Blogs and Stories
Lessons of the Beerfest
Official White House Photo by Pete Souza
Thursday’s purely symbolic White House beer summit capped off a week of teachable moments about race and police conduct, but Touré asks, is anyone listening?
The Kumbaya beerfest on the White House lawn linking Professor Gates and Sergeant Crowley—men who have become metaphors so fluid they can stand for almost anything any viewer wants—was indeed a teachable moment that gleaned several lessons.
We learned that it is possible, even in impassioned racialized moments, to lay down our swords, pick up beers, and talk instead of yelling. The beerfest reminds us how complex and nuanced modern race is—where once race was about powerful whites oppressing powerless blacks, here we have a powerful white cop and a powerful black academic who’s a close friend of the most powerful man in the world, our bi-racial president. Where once black and white would’ve remained separate and angry, on this day they came together. But the beerfest was purely symbolic and about as effective in teaching us something about what really happened that infamous afternoon on Ware Street as it might’ve been if Rodney King had stood on the White House lawn surrounded by the cops who beat him down as they said, “We’re really glad to meet Mr. King but we were following protocol when we beat him senseless so no, we’re not apologizing. Let’s all move on now.”
Professor Gates said after the beerfest, “When he's not arresting you, Sergeant Crowley is a really likable guy.” That, as Langston Hughes would say, is deep like the rivers.
Another lesson in all this is that using the word stupid is often stupid. This beerfest would not have happened if President Obama had not said that Crowley had acted stupidly and thus taken the most inept interpersonal step of his young presidency. In saying “the Cambridge Police acted stupidly,” Obama spoke the truth as he saw it and the man who once taught Constitutional law was not factually incorrect in calling the arrest unintelligent. Even according to Sergeant Crowley’s own police report, Professor Gates broke no laws and the arrest restored only the peace disturbed by Crowley’s entrance. This is a country that prizes the doctrine that a man’s home is his castle and cuffing a lippy older gentleman who’s alone in his place and upset about being mistreated by a police officer is counterproductive and a waste of taxpayer funds.
But for the commander in chief to call the arrest stupid made it impossible for Sergeant Crowley to apologize because an apology would also be an admission of his unintelligence and a loss of face too great to bear. “Stupidly” challenged Crowley’s manhood, perhaps the second such challenge in a few days by a black man more powerful than him. That forced Crowley to dig his heels in further and forced the president to take a break from the massively important business of health-care reform to officiate the beerfest.
Professor Gates said after the beerfest, “When he's not arresting you, Sergeant Crowley is a really likable guy.” That, as Langston Hughes would say, is deep like the rivers. Police officers are strong, admirable people who put their lives on the line to keep the peace and can be godsends in a crisis. But they can also be the cause of problems. Stripped of the imperiousness and arrogance and outsized ego that too many officers tote along with their badge and gun, Crowley turned out to be such a nice guy that Gates agreed to have lunch with him someday. But it is in the best interest of American law enforcement to take a long, hard look at itself and figure out why it has such a poisoned reputation within the African-American community and what part of that is the fault of our officers and how it can be fixed. Names like Sean Bell, Amadou Diallo, Abner Louima, Rodney King, Michael Stewart, and Eleanor Bumpurs live on in the black collective mind as testaments to the evil police officers can rain down upon us and how they cannot be trusted. In recent days President Obama, General Colin Powell, and Attorney Justice Eric Holder have all said they have been victims of racial profiling and nearly every black man in America is someone or personally knows someone who’s been mistreated by police. The reputation police officers have earned over many generations makes it harder for them to do their job and to do it safely and without undue fear. Just beginning the long, hard work of repairing that deep rift will be better for both sides.
Alas, as the Gates/Crowley national brouhaha segued into conciliatory brews yet another officer emerged as if to make sure black men remain certain there are virulent racists hiding within the force. Boston police officer Justin Barrett admitted to and was suspended for writing a lengthy anonymous email filled with incendiary racist language including calling Professor Gates a jungle monkey three times. Hours after the kumbaya beerfest, Barrett told Larry King, “I am not a racist… I intended no racial bigotry or prejudice.” As if merely asserting that makes it so. How long will it be before officer Barrett is given back his badge and gun? If the beerfest was a glimmer of sun peeking through the clouds that is racial unrest and misunderstanding in America then officer Barrett provided the storm cloud riding in just behind that glimmer of sun to keep the rain coming.
And one last lesson, something Professor Gates has surely learned this week, something my father taught me long ago: saying much more than yes sir and no sir to a police officer is tantamount to playing Russian Roulette.
Touré is a columnist for The Daily Beast. He's also an NBC contributor and the author of Never Drank the Kool-Aid, Soul City, and The Portable Promised Land. He is a contributing editor at Rolling Stone, was CNN's first pop culture correspondent, and was the host of MTV2's Spoke N Heard. His writing has appeared in the New Yorker and the New York Times.









The teachable moment is that a President should not inject his opinion into an incident before having all the facts. Furthermore, this entire incident would not have been on the radar if the professor was not a friend of the President's. Another teachable moment, unfortunately, is that this may encourage more people to resist arrest and/or berate officers for doing their job.
Here Toure goes again. In his first article (and the Beast's first article) on the Gates arrest, Toure' felt it necessary to drop the word "nigger" front and center--despite the fact that no one used the word during the arrest. Top notch journalism there, just doing his part to wantonly flame racial tensions.
Now, having prematurely ejaculated that bit of rhetorical nonsense, Toure' is left only with Rodney King, comparing the Gates arrest to "senseless beating" he received there. More top notch journalism, way to keep your eye on the ball and your mind out of the tabloid gutter.
The only lesson Toure learns is that "American law enforcement [needs] to take a long, hard look at itself and figure out why it has such a poisoned reputation within the African-American community and what part of that is the fault of our officers and how it can be fixed."
But I would suggest there's another lesson to be learned. Maybe prominent African Americans--or at least those with a microphone, like Toure--could really stand to get their minds out of the color gutter and approach the conversation about racial issues with the intelligence and sensitivity they are demanding of others. Stop knee-jerking with the N-bomb and wantonly calling those they disagree with "stupid."
All I've learned from this nonsensical scene is that even respected thinkers like Gates are 30 seconds away from dropping into old stereotypes (or, as Gates said, performing as pre-ordained "characters") and purportedly intellectual black writers like Toure are 30 seconds away from exploiting the shit out of it.
Stick to MTV and "pop culture correspondence," it would seem that's all you're cut out for.
thecolonel, as usual, adds nothing but his own closed-minded point of view. Of course you don't think you're learned anything valuable from this. You are a white man..surprise, surprise, I guessed it!
You have no clue what you're talking about and your opinions as a white man don't make any of the history of discrimination in America and the well documented bad treatment by cops to black people any less relevant.
How would you know that black young men from the suburbs are taught never to ride more than two to a car--otherwise they get immediately pulled over because they look like a gang?
How would you know that black middle class families are followed around shopping malls by security guards?
How would you know that young black boys in school are automatically treated differently by their teachers and expected to perform poorer than both their white and female peers?
The list goes on and on and has for centuries, colonel, and yeah, after a while, people do kind of become affected by it.
Freedom of speech is one thing, but I'm really tired of reading nonsense and ignorance on these pages. Leave those of us who care about the problem alone. Go vent on Fox.com.
Oh, I'm a white man, am I? My mother will be shocked.
I have no clue what I'm talking about? Sounds a lot like saying I'm "stupid."
Look: no one is denying the histories of racism and of racially motivated policement in this country. But as your own accusatory, belittling, and yes, racist response shows (automatically assuming that I'm (a) of a certain race, and (b) ignorant because of it), the discussion here has nothing to do with the facts of THIS case and everything to do with histrionics and hysterical exaggeration of people pursuing an agenda of race baiting.
Line up next to Toure and shout "nigger"; cast out everyone who disagrees to Fox.com. But god forbid you stop shouting long enough to recognize that this particular arrest doesn't implicate the racial histories you can't stop stamping your feet about.
The teachable moment is that even though the President spoke on the situation after the false police report was filed and the charges were dropped, no one spoke on the defamation of character of the 911 caller. The fact still remains that a police officer can file a false police report and have the entire police union of America back him in his lie.
You're an asshat! Obviously, you didn't learn anything. To compare this situation to what happened to Rodney King just shows how inept you are! What a hypocrite you are! You continue to accuse the white cop of racial profiling, but yet YOU ARE racial profiling the cop because he's white!!! BTW, Gates doesn't even fit a "profile"; he's 58 years old!! And FYI, a short, 50-something man could just as easily have a gun as a tall, 20-something man. Get a clue! As soon as Gates stepped outside and was yelling out nonstop at the onlookers and the police, he was breaking the law. Why don't you go try it sometime in a residential neighborhood? Or even a business district? Let's see how fast the police come to shut you up. But in your mind, it would all be about race! Why on earth MSNBC or TDB would even let you near them is a wonder!!!
In addition, one thing that can be learned is that the left has just as many loons as the right does!!
TotalRecall9 - According to MA law, the public does not include any of Gates property or rather, Harvard's privately owned property. According to the flawed police report, Gates was still on his porch. If he had stepped off of the porch he would have been on the lawn, still private property. Get the facts right before spew your nonsense.
Obviously, you are too biased to know what is law! Creating a disturbance on a privately-owned porch or in the yard is still a public disturbance! Get a clue! A quick google search brought up...
http://www.mass.gov/courts/courtsandjudges/courts/districtcourt/jury-ins tructions/criminal/pdf/7160-disorderly-conduct.pdf
http://www.masscriminaldefense.com/disorderly.htm
TotalRecall119
I really don't think that law that you have cited is much of a defense for the officer. With some of the facts ie police report, 911 caller's dispute, and Prof. Gates own dispute, well, that is why people hire lawyers to defend them in situations just such as this. And believe me, I hope Professor Gates goes for it.
"As soon as Gates stepped outside and was yelling out nonstop at the onlookers and the police, he was breaking the law."
Which law is that - the anti-yelling law?
Some commentators I've read have overlooked the fact that a white person might have been arrested in the same situation. I'm white and live in a fairly affluent town but I've been on the wrong end of an officer's stormy stare because I spoke out of turn. Fortunately I shut up but I have no doubt that I would have been cuffed and taken downtown if I hadn't.
The incident wasn't so much about race initially, imo. It became about race because the media jumped all over it and forced the issue of race into the discussion. Two normally intelligent guys overreacted and made a mountain out of a molehill. It was the press that squeezed Crowley into a corner and forced him to stand his ground, not Obama.
I am constantly amazed by the lack of depth in analyzing this situation. Total absence of critique of Obama, of Gates, of the police. Obviously, Justin Barrett's comments are racist. I see nothing racist about an officer going to someone's house to investigate an alleged break in. Clearly Gates needed to understand that it looked "fishy" to an outsider that he was actually breaking in to his own home. Patience and understanding was thus required from both parties and it was clear that this was not the case.
That the police officer was rude, uh, big surprise (not). The question that needs to be asked is why is this any more a problem of racial profiling (of which there is no evidence), than a problem of police aggressiveness and belligerence in the face of a subject who claims he is doing nothing wrong?
I find this to be a very, very interesting view and one I had not thought of or heard. So thanks for helping me think this through. Something lots of folks need to be doing. Looking at other views, thoughts, and ideas. It's called "communication".
As well a legal police report is a source of communication. However, in this case the source of communication was false. No one seems to want to talk about that. What will happen to the 911 caller and the fact that she rebuked the accounts given by the famed Sgt. Crowley. Oh well, at least the GOP is not talking about Prof. Gates now.
I keep wondering too.
Will blacks ever learn? This letter was sent to Dr. Gates by the former Mayor Pro Tem in Wilmington, NC. Dear Dr. Gates: I must say "I told you so." I was a college professor, national award winning business woman, and Mayor Pro Tem in Wilmington, NC for over ten years when, at age 62, I was falsely arrested, cuffed with my hands behind my back, placed in a squad car with the instructions to "slide your fanny over." I wrote you and asked that you help me expose how police in this country falsely arrest black politicians and professionals . Your response was polite "sorry." When will blacks learn that police don't care who you are when you are black. They suffer no consequences for their actions. Please visit:
www.oneagleswingsfearnoevil.com
When you say that Rodney King was beaten senseless, that would infer that he had any sense to begin with. I wonder what would have happened if the " don't taze me bro", guy was black. The media laughed off that incident and had bumperstickers made. The media is obsessed with race and conflict. If you lead the police on high speed chase through a busy city for miles and then resist arrest, you deserve to get your ass beat, white or black.
No you don't; you deserve to get your ass arrested and hauled to jail, but not beat -- unless we live in Iran or China -- which it seems more and more like we do.
Are you following me pearlx. How ya doin man? Ok your right. How about one kick, just one good kick.
The media had bumper stickers made? Really?
The media did'nt actually make them, but they reported on how funny they thought they were. There were T- shirts as well.
Imply, not infer.
Toure
I liked your article. The only thing is sometimes one has to gamble.
I love how Black people are supposed to surrender history for the greater good of racial conciliation: Authorities did not regularly beat us for demanding our rights. Every objective of the Civil Rights movement was attained. White people are as a group equally vulnerable to the caprices of racial oppression.
Underlying all the talk of Black media "profiling" the white officer or dropping the "N-bomb" without cause is basically a complete decontextualization of the conversation.
Europeans enslaved Africans and brought them to another country where they debased them for centuries, never offered equivalent reparations, and then criticize them for realizing that. This isn't a victim mentality anymore than the Jews remembering and teaching their children the story of Pharoah. If you do not learn from the past, you are doomed to repeat it. Black people are exceptionally well suited by history to be the conscience of this nation. Everyone and thing has a role to play.
Wrong. The histories of racism and racial profiling you reference exist, but are only implicated when there's some proof that an arrest was racially motivated. Here, there is no such proof. Nothing racist in what the officer said, nothing racist in his past (quite the contrary, actually), nothing specifically racist in what he did with regard to Gates.
Of course, any number of commentators want to insist that there "must have been" or "necessarily was" a racist angle here. But the only thing they can cite in support of that conclusion is their own belief.
In other words, the "context" you demand we wrap around this incident is your own insistent belief that racism always already permeates the bi-racial arrest stituation. But I don't share your religion, and in the same way I don't believe the devil makes people do things, I don't believe the ghost of some historical racial animus _always_ animates the actions of white cops.
Black america needs to wake up and recognize that people do things for all sorts of reasons, and that they're kidding themselves to always assume racism is the only motivator.
Far too much hatred! Makes a 'teachable moment' a waste of time. Teaching should result in learning; which by definition means a 'change in behavior'. How could this have been a 'learning' experience? Set Prof. Gates up to ride patrol for 5 straight nights in Boston with Officer Crowley and/or another officer. Then to write a report about his experience. Set Officer Crowley up to attend a class taught by Prof. Gates for a term. Then he can write a report about his experience. Set President Obama up to watch 20 episodes of the TV show 'COPS' and then write a report about his experience.
I think these experiences are more likely to result in a 'change in behavior' than what has been done thus far.
It would be interesting to consider the scenario if Mr. gates happened to be white! Irrespective of the race of the police offcer who arrested him, this would have been used as another example of how the country is becoming fascist, government is taking over, white people are being oppressed etc. by Fox Jazeera and their constituents - Republican party, Conservative groups, Birthers etc.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.