Blogs and Stories
Airlines You Should Avoid
With yet another plane crash on Monday in what is turning out to be a bad year for air accidents, aviation expert Clive Irving says the E.U.’s “black list” of airlines should be given more credence.
We now learn that Yemen Airways, one of whose Airbus A310s crashed in the Comoros Islands Monday with 153 people on board, had been on the European Union’s watch list between July 2007 and the end of 2008 for “incomplete reporting” of inspections of its fleet.
If you want to check the safety record of airlines, it’s a good idea to think in terms of used cars. Like cars, older models get sold by their first-time buyers, and then pass down a chain of owners. These tend to be airlines who are glad to find a bargain. But as in cars, one obligation that comes with older models is that they need increasingly vigilant maintenance. Parts wear out, minor things fail. There is no reason why a modern airliner—certainly any up to 25 years old—can’t keep on trucking if it is well serviced and maintained. The trouble is, who is watching that they are?
The effectiveness of airline regulators reflects the culture of the country.
The European Union has the toughest screening process: More than 160 airlines are on its black list, meaning that they are not allowed to fly into or out of E.U. countries. In reacting to today’s crash, the E.U. transport commissioner, Antonio Tajani, proposed that this E.U. list be extended to a global black list. Good idea.
I’ve been trawling that list of 160. It includes companies registered in Kazakhstan, Sudan, Afghanistan, Rwanda, Angola, Benin, the Democratic Republic of Congo—you get the picture. More significantly, it also includes all carriers “certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight” in Indonesia, which is hardly a Third World country, but which has a record of sloppy enforcement of safety standards.
The effectiveness of airline regulators reflects the culture of the country. Obviously, European and U.S. regulators have high technical standards and independence. In South America, aviation in Brazil is regulated by the military, in a professional way, but such oversight can be politicized and not as independent as it should be. Yemen, rife with tribal and sectarian conflict and a frequent victim of terrorism, hardly represents the kind of stable, conscientious regime that would guarantee reliable supervision of airlines.
This is turning out to be a very bad year for air accidents—an unusual anomaly after what had been a long period of improvement in the safety record. There is no common thread running through the crashes in 2009. The A310 involved in the Comoros crash is a first-generation Airbus, a design that has proved extremely reliable even though it is no longer built. It does not have state-of-the-art “fly-by-wire” cockpit automation and is, therefore, more vulnerable to being mishandled by pilots than modern Airbuses.
We don’t yet have a clear picture of what happened with this Airbus. But the general rule of thumb, that an airline at the end of the selling chain of used machines should be avoided, holds good here.
Xtra Insight: The Daily Beast's Clive Irving: Changing Planes Can Kill You
Clive Irving is senior consulting editor at Condé Nast Traveler, specializing in aviation.







areporter
what crappy reporting! and misleading headlilne. Where's the list? Airlines you should avoid? Really? Where? Not in this piece. Nice of Clive to "trawl" the list. How bout sharing it?
StacyW
You can see the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_air_carriers_banned_in_the_EU
JoshAus
I've seen reports that the aircraft that crashed was only flying the Yemen to Comoros leg of the route. That is, the airline used a different aircraft for the first leg from France. Could well be that the airline didn't want to risk the crashed aircraft getting a spot check by european authorities.
AmericanPravda
' That is, the airline used a different aircraft for the first leg from France. Could well be that the airline didn't want to risk the crashed aircraft getting a spot check by european authorities.'
JoshAus: That is exactly what happened. I believe that the term used for this is 'backdooring'.
ApresSki
I wish they'd publish the list! At some point, someone will get that list and publish on the internet so the rest of us & our loved ones can be spared the pain of a crash.
artois
Great article
nateroth
Where does one find the EU List of 160 airlines to avoid?
davidlee
http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air-ban/list_en.htm
try this link
biglover
I just checked out the link and I don't think I would ever get on any of those airlines. I am amazed there are so many of these little "fly by night" airlines
This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--joebloespotted
This isn't as simple as rolling dice; it's about the frequency and diligence taken in aircraft maintenance.
This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--joebloeTheWiseBard
This is idiotic. In classic probability terms (including the law of averages), coins being tossed do not have memories, and after five heads, the next toss is NOT more likely to be tails. In the real world, some kinds of events are not "independent" in this sense--airlines that do bad maintenance are more likely to have repeated crashes than those that maintain high maintenance standards are to have any.
Joebloe illustrates a generalization of another sort: a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. --The Wise Bard
JoshAus
I think the little smiley at the end of his post means he's joking. Lighten up.
This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--joebloeBocaDean
Why anyone would fly an airilne from one of these countries who only recently discovered fire & the wheel is staggering!
AlbertinBklyn
No need for derogatory comments about other folks. While I may be concerned about carriers that I'm unfamiliar with, I am also concerned about various US carriers, considering how tight their margins are. How thorough are they with maintenance and parts replacement. I find this article premature when we don't know the cause of this crash. Hell, we still know the cause of the Air France disaster, and I don't hear anyone talking about not flying that airline, even human error and parts malfunction may have played roles. For small countries like Yemen and Comoros, this kind of disaster probably impacts the whole country, since one is bound to have known someone on board. Tragic!
weakyknee
I know this comment is supposed to be a joke but... these countries did not emerge from the stone age any more recently than Europe. It's more about the level of impoverishment and government monitoring (or lack thereof) in these countries. Your comment suggests that the people flying on the Yemen flight were stupid for flying on a shady airline (follow that to its logical conclusion). Maybe they didn't have another option? Maybe they couldn't afford to fly with a more reputable airline? And certainly it's not a passenger's responsibilty to check out every single plane they board. Do you? I sure don't. Maybe that makes me stupid but I sure hope it doesn't mean that I 'deserve' to die in a ball of flame.
Johnnyappleseed
Agreed
tammydownunder
Certainly not to belittle of any of the passengers that perished, but didn't Air France just lose a plane?
Yashodhara
Such a wonderful thesis! Since when does a plain and simple correlation become the absolute truth? Such incredibly open and mindless racism! But, coming from a Conde Nast writer , it makes sense. Let me list useless, third world, dilapidated countries with a stupid darky population and a regime that is very nasty and stupid but whose national cariers have not faced major disasters - Myanmar Air, Jamaica air, Air Tanzania to name a few and guess what some lovely countries like France, Japan and even heck! USA have had at least one disaster, don't you think?!
nicfulton
I think that Switzerland has even stricter policies. I've flown with a Slovenian airline from London to Bologna that had to fly round Switzerland. I was a student with an Italian girlfriend so I was flying there quite a bit - it was very well priced, and we used to laugh about where they were saving money.
nickjacket
The accident aircraft from Yemen Airways first gen A310 is not "more vulnerable to being mishandled by pilots than modern Airbuses".
Its pressurization may have been only good for flights under 20,000ft but it still flew.
And the cockpit didn't have to be fly-by-wire to have been flown safely either. So what if the crew couldn't do foggy IFR approaches down to the runway like a new one but they should have been hand flying this type of aircraft for a long time before this accident.
Until the boxes are read-out by the investigators, we'll not know too much but I do know that mechanical problems of any accident aircraft are rare culprits compared to pilot error stats.
stetsonthehat
I've flown on an airline on that list. Garuda Indonesia airlines. I flew from Bali, Indo to Perth, Australia. It's the one flight I always tell people about because while the plane was "driving" to the runway, it lost power, complete power, three times. The plane went black, engines went dead, everything went silent. Three times in less than ten minutes. I thought we were for sure going to go back to the gate, disembark, and wait until it was fixed. Nope. We took off and flew to Perth. No one but me on the flight was even remotely concerned.
Brikoral
I've flown on Garuda too...Worst. Landing. Ever.
Wait, I take that back.
twotimestwo
The list is embedded in the headline---just click on "Black List" in quote marks and you will be taken to the site.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.