Blogs and Stories

Margaret Carlson

GOP Plots Ensign's Ouster

To pull him back, they forced him to sit down and write a letter (there's a picture of his shaky penmanship online) dictated by his roommate Sen. Tom Coburn to the effect that he and his mistress had to get straight with God and their families and that he was ending the affair. Like a hostage at gunpoint, Ensign was taken to FedEx to send the letter. But love trumped overnight mail. Ensign called immediately to tell Cynthia Hampton to ignore the note coming her way.

While cool heads in the GOP would like Ensign to disappear, the part of the plan where the Republican governor appoints a successor is complicated by the fact that Nevada’s current governor is a media circus all his own. Just last week, a court ruled that the lawsuit filed by a cocktail waitress against Gov. Jim Gibbons for hitting her outside a Las Vegas nightclub could go forward. Gibbons' wife is suing him for a divorce that gets nastier by the day.

Records came out recently showing that Gibbons had texted a woman not his wife 800 times over six weeks on a state cellphone. He arrives at his office mid-morning, if at all, calls meetings he doesn't show up for, and is ignoring his state's economic freefall now that tourism and housing have cratered.

Meanwhile, the Republican lieutenant governor, Brian Krolicki, is facing prosecution on felony charges that he mishandled a multibillion-dollar college-savings program when he was state treasurer. Unsurprisingly, the nonpartisan National Journal just ranked Nevada the second most dysfunctional state in the country after New York, where all state business has ground to a halt because the legislature locked itself out of the Capitol.

A recent Mason-Dixon poll has Ensign at a 39 percent approval rating. Doug Hampton is threatening to sue both Ensign and his parents, and an independent ethics group has filed a complaint about the tax consequences of the parents’ payoff. For his part, Ensign’s stalwart ally Coburn has refused to answer questions from reporters about his roommate citing doctor-patient privilege. Coburn is an obstetrician.

Back to Top
July 16, 2009 | 5:27pm
Comments ()
ApresSki

So much for "family values"!!

ROTFLOL!

|
|
Reply
|
5:51 pm, Jul 16, 2009
Banjo1

Nothing to do with family values here. What we have here is the homage vice pays to virtue. Put another way, hypocrisy. There are no hypocrites in the Democratic Party, none.

|
|
Reply
|
7:52 am, Jul 17, 2009
foxwolfer9

Hypocrites abound politically. From John Edwards to John Ensign, they're all cut from the same dishonest, self-serving cloth.

|
9:30 am, Jul 17, 2009
easton

perfect, when caught red handed point at everyone else and challenge them. So much for taking responsibility. Yes, it is the Democrats fault because not every single Democrat is without sin. What a silly argument you make.

|
9:32 am, Jul 17, 2009
uscutxp0

The Democratic Party has never claimed to be the "party of values" or moralized about gays and gay marriage. Republicans have wrapped their arms around determining for EVERYONE what "family values," morality," and "personal responsibility" should be. That the difference. And it's a big difference. If you don't see why things like this are destroying the Republican Party from the inside out, you really are just as clueless as your comment.

|
11:52 am, Jul 17, 2009
socialworklady

Looks like the new and improved Banjo1 roll out isn't going quite as well as expected.

|
1:28 pm, Jul 17, 2009
TREESKE

The Repubs claim to be the party of family and ethical values is what brought them back to power and the meaning of Hypocrite does not exist for them, they're CHOSEN!

|
1:54 pm, Jul 17, 2009
sippewissett

Every adult knows there's plenty of sinning on both sides of the aisle, but pointing at the other party doesn't fix what's wrong with this jerk. Stop trying to deflect from Ensign's miserable ethics with a "Look over there" gambit. He's a reprehensible jerk that even the Repugs don't want around.

|
6:51 pm, Jul 17, 2009
ubupete

"Rep. Largent, who no lives there..."

That's Margaret Carlson writing?

|
|
Reply
5:58 pm, Jul 16, 2009
blinky

attn: Tina...I was once a proof reader and considered myself one of the worst in the business, looks like somebody at the Daily Beast has set an even lower standard...Impressive.

|
|
Reply
|
6:29 pm, Jul 16, 2009
SolDogatto

Indeed! What editor in their right mind would stet "he doesn't show up for"?

|
|
Reply
6:41 pm, Jul 16, 2009
southernyankee

blinky, I am happy you were a proof reader at one time. Really who cares we get the point of the article.

|
|
Reply
7:01 pm, Jul 16, 2009
Hedda-Harlowe

You said it, blinky. There's a lot to be said for professionalism, standards and respect for the American English language. What our southernyankee friend doesn't appreciate is that if this writer and her editors are worth a damn, THEY care that A. they were sloppy, B. we noticed and C. we called them on it. Keep keeping them on their toes.

|
|
Reply
12:27 am, Jul 17, 2009
socialworklady

Tina,

Listen to blinky. Maybe you could drop the "culture blog" and make Rachel the new copy editor?

|
|
Reply
1:54 am, Jul 17, 2009
dlc1550

I agree Blinky - but it's not just the Daily Beast, it's all of the tv and print news. I used to point out misspelled words but it's gotten so ubiquitious that it's pretty much a waste of time. Now I just close my eyes and shake my head.

If there is one union that needs busting it's the teachers.

|
|
Reply
|
4:48 am, Jul 17, 2009
Sleepyd

Ha Ha. That's too good. I'm guessing you spelled ubiquitous with the extra I on purpose... possibly to make your point? I would hope so because misspelling a word while bitching about how bad teachers are and how bad spelling is throughout "ALL OF THE TV AND PRINT MEDIA"... well, that's too funny. Thank you for bringing a good laugh to my AM.

*closes eyes and shakes head*

|
8:37 am, Jul 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
12:28 pm, Jul 17, 2009
piktor

blinky and friends -- Have you seen any advertisements on this site? No? Wanna have limpid edition? Yeah?

Well, it don't come free. Wanna see this site edited by pros? Bring on the commercials then, Tina. Some readers here -but not all, I am sure- would rather have their edition druthers and ancillary costs.

|
|
Reply
|
7:14 am, Jul 17, 2009
socialworklady

piktor,
Good point. Only ever saw that gawd awful ad for for handbags or whatever it was. It came up on the front page as clickable option along with the stories. Ughh. If that's the alternative, bring on the typos -- but still -- can't we lose the culture blog and give poor Rachel something else to do?!

|
12:11 pm, Jul 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
12:29 pm, Jul 17, 2009
piktor

socialworklady -- Yeah, those commercials were schlocky. Advertisers will arrive sooner or later, though. Huffpost was amateur hour until real writers were brought in. Tina is backed by Barry Diller, so this site will have to become a moneymaker or it will fold. Some of the authors here seem to have barely finished college, the shallowness and gutless writing of some of the stories is a flailing journalistic malpractice of sorts.

|
1:20 pm, Jul 17, 2009
pricklypear

Yep, I agree. The worst one I recall was the one where Michael J's ex-wife supposedly agreed to keep her maternity a secret from the kids in return for money. Come on!

And all the Palin stories. They should just have a whole category for "Character Assassination" for all the conservative Republicans they love to bad mouth.

|
2:51 pm, Jul 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
6:43 pm, Jul 16, 2009
badbee54

Ensign had an abortion that he doesn't want anyone to know about since it also goes against his party's line.

|
|
Reply
|
9:24 pm, Jul 16, 2009
garryboyle

It totally makes sense that Coburn is his doctor. Ms. Carlson indicates that Ensign is a big baby ("they also infantilize the senator and makes him look foolish").

|
10:24 pm, Jul 16, 2009
southernyankee

What I worry about more than the affairs of these numb nuts is the connection with this group The Family. Plus Coburn is a female doctor. I don't think the privacy law with Coburn and Ensign applies to privilege. This group needs to be investigated.

|
|
Reply
|
7:03 pm, Jul 16, 2009
socialworklady

southern,

Coburn isn't a female doctor, he's a doctor with female patients ....

|
|
Reply
1:56 am, Jul 17, 2009
OffenbachStutz

Southern: No wonder you don't give a fig 'bout dem der copy edeets.

|
|
Reply
7:09 am, Jul 17, 2009
AlwaysOptimistic

"The Family" aka "Christian Mafia" of which Ensign, Coburn and others are members of have been working for decades with conservative political leaders, of both parties, to pass bills to "blur the lines" between "Church and State".

David Coe, the current leader of the group, says that they must be like the "mafia"...staying secretive so that they can have have more influence.

Their goal....To see that God's sovereignty is in every aspect of governance...

To learn more google....author Jeff Sharlet "The Family": The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power...

Again, this group has both republicans and democrats in their ranks. This is not about a political group's agenda. It is about a secret religious groups "grab for power and influence' in our government.

|
|
Reply
|
7:50 am, Jul 17, 2009
sippewissett

Great. A theocracy. Just what we need: a narrow interpretation of ONE religion as the state religion. So much for reflecting the diversity of our melting pot.

We need to be vigilant and expose groups like this for what they are. We need to name everyone in Congress who participates in this clandestine blurring of church and state (including Palin's whackiness).

|
7:19 pm, Jul 17, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
4:29 pm, Jul 18, 2009
january13a

Not only are the Republicans weird, comical and pathetic, but they are damned scary also. They are so fanatical about their moralism that they are turning into a sexually hedonistic group of weirdos and an crazy evangelical fanatical bunch. Not much different from those hysterical "witch burners" from Salem, Massachusetts and, quite frankly, the Taliban.

|
|
Reply
7:08 pm, Jul 16, 2009
Antinous

Doctor patient privilege? These clowns are more fun than a barrel of monkeys.

|
|
Reply
|
7:13 pm, Jul 16, 2009
paristokyo

Could not agree more!

|
|
Reply
9:34 pm, Jul 16, 2009
shag11

Couldn't happen to a better group of guys. The is what ya get when you "thrown stones."

|
|
Reply
7:31 pm, Jul 16, 2009
mslewis

Well, to be fair to Mr. Coburn, even if your speciality is obstestrics, as a physician you have learned to treat other injuries. Therefore, even if he put a band-aid on Ensign's finger, he can cite doctor/patient confidentiality as a reason not to talk. I just wanted to point that out!!

|
|
Reply
|
7:37 pm, Jul 16, 2009
pmwolf

You are wrong. A doctor-patient relationship is established by formal treatment. Did Coburn do Ensign's PAP smear? Or prescribe his birth control pills? Maybe Coburn put in Ensign's IUD. Doctor-patient relationship can't be sighted so casually as you describe. Check the laws which govern medical practice in your state. I'm certain you'll find a narrow definition of doctor-patient relationship. Of course, what's really going on here is the Senator-Senator relationship, right?

|
|
Reply
9:57 pm, Jul 16, 2009
xlntcat

A judge who was not affiliated with "The Family" is unlikely to rule that doctor/patient priviledge would extend to an obstestrician and his male room mate. There are limits to confidenitality. I think Coburn is the most dangerous one of all because he is the brightest and the most ruthless. When a group decides that GOD is own their side and that they are the chosen ones, the mindset dehuminizes all others who are not one of them. They feel no obligation or responsbility to those who elected them because they do no credit the voter since God ordained them to power.

|
|
Reply
1:51 pm, Jul 17, 2009
jenny4hill

The good doctor, Ensign's gynecologist, may be The C Street Family's private abortionist. With all those affairs going on, and the total hypocrisy, would anyone with a healthy dose of cynicism be shocked if that turned out to be true?

|
|
Reply
3:45 pm, Jul 17, 2009
gobydoc

Doctor-patient confidentiality is the right to refrain from disclosing or divulging information gained within the context of a "special relationship." Special relationships include those between doctors and patients, attorneys and clients... Dr. Coburn would have to be 'treating' Ensign or seeing him professionally for this discussion to be protected by confidentiality rights. Given that Ensign is a 'lobbyable' govt. rep., there would have to be appropriate billing for these services (or conflict of interest issues would arise). So, I'm betting confidentiality rules don't apply in this case.Also, just curious but what other injuries has Coburn 'learned to treat' in his career as an obstetrician that would be applicable to Ensigns 'problem' ???

|
|
Reply
9:13 pm, Jul 16, 2009
hmmmmmer

Coburn and the C street group need to be exposed for what they are. They helped keep quiet the illegal things that were going on as far as Ensign was concerned.

|
|
Reply
9:13 pm, Jul 16, 2009
macpdx

Rachel Maddow has been doing a great job of covering the C St family.
Frankly, this C St group is scary. This secret family believe that they are the chosen ones and the laws of morality don't apply to them. No wonder they went ballistic when Obama mentions empathy.

|
|
Reply
9:31 pm, Jul 16, 2009
finderj

Again and again in these scandals, the point that truly appals me is the utter, total stupidity.

Scandals are nothing new. historically, those in power have had scandals attend them throughout the centuries.
The problem with this latest batch of scandals is the stupidity.

How, how, do these people think that they will not get caught? Are they totally unaware of the paparrizi? Of political enemies? Of the internet? Of cell phone cameras?
Geeze.

Does anybody really want anyone this totally stupid runing anything? Even the shoeshine counter?

|
|
Reply
|
10:18 pm, Jul 16, 2009
pricklypear


I two am udderly appled. There are sandals for sentries, hysterically. The latest batch of sandals is a problem..they are cots. Wearing eminem underwear in pizzerias? Selling phones on the intenet? Does anyone ruin anything? Totally! Eve and Joe shine the counter. Shame, shame.

|
|
Reply
|
11:49 pm, Jul 16, 2009
socialworklady

prickly,

This sort of thing always seems to happen to you late at night...

Time to take your appled udders to bed, hon.

|
1:59 am, Jul 17, 2009
OffenbachStutz

Where am I? Feels like the Russian army just marched through my mouth!

|
7:11 am, Jul 17, 2009
piktor

socialworklady -- Homer!

|
7:31 am, Jul 17, 2009
Joanne38

What? (two(too), appled(appalled), sandals(scandals), sentries(centuries), hysterically(historically), ruin (run), they are cots(what?) Please help us out here. Give us some idea what the heck you are talking about. Anyone who can't spell any better than that shouldn't be posting. It just makes you look ignorant.

|
10:46 am, Jul 17, 2009
Joanne38

I forgot udderly (utterly).

|
10:48 am, Jul 17, 2009
pricklypear

cot (caught).

|
2:31 pm, Jul 17, 2009
pricklypear

socialworklady,
I get bored.
The same ole same ole droning on and on and on.......and on.
For an original comment see my latest at 1400 hrs. 7/17.

|
2:41 pm, Jul 17, 2009
socialworklady

prickly,

Okay. Is that what was going on with that *farts* thing late one evening -- all those posts that got removed? You were bored, so you filled the board with *cyer fart sounds?* Just checking.

|
4:29 pm, Jul 17, 2009
Joanne38

They didn't seem to mind when Clinton was stupid, did they? And, he was running the whole darn country. Somebody put this stupid idiot in twice. OMG, he was a Democrat too. That is just UN-thought of, right?

|
|
Reply
|
10:56 am, Jul 17, 2009
AlanD2

Clinton was one of the most intelligent presidents we have had (unlike, say, George W. Bush). Clinton is the only president in the last 50 years to have a budget surplus - the holy grail of so-called conservatives.

"Somebody put this stupid idiot in twice." Yup. In 2000 and 2004. Wasn't my fault - I voted against Bush.

|
5:41 pm, Jul 18, 2009
lovethesinner

As if John Ensign and Mark Sanford weren't example enough, it seems the mysterious Hotel for Hound Dogs known as "C Street" has produced yet another Republican Casanova:

(from Josh Marshall at TPM)
"But it's been occurring to us that the C Street Group, which is an emanation of a shadowy religious outfit called "the Family", might not be a religious fellowship at all so much as a covert 12 Step Group from Republican Hound Dogs, womanizers and sex addicts trying to get clean during their tenure in the hallowed halls of Congress."

(snip)

"Pickering and his wife divorced soon afterward and now she is suing the novelistically named Elizabeth Creekmore-Byrd for "alienation of affection," i.e., for stealing her husband. What's more, according to legal papers filed by Leisha Pickering, some of the "wrongful conduct" between Pickering and Creekmore-Byrd (I guess that's what they call it down there?) took place at ... you guessed, the C Street group home up on Capitol Hill."

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/07/c_street_on_the_skidz .php#more?ref=fpblg

|
|
Reply
12:13 am, Jul 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
7:38 am, Jul 17, 2009
TREESKE

Like the rest of the country!

|
|
Reply
9:06 am, Jul 17, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

GOP Plots Ensign's Ouster

by Margaret Carlson

Info
RSS
Margaret Carlson
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |