Blogs and Stories
Nothing Happened on the Fourth
Hulton Archive / Getty Images
Step away from the grill: Bestselling historian Joseph Ellis says we’re celebrating our nation’s independence on the wrong day. How history screwed up the date.
History is always messier than we remember. And when it comes to the date of the annual anniversary of American independence, the Fourth of July, nothing can be more disorienting than a faithful recovery of how, and when, history actually happened. As it turns out, nothing much happened on July 4, 1776.
The confusion starts with a painting done by John Trumbull entitled The Declaration of Independence. It depicts John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, plus two less-lustrous delegates in the Continental Congress, approaching the table where John Hancock is seated. Almost everyone assumes that it captures the magic moment on July 4 when the delegates signed the Declaration.
When the delegates concluded their debate on July 4, they then ordered the revised document sent to the printer. No one signed the Declaration that day.
But the day is actually June 28, and the scene recreates the moment when the committee charged with composing the Declaration presents its draft to the Continental Congress. Jefferson had written the first draft a week earlier, the committee had made a few minor revisions, and they were now showing the revised draft for the consideration of the Congress. The Fourth of July was almost a week away.
Then there is the equally confusing testimony of John Adams, delivered in a letter on July 3 to his beloved Abigail:
The second day of July 1776 will be the most memorable epocha in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival…It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations from one end of the continent to the other from this time forward forever more.
Adams got everything about the celebrations right—but he got the date wrong. He thought July 2 would be the national birthday because that was the day when the Continental Congress voted to endorse the resolution of the Virginia delegations, proposing the separation of the 13 colonies from the British Empire. Adams thought that was the decisive moment, and the subsequent debate over the language of the Declaration was a mere epilogue.






Chuckv
I have only one problem with this article: the title. Ellis does not claim that "the fourth is a fraud." He claims that it is somewhat arbitrary and that there are several dates with as good a claim. That is hardly a fraud.
I suspect that an editor tried to spice up the essay and draw more attention to it. In any case the title is misleading. This is not good.
KristaJulieva
I agree, and find it so annoying. I see it all the time, on the Daily Beast and elsewhere. I understand the incentive to make a headline attention-grabbing, but is it so much to ask that the title accurately reflect the content of the article?
dm10003
i learned the hard way a few months ago with both beast and huffpo to ASSUME AN EDITOR IS TRYING TO PUSH YOUR BUTTONS.
my hometown paper did that decades ago; when someone was asked if they did something and they said no, the paper printed the headline, "[person] denies it".
tankertodd
Totally agreed. The Daily Beast is king of the sensationalist headline. One day I'll quit coming here, probably as soon as I find a better site.
AliceJ
"As soon as I find a better site." Ah! there's the rub.
I do agree that misleading headlines are annoying and frequent, but no more on this site than on HuffPo and many others. Maybe DB could be a leader and write headlines that reflect the essence of the article. too much to ask?
NHBill
Buzz Kill!
My question is was Adams and or Jefferson euthanized?
whyland
In celebration of the 4th of July, I offer this essay in defense of our greatest founding father, Thomas Jefferson. I feel Mr. Jefferson's reputation has been unfairly eviscerated by a misrepresentation of the DNA results in the Hemings controversy. The exhumation of discredited, prurient embellishments has not only deluded readers, but impoverished a fair debate. In fact, with the possible exception of the Kennedy assassination, I am unaware of any major historical controversy riddled with so much misinformation and outright inaccuracies as the sex-oriented Sally Hemings libel.
The "Sally" story is pure fiction, possibly politics, but certainly not historical fact or science. It reflects a recycled inaccuracy that has metastasized from book to book, over two hundred years. In contrast to the blizzard of recent books spinning the controversy as a mini-series version of history, I found that layer upon layer of direct and circumstantial evidence points to a mosaic distinctly away from Jefferson. My research, evaluation, and personal interviews led me to one inevitable conclusion: the revisionist grip of historians have the wrong Jefferson--the DNA, as well as other historical evidence, matches perfectly to his younger brother, Randolph and his teen-age sons, as the true candidates for a sexual relationship with Sally.
A monopoly of books (all paternity believers) written since the DNA results have gone far beyond the evidence and transmuted conjecture into apparent fact, and in most instances, engaged in a careless misreading of the record. My new book, IN DEFENSE OF THOMAS JEFFERSON (Thomas Dunne Books, 2009), definitively destroys this myth, separating revisionist ideology from accuracy. It is historical hygiene by pen, an attempt to marshal facts, rationally dissect the evidence and prove beyond reasonable doubt that Jefferson is completely innocent of this sordid charge:
%u2022 the virulent rumor was first started by the scandal-mongering journalist James Callender, who burned for political revenge against Jefferson. Callender was described as "an alcoholic thug with a foul mind, obsessed with race and sex," who intended to defame the public career of Jefferson.
%u2022 the one eyewitness to this sexual allegation was Edmund Bacon, Jefferson's overseer at Monticello, who saw another man (not Jefferson) leaving Sally's room 'many a morning.' Bacon wrote: "...I have seen him come out of her mother's room many a morning when I went up to Monticello very early."
%u2022 Jefferson's deteriorating health would have prevented any such sexual relationship. He was 64 at the time of the alleged affair and suffered debilitating migraine headaches which incapacitated him for weeks, as well as severe intestinal infections and rheumatoid arthritis. He complained to John Adams: "My health is entirely broken down within the last eight months."
%u2022 Jefferson owned three different slaves named Sally, adding to the historical confusion. Yet, he never freed his supposed lover and companion of 37 years, 'Sally Hemings' from her enslavement, nor mentioned her in his will.
%u2022 Randolph Jefferson, his younger brother, would have the identical Jefferson Y chromosome as his older brother, Thomas, that matched the DNA. Randolph had a reputation for socializing with Jefferson's slaves and was expected at Monticello approximately nine months before the birth of Eston Hemings, Sally's son who was the DNA match for a "male Jefferson."
%u2022 The DNA match was to a male son of Sally's. Randolph had six male sons. Thomas Jefferson had all female children with his beloved wife, Martha, except for a male who died in infancy.
%u2022 Until 1976, the oral history of Eston's family held that they descended from a Jefferson "uncle." Randolph was known at Monticello as "Uncle Randolph."
%u2022 Unlike his brother, by taste and training Jefferson was raised as the perfect Virginia gentleman, a man of refinement and intellect. The personality of the man who figures in the Hemings soap opera cannot be attributed to the known nature of Jefferson, and would be preposterously out of character for him.
William G. Hyland Jr.
Attorney at Law
Tampa, FL.
carveson
Or maybe we celebrate the Fourth because the first words on that piece of paper in the National Archives reads: "In CONGRESS. July 4, 1776.
I reckon it is Ellis who is the fraud.
vanderleun
As was pointed out over at The Corner: "that piece of parchment in the National Archives, the first words printed, right there at the very top say: "In CONGRESS. July 4, 1776.""
RabelRabel
"Why, then, did July 4 become the preferred date for our annual celebration?"
That you could write this piece without mentioning that the first line of the Declaration is "In Congress, July 4, 1776." is simply amazing.
fenngibbon
Silly thought, but maybe July 4th was picked because that's the date at the top of the Declaration of Independence?
dm10003
well, if it's wrong, at least we have surity about christmas and easter.
drfamosa
I read in THE STARGATE CONSPIRACY book - that in the mid-nineties the current Pope of the Catholic church came out with a statement that December 25th is not Jesus Christ's real birthday.
So this development does not come as a surprise to me. Although I still feel astrologically wise - the United States' sun sign is Cancer. I recently read an article at astro.com related to astrological prediction, that Russia's sun sign is Scorpio. That makes a lot of sense!
In terms of Jefferson's draft - I read somewhere that Franklin and others initially said they would help Jefferson with the draft - but for whatever reason left him holding the bag. Some mysterious guy shows up in clothes of black and was Jefferson's real collaborator.
Franklin, the alleged genius, wanted the turkey to be the bird representing the United States. Maybe he was struck by lightning one too many times - cause we got the Eagle instead - which relates to our military policy through the centuries.
Napoleon supposedly had a mysterious military advisor.
History is always open for revision.
DavidBarron
That's not even comparable. Everybody knew that Jesus couldn't have been born on December 25th, since it was just a syncretised pagan holiday anyways.
I assume the astrology business is tongue in cheek.
And Wild Turkey would have been an awesome national bird, you apologize to Franklin right now. Anyways, Eagles are so derivative. Romans and French Empires already did those to death.
drfamosa
One other comment is that the United States represents the initial planetary experiment in terms of "democracy".
Today, July 4th, we celebrate the evolution of this experiment, one way or the other.
Whether or not you are into "The New World Order" or "The New Weird Order" - the United States - was depicted somewhere in the 1970's - I read this - that our country is the "pilot tv program" for the rest of our planet.
For better or worse - we as citizens of this country - are in a so-called "marriage" based upon the ideals that were first presented with the underpinnings of what we now reference as "Democracy" and what that awakened Frenchman, de Toqueville (sp?) was immediately fascinated with to study as an alternative to the monarchy system of government and the theocratic system of government (that is now being exemplified in Iran).
We celebrate today the evolved experiment in "democracy".
Spasticula
Thank God that article was divided into two page. I mean it was just so long and intricate. (sarcasm)
finderj
Just goes to prove that even history isn't perfectly recorded.
Wonder what will be written about the past ten years?
Fenario
Any human record is inherently flawed in perspective, bound and carried in the clumsy hands of human communication. I suppose we're not that much better off. Imagine freeing a nation in 140 characters or less. Then again, Jefferson never had a dead pop star gumming up the works.
DavidBarron
Right, Daily Beast, that's three strikes. Tone down your goddamn headlines! Stop making good articles look bad by comparison to false advertising at the head of the page.
Good article, but I guess it's more democratic to memorialize the day the people heard about the independence proposed for them. The double death on July 4 is good reason too.
zachgarber
Mr. Ellis: I am very glad you wrote this piece. There are many historians and they have written many books. It is sometimes hard to know what histories to spend one's valuable time with. Having read this brief, nonsense crap of of yours, I know I can now take a pass on reading your longer works. Thanks! Oh, and happen Independence Day/4th of July!
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.