Blogs and Stories
Why the Lockerbie Bomber Was Freed
Saif Gaddafi listens to freed Lockerbie bomber Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi in Tripoli, August 20, 2009. (AFP / Getty Images)
There's no proof yet that the British government made a deal with Saif Gaddafi, but with schmoozing from Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, Andrew Neil says all signs point to a Bond-like deal.
Scotland’s devolved government is now reeling from the vehemence of the opposition—from the White House to its own backyard—which has greeted its decision to free the only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi. The Scottish Parliament has been recalled from its summer recess to meet in emergency session in Edinburgh Monday. But increasingly attention is moving away from Edinburgh to London and the exact role of the British government in facilitating the Lockerbie bomber’s release. And here we enter very murky waters indeed.
Privately, Scotland’s First Minister, Alex Salmond, says he was in no doubt London wanted Megrahi returned to Tripoli.
Nobody has yet proved that the British government struck a deal with Tripoli—the return of the bomber for lucrative contracts with the oil-rich Libyans—but the circumstantial evidence that something was going on behind the scenes is growing daily. There is a bad smell in London that no amount of official spin can dissipate—and the cast of characters that might have been involved in any deal would not be out of place in a Bond movie.
• The Daily Beast's Lloyd Grove: The Man Who Freed the BomberTwo British prime ministers, the son of the Libyan dictator, a Russian oligarch, the scion of a European banking dynasty, a prince of the Realm, a leader of Big Oil and Britain’s very own “Prince of Darkness”—all have at least walk on parts, if not more, in events that preceded the release of the Lockerbie bomber, supposedly on compassionate grounds (because he is apparently dying of prostate cancer).
The man at the center of this web of intrigue is Saif Gaddafi, the shaven-headed son of the Libyan dictator. Turns out this graduate of the London School of Economics is a good friend of Oleg Deripaska, the Russian aluminum baron, and Nat Rothschild, of the eponymous banking dynasty. Saif invited both to his 37th birthday party in June in Becici in Montenegro, into which Deripaska and Rothschild have poured around $1 billion to create a sort of St. Tropez in the Balkans. Saif is also pumping Libyan money into Montenegro—reason enough for Rothschild last year to host a party in his honor in New York.
What’s all this got to do with the Lockerbie bomber? Enter Lord Peter Mandelson, Britain’s secretary of State for Business, the most powerful man in London after Prime Minister Gordon Brown and a politician so steeped in the dark arts of spin that he almost revels in his “Prince of Darkness” moniker. Despite his Labour politics, Mandelson loves the company of the rich and famous and numbers Deripaska and Rothschild as friends.
Last August he visited Rothschild in his $60 million estate in Corfu, Greece and stayed on Deripaska’s luxury yacht. This August he stayed at the Rothschild villa—and met Saif Gaddafi. Mandelson claims the meeting was only “fleeting” but admits they did discuss the Lockerbie case. A week later it became public that the bomber might be released on “compassionate” grounds. It was then revealed that Mandelson had previously met Saif at a reception in London in May.
As Business secretary, Mandelson is obviously keen on drumming up opportunities for British trade and business. And as the favored son of the Libyan dictator, Saif was keen to be seen to be doing everything he could to get the bomber back. He turned up in Glasgow on the private jet which whisked him back to Tripoli and in a taped TV interview during the flight Saif, whose name means “Sword of Islam,” assured the now-free bomber that “in all commercial contracts for oil and gas with Britain, Megrahi was always on the table.”
He has been “on the table” for some time. In 2004 Prime Minister Tony Blair flew to a tent outside Tripoli to do his so-called “deal in the desert” with Colonel Gaddafi which led to a broad rapprochement with Libya, a significant part of which was a prisoner transfer agreement which Gaddafi always saw as a means of bringing back Megrahi. Blair’s successor, Gordon Brown, has continued the schmoozing of Gaddafi, even welcoming him to a recent G8 summit.









There it is - Laid bare for all the imbeciles commenting on Katty Kay's blog last week! But what price you ask - the price that all states pay - NONE!
Backstroking in the toilet bowl with terrorists and kings. By all appearances, the British government would like nothing better than to cap this trade. There's too much collateral on the table, and conducting business with the dregs of terror is looking rather distasteful especially in the light of day.
This whole "episode" only peels back one layer of the untold layers of covert activities that Makes the World Go 'Round. Elected politicians are merely the public face of a democratic facade, at the service of not the citizens who put them in office, but to the forces that control/influence/blackmail/collude with entire governments: the monolith of global corporate/military interests.
Is this news? No it's as old as time, or at least since power made its alliance with money; and especially when the realization took hold that those who controlled the earth's finite resources controlled the world.
Thanks to Mr. Neil who has skillfully detailed the stink inherent in this "Lockerbie Onion."
That's it! No more Bangers! From now on: Freedom Sausage.!
Impeccably researched article, but it is still alot of inference.
The world is a whorehouse, and no matter how rich and powerful the highest level power players are, they are still hookers in terms of their morals.
In fact, I greatly believe that's how they become rich and powerful, in general, selling out for money, making deals with other monsters, telling themselves that it was necessary. And who knows, maybe it was.
And I no doubt I am being unfair to hookers who only sell their own bodies, rather than those who sell the integrity of their nation's ideals and honor.
Ditto. At least hookers are forthright in their profession.
What a tangled web we weave - extremely bad press for the UK.
Mr. Neil - is he a Scot? - seems scrupulous in his report of this case (more from him please) but still you don't have to have very sensitive nostrils to know that this case stinks. And the Brits go on about Guantanamo..and when we release one of those bastards they go on to commit more heinous acts. To hell with compassion for such
The planeload of people Megrahi killed didn't get any compassion. They didn't get a dignified death, at home surrounded by their loved ones.
Guess this is our payback for that whole American Revolution.
Re: marines and whip: I'd take a hooker or even a gangster for that matter over a rich serpent like Lord Whatsisname.
The Redcoats are coming !
as a former diplomat I will remind the readers that the role of government leaders is to defend and support their consituents. In some cases, that gets real ugly and we pray for privacy and a distracted media. That being said, this guy should have rotted in Scottish hell even if it meant a chili winter in Pall Mall.
The only Scot I knew had to be carried home after an evening out. Generations and generations of alcohol poisoning has turned this nation of warriors into skirt-wearing drunks.
However, ALL nations are corrupted by oil, which is why we need to do EVERYTHING here at home to break our ties with terrorist nations: drill, use our home-grown natural gas, develop better battery power, and use wind and solar. ALL OF THEM! To hell with the Scots and Brits! (Sorry Tina Brown.)
Time for a vote of no confidence and the end of Labour Governments. What a disastrous bunch of losers, starting with Blair. Good riddance to bad rubbish!
So America has been let down by the Evil socialists it has been lying about for the past few weeks,with its death camps and policy of killing old people to save tax.
Scotland upset it but it needs to strike out at the whole UK because nobody does geography.
I am sure if it was the other way round America would have listened to Scotland.
Personally from the Scots i know i doubt very much they really give a shit about what America thinks.
Consider the bright side: one day the Middle East will run out of oil, run out of money and influence, and the "Swords of Islam" will revert to their former status as pathetic goatherds, camel milkers, mutilators of women, and inconsequential religious fools. Their lights will go out, the foreigners will all go home, the peasants will butcher the princes, sand will cover their cities, and they will return to their well-earned obscurity. If the West had learned any of the lessons of the past four decades, Middle Eastern thugs would have had a much harder time financing terrorism. Why don't we wise up and them go to hell?
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.