Blogs and Stories
Inside Vogue's Queendom
Newscom
R.J. Cutler, director of The September Issue, talks to The Daily Beast’s Kim Masters about his eight months trailing Vogue editor Anna Wintour—and the failings of Devil Wears Prada.
Filmmaker R.J. Cutler seems curiously irked when asked whether he thinks Meryl Streep captured something of Vogue editor Anna Wintour in her Oscar-nominated performance in The Devil Wears Prada. He’s already explained that he approached Wintour about filming the process of putting together Vogue’s hefty and influential September issue months before The Devil Wears Prada was in theaters. Still, as you watch his documentary, The September Issue, it makes you wonder whether there really is something of Wintour’s mystique in Streep’s performance.
The September Issue, which opens in New York this week and gradually around the country, chronicles several months in the making of Vogue’s September 2007 edition. It provides an intimate peek at the eyes so often hidden behind Wintour’s famous dark glasses and reveals a woman who is opportunistically charming but who mostly seems to exist in splendid isolation, issuing sometimes-devastating pronouncements with a chilly insouciance that would make Marie Antoinette jealous.
While looking at Mario Testino’s cover shoot of Sienna Miller for the September cover, she dissects the actress with the detachment of a forensic pathologist, complaining that she is “toothy,” has “too many fillings” and “unruly hair.”
Part of her secret is her certitude, which is enough to unnerve most people. The September Issue suggests Wintour’s greatest genius is her unwavering commitment to her own taste. Her editors tremulously present her with months of work and she dismisses their labor with little more than the wave of her hand or a frown. It could be a failing of the film or it could just be unknowable, but you never get a sense of what calibrates Wintour’s fashion instinct. Though Cutler’s film does finally reveal her as almost human after all, most notably in the scenes with her daughter, Bee, who admits, "I really don't want to work in fashion. It's just not for me. I respect her, obviously, but it's just a really weird industry.”
It is clear that Cutler—who produced the Oscar-nominated documentary The War Room about Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign—has developed some affection for his subject. Perhaps a bit of Stockholm Syndrome after eight months of filming behind the scenes at Vogue. “You can be mean to Anna Wintour with a camera,” he says. “If that’s your goal, that’s what you can do. But if your goal is to tell a truthful story–then something else comes out.” Still, it’s a bit surprising that he seems to find the question about Streep on-screen versus Wintour in real life so irritating. “I don’t even know how to talk about the two things,” he explains.
“I didn’t find it well written or interesting,” Cutler says of The Devil Wears Prada.
The Devil Wears Prada was based on a novel written by former Vogue staffer Lauren Weisberger and many have assumed that the ice-queen boss portrayed in the book and subsequently in the film had something to do with Wintour. Cutler dismisses the novel (“I didn’t find it well written or interesting”) and argues with the supposition that Streep based her performance on Wintour.
Furthermore, he says, people see shades of Wintour in all sorts of places—in Johnny Depp’s performance as Willy Wonka and one or both of two magazine editors in Ugly Betty. “Her persona inspires these fictional portrayals,” he says. “For me, the interest was in going beyond the persona.”
What Cutler found most intriguing in doing a Kremlinology of Vogue was Wintour’s delicately balanced relationship with the magazine’s longtime creative director, Grace Coddington, who comes across as truly dedicated to couture as art. That makes the passionate Coddington the more appealing character, though the sight of emaciated models being manipulated in service of this passion is very much the opposite of attractive.









Cutler's complaining about the comparison in the movie to his beloved Wintour is nonsense. Obviously if the film is based on a book written by an x-Vogue staffer (who he doesn't mind taking a barb attack to, kind of a low blow) and Wintour is pretty much how everyone else describes her in real life, then it is based on her.
Geez Cutler, where is YOUR objectivity? Get yourself a room with a Vogue mag, why don't ya?
Clearly everyone realizes that the Devil Wears Prada was inspired by Weisberger's experience at Vogue with Anna, however how hyperbolic she was in order to sell books and get revenge is up for debate. Anyone with sense could realize the motive to embellish, and that is why Anna seems generally unphased by the book and film, even in her incredible boredom with being asked the same question since 2005.
Point taken, Bongenre. Weisberger may not even be a particularly warm person either.
But, Cutler does protest a wee bit, I felt, and the comment about the book was poor sportsmanship. He did make a movie based on it.
What is with the Daily Beast contributors sucking up to this aging princess lately. Seriously, she's irrelevant, vapid and boring.
Really, Harlowe, green is so Lehman Brothers.
I find it telling and rather ironic that the author should choose to make a hyperbolic (and uninformed) comparison to Marie Antoinette, a woman who was the opposite of cool or insouciant. The public desire to malign Antoinette over 2 centuries has remained strong and Anna, and many women like her, suffer as the modern manifestation.
It's simply amusing that it should be plainly laid out in an article aiming to separate Anna's grand and icy image with what is surely to be a less remarkable, regular woman.
I intend on seeing this moving because it looks very entertaining.
However, the problem is that Vogue has become boring and predictable, and I've been a faithful Vogue reader since the late 1970s. Is that because of the repetitiveness of fashion these days, or is it because of Anna being at the helm?"
This user is no longer registered.
Ditto Siouxie921
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.