Blogs and Stories
The Madonna Nudes
Thirty years after a then-unknown 20-year-old model bared all, a new exhibition of photographs opens in London today. VIEW OUR (NSFW) GALLERY.
Touting itself as “The most intriguing, controversial and sexy art gallery in the U.K.,” Brighton’s Impure Art is an outlet for erotic art, or as stated on its Web site, “anything from nude to rude.” Starting today and running through July 19, Impure Art, in conjunction with London’s Seven Dials, is exhibiting its biggest thing since it opened its doors in May 2008: The Madonna Nudes.
CLICK IMAGE TO VIEW GALLERY
The works, which are being offered for sale at £3,400 a print, are exhibited to coincide with the London dates for her Sticky & Sweet tour. Posing for Martin M. H. Schreiber’s photography class at New York ‘s Parsons School of Design in 1979, when she was 20 years old and fresh to the city, Madonna was paid $30 to model nude.
In 1985, Schreiber discovered that his voluptuous young model had become a famous entertainer. He saw Madonna’s face on the cover of Interview magazine in January and some months later repeated on the cover of Time. Since that discovery, Schreiber has marketed his black-and-white prints, which are naïvely artistic and heavily voyeuristic, to anybody willing to pay.
Schreiber first contacted Penthouse, but eventually ended up publishing his Madonna nudes, along with photographer Lee Friedlander’s naked pictures of the then-struggling dancer, in the September 1985 issue of Playboy. In 1990, Taschen published Schreiber’s nude studies in a book, which has since been reprinted by other publishers.
Describing the pictures recently, Schreiber told the Guardian, “I was into the body as a sculptural form in those days. I'd bend or twist models to see what I could create. It was experimental.”
Plus: Check out Art Beast, for galleries, interviews with artists, and photos from the hottest parties.
Paul Laster is the editor of Artkrush.com, a contributing editor at Flavorpill.com and Art Asia Pacific, and a contributing writer at Time Out New York and Art in America.








vboone
Since we're flashing pictures can I post a picture of my penis?
Maezeppa
Your penis is gross. Madonna is beautiful.
vboone
This isn't art it's soft porn.
sophia5
Beg to differ.
Madonna . . . WAS . . . cute ( in the early 80's ) .
Now Madonna is "gross."
She would lose to a penis in a beauty contest.
Zugzwang
Eh, Madonna is pretty gross, too. At least today, she is.
And the photography is pretty artistically done. Certainly not soft porn. Erotic, sure, but this is pretty tasteful stuff.
kbmcd2009
Can you keep the nudity off the home page? How do you expect me to read The Beast at work?
mredder4
Yeah, I sent a letter to the editor with the same comment. I know that a lot of online websites are run by the young and hip, but most corporations aren't. People could get written up or lose their jobs just for trying to read the news at The Daily Beast.
Epic FAIL, editors. Epic.
This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--charles116DBFan2009
i don't find these photos of madonna to be either art or in fact, "voluptuous." they look as if anyone could have snapped them (the long johns - i mean, really...), and madonna herself isn't exactly projecting "sex" or "sexy" in any of them. she's far from "voluptuous" - she's just a skinny girl who needed to pick up some cash at the time.
it's just capitalizing on her fame. not that i have a problem with that per se...
CultureVulture
What's really going on her, Paul? It could been seen that you are using an art exhibition excuse to plug a famous entertainer's London concert dates (an entertainer who will actually show up for her London concert dates).
Did Tina Brown put you up to this?
And prices!! How convenient!! Are you shilling for the photographer as well? Are the photos open editions, in which case anyone who buys one is a FOOL.
This really should have ADVERTORIAL stamped on it, or you should raise the bar in what gets covered art-wise on TDB.
Mastercaster
If you had a grain of sense you'd find out the facts before shooting your mouth off. They are in a very limited edition of 25 and they are selling like hot cakes. Now who is the FOOL?
Siouxie921
Say what you want about Madonna, but she got one gorgeous set of boobs!
jazzgrrrl25
i seem to remember seeing these years ago.
and, the thing that i seem to remember about them was her pit hair...and, now it's gone...does anyone else remember one way or the other?...would they have airbrushed it out now?
Rdschenkel
Beautiful pictures. Today I find her gross, inside and out.
Maezeppa
Shame on you.
TheWildestofThings
Incredibly beautiful young woman, beautiful pictures, nothing fake about her(at least in these photographs).
guiltybystander
they're crappy
exploora
I guess the news story is Madonna isn't really blond.
crymeariver
exploora
I guess the news story is Madonna isn't really blond.
-------------------
Yeah, it was news like 20 years ago when she told all reporters and showed off her pre-bleached hair! Do you live in a cave or something, I think even Osama bin Laden knew that.
exploora
I was joking. :).
speechrock
There is no such thing as a blond.
Dreamer4Ever
Kitty cat! Yay!
milkman57
bet they don't look like that anymore!!
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.