Blogs and Stories
China's Dangerous Delusion
Ng Han Guan / AP Photo
Beijing’s response to the Uighur massacre is just like its reaction to last year’s Tibet uprising—self-denial and scapegoating. Until the party honchos realize their own abusive rule is to blame, they’ll face increasing challenges to their power.
The Communist Party has serious psychological problems dealing with reality and belongs on a psychiatrist’s couch.
When the worst violence in decades broke out in China’s far northwest on July 5, the Chinese government responded by falling back on a tried and trusted method: Sink into self-denial and push the blame on scapegoats, some as far away as the United States.
The Communist Party may gain in the short run by deflecting attention from its own failures, but in the long run the growing divide between Han Chinese and the country’s ethnic minorities is widening by the day.
The steadfast refusal even to consider that the violence may have been the result of decades of well-documented harsh misrule over the Uighurs, a Turkic-speaking Muslim people who are the majority in Xinjiang, means we can expect to see many more such incidents around China in the future.
The government was quick to blame the violence on the World Uyghur Congress, based in Washington, and its 62-year-old leader, Rebiya Kadeer, a former businesswoman in China and former member of the National People’s Congress who spent five years as a political prisoner before being exiled. A few days later, the official People’s Daily pointed a finger at the United States, saying it funded the WUC and other overseas Uighur organizations.
On Friday, a spokesman for the ministry of foreign affairs argued that government policy toward China’s 55 ethnic groups was praiseworthy, and he accused outside forces of being behind trouble.
“Last year it was the Dalai Lama, this year it’s Rebiya Kadeer,” he said.
The ministry spokesman emphasized that the trouble had nothing to do with ethnicity or religion, adding, “It’s a fight between us and separatist forces.”
When this reporter asked if there was concrete evidence of outside involvement, he replied simply that proof would later be released.
The government has a history of looking outside its own conscience when such problems emerge. In the past, it has attempted to pin blame for a number of violent incidents on the East Turkistan Islamic Movement. However, Xinjiang experts and Uighurs living overseas say the organization no longer exists, never had more than two handfuls of members, and the Chinese never offered evidence that the group was ever involved in terrorist attacks. They say the Chinese government inflates claims of organized terrorism as an excuse for cracking down on any dissenting opinion in the region.
The fact is that this most recent incident had nothing to do with Kadeer or the U.S. government. It was simply the result of decades of abusive Chinese rule.
The initial spark was the murder of two Uighur factory workers in Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, after word spread that a Uighur had raped a Chinese woman. The rape turned out to be a rumor, but it took the police two weeks to provide details and no arrests were immediately made. Meanwhile, news of the murders spread throughout Xinjiang via the Internet and anger mounted over the government’s inaction.







I suggest you stop MEDDLING in CHINA's AFFAIRS................it is none of our business. Leave China alone.................We do not need another enemy.
Gee, isn't harmony a wonderful thing?
While this is certainly a mess, I doubt the Uygur-Han conflict can be avoided even if China has a democratic government. Not everything is because of CCP. Chinese have been fighting for the influnce in central Asia for thousand of years, this is essentially a continuation of that. Whatever government in Beijing, they will not let Xinjiang secede, this is nothing unique to CCP.
You might be under-estimating the capability of the CCP government. Afterall, they led a 30 year continuous economic growth that would impress any governments. They do know a few things on how to manage China. While some might think the riots are failures of CCP policy, many in Chinese government would think this conflicts are unavoidable due to the accelerated pace of integration into China. One can not ignore the fact that the current Chinese government has done a rather decent job of economical development.
As the Xinjiang expert Dru Gladney said, unless China implodes, Xinjiang will stay in China and the integration would continue, whatever party runs China.
> Afterall, they led a 30 year continuous economic growth that would impress any governments.
Of course it helps to look at the 60-year story. If you take one of the world's smallest and weakest economies and then drive it into the ground, killing tens of millions of citizens in the process, it would be pretty difficult not to engineer some kind of improvement e.g. by the simple process of actually allowing a few people to start private businesses. When your economy is so miniscule growth doesn't amount to much and isn't hard to achieve. They really deserve credit for this? Just about any one else running China would have avoided the first 30 years, not murdered tens of millions, and promoted economic growth from the start, which given China's astonishingly low labour costs would hardly have been difficult.
Furthermore, China's growth, while it does exist, is nothing like as great as is publicised. The sole source of statistics is the government itself, and it lies consistently. The statistics themselves are internally inconsistent, and economists simply discount 2% of growth to start with, and work down from there. But even that growth that does exist has its benefits distributed with a lack of equity hardly paralleled anywhere else in the world, and the disparity between the rich and the poor is now even wider than it was when the so-called party of the people took power.
None of this is 'a decent job of economical [sic] development' by any usual measure. It is, in fact, a nightmare.
Amongst the several hundred million losers are the Uighur people, who in addition suffer from having their homeland occupied by alien people with zero tolerance for them, who repress and suppress them and their culture at every turn.
Unfortunately it's rare that a democracy campaigner (with the exception of the nearly forgotten Wei Jingsheng) would even consider anything other than continued Han occupation of Xinjiang (and Tibet, or dropping claims over Taiwan), suggesting a limited understanding of the word 'democracy'. That doesn't mean that China should not move towards democratic government of a better kind, or that democratic government within East Turkestan would not benefit its natives.
Unfortunately this seems very unlikely to happen.
Do be serious.
China considers the US an enemy, and has for sometime. Granted, the US earned it in the 19th century, and again in the 20th, but then, China has earned the appellation from the US several times over. Ultimately, the US is China's enemy, not through an active conflict, but through the dichotomy of rule of law, individual rights and democratic power and the rule by despots, capricious and self-serving.
China is an insular country, and though it gave up rule by emperors for rule by Communists, it did not give up the idea that China is the Middle Kingdom, better than all others on earth by divine right.
Divinity dos not make mistakes and has no need to search its conscience.
There is the rule of China in a nutshell.
" Divinity dos (sic) not make mistakes and has no need to search its conscience"...Sounds like any republican talking about Rush Limbaugh.
No one should be under the illusion that the Uiguhrs can win. The ChiComs will crush them they way they crushed the Tienamen protests. The Han outnumber everyone else in China by at least 15:1. What's more, then China crushes them, we won't even know until long after the fact.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.