Blogs and Stories
Friday Surprise in Iran?
AP Photo
Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the second most powerful man in Iran, is delivering the Friday Sermon in Tehran. Will it be the end of the protests, or a new challenge to the regime?
Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the second most powerful man in Iran (after the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) and one of the principal figures behind the anti-Ahmadinejad movement that has rocked the country over the last month, will deliver the Friday Sermon in Tehran this week, the first time he has been offered the prestigious pulpit in years.
Even more surprising, sources in Iran have confirmed that both the main reformist challenger Mir Hossein Mousavi and former president Mohammad Khatami will also attend the sermon. In fact, Mousavi’s Web site is encouraging all of his supporters—that is, the hundreds of thousands of protesters who flooded the streets of Iran in the wake of the disputed presidential elections—to come along, too. Both Reuters and the Los Angeles Times report the rumors of Mousavi and Khatami attending.
What makes Rafsanjani’s invitation to deliver the Friday Sermon so unusual is that it could only have come from one man—Khamenei.
The presence in one place of the three main leaders of the protest movement (something that has not happened since the presidential elections) has fueled speculation about what exactly Rafsanjani plans to say. Could a compromise between the two camps be in the works? Or will this be the start of a new wave of challenges to the regime?
This will be Mousavi’s first public appearance in weeks; he has been under virtual house arrest since his refusal to accept the election results that returned Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the presidency. Why has the government suddenly allowed him to leave his home and attend the Friday Sermon? Could it be to force his capitulation to Ahmadinejad? Or is it the regime that’s capitulating?
The truth is no one knows what to expect from Rafsanjani on Friday. But the fact that the man known in Iran as “the Shark” has now become the reformist camp’s best hope for political change has left many in Iran scratching their heads. For years, no one was more emblematic of the hatred and anger that many Iranians, particularly the youth, feel toward the clerical establishment than Rafsanjani. Indeed, Rafsanjani is the clerical establishment. As one of the architects of the Islamic republic, he’s held almost every major post in the country. President from 1989-1997, he is now chairman of both the Expediency Council—meant to be a neutral body that arbitrates disputes between the parliament and the forces of the supreme leader—and the Assembly of Experts, which has the power to choose and to dismiss the supreme leader.
Rafsanjani is also staggeringly rich. A few years ago, when Forbes magazine published a special report on “Millionaire Mullahs,” it was Rafsanjani who made the cover. Since the revolution in 1979, Rafsanjani has managed to rise from his humble origins to build an empire worth more than $1 billion—this in a country in which the average adult income is less that $2,000 a month.
It is difficult to describe the fear and contempt with which a great many Iranians hold Rafsanjani. As the brainchild of the Iran-Contra scandal, Rafsanjani’s name is whispered at the head of every conspiracy. It is said he had a hand in the murder of Ayatollah Khomeini’s beloved son, Ahmad, so as to ensure his own promotion to the highest ranks of the revolutionary government. He has even been linked to a series of gruesome murders of dissident writers in 1998.
Of course, no one dares speak such things in public. When the intrepid Iranian journalist Akbar Ganji published an investigative piece about Rafsanjani’s role in the dissident murders, his newspaper was promptly shut down and its editors—Ganji included—were arrested. (Interestingly, Ganji never identified Rafsanjani by name, though everyone knew about whom he was writing—including, apparently, Rafsanjani.)









Like a science-fiction story.
We now find out that the present government of Iran is composed not only of cruel, vindictive men, with no use for democracy, but who are also -- and we thought that clerics would at least have SOME basic honesty -- liars, thieves and cheats.
Is this the face they want to represent Shia Islam? And as for any upcoming "trials" with "voluntary confessions", no one will be fooled. We shall be reminded of the Volksgericht in Nazi Germany, the "confessions" in the 1930's during the purge trials in Soviet Russia, the "confessions" by McCain and others in Vietnam, etc. Iran has a medieval regime which lusts after power at all costs. What's next? Will the terrible recent plane crash or any future earthquake now be blamed on the West, too? SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!
Sounds like a real show down could occur. Great write-up, Reza!
Reza, my friend. Let's not kid ourselves. The struggle in Iran is between the people and the entire regime. Rafsanjani, Khomenei, and even Mousavi are all cut from the same cloth. They are having internal conflicts but they don't really have the interest of the Iranian people in mind.
Mousavi is an accidental "leader."
Remember that our dads used to say after the revolution that the mullahs and the regime won't last for more than a year? The struggle against the Islamic regime in Iran started from the day it was established.
Let's not over analyze the situation. Iranians hate the entire Islamic republic and the founding fathers of the revolution are doing their best to maintain control and project an image to that ensures their existence.
I fear the worst. I think Khamenei will harm Rafsanjani's family if he doesn't concede the opposition.
Wow. It looks like no matter what happens, democracy will not win. From what Mr. Aslan is saying, Rafsanjani is doing this for his own, not the people's, benefit. It certainly will be interesting to watch, though.
Thank you for your continued excellance in reporting, Mr Aslan.
The author of this hatchet job Reza Aslan is a shameful man. To base his work on that of Akbar Ganjii shows that he is more dedicated to the destruction of Iran and cares little about the fate of the common people of Iran. it figures that he is a California College Professor. I would love to see him relocate (maybe Evin prison Tehran or Tel Aviv) we don't need his kind here in the US
Barry O'Connell
Dear Mr. Aslan, on Reuters and LATimes ?
It is a big deal that Rafsanjani is publicly speaking again for the first time since the election, and your analysis is quite to the point, but there are some facts that are not correct here :
Rafsanjani did deliver the friday sermons about 2 months ago. It has not been years. There are 4 people right now who do it in turn : Khamenei, Jannati, Khatami (Ahmad) and Rafsanjani. Among Which Rafsanjani is the more moderate. Jannati is also the head of the guardian council and a fierce conservative, as is Ahmad Khatami.
Although it is Khameni who chooses the other clerics who can deliver friday sermons in Tehran (he never let Mohammad Khatami do it), he does not decide who goes which week. there is a comitee for that, so it is not a direct invitation.
Kharroubi and Moussavi has declared clearly on their official sites that they will be attending. Why are you talking about
If you read persian, this is the website of the friday sermon comitee: http://namaz-jomeh.ir/
If this dirtbag is Iran's best hope for democracy, it would appear that the fascists will be running the country for a long time to come
Reza, you are incorrect about the Constitution. You say, "a committee of three or five ayatollahs (as Iran's constitution allows)."
In fact, while the original Islamic Republic Constitution allowed a Leadership Council (Showray-e Rahbari), the 1989 revisions to the constitution eliminated that provision. This was part of the same set of revisions to the constitution, by the way, that, allowed for a non-Ayyatollah-e Ozma (Grand Ayatollah) or non-Marja' (Source of Emulation) to become the Supreme Leader, paving the way for Khamene'i to become Leader.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.