Blogs and Stories
The Taliban PR Push
Allauddin Khan / AP Photo
Three weeks before the Afghan elections, Taliban commander Mullah Omar is offering a manifesto to unite his fractious fighters and cement his power. Reza Aslan on why his effort will fail.
Just as the presidential campaign in Afghanistan has begun to heat up, with the various candidates publishing individual manifestos that lay out their plans and promises for the country, the notorious Taliban commander Mullah Muhammad Omar, Osama bin Laden’s cohort and cave-companion, has issued a manifesto of his own.
“The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Rules for Mujahideen,” published in Pakistan but clearly meant for an Afghan audience, is intended to be a kind of Taliban code of conduct—to which every fighter in Afghanistan who wants to call himself Taliban must adhere.
The new rules also encourage suicide bombers to “do their best to avoid civilian deaths and injuries and damage to civilian property.”
This is not the first time the Taliban has issued rules for conduct, but it is obvious that the manifesto’s publication was timed to coincide with the presidential elections in Afghanistan. The government of Hamid Karzai, and indeed all of the major contenders for his office, are united in the goal of initiating dialogue with those among the Taliban who may be willing to lay down their weapons in exchange for a few bucks and the promise of semi-autonomy. The new code of conduct may be Mullah Omar’s way of preempting such dialogue by making himself the only legitimate leader of the Taliban—that is, the only person in a position to negotiate anything with the government.
Some half-dozen unaffiliated groups and military organizations in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan operate under the umbrella of the Taliban. (Experts caution that the Afghan and Pakistan Taliban must be considered two separate branches of the larger Taliban movement, with little in common beside tactics.) What we call “Taliban” is a fractious and deeply divided movement made up of different ethnicities and tribes, some of which loathe each other as much as, if not more than, they loathe the “infidel West.”
According to David Kilcullen, one of the chief advisers to Centcom Commander General David Petraeus, about 1 percent of those who call themselves Taliban—including Mullah Omar and his followers—have joined al Qaeda and given up their nationalist ambitions in favor of bin Laden’s global jihad. However, the rest of the Taliban fall into a bunch of other categories.
Some are precisely what the name Taliban suggests: “students.” These are ultra-conservative Muslims—followers of the Deobandi School of Islam—who nevertheless remain totally uninterested in politics or statecraft. Mostly, they just want to be left alone.
A good portion of the Taliban are little more than petty thieves who have grown long beards and who dress in Taliban clothes in order to break into people’s homes and steal their electronic equipment—TVs, stereos, home computers—all of which the Taliban forbid. They then make a hefty profit selling the stolen contraband on the open market.
Beyond these two groups are those Taliban militants who seek to overturn the Afghan government and replace it with a draconian Islamic state. The majority of these Taliban act independently of each other. The fighters associated with these Islamist groups follow the leadership of their individual commanders, most of whom enjoy a sense of autonomy, choosing for themselves whom to attack, how, and when.
But experts see Mullah Omar’s new Taliban manifesto as a deliberate attempt to bring this fractious group under his centralized control, thus weeding out what he calls the “criminal elements” operating under the Taliban name. So, for example, the new rules state that all decisions about what to do with captured prisoners can only be made by Mullah Omar himself. “If a military infidel is captured, any decision to kill, conditionally release, or exchange such a prisoner can only be made by the imam [Mullah Omar] or his deputy,” the manifesto declares.







nytheatreguy
I have no problem admitting I'm madly in love with Reza Aslan.
This user is no longer registered.
Txfugee
Bullmoose-Your far east policy (as whacked out as it seems) has some merit-however, the BBC documentary not withstanding-I believe your feel for the plight of Iranian youth is way off base. Look up casualties from the Iran-Iraq war and you will notice that an entire generation was lost. Moreover you have a theocratic government that rules with a vice grip. This in a nation with a very educated public-educated, cultured and amazingly aware of the outside world. Iranian youth have to travel to isolated areas just to walk and hold hands with the opposite sex. The Iranian version of the virtue police is every bit as ruthless and aggressive as Shah Reza Pahlavi's secret police was. Despite the seeming similarities, geo politics is not chess. A whole host of contributing factors-macro and micro, delineate Iran and her youth from countries like Saudi Arabia and Yemen. They have sufficient reason to get "faded" on meth or heroin (I am not saying it's right)-what's our excuse? Now- if you are talking about countering China-I accept your some of your "strategery".
mcmchugh99
I favor giving the Iranians time to reform or overthrow that fascist regime there. Maybe there are some ways of assisting them under the table and off the books, if that's what they want, but I have never favored the shotgun approach.
We could probably break Iran, but we would have no idea how to fix it. That's not something we do very well, as Iraq and Afghanistan prove.
In these places, we just have to turn everything over to the locals as soon as possible, leaving only very small forces in place. As long as they refrain from uses these places to attack the West, we will have attained our minimal objective.
Beyond that, the future of these places must of necessity be left up to the locals. Nation building is just not our thing--we suck at it.
lablahlablah
"hese are ultra-conservative Muslims-followers of the Deobandi School of Islam-..."
The majority of ddeobandis are peaceful people, who want nothing to do with the Taliban.
ginsushark
this code of the taliban smells like a CIA trick. do the afgans bow to a saudi? is omar a prophet?
whats with the other comment about nuking iran. doesnt he know any persians? they are some nice people. a holes can take over any country with underhanded corrupt action. just look at our country threatening the world with expensive nukes. does that put food on american tables? does that cure cancer? is it better to be feared or respected?
mcmchugh99
It's nice to have a more polite class of suicide bombers. Who says there's no such thing as progress?
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.