Jun 26, 2009
EdmondDantes

Good point! (I have no idea what you are talking about btw)

As I wrote in a comment before, Madoff was kept by the financial power holders to 'hold the bag' until something really bad happened in the market. Well, this 'something really bad' has happened to the market and Madoff has served as a wonderful distraction in the Wall Street fiascos. Imagine what Wall Street would have faced without a Madoff as a scapegoat?

|
|
Reply
3:15 am, Aug 16, 2009
exploora

Oops: That is what I don't get. How no one investigated, and how his propriety rights were given more consideration than the public's need to be assured the records of such a huge fund which feeder funds, charities, and all kinds of people were depending upon to BE reasonably accurate.

|
|
Reply
10:59 pm, Jun 26, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
1:34 am, Jun 27, 2009
lbbetc

who knew racists read the daily beast and didn't hesitate to reveal themselves??

|
|
Reply
10:26 pm, Jun 27, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
2:40 am, Jun 27, 2009
Southpaw

Keep digging!

|
|
Reply
6:49 am, Jun 27, 2009
Hawnzz

Lock him up and throw away the key... or better yet, let's be cruel. Let's take every dime, make them live in public housing and work at Walmart (as a greeter) for the rest of their lives. (With a sign around their necks that says who they are and what they did... the same goes for the rest of the family.) Sounds cruel to me...

|
|
Reply
|
9:00 am, Jun 27, 2009
estcruzer

I believe that is demeaning to greeters at Walmart. With the proper attitude it is joyful work and the Madoffs don't deserve it just yet. First they must learn to be honest and authentic human beings. The problem is that they must understand the enormity of the damage they have done - at least one person committed suicide because of their deception. But, once they understand the scope of their crimes even a saint would be overwhelmed - what to do?

|
|
Reply
9:50 am, Jun 27, 2009
christine

So interesting! It makes total sense that he knew the walls were closing in. Madoff is a very bad apple with very strong instincts. I sure hope every miscreant and every penny involved in this scam is uncovered.Thanks for peeling back still more layers of this complicated story, great reporting.

|
|
Reply
10:00 am, Jun 27, 2009
boredwell

If I were Mark, Peter and Stephanie and my rich dad suddenly, without any explanation, started forking over some Big Bucks and/or buying me expensive real estate, I'd ask, "Dad, whuzzup?!" But I never had a rich dad. Maybe rich kids are used to receiving this kinda largess. But still I think they must have decided not to look the gift horse in the mouth.

|
|
Reply
8:28 pm, Jun 27, 2009
STepper

exploora - I tried to follow what you were saying, but neither your original submission nor your correction makes much sense. It must have been important. Want to give it a 3rd try, but this time read it a few times before posting?

|
|
Reply
9:27 pm, Jun 27, 2009
factcheck

This makes no sense.
1. Franks writes that the Foundation was set up in the last month of 2007 and then suggests it is odd that that the tax return for 2007 was remarkably blank. What does she expect of a foundation that was a couple of weeks old?
2. A quick Internet search pops up several examples of donations from this foundation.
3. The accounting firm, Price Waterhouse, is a 28 billion dollar firm. Why does Franks find this peculiar?
Maybe there's a story here, but this article is simply sensationalist nonsense.

|
|
Reply
7:59 pm, Jun 29, 2009
mrspanstreppon

To add fuel to the fire, the Andrew and Deborah Madoff Foundation hasn't filed a 990 since 2006, according to Guidestar and the 990 Finder. The foundation, registered in 2003, was initially funded with $3 million, ostensibly contributed by Andrew and his wife. As in the case of Mark Madoff's foundation, the Pittsburgh office of Pricewaterhousecoopers prepared the 2006 990. However, it appears Andrew himself prepared the 990s in prior years. The foundation had an approx. balance of $5 million at 12/31/06.

|
|
Reply
1:56 pm, Jun 30, 2009
mrspanstreppon

I was wrong. The 2007 Andrew and Deborah Madoff Foundation 990 was filed. Andrew an his wife didn't contribut4e to the foundaqtion in 2007 but Walter Zacharias contributed $18k. The return was signed by Priceaterhousecoopers in May 08, by Mark Madoff in June '08 and postmarked 8/13/08. For some reason, the Madoffs wiated until that last minute to file the 990.

|
|
Reply
1:08 pm, Jul 3, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

The Mysterious Madoff Charity

by Lucinda Franks

Info
RSS
Lucinda Franks
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |