Blogs and Stories
Kerry Can Save Obamacare
Haraz N. Ghanbari / AP Photo; Dita Alangkara / AP Photo
Obama’s plan isn’t winning over the 85 percent of Americans who already have insurance, The Daily Beast’s Matt Miller writes. But the big loser of the 2004 campaign has a great idea.
President Obama’s health-care woes go beyond sagging poll numbers and conservative protests at town-hall meetings. As the White House has realized, the president’s biggest problem is that he can’t make a compelling case about the benefits of his plan for the 85 percent of Americans who already have health insurance. Maybe he should talk to John Kerry.
Bear with me a nanosecond and you'll see why an obscure piece of Kerry’s otherwise disastrous 2004 campaign might help save the day.
What the president needs right now isn’t necessarily better policy. It’s a better sales pitch.
It’s not that Obama does nothing for the already insured. The insurance reforms the president stresses—such as the inability to be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions and caps on out-of-pocket spending that will end the scourge of medical bankruptcy—are vital for every family's economic security. But it’s not the same as fresh cash in your pocket. Unfortunately, the White House has raised expectations about cost savings that its plan can’t meet.
Obama promised repeatedly in the campaign, and says as part of his health care mantra today, that reform will save the average family up to $2,500. But this has always been a bit of a ruse. In reality, Obamacare means “savings” only in the Washington sense of reductions from what would otherwise be even higher future costs. This is a good thing if it happens, but it doesn’t change the fact that the average family under Obamacare would still see its outlays for premiums and co-pays go up, not down, in the years ahead. With all respect to White House economists, that’s impossible to sell to real people as “savings.”
There is only one way to deliver actual premium savings, and interestingly enough it was proposed by Kerry in his 2004 campaign. It’s called reinsurance. Kerry’s idea, developed by Stuart Altman of Brandeis University and Ken Thorpe of Emory, was to have the federal government pick up the tab for the highest-cost cases in the private insurance system, in exchange for the insurers passing on the savings dollar-for-dollar in the form of premium reductions to everyone else. It’s a matter of math: if you socialize the cost of the most expensive illnesses (say, those incurring over $50,000 in medical costs during a given year), you can lower premiums for others.
The problem is that reinsurance at magnitudes meaningful enough to make much difference to premiums gets expensive fast. In rough terms, if the feds picked up the tab for cases running over $50,000, private premiums could be cut 10 percent across the board, at a cost of roughly $80 billion a year. A step like this atop current plans would bring the total cost of health reform to just over one percent of GDP. At a time when Washington is scrambling to find $800 billion to $1 trillion over ten years to expand coverage, a permanent reinsurance initiative seems impractical. Better to use every dollar available to expand coverage to the millions of uninsured, many Democrats say.
But what if you don’t view reinsurance as long-term policy? What if instead you viewed it as a near-term political sweetener, something that helped insured Americans feel comfortable with the direction Obama wants the country to take? A two- or three-year economic recovery-related reinsurance initiative could provide direct relief for average families (and the firms that employ and help pay to insure them) at a cost of $100 to $200 billion, depending on how it’s crafted. Think of it as a second stimulus. Republicans should appreciate that this would operate like a tax cut to get cash directly to families and businesses. The White House could sell it as a way to bring concrete health savings to hard-pressed families now, as a bridge to the longer-term reforms that help bend the cost curve over time. It might be targeted to deliver its biggest breaks to small business, the group that’s most vulnerable to stiff premium hikes—and a group that’s on the fence now about broader reform.
This isn’t ideal public policy, perhaps, but that’s not all the president needs right now. The president needs a better sales pitch. As health legislation heads toward its critical finale, some politically creative reinsurance could be part of the answer.
Matt Miller is a management consultant, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, and the host of public radio’s popular political week-in-review, Left, Right & Center. His new book is The Tyranny of Dead Ideas.









Didn't he get a medal for healthcare in Vietnam?
At least he was there flyover. Bushie couldn't even show up for grueling National Guard duty in Texas.
Anyway, a good idea is a good idea no matter who thought of it. (Of course if someone's I.Q. hovers around room temperature the chances of a great idea developing are slim.)
If you are talking about Bush, it has been widely reported that his IQ is higher than Kerry's. If you are talking about mine, it is higher than both. The only difference, I had to make my own money.
Fly-
Widely reported?
You can beat any issue to death
With your hyper-partisan arguments
But if you're going to stick
Your neck out in defense of Bushs' IQ
Let me warn you in advance-
That's a loser.
So, are you saying both Palin & Limbaugh think Shrub is real sharp?
according to records released by Yale, Bush had a higher IQ and a better grade point average. This was widely reported during that election. I am not sure who was more popular in Skull and Bones.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
It's pointless to argue about IQ scores and GPAs - argue about what George W did with whatever degree of intellect he has. From what I've seen, he didn't do much except put cronies in positions of importance, and then patted them on the back when they failed, he stepped aside and let Cheney run the country for his first term, let big corporate interests get away with whatever they wanted, politicized the legal branch and oh, gutted the state department and ran up the national debt.
It's not what you've got, it's how you use it.
flyover
Bush's college records. It has been widely reported that there were two sets of records kept- the real set and the altered set. I would never had known this if the birthers hadn't kept demanding to see Pres. Obama's because they had seen Bushs'.
A purple one, right on his swift boat! LOL Never mind he can't fight his way out of a paper bag without Kennedy and that has been tenuous at best lately.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
No no, I think he testified in front of Congress about all the health care atrocities he knew about. He was part of the Winter Doctor movement. Closely related to the bowel movement.
It won't be funny when you stop having bowel movements and find yourself filing bankruptcy in order to get the treatment you need to become regular again. Either way, you're full of sh*t. No pun intended. :-)
This user is no longer registered.
Charlietownduncer, Brilliant argument. Well thought out and completely forgettable on so many levels.
Charleston-
Admit it.
You can't stand the guy
Because he speaks French.
Kerry's polling credibility is one of the lowest in the country. Having him campaign for the current reform the President favors will make certain its swift defeat. That said, bring on Kerry!
For all of Obama's charisma,
why would he choose a liability
such as the droll, humorless, stone faced Kerry ?
Er, last time I checked, Obama attained the Presidency *without* the double-wide-residing, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, lily-white yokels in "the South."
So who really cares?
This user is no longer registered.
You will be fooled again and again and again. It happened for two elections prior to this one os why not again.
Liberals are always trying to find clever ways to pull one over the American public. The idea is to obfuscate who is going to have to "pick up the check" until it is too late to do anything but pay.
unlike putting the bill for Iraq off-budget, we admit there's a problem and need a solution - even if only half of congressional dems if that, would put aside corporate money, we know where rightie leaders are; even if their constituents don't: completely in the bag; apparently that's "american".
I heard on the
Very funny NPR show today-
'Wait Wait Don't Tell Me'
That seniors were showing up
At townhall meetings to complain
That the government WANTED
To give them healthcare.
Their motto?
'Give me liberty AND give me death'.
This user is no longer registered.
Your right they should just do more tax cuts for big buisness. Because big buisness is all about taking care of it's workers, definitely not about lining the pockets of it's investor and board of directors.
Douche Bag
In an interview with the Times's economics correspondent, David Leonhardt that was published in The New York Times Magazine back in May, the President observed that "the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 per cent of the total healthcare bill out here."
At that point, Mr Leonhardt asked: "So how do you - how do we - deal with it?"
Here's what the President said in reply:
Well, I think that there is going to have to be a conversation that is guided by doctors, scientists, ethicists. And then there is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place. It is very difficult to imagine the country making those decisions just through the normal political channels. And that's part of why you have to have some independent group that can give you guidance.
Maybe Palin reads the NYT more than the so called liberals.
The President is typical of out touch elitists. He knows a lot of facts and figures and evidently is in love with his own voice. He would be smart to learn more about the American people he wishes to lead. They did not vote for more government. They voted for change. Too bad he didn't use his mandate to smack down both party leaders in Congress and lead in a new way. Sadly, he seems incapable of leadership...which requires vision...which he seems to lack.
Go take a pill.
He's elite? Being smart does not mean that he's an 'elitist'. Ditto-heads repeat the words and don't even know what they mean.Are you a ditto-head? You have internet - you can look the words up.
This user is no longer registered.
Free medical education for dr.'s dentists, nurses and all related personal is the solution - the goal - to graduate 100,000 Dr.'s a year so we have 1 doctor for every thousand people.
The 250,000 dollars spent on the education would be interest free and spread over 40 years for pay back.
Say there is one dr for 1000 people and the 1000 people pony up five bucks a week, which includes one major check up per year. The Dr earns 150-175. The balance runs his office. Five doctrs opening a clinic would do well, and the cost of medicine would go down!!
The same thousand people could pony up another five bucks a weel for the hospital pool. And an additional five bucks to cover the rest of the family! That is affordable. Ileft out the "insurance" companies.
We should see how insurance companies make money in Canada, England, France, etc.
michelslevinson.com
Kerry to the rescue ???
Why doesn't that instill me with confidence?
You Americans break me up
Be careful when you read this as I come from a country which takes care of it's people...liberal and conservative. Jim Cramer is right America is of..for and by the corporation. Boy they really know how to protect those profits...shoot those darts at some hot spots and get Joe six pack going. It's easy and I'm sorry to say sad because you see i like you guys at least most of the time.
Those commercials are produced for one thing in mind status quo...yes things are are not perfect in other countries health system but we won't lose our homes ..because some insurer decided that their margins were too small so let's drop them...Good luck you guys and try traveling around the world a little and do some thinking for yourself ...
Q: What's the difference between a senator and a minotaur?
A: A minotaur is a bull that produces manshit.
Seriously, I want health care for everyone. The last thing we need is Kerry as front man or poster boy for the movement. The right wing would descend on him like a bunch of kids on a pinata. Even I couldn't stand this guy back in '04 and I was a supporter after Dean dropped out. I voted for him but I can't stand the sound of his droning voice and broom-pole-up-the-butt demeanor.
...and it won't just be the right...there are plenty on the left he puts to sleep too. When I couldn't fall asleep an night during that campaign, I just turned the TV on and tuned in to Kerry......Kerry couldn't energize a power plant!
Problem with Democrats is lack of spine and inability to the talk to Americans as adults. If they use half the audacity that Republicans have while they lie and misinform the public their polls would go up. You don't have to go make things more complicated by looking into a non-starter like a plan that has John Kerry's name on it.
So the fiscally phony-conservative, gun toting, conspicuously white, over-weight (lot of them are couple of cheese burgers away from their own medical nightmare) crowd that show up at these town halls are okay with a trillion dollar Iraq war plus 1 million hurt in the VA pipeline that will cost us about 2-3 trillion over 10 years but a health care reform that will get us an umbrella exchange program aka govt. provided menu and ability to negotiate better rates with the Insurance companies is not .. that is the beginning of tyranny as Glen Beck regurgitates every night.
47 million uninsured is only one issue .. We have another 23-30 million and more perhaps people who are not under some type of large umbrella group policies aka working for a mid or upper market corporation because they buy their own insurance with high deductibles and no protection from the underwriters. Right now there is no law that can prevent an insurance company to drop you as soon as you have a health catastrophe. Unless you have a job with the company that has negotiated a large group policy. The HMO scam !!
Well said.
Kerry the "big loser?" Bush barely won that election. Just like he barely won, oops, was appointed in 2000. Two of the closest elections in history. Kerry may have run a less than stellar campaign, but it doesn't equate to being the "big loser."
Honestly, neither Bush, Gore or Kerry were inspirational candidates those years. We chose the one who didn't inspire the least. Kerry may have lost the election, but Bush was no winner.
There is an old saying in America, "It's better to be lucky but not smart.". Some egg heads all over the globe say that the USA is an Idiot's Paradise & go on in great detail citing Americans who made good & were as dumb as cat shit.
After Max Baucus and his band of Republicans finally produce a bill that is a fraud but acceptable to their insurance company patrons
Assuming he can get it out of committee with a minority of the democratic members votes
When the bill comes to the floor look for a wholesale replacement amendment
Jay Rockefeller has alluded to this
So we will get a clear vote seeing who is with the people and who is with the insurance companies
Kerry , is he still on the John Heinz teet ?
Millions of kids eating sugar infused tomato goop on fries and he is anything to do with health . Hardee har har .
Yeah, because Ketchup is the real cause of all health care woes in this country. Ketchup.
Thanks for that heads up...I'll be putting mayo on my burgers from now on.
Is there anything to be said for objectivity? Instead of targeting the bearer of the words(Kerry), take the plan for what it is worth. So many comments focus on Kerry's character rather than the quality of his healthcare approach. You do not have to be a supporter of him or even like his plan, but at least detach the work from the individual for the sake impartialness. In my mind, that proposal sounds much more agreeable than the current one Obama favors.
I don't think Obama needs the baggage that Kerry carries to fight for Health Care Reform. He needs Dr. Howard Dean and believe it or not, Tom Daschle. Say what you want about Daschle, he knows his sh@# about healthcare.
This user is no longer registered.
It won't matter if God pushes Obama's plan. The problem is the lobbyists and the insurance companies themselves playing God. They are our death panel. http://newsy1.wordpress.com
Not only insurance and pharmaceutical companies, unfortunately. Over 22,000 uninsured Americans die each year. If health care reform fails, we voters are the "death panel" for the next 22,000, and the 22,000 after that...
Money buys influence, but votes can get rid of members of Congress.
This user is no longer registered.
IN RESPONSE TO THIS:
clubed60090
Go take a pill.
He's elite? Being smart does not mean that he's an 'elitist'. Ditto-heads repeat the words and don't even know what they mean.Are you a ditto-head? You have internet - you can look the words up.
The President is a perfect example of an out of touch elitist...and yes people other than yourself understand the English language. I do not know, however, what a ditto-head is. I guess you do...but it doesn't matter...most Americans on the Palin side of the isle...the woman who just bested Obama in a week long debate over the end of life panels...understand America very well. You see, we live it each day.
You live in an alternate reality.
Doing research about the formers and backers of opponents to a new health care system I was amazed to find out how many actual crooks are in these organizations.. Too many to list here but for an example: Conservatives for Patient Riights is run by Rick Scott, the former head of Columbia/HCA, a for profit hospitl chain. Scott ws forced out of that job amid a fraud investigtion;
the company eventually pleaded guilty to charges of over billing state and federal health plans, paying $1.7 billion dollars in fines. You just can't mke this stuff up.. the informtion is readily available to all It is always a mystery to me why the Republican diehards will follow a crook any where.
"The insurance reforms the president stresses-such as the inability to be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions and caps on out-of-pocket spending that will end the scourge of medical bankruptcy-are vital for every family's economic security."
Those are two examples of easily understood and appealing reforms. And there are others. Why does it take 1000 plus pages to enact them? What worries everyone is the hundreds of unknowns that this vile Congress is including.
Kerry's idea is a good one.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
hm. Interesting idea. I hadn't heard of this nor do I remember it from 2004 ... Could it be that the media basically ignored it then just as it did almost all substance in a general election race that was dominated thoroughly by trash-politicking, horse-racing, and fear-mongering, thanks to a media that even kept secret from the public the entire wiretapping violation of the Constitution?
Matt, I do object to hyperbole though. Granted Kerry's campaign left me also completely disappointed, but to call it "disastrous" when he only lost by one state seems a bit much - obviously his message got to a lot of people and nearly a majority. To me, this is you (Matt) doing media-hype whereby it's "cool" to yet again bend over backwards to appease right-wing flakkers (of which I see already this place abounds), as the spurioiusly labeled 'liberal media' have been doing for at least 16 years) and refer back now to Kerry's campaign dismissively while, at the time, they were playing ostrich about swift-boating etc. and doing nothing to nip outrageous campaign lies in the bud.
So, among the "disastrous" components of the 2004 campaign, the media get credit for the bigger share - Kerry comes in a disappointing 'second' even on that score. The media give only passing lipservice to their failings, which they either ignore* as Matt did here or pose as if past misdeeds are 'history', and now continue on as if they'd learned nothing from their own lack of spine and failure to be the fourth estate doing the public's business of serious inquiry and putting politicians' feet to the fire, systematically. We're left with channels of hot air (Fox, Limbaugh) and then channels of virtually empty air. The hot air consumes the vacuum. And the public is left either knowing crap when we hear it and scratching their heads "how could this be happening that it's not being flayed on the spot?" or else they are having their propensity to fear played to bigtime and totally buying into the fabricated fact-defying propaganda of the hot-air crew.
*Matt, any time the media omits mention of its own role and responsibility, then imho it is complicit in perpetuating the climate of "disaster" you rather too simplistically put at Kerry's feet - and this applies to current situations every bit as much.
On this health care issue, here's one of the most recent of informed sources on the kind of matter that the media have allowed the hot-air guys to turn into mythic lies:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/health/healthreform/
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.